There isnt a clear difference what you mean (and you have explained this before) is the drop between thinest and thickest point of a shoes midsole. The "minimalist" shoes you refer to are simply rebadged "racing" shoes and I have even ran marathons in such shoes. They are nothing new. It is simply marketing hype.
I'D echo those posters who have said take it easy. The number of injured beginners and returning runners I've come across is ridiculous.
I'm not an expert by any means,but I have run a marathon at 16 stone. I found when I was fresh I ran easily with good technique, no problem. As I tired, unless I concentrated on form I started banging my feet into the ground, running bent over and generally being sh*t. I read a tip from an ironman triathlete to stop for 30s if you lose form. Really works for me, even when I stop my overall times are coming down.
Matt
I read a tip from an ironman triathlete to stop for 30s if you lose form.
The time to have a pee, dive headfirst into the sponge barrel, drink something disgusting and psych oneself up for the distance to the next sponge barrel. I reckon the improved form just comes from the drop in body temperature.
The "minimalist" shoes you refer to are simply rebadged "racing" shoes
I asked about racing shoes when I was in a shop, before I bought mine, since I could see they had low heels and I knew that's what I wantd to try. She said they wouldn't wear well enough for training in due to softer soles.
My shoes are a different shape to those racing ones I've seen, the toe and forefoot is wider. But that's nit-picking really - [b]IMO[/b] forefoot striking is important, and if you do it in race shoes or traditional shoes then great.
You missed the bit where I said I messed up my ankle?
Fine, I'm not trying to convert you to anything, but the OP asked if minimal shoes were worth it, and I think they are. They were the key to enjoying running for me, so I think it's pretty damn important to get your style right first.
After all, most of us have run at some point in our lives, and only some of us find it enjoyable. I wasn't one of them, but I changed my style and now I am. Technique was the difference between loving it and hating it.
I am not saying it's for everyone, but I have been running barefoot, as in no shoes at all for years. I have completed ten and fifteen k assault courses sans shoes with no ill effects. Never liked footwear of any sort, only ever wear shoes, vivo barefoot, for work or in serious cold weather.
To OP, if you are serious about giving true barefoot a go, learn to walk without shoes first. Spend as much time as possible without shoes and build up slowly. After several years the soles of my feet are extremely tough. Just be patient and don't risk injury, at the first sign of even slight pain, stop and rest.
I get pretty fed up of preachy people on both sides of the argument. Just do what's right for you. Thousands of years of evolution have given us a natural platform for running on. The human foot is an
awesome piece of evolution. for me, you can't beat the feedback you get from going barefoot. Hobbits for the win!
I've run barefoot for short distances on tarmac. It feels fantastic, your feet feel incredibly light. It hurt the pads of my feet though quite quickly 🙂
When I spoke to Andy from http://www.runningschool.co.uk/ about heel/forefoot running he said it didn't matter as some heel stike and some don't and neither is right or wrong. His view is to continue how you normally run but then tweak it to improve your technique not fundamentally change your running style. Personally I run in racing flats on the road and track, but then my technique is not bad. You would have to be putting in pretty serious mileage to be worried about wearing out the soles too quickly. Racing flats are also generally a lot cheaper than fashion minimilist shoes.
It will hurt at first, I had awesome blisters for the first few months. I now spend as much time as possible sans shoes and it's amazing the difference it's made to leg strength and calf definition.
I stopped wearing socks and shoes regularly in about 2003 and can't handle anything other than zero drop shoes anymore, it just feels odd wearing anything with a heal.
it's fun, that's the main thing 🙂
How much do you think us fashion victims pay for minimalist shoes then? (Incidentally, I've never read a running mag ever, and I started forefoot striking before I'd ever heard of this whole debate.)
My problem with my previous gait was that my heel was striking the ground out in front of me as I landed, and my momentum was travelling up my straight leg to my hip. This battered my body and each hit slowed me down so I had to use my muscles to overcome that.
Now I land on my foot underneath my body and the energy gets stored in my achilles and foot, so when I push off I'm using that stored energy to go forwards instead of absorbing it into my skeleton. I've found that as long as I don't put my foot too far out and keep it under me, it doesn't make a huge amount of difference if I land heel first or forefoot.
Molgrips thats exactly it. Don't over stride and dosn't matter if you heel or forefoot strike.
I would agree. My running style looks like I am running on the spot. Feet and knees pretty much under my hips with a straight back and high cadence. Different strokes for different folks though I guess.
On the shoe front, I paid forty quid for the tough gloves I own and sixty for the two pairs of vivo. The vivo are by far the next best thing to going barefoot. If it wasn't for winter and work demands I seriously doubt I would own any shoes other than for MTB and climbing.
Sorry for derailing slightly
I think its all a fad, as your legs strengthen you need less stability and cushioning meaning you can graduate from your big foam trainers that look like a melted coolbox, to a racing flat.
Its no surprise that newcomers to running get injury whatever their shoes.
I am no match for surfer, but a half decent runner and I would always choose a shoe with some stability and cushioning
My current shoe btw
[img] 
[/img]
I think Molgrips has it spot on. Im a distance runner using exactly the same technique molgips describes.
I changed from a heel striker.
Who remembers buying there 1st pair of real trainers as a teenager and bouncing on the heel in the shop saying 'ooh these are comfy'? Then running to utilize that heel?! Well take your shoes off and run on your heels on the spot... Now run on your forefoot on the spot... Which is comfier?
Who has children under 10 and how do they run?
OP, personally i would buy something flat, with a bit of cushioning in the forefoot, take it steady, land on your Mid foot to forefoot with the foot underneath you as it stikes.
I reccomend the Saucony Kinvara, it can be had for 40 quid ish.
Edit, or for off road Something like The inov8 above.
I've tried barefoot and it hurts my feet (muscle strains) and may use it to strengthen the muscles but I'm not particularly bothered to pursue it. I do prefer the 'feel' of minimal shoes though both on and off road.
http://www.peteblandsports.co.uk/products/inov-8-roclite-285.htm
I'd recommend these as a compromise between built up and minimalist shoe.
I have a son who's now a little older than 10 at 15. He's one of the best hurdlers and triple jumpers regionally, and was in his school team that was fourth in the French championships. We've worked on various aspects of his running but his footwork is something I've never felt the need to comment on. He forefoot runs in spikes over short distances on the track and heel strikes in trainers when we go out running in the woods.
Edukator, He forefoot runs when racing. But doesn't train that way on his long runs, Why is that? I'm not wanting an argument so don't take offence I am just interested.
I'm no expert just offering my opinion but i would want to train the same systems every-time i ran.
If I run on the spot I land forefoot, if I sprint i'm forefoot if i'm doing an ultra or attempting other long runs I run on my forefoot.
The difference between distance is I admittedly opt for slightly more forefoot cushioning above half marathon when on the roads.
What shoes does he use to run in the woods?
isnt it about time someone posted the timelapse of the running race showing the footstrike of all the fastest runners ?
He does what is natural. When we do longer runs that include fartlek he progressively goes from heel strike to forefoot as we increase speed, I do exactly the same. Running in the woods includes forefoot running but as much of the time we're heel striking trainers with a heel are more appropriate. Track sessions he does in spikes whether training or racing.
Edit to answer question: His trainers are Adidas Litestrike.
Forefoot/flat is fastest, Trail rat, but this thread is advice for beginner and leisure runners that probably won't be doing more than 12km/h most of the time and won't have the strngth to maintain a forefoot stye for long. They'll soon be heel striking and suitable trainers will reduce injury risk.
Whats natural? Natural isnt in a big heeled shoe its barefoot or flat footed.
It feels natural to heel strike when in heel striking shoes.
I am not sure you will see many forefoot runners if you stand at the finish line of a marathon regardless of how many started the race forefoot running. As I posted above I think it is something people get far too hung up on. The professional advice I hear for lots of runners is to shorten your stride and speed up your cadence regardless of heel/ forefoot strike. As molgrips has said it is over striding and landing heavily on your heel that is poor technique and can cause problems.
If you can't forefoot strike in regular shoes, don't bother with barefoot yet.
Look at a shoe like Saucony's Virrata/kinvara or a natural Range from Asics.
They offer cushioning with little or no heel to toe drop. So you'll be running without a built up heel, but still have the forgiveness of a cushioned shoe. Once you can handle the technique in those then look at barefoot. You'll need to build your technique and fitness before switching to barefoot. It'll be worth it in the long run. There's no quick fix.
There's a reason shoes like Vibram, minimus, hattori etc come with big health warnings in the box.
Edukator, Re your last post.. If i was a beginner i would want to start from scratch in the best way, forefoot.
I think were most people go wrong is they bumble in to running, get half good then try to run forefoot doing the same distance and speedwork as they can already do and therefore Its gonna hurt and you will get injured.
You need to restart from scratch. This is where most people go wrong.
Even novice runners who just start running think they can go further and faster than there bodies will allow and then wonder why the next day they cant move.
It's natural to heel strike when you walk, you heel strike a little less when you break into a jog, increase speed and you'll heel strike a little less, run really fast and you'll be flat or forefoot. Most people run at a speed where they'll naturally be heel striking whatever they have on their feet and having something under the heel to reduce shock is a good idea.
How much you want under your heel depends on how far and how fast you intend to run. Nothing for a 100m, something for a 10 000m, a little more for a marathon and a lot more if you're a fat marathon runner with limited fitness.
errr edukator - you obviously havnt seen the photograph.
basically it points out that there is no correct way to run - these guys are all near top flight and all run differently.
forefoot is promenant but there are all sorts going on.
I've seen lots of photographs of runners at different distances. There's variation between runners but the general theme of heel striking less and less as you go from a walk to a sprint holds.
If i jog on the spot i dont heel strike. I could jog on the spot for hours if i had to, wouldnt want to but i could. 🙂
Not sure why we walk on our heels, but yeah you got me there. I guess walking is more balancing on the skeleton with little muscle usage.
Feel free to race me over a marathon with you speedwalk!
I love this subject! Sad.
Older runners may remember some Brooks shoes (I still have a pair) with a very think forefoot. The idea was maintain the natural angle of the foot and allow forefoot running but with a cushion. They did what they were supposed to do very well but I found I was slower than in shoes with a heel at least 5mm thicker than the forefoot. They were very comfortable but not quite as fast.
Edukator - MemberIt's natural to heel strike when you walk, you heel strike a little less when you break into a jog, increase speed and you'll heel strike a little less, run really fast and you'll be flat or forefoot.
Try running on the spot with a heel strike, it's awkward at best.
With a little practise, running forefoot is easy at any* speed, even 0kph. The idea that there's a natural progression(?) from heels to toes, as speed increases, is perhaps a little misleading.
The idea that 'forefoot' means 'running on your toes', is also misleading, my heels touch down gently at the end of the 'landing strike'.
(*obvious limits of human performance apply)
OP, ask the question on runners world, there are slightly less self important asshats on there.
My opinion FWIW, I wouldn't start off in barefoot shoes I know I was bloody glad of the cush from my stability shoes when I started.
Are there as many that indulge in gratuitous insult, KINGTUT?
Touched a nerve there I see, Edukator.
Nope, are you going to edit again or should I wait 15min before replying to you in future.
the accusation of sneaky edit. is that the new version of the edinburgh defence.
he may have edited but the essense of his post remains the same.
Well hopefully this has put the OP off going for a run. It's serious business.
Like has been said above...
Just go and run
Find out for yourself, before spending on something that may not be right for you.
Once you know what's right for you - and whether you want to continue running, that's the time to seriously think about your 'style' of running.
I think its all a fad, as your legs strengthen you need less stability and cushioning meaning you can graduate from your big foam trainers that look like a melted coolbox, to a racing flat.
Well possibly, but one of the principles of minimal shoes is that you start off strengthening your feet and tendons in a way that's supposedly more suited to our evolution. When I started running, I couldn't run very far anyway so my feet were indeed tired, but so were the rest of my legs so it all worked out.
Re sprinting - I've always been a good sprinter but a bad distance runner. The reason I ended up thinking about gait had nothing to do with marketing - I was on a treadmill once, and I wondered what would happen if I started to run my 8m30 pace as if I were sprinting. It was instantly far easier - I believe I posted on here about it I was so excited to have discovered this.
So the point is what 'comes naturally' isn't necessarily what's best for you.
Get the shoe that suits you and the type of running you do. Its personal and takes time to find the correct one.
Mix some barefoot (on grass) with running in shoes. Be careful, listen to your body and if you calfs, achilles feet ache stop.
IMO the heel strike argument is a red herring. More important is where your foot lands in relation to your body. Watch top runners and some do heel strike/mid-foot but not with their legs extended.
FWIW, i run up to HM distance in flats. I like to have some protection but still be able to feel my feet in contact with the ground. I hate any excess cushioning - it feels weird to me. But marathon and above, there is no way I can cope without some more cushioning.
ASICS DS racer/trainer - for most running
ASICSs 2130 - or whatever latest number is for longer stuff
Slippy Salomons for trails
When I run a long way, it's my groin and outside of thigh that get tired and sore eventually. My achilles and feet never give any trouble...
KINGTUT's original post had nothing on topic and was a gratuitous insult, Trail-Rat. The edit added on-topic content. The original reason for posting was to insult. I think that's worth pointing out.
Hurtmore adds another another shoes-to-suit-the-distance-and-speed post. Has any of the minimalist/barefoot protagonists managed to run a marathon minimalist/barefoot? I ran one in Mizuno race shoes with about a 15mm cushon and regretted it.
Maybe all that running in sofa shoes has made your feet weak and feeble Ed 🙂
Has any of the minimalist/barefoot protagonists managed to run a marathon minimalist/barefoot?
yep, last year, fell race too, including rocks, roads, tricky descents, the lot.
with little or no training in the preceeding year other than a weekly 5k potter with my girlfriend.
result: legs a bit knackered, feet fine (1 minor blister that caused no pain)
shoes worn: NB 101's
5 years ago several doctors told me that i'd need bones removed from my feet if i even wanted to walk again (i didn't listen to them, and opted for the non-surgical route to recovery - ie, not wearing shoes with arch support, or raised heels)
ED, Ive done My longest race at 35 miles of trail and road in xtallon 212's. Also 3p twice in them.
Snowdon marathon in kinvaras twice, london in newtons.
In fact i started forefoot running just before doing the yorkshire off road marathon, my first marathon. So ive done all my longest races in barefoot style.
I use addidas adizero hagios for 10 mile and less. My toes grumble if i go further in them which is why i like to train in the kinvara.
Edukator - Member
KINGTUT's original post had nothing on topic and was a gratuitous insult, Trail-Rat. The edit added on-topic content. The original reason for posting was to insult. I think that's worth pointing out.
Good lord.
