Forum search & shortcuts

Since when is '...
 

[Closed] Since when is 'regular' a synonym of 'frequent'?

Posts: 10770
Full Member
 

This reminds me of the nervous flyer who asked the steward how often Boeings crashed.

"Just the once, Madam."


 
Posted : 04/08/2017 7:43 pm
Posts: 131
Full Member
 

Do you often have these discussions, or is it periodical?


 
Posted : 04/08/2017 9:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As somebody who cannot help but take things literally, I have had the OP's discussion several times and it irritates me greatly. edlong I fully agree with you. However, I am surprised you have not come across this before - ie regularly, frequently being used to mean frequently.


 
Posted : 04/08/2017 11:19 pm
Posts: 9010
Free Member
 

I was in my regular state of mind earlier - I frequently don't think straight.


 
Posted : 04/08/2017 11:25 pm
 sbob
Posts: 5581
Free Member
 

We do a thing at work. We do it once a[b] year[/b]. We do it the same time every[b] year[/b]. We've done it at that time every [b]year[/b] since we started doing it. We've not missed a [b]year[/b], and we've not done it at a different time of [b]year[/b].

Long rant just to let us all know that you failed to use the word "annually". 💡


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 12:18 am
Posts: 34060
Full Member
 

Do you often have these discussions, or is it periodical?

That should be 'periodically', a 'periodical' is a publication that appears at regular times.
pe·ri·od·i·cal (pîr??-?d??-k?l)
adj.
1. Periodic.
2.
a. Published at regular intervals of more than one day.
b. Of or relating to a publication issued at such intervals.
n.
A publication issued at regular intervals of more than one day.


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 1:13 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

CountZero - Member
mikewsmith » If I tell you to do something regularly how often would you do it?

This isn't pedantry, your demand has no specifics to comply with.


Exactly the point, the op has made an ambiguous statement and expected people to get what he means. Neither word is appropriate unless you know the exact specifics of the subject, hence it's a bad use of the terms.


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 7:08 am
 aP
Posts: 681
Free Member
 

Change your wording to 'regular periodic'.
Or alternatively to 'annual'.


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 7:25 am
Posts: 12888
Free Member
 

I suggest anyone who is confused stops googling misinformation and looks up the word in the OED. Yes, the book. 😀

OP is wrong as the word has more than one meaning, one of which is "recurring at short uniform intervals". (As is the pompous buffoon who doesn't like "regular fries" 🙂 - perfectly correct use of a word which has multiple meanings).

Thus the frequency of the regularity must be stated (or given context, as mentioned). This is why the word "annual" exists. It's not rocket surgery. 😆


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 8:07 am
Posts: 23674
Full Member
 

We do it the same time every year. We've done it at that time every year since we started doing it.

This is why the word "annual" exists.

If its happening the same time year every year then its presumably anchored to something in the calendar. You could remove all doubt about frequency by just saying

'On St Swithins Day'
'On the first Thursday in October'

I wonder if the 'event' that the OP and his colleague are discussing the frequency and regularlty of is the Office Christmas Party 🙂 That should certainly happen more regularly.


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 8:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The OP should get their colleagues to consider the relative effects of eating roughage and fruit with dysentery.

One keeps you 'regular', the other 'frequent'.

Scatological examples usually stick in people's minds.


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 9:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Good god, I can't believe I just read this thread right to the end 😆


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 9:03 am
Posts: 18085
Full Member
 

I thought these days regular means small.


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 11:21 am
Posts: 145
Free Member
 

Three cheers for BA!!


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 11:27 am
 sbob
Posts: 5581
Free Member
 

As is the pompous buffoon who doesn't like "regular fries" - perfectly correct use

If you're a septic.
Medium chips would be the British version.


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 12:13 pm
Posts: 44925
Full Member
 

dannyh - Member

The OP should get their colleagues to consider the relative effects of eating roughage and fruit with dysentery.

One keeps you 'regular', the other 'frequent'.

Scatological examples usually stick in people's minds.

very good. I like it


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 12:24 pm
 km79
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Medium chips would be the British version.
Medium chips doesn't exist, no one has ever order medium chips. You get a bag of chips or a big bag of chips.


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 12:25 pm
Posts: 12888
Free Member
 

If you're a septic.
Medium chips would be the British version.
wrong. Why do you think professional soldiers have been called "regulars" for hundreds of years? Do you really think it's because of their bowel movements? 🙂

If you don't have access to an OED, why don't you get one and educate yourself. 😆


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 12:31 pm
 sbob
Posts: 5581
Free Member
 

Medium chips doesn't exist, no one has ever order medium chips. You get a bag of chips or a big bag of chips.

Absolutely, hence my use of the word "would" rather than "is".

wrong. Why do you think professional soldiers have been called "regulars" for hundreds of years? Do you really think it's because of their bowel movements?

Do you think it's because they are medium in size?
(Strawmen do blow over easily old chap 😉 )

If you don't have access to an OED, why don't you get one and educate yourself.

I have access to many dictionaries, and the only ones that give examples of "your" usage do so using Americanisms, which was kinda my point. 😉


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 12:48 pm
Posts: 12888
Free Member
 

Bless. Hint: Wikipedia is not a dictionary 😆


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 12:54 pm
Posts: 5180
Free Member
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Zilog6128

OP is wrong as the word has more than one meaning, one of which is "recurring at short uniform intervals

Sorry zilog you are incorrect, the op is correct. Your quoted meaning here agrees with the OP.


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 1:01 pm
 sbob
Posts: 5581
Free Member
 

zilog6128 - Member

Bless. Hint: Wikipedia is not a dictionary

Didn't say it was, so that makes it two strawmen in a row.
Care to make it three, as you obviously have nothing of substance to counter?
Throwing lol smilies about and failing to condescend with words like "bless" does little for your argument, FYI. 😉

I'm going to wager it being half-term...


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 1:05 pm
Posts: 412
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 1:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[quote=mikewsmith ]Exactly the point, the op has made an ambiguous statement and expected people to get what he means. Neither word is appropriate unless you know the exact specifics of the subject, hence it's a bad use of the terms.

You appear to be making assumptions about the context in which the OP used the word, assumptions which aren't justified by anything he's written. Meanwhile his colleague is incorrectly insisting that he is wrong and that "regular" can't possibly mean anything other than "frequent" - are you defending his colleague?


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 2:14 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

The op has an annual event, he chose to call it regular and it's leading to confusion as people do the kind ow how often it occurs. Hardly assumption is it.


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 3:27 pm
Posts: 78716
Full Member
 

"everyone knows" that that's what you mean when you say something is done regularly.

The reader's illiteracy isn't the fault of the writer.


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 4:09 pm
Posts: 5180
Free Member
 

The reader's illiteracy isn't the fault of the writer.

Communication is a two way thing. Being aware that what you say might be misunderstood is quite an important life skill


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 4:18 pm
Posts: 78716
Full Member
 

Are you new here? (-:


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 4:23 pm
Posts: 78716
Full Member
 

More seriously,

I take your point, and you're right in that it's good practice to target your audience in the language you use. Using long words can add accuracy but can also make it more impenetrable to understand.

But some jackass saying "well, everyone knows that" as an excuse for misunderstand something after it's pointed out by the writer that it's been misunderstood, pff, that's their own lookout.

People misuse words all the time and "everyone knows" what they mean, it makes me literally incandescent with rage.


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 4:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The op has an annual event, he chose to call it regular

cite


 
Posted : 05/08/2017 6:59 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

We do a thing at work. We do it once a year. We do it the same time every year. We've done it at that time every year since we started doing it. We've not missed a year, and we've not done it at a different time of year.

So, I have described this thing we do as being done regularly.


that what you were after aracer.


 
Posted : 06/08/2017 1:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No, I don't believe it is!


 
Posted : 06/08/2017 1:21 am
Page 2 / 2