Forum search & shortcuts

Small boys in the p...
 

[Closed] Small boys in the park, jumpers for goalposts, rush goalie. World cup thread.

Posts: 57415
Full Member
 

I need to get a Donald Trump style bank of big telly’s 😀

This World Cup has been absolutely bloody brilliant so far!!!


 
Posted : 25/06/2018 10:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The VAR stuff is becoming a bit of a farce. Maybe it's just the refs needing more training, but the Portugal game was silly. Players rolling around and exaggerating reactions more than ever before, it's getting out of hand. Do we need to use a system like the NFL where the coach or the captain gets a certain number of challengers per game so we a) don't waste time and b) players stop play acting quite so much?


 
Posted : 25/06/2018 10:09 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

The VAR stuff is becoming a bit of a farce. Maybe it’s just the refs needing more training, but the Portugal game was silly.

I'd go with Liniker's assesment that it's more right than wrong and it's finding some of that in the box set play stuff that was being missed. I heard this ref was complained about by Egypt, he would probably have been fine when this was going to be a dead rubber but Iran got up for it, both sides lost it and it needed a top level official to sort it out.

A simple review of the footage after the game would have told FIFA who to be checked, booked and spoken too.


 
Posted : 25/06/2018 10:15 pm
Posts: 20994
 

Well, that was uncomfortable watching (Por-irn) the Iranian bench trying to whip up the crowd during the ref inspecting the replays, and then the constant looking for fouls and goading players into reacting.

my view for VAR is that the ref should get one view, at full speed, and if he can’t see the issue, he can’t give the penalty/card/whatever. Players suggesting he check the VAR should be booked, as they are for suggesting a player be carded.

As an aside, who found a shipping crate full of vuvuzelas before the game?


 
Posted : 25/06/2018 10:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I’d go with Liniker’s assesment that it’s more right than wrong and it’s finding some of that in the box set play stuff that was being missed.

It is, but we're going there far too often. And the Por pen should never of been given, again, this is maybe a case for more training, but I don't think the system is adding much. The offside call in the other game - perfect use.


 
Posted : 25/06/2018 10:47 pm
Posts: 605
Free Member
 

I think there should be a ref in the stands with the monitor who can advise the pitch ref, should he request it. Like rugger I guess - there is so much time wasted with the red trotting over to the pitch side monitor.

Players should also be booked if they do the VAR symbol thing and coaches sent to the stands.


 
Posted : 25/06/2018 10:49 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Yep much prefer the Rugby/Cricket version making the Ref do the recheck is just football trying to invent things themselves rather than just accepting stuff was better.

A heap of stuff on appealing, goading and diving needs to be done in Football but it would result in needing a 30 man squad for the group stages at this one


 
Posted : 25/06/2018 10:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

whatnobeer

The VAR stuff is becoming a bit of a farce. Maybe it’s just the refs needing more training

Var has been fine, it's still open to interpretation and clownshow refs though, so it won't completely irradicate the controversy!


 
Posted : 25/06/2018 11:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Var has been fine, it’s still open to interpretation and clownshow refs though

The two are pretty inseparable, no? Throw in the behaviour of the players who now have an incentive to over act to get things reviewed and I see potential issues.  Rugby doesn't seem to have these issues, but maybe it's just the mentality of the players in both sports.


 
Posted : 25/06/2018 11:20 pm
Posts: 4111
Free Member
 

Certainly an interesting couple of games for mostly the wrong reasons, but plenty of drama. How long will that Iranian who had the chance to score at the end rue his miss. All his life? 😮


 
Posted : 25/06/2018 11:22 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

 Rugby doesn’t seem to have these issues, but maybe it’s just the mentality of the players in both sports.

I know none of the rugger lads would have missed like Ronaldo that would have been teeth on the floor 😉

They know how to pay lip service to the ref as they know they will be booked/sinbinned otherwise, the punishment is not there in football that is the issue


 
Posted : 25/06/2018 11:24 pm
Posts: 4111
Free Member
 

Please don’t start the egg chasing comparisons! It’s like chalk and cheese.


 
Posted : 25/06/2018 11:43 pm
Posts: 5739
Full Member
 

Regarding VAR, I don't think the Iran penalty was a penalty in a million years.

I do however think Portugal or Uruguay could be an easy quarter final for someone, neither team has impressed. Both look disjointed.

Obviously is either came up against England that wouldn't be the case...


 
Posted : 25/06/2018 11:46 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

This World Cup has been worth watching  so far!!!

FIFM.

As someone who doesn’t watch football, I’ve enjoyed it being on and seeing the smaller teams play out of thier comfort zones to equal some of the more AmDram professional squads.

I will watch the rest of the tournament.


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 12:15 am
Posts: 13292
Free Member
 

Please don’t start the egg chasing comparisons! It’s like chalk and cheese

it really isn't.   both games could be respectful of each other and the referee if the players wanted it.

at least in rugby you know someone is hurt because they don't get up. would be interesting to see how some of the footballers/rugby boys would react if playing the other game.

re. the VAR/4th official.... the rugby way of doing things seems much fairer (all players get to see the foul/dispute) and much more efficient...


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 2:32 am
Posts: 57415
Full Member
 

I think you’ve got to take into account that this is the first time VAR has been used at a major tournament so there’s bound to be a certain amount of learning on the job for the refs. It’ll soon sort itself out.

Overall I think it’s been pretty goood. I was worried the flow of the games would be stifled with VAR being used every 2 minutes. That hasn’t happened. And some close, but wrong decisions have been rectified. Ie the Spain offfside goal last night.

its about a million times better than the utterly farcical scenes when they tried it in the UK last season


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 6:57 am
Posts: 5739
Full Member
 

Will be interesting to see how VAR develops as we lose the less, shall we be kind & say experienced, referees & have ones that are less in awe of being on the same pitch as Ronaldo et al.


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 10:53 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

It will though I can see Sky and ITV rubbing their hands at the chance of another 2 mins of ads in a game.


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 10:58 am
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Please don’t start the egg chasing comparisons!

Wondering what the difference is.  I don't see why a football ref can't be respected like a rugby ref.

Re the VAR - on rugby the TV coverage gets the same replays that the video ref sees, and I think on the big screen too.  I wonder if this would be better or worse in football?  The rules on what constitute a foul seem more subjective than most of the rugby rules so it might result in even more conflict if the crowd disagrees.  Which it well might.


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 11:14 am
Posts: 57415
Full Member
 

Oh Christ on a bendybus! Not this again?! Can we please not derail the thread with this nonsense? FFS!!!

Ok... egg-chasing is a sport of gentlemen and kings, and they are all models of respect and dignity. It is watched by people of high moral calling

Wendy ball is a game played by vile, cheating working class ruffians, and slimy foreigners and supported by Morons who get their clothes from Sports Direct.

There... I've saved you all a few pages of cyclical arguing

TOPIC CLOSED!!!

Right... back on track... todays games...

I'm quite fancying Iceland to get a pummelling from Croatia who look really good. Should be a good match though

The question is ... will Argentina show up? Apparently Aguero isn't starting. Imagine that? A squad built so much around one player - Messi - that one of the best strikers in the world is left on the bench? Mind-boggling. I hope they get absolutely walloped!


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 11:24 am
Posts: 5739
Full Member
 

I can see Iceland beating Croatia.... They're already through so they'll be looking towards the next round & Iceland finished above them in the qualifying group. They'll be keen not to meet France tho, who have also qualified, but might slip up against the Danish... might. Would like to see Peru get something from the Australia game.

Interviewer: "Do you think Brazil's 1970 team can beat today's Argentina?"
Pelé: "Yes."
Interviewer: "By how much?"
Pelé: "1-0"
Interviewer: “That's it?"
Pelé: "Well, most of us are over 75 years old now."

Argentina will go out with a whimper I think, I can't see a reaction if they all hate their manager, & Nigeria are looking like the best of the African teams.


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 11:37 am
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Aguero has probably been their best player so far as well, but it sounds like he lead the attempted mutiny against the manager, and has paid the price.

It is a real shame with Argentina, they have many of the best attacking players in the world, but their tactics are to just rely on Messi, if they played as a team that just happen to have probably the best player in the world as part of their attack, then it would be better for Argentina, better for Messi and better for everyone watching them.


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 11:43 am
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

 I was worried the flow of the games would be stifled with VAR being used every 2 minutes. That hasn’t happened.

Apart from the Portugal v Iran game. Hopefully the Chief Referee (or equivalent) will sit all the refs down and make an example of Enrique Caceres.


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 11:47 am
Posts: 57415
Full Member
 

Bad refs are just bad refs, with or without the aid of VAR. That won't change.

Its fine when VAR is asked to show was that or was that not offside? As that can be easily proved or disproved. But heres an example of the average conversation in the pub with me and my mates while watching a match

"* me! He should be off for that, the dirty *er!!"

"Don't be ridiculous! That wasn't even a ****ing yellow! Its a contact sport! He needs to MTFU and stop diving, the big fanny!!"

Etc... etc... etc...

I'm sure we're no different from everybody else. And lets be honest... thats half the fun 😀

And therein lies the problem. So many decisions are subjective, and peoples opinion of what warrants cards etc vary enormously. VAR won't change that. Thankfully.


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 12:39 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Plenty of chat on R5live this morning about VAR. Some shouty presenter was getting properly het up over it all (can't remember his name, but you'll know him) frankly it was the funniest chat show I've heard in Yonks.

I don't really care whether it works or not, listening and reading what you lot post is the most amusing thing.

I'm hoping Iceland win, I'm all for some underdog winning the competition.


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 12:52 pm
Posts: 24869
Free Member
 

I got annoyed yesterday (again) by the inability of the pundits to understand the laws. Ronaldo's penalty, given by VAR shouldn't have been given 'because he'd lost control of the ball'

WTAF..... so you can scythe someone down as long as they aren't actually in control of the ball at the time? How was Harry's wrestling penalty a penalty then, he wasn't near (couldn't get near!) the ball to be in control of it. A late tackle is OK if you've passed the ball by the time it's made.... in fact, the later the better, surely?

I agree with Binners, the game is one of opinions and you'll never get everyone to agree on the borderline stuff, but the Ronaldo one was a good case of VAR well used, as he was clearly taken out by the defender even if the ball had gone by then.

But I think it should go to a similar system as cricket or tennis, where a team has say two challenges per half. It would have the dual benefit of 1/ in general, players know when they've been fouled or won the ball clearly so the times they'd go and look at VAR would be reduced to ones where people genuinely believe; and 2/ the appealing currently is mainly for influence. If every time someone appealed for a pointless one - I happen to remember Ronaldo begging for a corner yesterday, various 'he must have been offside' protestations about goals, etc. - if the Ref signalled VAR, denied the appeal and then you're out of appeals when you really need one I reckon the pointless appealing would stop quickly.
And make ANY further appealing once you've used your allocation an immediate yellow.


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 12:57 pm
Posts: 57415
Full Member
 

That'll be Robby Savage BB. Do you not listen to 606 on Five Live where people phone in to 'discuss' the weekends football?

Its absolute comedy gold!

Though now Wengers actually gone, thats 50% of their weekly callers wiped out. The producers must be praying that Liverpool never actually do win the Premiership, as without the delusional 'next year is our year' scouse lot on, there'll be nobody left 😀


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 1:01 pm
Posts: 4111
Free Member
 

lol at Binners! 🙂

Its definitely true about a game of opinions....my first thought was that Ronnies' penalty wasn't a penalty, but then reflected that he had definitely been fouled....in the box, so it must be a penalty!

I'm not sure if Iceland can thrive now they need to win the game. They have relied on defending and scoring from the set piece or on the break, but Crotia have all but qualified in top place already, so they won't be overdoing themselves.

I'm just pleased that at least we are giving it a go so far.....it may all end in tears, but hoping we can keep going for the jugular and don't start freezing when we reach the KO rounds.


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 1:12 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Good thoughts from a man who knows a lot about weaknesses in teams 😉

Former Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger has highlighted Kyle Walker - deployed as one of three central defenders rather than in his usual right-back role by Gareth Southgate - as England's potential weakpoint at the World Cup.

“He’s not a real defender, and especially not a central defender," said the Frenchman in comments reported by the Telegraph.

"He can be subject to defensive mistakes, which he would not pay for when he plays as a right-back.”

But what I like more is it wasn't a tweet, I can't imagine Wenger actually tweeting along to the WC

Back to today? Who are you rooting for 😉 is it Australia

Hoping for France/Australia and Croatia/Iceland to be the happy teams this evening


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 1:31 pm
Posts: 4111
Free Member
 

Good God...could never root for the Aussies, their cricketers have seen to that!

iceland have to beat Croatia whilst Nigeria lose to Peru, so can’t see that happening.


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 2:51 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

That’ll be Robby Savage BB. Do you not listen to 606 on Five Live where people phone in to ‘discuss’ the weekends football?

Its absolute comedy gold!

Can’t say I do. Though listening to some phone-in’s they have does make me cry a little inside.


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 2:57 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

iceland have to beat Croatia whilst Nigeria lose to Peru, so can’t see that happening.

I'd give Nigeria more chance if they were playing Peru though 😉

Australia beating Peru and France winning is a good possibility, their footballers I have to say are what is good about sport in Aus, dedicated, in it till the end and never give up, plus you can't get bits of sandpaper that big


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 3:02 pm
Posts: 4155
Free Member
 

Iceland might have a chance today .....  as Croatia are to make 10 changes !! They can lose the game and still win the group (with, as it stands, a goal difference of 5 against nigeria 0)


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 3:25 pm
Posts: 4111
Free Member
 

I’d give Nigeria more chance if they were playing Peru though

Oops....dont know why I wrote that....I know its Nigeria V Argies tonight.  Should be a game!


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 3:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

When you tell your wife you are away at a work conference

https://twitter.com/toddy0011/status/1010965765829414913?s=12


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 3:49 pm
Posts: 5739
Full Member
 

So half times - Peru off the mark, France level with Denmark, as it stands, France would go through as group winners to play one of Iceland, Nigeria or Argentina.. Which would leave Denmark playing Croatia... If I was Denmark I would want to avoid them in the next round.

But if Croatia do make all the changes, will that kill their momentum...


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 5:00 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

france and denmark have the cigars out, the bbq will be rolled out soon and they'll crack a few beers


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 5:10 pm
Posts: 4111
Free Member
 

Musa was on fire in the match v Iceland, so will he send Messi and his mates home?


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 7:41 pm
Posts: 4111
Free Member
 

Two touches from Messi that were utterly flawless....then dispatched!  Pure quality!


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 8:17 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Don't think we can count Nigeria out of this yet, they look like they could turn it on too

edit.

and a much better ref for this game


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 8:18 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Iceland are having a very good go there too


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 8:48 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I do hope Iceland score/win.

Fair play, they’ve gone for it.


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 9:03 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Well Mascherano is having a bad day at the office, Iceland are getting stuck in too

and Calmest coolest penalty so far!!


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 9:09 pm
Posts: 57415
Full Member
 

Game on!


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 9:09 pm
Posts: 24869
Free Member
 

controversy awaits either way......

Right decision


 
Posted : 26/06/2018 9:35 pm
Page 15 / 46