Forum menu
Both her and the lurker come across as complete tosspots. Made me count my blessings I didn't go into law.
This is 4 hours of her twitter feed. If she was looking to provoke a reaction she's succeeded.
[url= https://medium.com/@martinbelam/a-four-hour-window-into-the-storm-of-abuse-feminazi-lawyer-charlotte-proudman-faces-on-twitter-b654f5fa36ce ]https://medium.com/@martinbelam/a-four-hour-window-into-the-storm-of-abuse-feminazi-lawyer-charlotte-proudman-faces-on-twitter-b654f5fa36ce[/url]
WARNING: contains quite a lot of NSFW language.
This is 4 hours of her twitter feed.
I glanced over a short section of that. Just goes to show what absolute morons use Twitter.
A Roman centurion?
Probably just you, tbh.
I glanced over a short section of that. Just goes to show what absolute morons [s]use Twitter.[/s] exist.
FTFY.
Have to love the fact that a lady who feels so violated chooses to make such an effort with the LI photo - no really.
Yeah, she should've just posted a photo of herself in curlers or out on the lash. That always makes a good impression in legal circles.
All my staff have professional photos - they don't need the glammed up look. They consider THAT demeaning and unnecessary as they are professionals.
No justification for the comments from the partner - plain stupid. But the irony of the whole thing can't go unnoticed.
I have watched plenty of professional (?) service women use their looks to advance their work and then pull the discrimination card when things go pear shaped later. The whole thing is absurdly unbalanced.
All my staff have professional photos
Only today you were telling us, when asked if you had a degree in economics
Yes thanks and a 100% A*/A hit rate with tutees. Why?*
Its quite a busy and diverse working life you lead what with the teaching and employing all your staff and monitoring their linkedin.
I am glad you find time to post on here as that job sounds awfully strange not to mention busy.
Any analysis would show which gender has it toughest, out of interest have you ever seen a woman hit the glass ceiling or had a harder time due to gender? I am sure you treat your tutees and staff equally well but somewhere else in your working life? Surely you must have as it seems so diverse and extensive
* http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/living-wage-inflation/page/2#post-7166695
All my staff have professional photos - they don't need the glammed up look. They consider THAT demeaning and unnecessary as they are professionals.
+1
You can't find a single work related photo or bio of me anywhere. No linkedin, absent from company website, name kept off promotional and press stuff.
In an age when it seems the norm to prostitute yourself to anyone and everyone, apparently I'm being silly, but I get a strange satisfaction of being "ungoogleable" professionally. That said, I don't need to win any work, so can see why those who need to drum up clients would find it beneficial/necessary.
So she's ageist and he's sexist?
Shame really 'cos if they were French they could just bang and smoke, bang and smoke, write existentialist poetry, smoke, bang then lounge about looking bored with each other in a sultry fashion.
"PaPa"
[i]"Nicole"[/i]
"No PaPa"
[i]"Nicole"[/i]
"Meh. Ok"
Its quite a busy and diverse working life you lead what with the teaching and employing all your staff and monitoring their linkedin.
All that work must make him sweaty
they don't need the glammed up look
Are we talking about the same photo? It's mildly flattering sure, but it's not going to be on the cover of Vogue any time soon.
Are we talking about the same photo? It's mildly flattering sure, but it's not going to be on the cover of Vogue any time soon.
It's a woman trying to look good. Obviously she is asking for it, and deserves whatever she gets.
Its quite a busy and diverse working life you lead what with the teaching and employing all your staff and monitoring their linkedin.
True, but it's important to keep tabs on what's going on below stairs.
😀 How very true 😀
Some of-em are real tetchy don't you find usually their time of the month 😉
Can imagine there is much moral outrage and bants going on in the silly kids playground Twitter and Facebook. Well really who takes it seriously or gives a flying f$$k about these uppty, self-promoting, narcissistic, adult children and their by-proxy squabblings about nothing!
On Newsnignt tonight FWIW
Gonna record it incase she's looking 'hot' 😆
Oh my christ, I can't believe this is still dragging on! GO AWAY!
She came across as a goon.
Can't believe i'm the first to mention it but………... matt lucas in a blonde wig? 😕
If that's Mat Lucas then Greggs turnover (Apple?) is down, better all my shares.
Saw Newsnight and my sympathy for her vanished. The public humiliation of a person for being stupid is as wrong as their (allegedly) out dated comments.
Watched her do an interview on Newsnight last night - what a total pleb
Yep, he made a silly comment
She then chose to go on national TV and rant for 10 minutes about equality - with some very poorly planned arguments
Cringworthy at best 🙂
It would've been far more interesting if she'd been interviewed by a woman. None of us can really appreciate what sexism in the workplace is like for women. Which seemed to be the thing she had a bee in her precious little bonnet about.
It would've been far more interesting if she'd been interviewed by a woman
I think she was on C4 News as well being interviewed by Cathy Newman, who wrote an article that was critical of her reaction so it may have been more illuminating. The Newsnight interview was very soft and enabled her just to repeat vacuous slogans and her desire for a public apology - even though it was her that brought it into the public domain and she has already received a private one.
her desire for a public apology - even though it was her that brought it into the public domain and she has already received a private one
Wasn't it two? One from the silly man involved, one from his employer?
None of us can really appreciate what sexism in the workplace is like for women.
Try working in marketing 😆
*reported*


