Forum menu
Sexism on STW (a go...
 

[Closed] Sexism on STW (a goodbye and some thanks 🙂 )

Posts: 621
Free Member
 

Shame that people feel that they have to leave. But I still think this is one of the best behaved forums on the web. Especially given the volume of users.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:07 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've met some really nice people from STW. Some have had a real hard time in real life. I've also met (a minority) a few that seem to have social skills issues.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:08 pm
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

pathetic men flocking towards a woman's defense (especially when they are out of order)? is that not sexist? Hmmmm.... 😕

I wouldn't worry boys, there will be others along soon enough for you to pander to


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lol thanks for making me smile Flange


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TandemJeremy - Member
carbon337

~a classic example of the sort of post that people dislike.

I agree with TJ.

No, really.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Carbons post appears to have disappeared - does that mean he is banned 🙂

Edit - woppit 😯


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:10 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There was a hottie on one of the boggys Hebden Bridge rides. Am I allowed to say that? 🙂


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:10 pm
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

You might have a point - some of it is pretty horrid, but how do you cope in life outside of STW where simply withdrawing your participation isn't an option?

I don't really get involved with the sexism on here, it's a bit horrible at times. But often it's nothing more than banter and I have to say that it's a hundred times less coarse and less invasive than real life so I'd agree, I've no idea how you survive in the ouside world if STW gets you down. I don't mind a bit of objectification on either side so long as people remember there's a person and more to that person involved. Unfortunately some people take offence and assume that any sort of appreciation of appearance as assuming the person has no appreciation of any other part of the person.

Shame.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Furthermore, I am P1SSED OFF that emsz is leaving.

REALLY. 👿


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Don't let the, juvenile, buggers get you down. There's [s]plenty[/s] a few good people here. 😛

Emsz, going too? NOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

A few good people and getting less, maybe it's the right decision after all.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well said GW


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

GW makes a good point. If this had been one of the guys "signing off" we would have had multiple Flouncer-One-Niner posts already.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:17 pm
Posts: 17843
 

(i hope CG doesnt mind me bringing it up cos it always brings a smile to my face when i read CG's posts having met her several times in real life... knowing people in real life makes their forum contributions much more interesting personally)

but should CG saying jenson button is fit be just as frowned upon as a bloke saying they find a female celeb attractive? i know i've banged on about thinking natalie portman is stunning loadsa times but hopefully i've never overstepped the mark into 'backdoor' territory like some users.

Come now Phil - this can get taken two ways! I didn't start a thread saying that, it just got mentioned on a shaving thread and I didn't expand on it. Or ... perhaps you think an old girl shouldn't be thinking inappropriate thoughts? 😉


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:18 pm
Posts: 25941
Full Member
 

I don't get offended by anything on here. I find some posts funny and some shit but I honestly don't remember ever feeling that one was offensive. Trouble is I'm a white middle aged agnostic middle-class bloke (GSOH, own teeth (largely) 😉 ) with a dangerously mainstream sexuality and I struggle with other people's perspectives. After all, I don't get all cross about the tubby 45 yr old comments.

This whole place is not to be taken seriously IMO

... but, c'mon GW, a sensitive soul like you must be able to empathise with the girls ??


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

serious question:

am i allowed to talk about deadly, yeti and b'mitch in a sexual fashion?

i refer to most of my male friends in sexual terms or terms of endearment usually used when referring to a loved one, as they do to me. its reminds us we love each other but without looking deep into each others eyes and saying i love you suggesting a deep level not quite approprirate for the friendship :mrgreen:

i hope Sue and Emsz dont leave forever and they return promptly with a heavy 'report button' addiction 😀

EDIT - CG you know what i mean 😛 its more referring to the casual comments that are innocent and without malice, but could easily be taken the wrong way if one was feeling overly sensitive at the time. looking for a bit of clarification that its ok to say someone's attractive but not take it to the point of suggesting sexual things you'd do to them.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:20 pm
Posts: 17843
 

GW - i think you'll find that the girlies can stand up for themselves. Have even be known to fix a puncture too. 🙄


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm not totally sure how I feel about this, largely becuase I didn't see the thread, but some randomn thoughts that spring to mind are ....

It’s an internet forum. 90% of what is on here is not representative of the people behind the key boards that post it.

Try googling big hitters and click on images …. the first couple of lines should show you that what you see on here simply reflects society at large.

Whilst I do sympathise and will miss Sue and Emsz, I can’t wonder how female sufferage and race relations would have got on if Emily Pankhurst, Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela et al had taken the same attitude.

Truthfully, its much better to challenge these sort of behaviours than it is to walk away and ignore it, albeit I fully understand that it might not be everyone’s cup of tea to do that.

Credit to TJ who is one of the few that always does.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

In addition to the above guidelines we have a limited number of hard and fast rules that you should familiarise yourself with before posting on any of our forums.

* No posts of a sexual nature, including images of a sexual nature or intended to provoke a sexual response.
*
* No posts which, in the Moderators opinion, are likely to cause offence to either an individual, or group, whatever their gender, sexual inclination or ethnicity.
* No posts, including links to other sites that are deemed to be of a sexual or distasteful nature, incite racial or sexist behaviour or are in any way discriminatory and/or offensive towards individuals or minority groups.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hopefully one day TJ and ElfBoy will throw down an ultimatum


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:22 pm
Posts: 16210
Free Member
 

If you really can't see that "I'd bang her back doors in" is not acceptable banter, then there's no hope for you. You wouldn't talk like that in front of a female acquaintance in real life, so don't do it here.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mr Woppit - Member

thegman67 - Member
Cos she will stop taking it up the arse

"Because after years of rejection, I still haven't grown up enough to understand what the point of marriage is..."

Ladies (if there's any left) and gentlemen of the jury - my case.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:25 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Erm... blinkinek. Glad I was driving back from UooopNorth last night rather than on here.

T'is a broad Church this, I type in a broad Church, I read in a broad Church, I contribute to a broad Church.

Takes all sorts this broad Church.

Shame Sue and now emzs are off for a wander around, but once they've played off piste they'll be back I hope, seems a shame to miss out though.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You wouldn't talk like that in front of a female acquaintance in real life, so don't do it here.

And you know this how?


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:26 pm
Posts: 6480
Free Member
 

Credit to TJ who is one of the few that always does.

😆


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:26 pm
Posts: 16210
Free Member
 

And you know this how?

You could be right. Maybe these people are as offensive in real life as they are on here. But I doubt it.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:28 pm
Posts: 8757
Full Member
 

Shame some people are leaving if they find the forum useful for other reasons, personally I' think I'd choose to ignore the muppets here but not coming from any group that gets abuse that I'm aware of (although I do ride a road bike and don't own a SS...) that's probably easier said than done.

I'd happily see the banning of gratuitous image threads etc. to as I only read the forums at work in an open plan office so don't really want that plastered all over my monitor :p


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sue seems to be very fragile and intolerant, different strokes and all that


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sexism on STW? I think we should get the opinion of the female Mods.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

carbon337 - Member

oh well run along then, enjoy your break, dont hurry back.

Can we have some more Jessica Ennis threads now that these two have gone?

No 'cause I'm still here to pull you up on it. I'm not a girly-girl and rarely take offence, but am totally fed up with seeing mtbking ladies, and their input, disappear from forums because of idiots. If you want to be offensive, drool over women and generally behave like a caveman, then may I direct you to to google....I'm sure it wont take you long to find what you are looking for.

Leave the mountain bike forums as a welcoming place for all.

Sue and Emsz -sorry to hear you two are going, but, if you read this, I really think you should reconsider. Seriously, don't back down to the sexist idiots. Is it really better to walk away rather than stay somewhere where, overall, you are both respected and liked?


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:31 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

And you know this how?

Oh you're socially inept in real life as well as on the internet? That's a shame for you.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:31 pm
Posts: 57393
Full Member
 

Well joao3v16 - normally I don't rise to it. But this is my first full day as a non-smoker so quite frankly, anyone's fair game at the moment

My normal light, airy, freewheeling nature (think Bodyform ad) is a little lightly frayed

[url= http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/international/iran-better-not-f*ck-me-around-today%2c-warns-cigarette%11free-obama-201111024493/ ]An insight for you into my present mindset[/url]

Actually I stand by everything I said. He's a tool! Its that simple. I was merely pointing it out


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:32 pm
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

cinnamon_girl - Member

GW - i think you'll find that the girlies can stand up for themselves. Have even be known to fix a puncture too.

Aye, I'm well aware of the fact, it's not actually me you need to tell that to. HIDHTM

*hope I didn't help too much 😉


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Please don't go, we'll eat you up, we love you so, and Max said NO! 🙂


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

binners - Member

Well normally I don't rise to it. But this is my first full day as a non-smoker so quite frankly, anyone's fair game at the moment

I noticed

*Cringes away from the big scary man*


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:33 pm
Posts: 139
Free Member
 

I'm not defending sexism or anything else negative but a bit of perspective is needed - it is after all just a internet forum and shouldnt be take too seriously (and as forums go it is pretty genteel and well moderated - banter amongst friends in "real life" is much worse than the banter amongst posters on here!)


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:33 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

T'is a broad Church this, I type in a broad Church, I read in a broad Church, I contribute to a broad Church.

But that's the trouble.. all the broads are leaving the church.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:33 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

banter amongst friends in "real life" is much worse than the banter amongst posters on here!)

Aye but the thing lots of people seem to forget is they are not with their mates in the pub, they are broadcasting to everyone and anyone.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This place makes my arse laugh, you couldn't invent it.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 


Oh you're socially inept in real life as well as on the internet? That's a shame for you.

Wasn't me who said it, calm down treacle 😉


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I was just about to say the exact same thing Legspin, word for word 😆


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:37 pm
Posts: 0
 

Well I don't come on here so often any more (never posted that much in the first place tho) as I find it quite sexist (among other reasons).

Didn't see thread in question though I did see one where Sue got a VERY different response to asking if anyone fancied a beer than if a bloke had asked...

And I doubt Emmeline Pankhurst et al, if around today could be arsed with the likes of singletrackworld - as Sue says, she comes/came on here for fun - as she's not finding it fun any more she's leaving - who wants to have to come on a forum (which as you all validly say is just for fun, etc, etc) all the time and either put up with vile sexism or have to fight your corner by objecting to it all the time?


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:40 pm
Posts: 25941
Full Member
 

A laughing arse !

If only I could invent that, I'd be rich and famous for sure 🙁


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Re. tools such as carbon337: "not responding makes the accuser look pathetic"

I.e. rather than taking issue with their ignorant posts and starting an arguement, they'd probably give up pretty quickly if we all just ignored them and continued the thread as if they didn't exist.

Giving them any kind of attention just encourages them.

Like the annoying kid at school: ignore them and they'll eventually get bored and leave of their own accord.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:41 pm
 Del
Posts: 8278
Full Member
 

i'd have a lot more sympathy for the OP if she'd stated she'd repeatedly reported posts she found offensive to the mods, but that they'd rejected the complaint, particularly if these were of the KTBDI nature.
the button is there.
use it if you don't like what people are saying, or stand up for yourself, or ignore it, or go and do something less boring instead.
this thread is a bit 'look at me', IMO, i'm afraid. it's not like you're trying to chnage anything, otherwise you'd stick around to see if anything did change.
all the best.


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:41 pm
Posts: 12529
Full Member
 

Personally I find this kind of direct personal insult far more offensive than sexist comments ...

Oh come on, he was actively fishing for it!


 
Posted : 03/11/2011 4:42 pm
Page 3 / 14