Forum menu
She should have either parked diagonally, or at the very least, moved her car another 4ft forward.
Anyway, its a good job she was in Bath. Id like to have seen the reaction her, and her **** man, would've got if they pulled that one in Fife. Middle class arguments are soooooo funny!
It doesn't have anything to do with him, BUT he is within his rights to film it. She was not within her rights to park like she did, nor threaten and harass him.
He may be sad and need a life but that is not illegal. There are plenty of people around who think people chatting on internet forums are sad, let alone us mid life wasters who sprout nonsense on cycling forums.......
There are plenty of people around who think people chatting on internet forums are sad,
Bloody right it is, you'll never find me doing that.
I spent the last 5 mins of that wishing that one of them, any one of them, would resort to violence. That was like a real life STW thread. Would have been sorted in a much quicker and entertaining manner with some furious fists.
What exactly is the legal stand point on this ❓ is she breaking the law by obstucting the flow of traffic and if she is breaking the law is it illegal to film her ❓ is it illegal to film someone who is breaking the law?
Would have been sorted in a much quicker and entertaining manner with some furious fists.
+1
"Man dance, man dance, man dance."
Pretty certain it is illegal to willingly block the highway or some such wording! Not illegal to film in a public place.
Following a prolonged campaign, including a series of demonstrations by photographers abused by Police Officers and PCSOs, the Metropolitan Police was forced to issue updated legal advice which now confirms that '[b]Members of the public and the media do not need a permit to film or photograph in public places[/b] and police have no power to stop them filming or photographing incidents or police personnel' and that 'The power to stop and search someone under Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 no longer exists
From Wikipedia
Isn't it illegal to air said film without the consent of those filmed? The tv always distorts the faces in those cases...
Edit: I guess not
Isn't it illegal to air said film without the consent of those filmed? The tv always distorts the faces in those cases...
I wouldn't have thought so. I can't imagine the crooks they show on Watchdog etc give permission. I think the distorted faces are usually because there is an on going court case.
Yes, of course. 😳
All I saw was a typical audi driver
If there was more filming of people being cocks and subsequent airings perhaps they might think about their actions but I wont hold my breath.