Forum menu
Television Licensin...
 

[Closed] Television Licensing Authority enforcement officers

Posts: 1383
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#2462779]

I haven't had a TV for several years, and informed the TLA when I got rid of it. They write from time to time to check whether you are watching a TV illegally yet or not. I've always replied and I think I've let someone in my flat to check whether I have one.

They started writing to me again a couple of months ago and I decided I was fed up of answering them and fed up of their tone, that makes the assumption that I must be watching TV illegally. So I haven't answered them this time and after about 5 letters they said they were going to send their "enforcement officers" round. They visited today, but I was out on my bike - they left a letter entitled "We said we'd call..."

My plan is to not let them in as they have no right to access my flat without a warrant - but I'm wondering if anyone has experience of not playing their game and the outcome?

Thanks!


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 7:40 pm
Posts: 23334
Free Member
 

If you don't have a tv then let them waste their time trying to prove you do. I did for years.,


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 7:43 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

yes not worth the hassle
when it asked why you dont have a televison licence - after three years i wrote
"take a wild effing guess"
they wrote back thanking me for my reply and asking for more details!!
I just said stop sending me letters and call round because i am sick of this. They did stop writing and called.
Suspect they have the right to check but just reply and ask them to stop harrasing you as you dont have a tv and infrom them you wont write again.


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 7:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I went through something similar. They gave up in the end. I also received a few "we said we'd call" hand written notes... delivered by my post lady! Its just another scare tactic to get evaders to buy a licence. I also took exception to their lightly veiled threats, general tone and accusations of law breaking, despite doing nothing wrong. As there are millions of non payers, expect a genuine visit in a good few years, then simply say nothing and shut the door. There is loads on line about their powers (or should i say lack of them) if you search....


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 8:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

think i've had about 15 letters since moving into this flat 2 years ago..


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 8:09 pm
Posts: 3384
Free Member
 

12 years of not paying, just ignore them and their useless threats


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 8:11 pm
Posts: 52
Full Member
 

There are horror stories of little old ladies who don't have TVs buying licenses just to keep the TLA bullies away.

Mate at work doesn't watch live TV but downloads all he needs instead. He's had countless threats which all end up in the bin. They are all addressed to 'the legal occupier' because he's kept his name off the electoral roll.

Unless they turn up with a warrant issued by a court, he has no intention of letting them in.


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 8:26 pm
Posts: 78471
Full Member
 

They don't have any authority whatsoever (and "detection vans" are a myth). Stick the letters in the big round file and if they turn up on your doorstep without a warrant tell them you'll be persueing them for trespass.

Never had a problem personally, but then, I've never not had a TV licence.


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 8:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

all you need to know here 😉

http://www.tpuc.org/stoppayingtvlicencefees


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 9:03 pm
Posts: 79
Free Member
 

The great thing is that they can't get a warrant without proof of you owning a TV, and they need the warrant to get the proof!!


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 9:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They came snooping round my place some years ago when I had no TV. - then they ask to come in and look!
I told them to go away and they didn't return.


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 9:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

(and "detection vans" are a myth)

Really?

So if you have a TV, and watch it all the time without a license, there is nothing they can do about it? Assuming you don't let them into your house voluntarily.


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 9:35 pm
Posts: 3648
Full Member
 

a short informational video for you.....


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 9:54 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

I'm happy to pay mine, the BBC is worth every penny IMO.


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 9:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm with loddrik


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 10:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i'd happily never watch BBC ever again (but it appears we Dont have the choice) ... i vote with me feet 😉


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 10:37 pm
Posts: 78471
Full Member
 

Really?

So if you have a TV, and watch it all the time without a license, there is nothing they can do about it? Assuming you don't let them into your house voluntarily.

Correct. Unless they get a warrant, which is highly unlikely.

It's all done by address, basically. I believe (though don't know first-hand) that when you buy a TV you get 'reported' to the licensing authority so they can cross-reference your address.


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 10:40 pm
Posts: 78471
Full Member
 

... of course, if they look through your window and see a TV sitting there, you might be on shakier ground. (-:


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 10:43 pm
Posts: 78471
Full Member
 

And yeah. Personally I think it's worth paying for, I think Auntie Beeb is an institution worth supporting. I listen to radio 1, 2 and 4 regularly, as well as enjoying a lot of their home-grown TV output.

With the growth of alternative technologies letting you watch TV without a TV I do wonder how much longer the "unique way the BBC is funded" will be able to sustain itself. If the arse drops out it though, I think that will be a pity.


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 10:47 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

So.. does BBC iPlayer log IP addresses? It should 🙂


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 10:48 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

do pay now as i do have one now. Agree it is a great institute and preferable to a Fox news /berlusconni type scenario
Does an amazing cross section of programmes from Top Gear to good stuff 😉


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 10:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Seems unlikely, as you don't need a licence for iPlayer.


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 10:52 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

And yeah. Personally I think it's worth paying for, I think Auntie Beeb is an institution worth supporting. I listen to radio 1, 2 and 4 regularly, as well as enjoying a lot of their home-grown TV output.

+1. I watch the BBC channels, listen to BBC radio and use the BBC News website.

I quite like having an internationally respected broadcaster producing stuff for my consumption and I think the licence fee is pretty reasonable. Try comparing it to Sky!


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 11:00 pm
Posts: 78471
Full Member
 

all you need to know here

I have POLICY of NOT reading ANYTHING which has RANDOM words in capital LETTERS for no apparent REASON. It's a good rule of thumb that's served me well in the past for avoiding lunatics and the religious.

Have you had a look at the rest of the site? It's fantastic, I've not seen so many barmpots in one place for quite some time.


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 11:02 pm
 cxi
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's all done by address, basically. I believe (though don't know first-hand) that when you buy a TV you get 'reported' to the licensing authority so they can cross-reference your address.

Aye - I had Amazon deliver a DVD/HD recorder to work. I now get letters (at work) saying I don't have a TV license... 🙄


 
Posted : 12/02/2011 11:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They kept promising me visits, and the letters got more and more threatening (and red) but after ignoring them they seemed to go back to the first letter.

I did get a TV license man to the front door, he asked if I had a TV I said no. He asked if he could come in and check and was very put out when I told him no.

Shortly after I got another 'initial' letter, no reference to the fact I'd had a visit. As soon as the option to fill in online to state you didn't have a TV I did that. I received a letter stating I wouldn't receive any more correspondence for, I think 2 years, and then the next day I got another threatening letter 🙂

It's all run by Crapita, I don't think they have a clue what they're doing, but I hate the wording of the letters and the presumption of guilt.


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 10:44 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't watch TV it promotes delusionment and a lack of touch with reality.

As for licensing, I just laugh about the letters and if they come to my door, I laugh even harder.

They assume everyone watches it, because most people have been brain washed since they where kids into believing that false hood is truth and vice versa, don't pretend you have a choice to watch it or not, you are addicted to it!


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 11:01 am
Posts: 3013
Full Member
 

I love telly. So do my kids. 🙂


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 11:05 am
 Drac
Posts: 50603
 

I don't watch TV it promotes delusionment and a lack of touch with reality.

So true not like being on a forum typing any old rubbish under a persona.


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 11:09 am
Posts: 35041
Full Member
 

[i]They assume everyone watches it, because most people have been brain washed[/i]

really? brain washed? But not you though, right?


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 11:09 am
Posts: 8859
Free Member
 

I went for about 5 years without a TV, until my mum gave me a virtually new one last year, it had sparkly bits on it and dozens of channels, so I caved in and bought a licence.
Anyway, In my case, I got the reminders, then they got more and more threatening and red. At one point I did phone them, but the letters continued, so I never replied to them again.
I did get a visit, the guy was sat outside my house, in a car. He came in, looked around, went away and the letters stopped for about 2 years.
Then it all started again, with regular letters to 'the occupier', threatening all sorts of things, I was/am on the electoral roll BTW. I ignored them all.


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 11:26 am
Posts: 14707
Free Member
 

They are very annoying, though I did read somewhere (urban myth???) that if you respond to them formally & keep a record (recorded post) you could have them prosecuted under anti-'harassment' laws.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/contents


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 11:49 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The amount of times I've said get rid and mrshora has basically rioted


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 12:03 pm
Posts: 78471
Full Member
 

It's all run by Crapita, I don't think they have a clue what they're doing

I didn't know that, but it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest. I've had a few dealings with Capita and I'd struggle to find something favourable to say about them.


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 12:05 pm
Posts: 2032
Free Member
 

You need a license for any device *capable* of receiving a *live* TV broadcast.

Although it funds the BBC, the license isn't required to watch BBC channels (ie you can't de-tune BBC channels and say you dont need a liscence)

Interestingly the authorities have stated that they wont (can't) be chasing people watching live broadcasts through I player.


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 12:10 pm
Posts: 9296
Free Member
 

The BBC is a good service. People from other countries always say they wish they had something as good.

Do you still have to pay a license if you buy a telly to only watch dvd/bluray/games on? If they "catch" you with the tv how can you prove you don't actually use it to watch tv channels on?


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 12:15 pm
Posts: 1383
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Interesting to read everyone's experiences, thank you. It's frustrating that you can't just tell them once and for all and then be left alone - and this spate of letters addressed to "the occupier" does feel a bit like harassment. I'm also on the electoral roll - so if they could be bothered they could actually find out that I'm still living at the same address, and I'd hope they would have a record of previous correspondence.

The TV good/bad debate is a different subject.... I'm not passing judgement, TVs just not for me at the moment. That includes iplayer which I also never use. I do meet people though who say they would love to get rid of their TV, but can't imagine life without it, which I thinks a bit of a shame. Planning to get one to watch the Olympics though next year - if I can get a licence for 2 weeks!


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 12:18 pm
Posts: 78471
Full Member
 

Do you still have to pay a license if you buy a telly to only watch dvd/bluray/games on? If they "catch" you with the tv how can you prove you don't actually use it to watch tv channels on?

As thekingisdead said, you need a licence if you've got equipment capable of receiving broadcast telly. Taking a glue gun to the RF input on your TV / video etc would probably be sufficient.


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 12:22 pm
 Aidy
Posts: 2977
Free Member
 

As thekingisdead said, you need a licence if you've got equipment capable of receiving broadcast telly. Taking a glue gun to the RF input on your TV / video etc would probably be sufficient.

Wrong, you only need a TV license if you're using equipment to receive TV signals.
The very fact that it /can/ is irrelevant.

http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ15/


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 12:52 pm
Posts: 833
Full Member
 

If you really want to confuse them change the name of your house.

It took 18 months and three visits for them to register the fact that as I had a TV licence in the new name of the house they were on very dodgy ground trying to prosecute me for not having a licence in the old name of the house.

We live on an old farm so once found a chap on my property scouting round to find which building was the "old" address. As I escorted him from the premises I explained that the building he had been looking at was indeed occupied intermittently but neither the swallows who nest there each summer nor the dog who used the run there when the rest of us were out were that into TV and more to the point I didn't fancy his chances of getting them to pay.


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 12:54 pm
Posts: 78471
Full Member
 

Wrong, you only need a TV license if you're using equipment to receive TV signals.
The very fact that it /can/ is irrelevant.

Hm, that's interesting. Has it changed recently, or have I been wrong for years? I could've sworn that used to be the case.


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 1:05 pm
Posts: 99
Free Member
 

Jesus. That Young Ones clip.

The TV licence investigator drinks in my local. Someone said he used to be on telly but I never really took much notice.


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 1:33 pm
Posts: 8671
Free Member
 

"Television Licensing Authority" this is an outfit the governmeent should scrap. Defo vote winner.

****ing licence for a TV wtf. Make some real money and bring back the dog license at say £1000 per dog ;-).


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 1:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

he's kept his name off the electoral roll.

how's he managed that then?


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 2:13 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Interestingly the authorities have stated that they wont (can't) be chasing people watching live broadcasts through I player.

Are you sure this is the case? - I thought that watching live tv on-line was illegal without a license


 
Posted : 13/02/2011 2:22 pm
Page 1 / 2