Balls! Who voted for that egomaniac!
Happy for Lewis, well deserved!
[quote=mikey74 ]Deserved win.
Yep
😀 😳 😈
Well it's good for F1....
A good winner, being top of your game in any sport deserves a lot of recognition. A season long battle with your team mate is probably the toughest thing to do.
I think he was so emotional as he got to stand next to king kenny. Fair dos.
Dull bloke, dull sport, dull UK public
Predictable, no ?
It's only been won by a royal in 1971 btw..
You missed 2006 then, when her daughter won it? 😕
Couldn't quite put my finger on it, but the wife did. 'That bloke is false and lacks soul'.
She doesn't normally do sport but i thought it quite perceptive
All the finalists deserved to win, but there can only be one winner.
Lewis is the best in the world.
I hope he goes on to take another world title and equal Sir Jackie Stewarts tally of titles.
ElShalimo - Member
Dull bloke, dull sport, dull UK public
POSTED 11 MINUTES AGO # REPORT-POST
Dull post
Why would you take a bulldog along? Tries desperately to look cool but comes across as a chavy cockwomble
As a dedicated sportsmen he's o.k. It's the fans/hangers on with their baggy shirts tucked in to their chinos and monogrammed blouson jackets I can't stand.
I think it has lost it as a progamme, I watched 20 mins which coincided with the commonwealth games section. An event I didn't watch at all. I have very little idea who won anything as a result of the section they did. I guess it is a function of the age and the assumption that the knowledge is easy to obtain if you desire.
Must be great to be in a "sport" where you only have to beat one bloke to be world champion...
Its a joke now. As John Mcguiness has said on twitter, why werent Simon Andrews and Karl Harris mentioned in the section about lost sportsmen and women but the well known "sportsman" Malcolm Glazer was. And also, why is Ronnie O'Sullivan never nominated? - he won the uk champs and got a 147 with a broken ankle! Motorcycling and snooker obviously not fashionable enough or high enough on the sporting agenda!!
Snooker isnt sport
Edric 64 - and horse dancing is?
Last time i looked, snooker was covered by BBC sport.
At least it wasn't the walk spoiler - though I'm now kicking myself because there wasn't actually a catch when the bookies were offering very generous odds on Lewis.
Oh bllx he won. Was it worth watching back? Any highlights?
You missed 2006 then, when her daughter won it?
Zara holds no royal title... 😉
Can't say I'm particularly pleased Lewis won, but it takes more work than I think any of us are capable of to get where he's got. Just a shame JB didn't win when he took the WDC.
[quote=idiotdogbrain ]Just a shame JB didn't win when he took the WDC.
I was thinking maybe there was somebody more worthy, and then I checked 👿
It just proves that motor racing fans seem to be well represented in SPOTY TV audiences. Dunno why that should be.
Ronnie is undoubtably an absolute legend and gifted at his game
but he's not really an 'ambassador' is he?
gj lewis by the way.
'Walk spoiler' - descriptor of the day 🙂
To win it your sport or achievement would need to capture the voting publics attention. Hamilton's battle with Rosberg has clearly done that this year. He hasn't really had that much in the way of completion from the more popular sports this year either.
As with all these popularity contests, I wonder if those complaining about the winner actually bothered voting for the person they wanted to win.
I thought the skier lass was bold, did not realise her vision was so limited.
The Invitus people and any of the Para-Olympians were a great reality check.
Loved the unsung hero award.
Them world champ women rugby players also impressive and well deserved.
Apart from Lineker enjoyed it this year.
Did feel that the intros to the big star nominees were a tad biased, where was the dry ice and light show for Joe Pavey and the others who don't live in the high net income sports world.
Hamilton should be paying his tax in the UK or be banned from pretending he is proud of being British.
I'm not sure I like the change to the new talent show format, it's all a bit Phoenix Nights for me. That said, Alonso's Borat impression was inspired, and by golly, who'd have ever known that Carlos Valderamma could sing like that - if you squinted it might as well have been Beyoncé. Pity it was won by some generic footballer.
An underwhelming result in my opinion. I don't know why but Lewis evokes no emotion, positive or negative, from me, very odd. I'd have been happy to see Rory McIlroy win, though I did vote for Jo Pavey.
I don't think it has been a vintage year for sport in all honesty, no truly outstanding performances in my eyes at least though my brother (golfist) and best mate (motor racing fan) heavily disagree with me.
At least it was exceptional performances that placed the nominees on the list (despite it not having one of this bunch Carpenter, Bryceland, Atherton on the list)
Was there any mention in the show of the Outstanding performance of the British Downhill team at the World Championships who literally blew the world away ???
No ??? am not surprised .. it used to be a celebration of British Sportsman competing and winning at the highest levels .. what is it now?? poop.
Erm, yes. They got a mention. It was brief thoughWas there any mention in the show of the Outstanding performance of the British Downhill team at the World Championships who literally blew the world away ???No ??? am not surprised
It's the program itself that's the issue now, if you recall it was always called "Sports Review of the Year", not "Sports Personality....". And that's why it was so good, it was a genuine review of the sporting year with an award tacked onto the end of it. I may have fast forwarded the horse racing roundup but at least you got to see a spectrum of performances across a variety of sports.
All it is now is 2 hours where they spend 10 minutes per nominee (and not actually showing properly what they did, just some arty piece about how hard they've worked blah-blah) and 20 minutes giving awards. How much actual sport was shown last night? As a percentage of the show it must be buttons.
Shame as it was always one of the must watch December programs for me, I think this will be the last year that I do....
The BBC website says "Ryder Cup captain Paul McGinley named Coach of the Year" Not sure how someone who captained/managed a team in a week long event can be coach of the year!?!
Because he has been working with his potential team for at least a year before the week long event?
But still not coaching them 🙄
Not a popular winner in the broadsheets
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/dec/15/rory-mcilroy-lewis-hamilton-sports-personality-of-the-year
What was that about a dog? Didn't watch it myself.
And "Pedant of the Year" goes to......... 😉
those newspaper articles remind me why I don't read the papers anymore - what bitter spiteful guff.
Unlucky Rory, but golf sold it's soul and public vote to sky. At least some F1 was available for all!!!
those newspaper articles remind me why I don't read the papers anymore - what bitter spiteful guff.
Whilst I would agree to a certain extent that it is bitter, they do have a point regarding the issue that effectively Hamilton was really only racing one other person with the same equipment, whilst McIlroy was against a much wider potential field.
[quote=jimw ]
those newspaper articles remind me why I don't read the papers anymore - what bitter spiteful guff.
Whilst I would agree to a certain extent that it is bitter, they do have a point regarding the issue that effectively Hamilton was really only racing one other person with the same equipment, whilst McIlroy was against a much wider potential field.
Hamiltons equipment was only better because of the incredible team behind him. The same could be said of Wiggins, Hoy etc
Whilst I would agree to a certain extent that it is bitter, they do have a point regarding the issue that effectively Hamilton was really only racing one other person with the same equipment, whilst McIlroy was against a much wider potential field.
That is such a simplistic view: The fact is that there are so many things that can go wrong over the course of a season, including driver error, that just saying all he has to do is race one other person is daft.
I can't believe this has caused such controversy: Are people genuinely saying that a Formula 1 World Champion (for the second time) is not a worthy winner of a sporting accolode? Do these people realise what skill, fitness, determination and sheer talent it takes to do that?
I agree that McIlroy would also have been a good winner, as would Pavey, but it's not the end of the World. Let's just congratulate Hamilton and the others on their amazing seasons and move on.
Hamiltons equipment was only better because of the incredible team behind him. The same could be said of Wiggins, Hoy etc
True in terms of the team behind them, but I would disagree that you could put any of the best riders on the same equipment and guarantee that they would beat their opposition, whereas you could probably have put Hamilton in the Ferrari all season and see Bottas in a Mercedes disappearing into the distance
Edit:I'll be upfront about it, I am not a fan of Hamilton nor F1 as it is presently set up, so this may cloud my perspective. On the other hand it is my opinion and I'll stick with it
[quote=jimw ]Not a popular winner in the broadsheets
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/dec/15/rory-mcilroy-lewis-hamilton-sports-personality-of-the-year
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/sports-personality-of-the-year/11294032/Sports-Personality-Rory-McIlroy-snub-is-a-travesty-he-should-not-bother-turning-up-again.html
What was that about a dog? Didn't watch it myself.
Whiny articles by the golf correspondents, meh.
