Forum menu
Seems only the usada was the only group willing to stand up to him.
Well, it took them long enough. 🙂
My point being that Contador is a reformed doper, as murderers can be rehabilitated. That we have to trust that Wiggo is clean and that Lance was able to get away with it for a good few years while rejecting and suing any claim to the contrary.
I don't think anyone here has enough insider info to be clear one way or the other. 😉
All other things being equal whoyagonnabelieve?
Again, from personal experience I'd believe the ex-doper. They're the ones who undestand what they've lost.
Look at the other famous doper.... Millar.
You believe the person who said sorry over the guy who never did wrong in the first place?? 😯
They must all see you coming....
What a pointless thread this is!
I've got quite a lot of faith in him.
When Cofidis were chucked off the TdF because one chap was caugght doping Wiggins flounced off immediately.
He then joined Slipstream, where Vaughters and Millar were working hard to run a completely drug-free team by actively engaging their riders in a clean ethos based on Vaughters' and Millar's considerable experience of how and why doped teams happen and what can be done to stop it. During that period, Wiggins' blood values from internal team testing were available online for everyone to see.
After Slipstream, Wiggins goes to Sky, another team with a very engaged zero-tolerance policy for doping run by Brailsford - a man to whom Millar had to explain the very concepts of doping to after he eventually got out of Biarritz police station to find Brailsford waiting for him.
For much of his time, Wiggins has also ridden for British Cycling, which again runs explicitly drug-free. Crucially, there is no suggestion at all that he has any association with any problematic doctors.
He has been consistently, bitterly intolerant of other people doping and has repeatedly stated that he doesn't dope (cf. "never failed a test" and other weasel forms of words.) He has simply never demonstrated any ambivalence on the subject.
He has had a reasonably plausible run of form, including winning a seriously slow TdF in which he repeatedly appeared very tired and vulnerable.
Compared to the astonishing speeds and 1990s-style heroics of the Vuelta last year, the TdF looked very much like a panyagua effort.
We can either simply say "they are all at it", or we can grasp that this stuff comes and goes, and at the moment there seems to be a critical mass of teams which appear to run clean and riders who take pride in having a clean competition. Sky appears to be such a team, and Wiggins appears to be such a rider.
That said, I'm always slightly prepped for being bitterly disappointed, and if anything does go wrong I think it's very, very importnant to let go of the denial immediately and move on. The saddest thing about the Lance shambles is the poor saps still wittering about a massive conspiracy to frame an innocent man...
No respect for Millar who was caught, bang to rights. He'd have been at it for as long as possible. His little boy lost routine is riseable.
As for Wiggins, Kimmage seems to think so...
My point being that Contador is a reformed doper, as murderers can be rehabilitated.
In order for murderers to be rehabilitated they have to express remorse. I'd suggest the same should apply to dopers.
You believe the person who said sorry over the guy who never did wrong in the first place??
This is why it's a pointless discussion. As an ex-smoker, I've been there, seen it and done it. I've seen the negatives and understand the down side. The never-smoked are always prey to the peddlers of filth. What we can not, and you can not, prove is Wiggo's resolve against this pressure.
You can not prove he isn't doping,can you? It's a question of trust and belief. Simple as that.
I say you’re just a * *. I cannot be doing with people like that. It justifies your own bone idleness because you can’t imagine applying yourself to do anything in your life.It’s easy for you to sit under a pseudonym on STW and write that sort of shit, rather than get off your own arse in your own life and apply yourself and work hard at something and achieve something. And that’s ultimately what counts. ****.
WOAH WOAH STEADY ON THERE!!!!! 🙄
I'm pretty sure you don't know me, you have no idea what I have or haven't achieved, so you have no right to blurt out those absurdities.
Sounds like you're the naive type to me tbh.
I say you’re just a * *. I cannot be doing with people like that. It justifies your own bone idleness because you can’t imagine applying yourself to do anything in your life.It’s easy for you to sit under a pseudonym on STW and write that sort of shit, rather than get off your own arse in your own life and apply yourself and work hard at something and achieve something. And that’s ultimately what counts. ****.
And pages 198 - 200 of his book. Read that and tell the world you think he's doping. Well done aracer.
There's just a blatant pattern of tour winners cheating, which doesn't really need to be stated as its pretty obvious one would think. I was a big Armstrong fan and was probably one of the last to actually come around to the idea of doping, It just doesn't really seem to make sense that someone could win the tour without some performance enhancement when half of them seem to be on something, if not all.
^^^ Poor little lamb, it went straight over his head.
Happy Birthday Marco.
As for Wiggins, Kimmage seems to think so...
[url= http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/kimmage-unconvinced-by-sky-and-wiggins ]This is the strongest Kimmage statement I can find. [/url]
I'd forgotten about Leinders... 😕
WOAH WOAH STEADY ON THERE!!!!!
You know he's paraphrasing Wiggo in a tour interview, right?
Cynicism - knowing the cost of everything and the value of nothing. A terrible way IMO to spend the few years we have to live life...
People don't seem to appreciate that what LA did was not a simple thing to do and required a certain type of extreme personality to deliver. And even then he's not been successful - he's been found out. Very very unlikely to be repeated...
The likelihood of Brad being able to dope and not get caught given all the attention given to both him and doping these days is pretty unlikely. And as said above, he has no record at all which suggests any reason to be suspicious.
If you love cycling, have some hope the battle's beginning to be won FFS!
😆 😆 😆 😆 😆
<note to mods - it wasn't an intentional troll!>
Threads like this and the 'everyone's at it' attitude are part of the fallout of cyclings dirty past.
I'd like to think that's changing.
Bit niave. Dopers just step ahead of the game.
Threads like this and the 'everyone's at it' attitude are part of the fallout of cyclings dirty past.I'd like to think that's changing.
Although threads like this don't help.
I'd love to see some of you anonymous forum lurkers stand eyeball to eyeball with Wiggins and then accuse him of doping. Doubt you'd be so brave or smart then!
Bit niave. Dopers just step ahead of the game.
Looks like that wasn't quite the case...
To some degree they doped in way which could get them round the tests (refusing to answer the door when the testers came round - not hard!)
But the other side of their strategy appears to have been working on governing bodies so that for those times when the testing regime did catch them, they could simply avoid it being properly dealt with.
This strategy has also now been kicked in the knackers...
I was a big Armstrong fan and was probably one of the last to actually come around to the idea of doping,
No offence but that what loads of folk say who only really got into because of LA.
At the time it was obvious what was going on , for many, within the peleton and with LA as well.
As for calling Brad or any other winner [ Cadel is clean IMHO]its like doubting Bolt because of Ben Johnson
I think he's clean I also believe Evans, Lemond and Sastre were clean winners too, but I'm not daft enough to think I could change anyones opinion on the matter so believe what you like.
I'd like to distance myself from the sceptics. I do believe Wiggins is the real deal.
I also believe that doping continues, and evolves with new products, with riders evading testers not at the door because they are confident that any test will not show them glowing
There was no tests to detect EPO for years.
Are a lot of people afraid of what they might think is the truth?
I dunno, tell me what the truth is, and I'll tell you if I think it's the real truth, a partial truth, or just your idea of what the truth might be, and whether I believe it or not. The only time I'd actually be afraid of the truth, is when it's a doctor telling me I have a terminal disease, otherwise, I don't care.
I was a big Armstrong fan and was probably one of the last to actually come around to the idea of doping, It just doesn't really seem to make sense that someone could win the tour without some performance enhancement when half of them seem to be on something, if not all.
Having displayed poor judgement once, does it not occur to you to refrain from displaying it again in public?
I hope that hes clean. Thats all we can say really.
I have faith that Wiggins is clean.
I have no faith that Contador is clean. What's the chance that during his ban he was using performance enhancing drugs during training as he won't have been tested. The beneficial effects can last for years - his ban was pathetic. Back dated, what's that all about!?.
One of the main reasons that Wiggins won the tour last year was the format of the tour suited him, he did well in the time trials and hung on in the mountains of which there werent a lot. The team was disciplined and worked for him to get the win. I would be amazed if he is doping, the scrutiny he is under would make it impossible. IMO he didnt do anything superhuman * the climb when LA looks over his shoulder at Ulrich and just blasted away that was superhuman and now we know fuelled by doping.
* apart from win the Tour and a gold medal 🙂
Wot Pigface said....And will be shown in the fact he will not win it this year,unlike Froome 8)
Eh? Caught doping = doper.
What was he (Contador) caught with?
A drug dose 180 times below the level that would cause any effective performance effect...
I have to laugh at people who think guys like Wiggins and Evans are clean yet guys like Contador aren't. Look at the 2007 Tour for example, 23 seconds between Contador and Evans. If a guy like Contador was doping and Evans was't the gap would be closer to 23 minutes.
A drug dose 180 times below the level that would cause any effective performance effect...
IIRC, it was the combination of clenbuterol [u]and[/u] plasticisers that did for Bertie - clear indicators of transfusions?
FWIW, I think Wiggins is clean - without the TT & flatter stages there were several contendersin 2012.
This is why it's a pointless discussion. As an ex-smoker, I've been there, seen it and done it. I've seen the negatives and understand the down side. The never-smoked are always prey to the peddlers of filth.
I've seen many more ex-smokers restart than I've seen non-smokers over the age of 30 take it up. Out of all the stupid incorrect arguments on STW this possibly tops even TJ's zenith of idiocy...
I think Wiggins is 100% clean and In general the sport is getting cleaner. The fact that Sky has used personell that may have had a history with doping in the past is fairly inevitable seeing as how widespread it was afew years back. As others have said the times over the large climbs on any Grand tour event have slowed up considerably over the last ten years. I think a lot of people think doping only dates back to the mid 80's when If you read any article on great riders like Coppi etc they were all on amphetamines back in the 50's .
Here's an interesting article on the legal stuff that goes on in the Peloton . [url= http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/13076/Taylor-Phinney-Interview-Getting-the-pill-culture-out-of-the-sport.aspx ]Taylor Phinney interview[/url]
He "must" be clean, he is one of us. 😉
I certainly hope so, especially as I went to the effort of growing sideburns before watching/supporting him in the TT, but my view on most pro sport is (sadly), " who knows?". Cycling is no exception. In my blissful state of ignorance I will continue to celebrate his success and hope that my innocence is not shattered at some later date. I think that is the best one can hope for in pro sport these days.
Why would the sport suddenly be clean? What's changed? Genuine question.
A drug dose 180 times below the level that would cause any effective performance effect...
Ah but you forget the belief is it's actually a blood bag that he used and the traces were from pre-season training when he had the blood extracted. He had plasticisers in his blood but that wasn't allowed to be discussed in the CAS case. [url= http://nyvelocity.com/content/interviews/2012/behind-scenes-contador-cas-hearing-michael-ashenden ]NY Velocity covered it with Michael Ashenden[/url].
If Ashenden thinks that Contador was blood doping, that's good enough for me. He's been caught doping, never admitted anything and came out in support of Armstrong (until it became damaging to Saxo's chances of a license).
Unrepentant doper.
BD has it with this...
Compared to the astonishing speeds and 1990s-style heroics of the Vuelta last year, the TdF looked very much like a panyagua effort.
I watched the TdF and hoped to also enjoy the Vuelta. Turned off after a couple of stages - the whole thing looked like a circus. On the TdF, those who attacked in the mountains one day were hanging on afterwards. In the Vuelta it looked like day after day attacks with no penalty to be paid following an "all out" effort - and Sky faded...
I hope Wiggins is clean, I think it much more likely that he is clean than those going back just a few years, however I would not be surprised or shocked if he was caught doping, just disappointed.
Millar = far from a hero, he got caught otherwise he'd still likely be doping. At least he admitted it and has tried to help clean up the sport since
Contador = got caught but still maintains innocence and therefore cannot be trusted
Wiggo = personally I think he's clean but he can't be above suspicion, no pro can. I'd also like to see him post blood values, I don't really see them as top-secret info that rival teams can use (at least post them up after the TdF).
You could ask this question of every sportsman? So what? He is innocent until proven guilty. Personally l am not interested in speculating on something the cycling authorities are handling for us. Why do we even need to talk about it, it's just malicious chatter. Caveat : I don't like wiggo, l think he is a prick, incredible cyclist, admirable achievement, but a knob.
Again, from personal experience I'd believe the ex-doper. They're the ones who undestand what they've lost.
Look at the other famous doper.... Millar.
The difference between Contador and Millar is Millar said sorry, Contador claimed he'd eaten some dodgy steak imported from a Spanish butcher that no one could rememeber the name of.
I'm pretty sure you don't know me, you have no idea what I have or haven't achieved, so you have no right to blurt out those absurdities.
Wasn't this the whole point of your thread? Blurting out absurdities about others achievements.
Should we start casting aspersions about your drug taking, after all, we've never seen you pass a test!
michaelmcc - Member
It just doesn't really seem to make sense that someone could win the tour without some performance enhancement when half of them seem to be on something, if not all.
Why would the sport suddenly be clean? What's changed? Genuine question.
I'd also put money on it being clean for the majority. There's no way teams are at it anymore, and with whole teams being expelled for a single rider being caught there must be pressure on the riders not to dope.
And look at the reduction in average speed and attacks over the last few years. If one person was doping we'd have something that looked suspiciously like Contador in the Vuleta. Not that him winning is a sign of guilt (although I'm suspicious), I'm happy to put that down to him being better preared for the vuleta having had the whole season off to prepare. Although Armstrong used the same 'tactics' (OK Bertie was on a ban, rather than a tactic) for the TDF...............
In a word, no.
#waits for the thought police to call#
What was he (Contador) caught with?
Drugs he was not alowed in his body- also indications of blood transfusions
In short he was caught cheating.
A drug dose 180 times below the level that would cause any effective performance effect...
so he is rubish at it? is this your defence of him?
quote]I have to laugh at people who think guys like Wiggins and Evans are clean yet guys like Contador aren't.
I have to shake my head in disbelief at someone who defends someone who has failed a drugs test then laughs at folk who defend those who have not. Why exactly are you ignoring the evidence?
Look at the 2007 Tour for example, 23 seconds between Contador and Evans. If a guy like Contador was doping and Evans was't the gap would be closer to 23 minutes.
Yes this is the pull figures out the air without any evidence type argument that will sway the haysayers..I feel certain of it.