Forum search & shortcuts

Talk to me about wa...
 

[Closed] Talk to me about walking boots

Posts: 13356
Free Member
 

FWIW I have Lowas, the 'made in Germany' ones, as does my Mrs & we love them. I would certainly look at Altbergs next time, UK company with a factory in Richmond, North Yorks. (& another in Italy I believe)


 
Posted : 15/10/2017 9:44 pm
Posts: 44885
Full Member
 

I am with KM79 on this - fabric boots simply do not remain waterproof for me no matter how expensive. Much more comfy tho. Maybe waterproof for a year or so. Want a proper waterproof boot it needs to be leather. If you are prepared for a bit of water to come in after a year or twos use fabric boots are great - really comfy.

Thats my experience. I do a lot of trekking in Scotland tho so its not just walking in the rain - its trudging thru swamp and wading rivers in them!

My current selection of boots are an old pair of 3/4 shank zamberlain leather boots. 100% waterproof after years of use, a pair of Salomen fabric boots - waterproofing lasted one years use but it does take a wile for it to leak ( this is the seond pair - the first replaced under cuarentee)and a pair of Merril Moabs that I had imported from the states as the US ones have no goretex membrane - these have no pretence to waterproofing - I got them for use in hot climates so my feet wouldn't sweat.

Recently I have also had Salawa boots - very very comfy but didn't even last a year until they leaked


 
Posted : 15/10/2017 10:21 pm
 jond
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

For traditional leather boots, Anatom are worth a look, think they're uk designed - bought a pair a few months back to replace some 90s Brashers (the modern equivalent has a different last). Pity is I didn't find them last year, I'd already bought some (leather) Hanwags (worth looking at too), which are fine for the steeper/rockier stuff I do with some mates, but a little high/OTT for wearing all day on holiday or general rambles - whereas the Anatoms are beefier than the older Brashers and could have doubled up duties. Cotswold are pretty decent at sorting the right fit out, esp the branch in Betws y Coed. Couldnt find any Meindls that fit my feet, fwiw.


 
Posted : 15/10/2017 10:35 pm
Posts: 34037
Full Member
 

They're quality kit, the most comfortable thing I've ever put on my feet, and I expect them to last forever

For general walking, in fact general wear, I’ve found Meindl boots to be about the most comfortable boots ever, my choice is the suede/fabric Desert Fox boot, my first pair I bought around five-six years ago, from eBay, worn once or twice, for £35, IIRC, then I bought another more worn pair for work, cost £28 and I’ve since got two more pairs, both almost brand new, for around £28-35, all ex-Army issue. Especially when the RRP is £170!
The very first pair I recently had re-soled after I wore them down to the mid-sole, but I wear them practically all the time, they’re so comfy, and I like the high ankle protection they give. Fantastic boots.

[img] [/img]

http://www.meindl.co.uk/products/desert-fox1

If I’m going walking where I know it’s going to be wet, I’ll wear my Muckboots.


 
Posted : 16/10/2017 12:10 am
Posts: 301
Free Member
 

Really happy with my salewa mountain trainers which I bought early this year. Most comfortable set of boots I have owned.


 
Posted : 16/10/2017 6:40 am
Posts: 11480
Full Member
 

Being STW, Moley ought to fashion his own boots from a lump of oak....

Oak? You're having a laugh. Fairly traded bamboo is lighter, more flexible and less prone to cracking. The whole oak thing is so 1800s... just saying.


 
Posted : 16/10/2017 8:16 am
Posts: 5198
Full Member
 

I generally 'walk' in trail/approach/fell running shoes, walking boots generally reserved for crappy conditions or hikes at the more rugged end of the scale

I have a pair of Meindl Burmas that are about 9 years old and the sides of the sole are disintegrating. Trip to the Alps last year in them, probably their last outing

Replaced them with a pair of Scarpa SLs. It's tricky trying to find a pair of leather boots without a waterproof liner!


 
Posted : 16/10/2017 8:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

benp1 - Member

I generally 'walk' in trail/approach/fell running shoes, walking boots generally reserved for crappy conditions or hikes at the more rugged end of the scale

I'm the same, perfectly happy with brooks cascadia and merrell moab for general walking and scrambling about but two of the routes to the nearest village (walking) are extremely wet and muddy. One option is to go along the river bank, the other is a right of way that is regualrly used by farmers/cattle so it's often ankle deep in mud.

There's also a small mountain range I've earmarked for photographing but if you pretty much have to traverse deep bog to get anywhere near the hills.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 16/10/2017 8:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The North Face boots ..couldnt tell you which model but they are leather & suede constructed , waterproof , icepick toes , wintergrip, primaloft ..comfortable as owt and have never let me down ..getting on a bit now ..but still plenty of life in them..
[img] [/img]
[url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/156204930@N03/37063158803/ ]20171016_135048[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/156204930@N03/ ]Neil Hodgson[/url] - [url= https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dariogf.flickr2BBcode_lite ]Flickr2BBcode LITE[/url]


 
Posted : 16/10/2017 2:27 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I've got some of the Adidas Swift R GTX that Colournoise posted. Purchased mine to wear for the 3 peaks challenge I completed in March this year, they were fantastic! Also took them on Holiday to New Zealand in July and pretty much lived in them whilst there. Very comfy, like wearing a nice pair of trainers. Really impressed with them.


 
Posted : 17/10/2017 3:51 pm
Posts: 3995
Full Member
 

mobes - what is the ankle support like? I keep turning one of mine so need some new boots with decent support and like the look of these


 
Posted : 17/10/2017 4:13 pm
Posts: 44021
Full Member
 

I've read a few articles basically debunking the ankle support thing with boots and suggesting it's more to do with the heel cup.


 
Posted : 17/10/2017 4:16 pm
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

I've read a few articles basically debunking the ankle support thing with boots and suggesting it's more to do with the heel cup.

Yep, I've walked & scrambled all over the place in trail shoes, and never noticed a lack of ankle support. Used to fell run everywhere in Walshes, which were about as low and unsupportive as you can get.


 
Posted : 17/10/2017 4:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've read a few articles basically debunking the ankle support thing with boots and suggesting it's more to do with the heel cup.

I have a dodgy right ankle, broken it a couple of times and badly sprained it several more - no boot gives me enough support, they make little difference, I'd need some sort of rigid ski boot or the like to make any appreciable difference. What is 'the heel cup'?


 
Posted : 17/10/2017 4:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've given up using boots for the majority of my walks, Salomon fast hike or approach shoes for me. I also have Adidas and Saucony trail running shoes that are great for faster work, but I prefer the tougher more stable Salomons for slower paced walking.

If you really need a boot how about these bad boys:

[img] [/img]

Not cheap mind.


 
Posted : 17/10/2017 5:03 pm
 km79
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Walking shoes are great but I hate wearing them with waterproof overtrousers, much prefer the fit of boots with overtrousers.


 
Posted : 17/10/2017 5:10 pm
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

If you really need a boot how about these bad boys:

Looked at those, they look like they won't breath very well. I have Rab Scree gaiters I use with trainers, and they don't half make your feet sweat.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 17/10/2017 6:21 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I've read a few articles basically debunking the ankle support thing with boots and suggesting it's more to do with the heel cup.

Makes a lot of sense. No matter how lose or tight, or how stiff or flexy they are, I never feel boots give an significant increase in ankle support. Might be my ankles though.


 
Posted : 17/10/2017 7:26 pm
Posts: 3995
Full Member
 

Yeah never occurred to me either but makes sense when you think about it?

So then, narrow fitting boots with good heel cup support, light, sturdy, waterproof, under £100, moon, stick, go!


 
Posted : 17/10/2017 7:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you don't mind something a bit heavier and sturdier then Haix "Cold Wet Weather" British Army boots are amazing. Mine were £60 unissued (new).

My pair replaced a £180 pair of Mammut GTX something or others that were a little lighter and a bit springier in the sole but fell apart after a year of gentle use. In fact I've got a pair of £40 Dickies work boots which have been treated horrendously and they have far, far outlasted the Mammuts.


 
Posted : 17/10/2017 7:54 pm
Posts: 1021
Full Member
 

25% off on www.adidas.co.uk today.... guess who just bought a pair of the shoes recommended above!


 
Posted : 17/10/2017 8:30 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

I like boots, prefer them to shoes on rough stuff.
Even if the ankle support is a placebo and I don't think it is, I like having my ankles protected.

Love Brasher & the Berghaus clones for fit (wiiiide), get mine from a place that does returns and refurbs for the big brands.
Brasher soles last about 2 years, cheaper to buy a new refurbished pair than have them resoled.
The uppers softens a bit too much for me even the toe box, the only downside.

Also picked up a new pair of Hanwags new from the same place, leather lined, stitched sole etc.
Beautiful things, (and less than half price 🙂 ).
Bit heavier than modern boots, but I get the feeling they'll see me out.


 
Posted : 17/10/2017 9:01 pm
Posts: 44021
Full Member
 

On the boot weight/stiffness argument

http://www.christownsendoutdoors.com/2017/10/some-thoughts-on-lightweight-flexible.html


 
Posted : 02/11/2017 8:59 pm
Page 2 / 2