Forum menu
Rugby World Cup Thr...
 

[Closed] Rugby World Cup Thread 2019

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I want to see Japan gain parity with tier one teams but why is it always at scotlands expense!

Because Scotland aren't very good. If they consistently beat the top teams, there wouldn't be a problem.


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 2:38 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50615
 

Looks like I missed a good game.


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 2:43 pm
Posts: 1361
Free Member
 

Japan are such a fun team to watch, really enjoyed their games this tournament. If i was wearing the saltire i'd be a bit nervous right now*
Bit workmanlike from England at times, but Argentina are a solid team and turned it into a niggly game.

*Edit: Still not as embarrassing as Eng going out in 2015


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 2:44 pm
Posts: 2591
Free Member
 

As much as you would like to see us out, it doesn’t change a thing. We will get the bonus against Russia then need to beat them by more than 7.

Well it does change things. It means you have to do more than simply beat Japan to qualify.

Based on how we each played against Samoa Ireland , I am significantly more less confident than I was 2 hours weeks ago


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 2:49 pm
Posts: 44814
Full Member
 

Hools - we have actually beaten top teams in recent years more than many teams ranked above us. Its just that is often followed with a rubbish defeat.


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 2:52 pm
Posts: 1361
Free Member
 

It is the inconsistency that's the frustration with Scotland, i enjoy watching them much more than Wales or Ireland, you just never know who's going to turn up.


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 3:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hools – we have actually beaten top teams in recent years more than many teams ranked above us. Its just that is often followed with a rubbish defeat.

That is somewhat misleading, as New Zealand have not beaten a team ranked above them for years.

The Japan v Scotland game is hard to call, especially as Scotland need to field a team strong enough to be confident of beating Russia with a bonus point, but be ready to play Japan 4 days later.

I am getting increasingly anxious about the Wales v Fiji game and it’s not until Wednesday.


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 3:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

New Zealand have not beaten a team ranked above them for years.

Yes, but New Zealand have a consistent strategy (that Japan seem to have cottoned on to recently) of having more points at the end of the game than the opposition. Seems to make all the difference when rankings are calculated.


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 3:26 pm
Posts: 7766
Full Member
 

Yawn; paraphrase/selectively post away nmbuzz. None of the Scottish supporters posting on here have said we just had to beat them, we all assumed a Japanese’s bonus against Samoa, so as hard as it it to comprehend, nothing has changed from last week and we need to stop them getting a bonus. Overconfidence in our own superiority isn’t a Scottish trait amongst the six nations, certain other countries do it much better. Often closely followed by press releases asking for clarity about Welsh scrummaging technique/ complaints about captains decision making etc.


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 3:39 pm
Posts: 44814
Full Member
 

🙂

Scotlad have this weird stat (IIRC) where over the last 3 years we have beaten every team ranked above us bar NZ and been beaten by them as well - sometimes very badly!


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 3:40 pm
Posts: 44814
Full Member
 

If we cannot beat Japan without conceding a bonus point we do not serve to go thru. Its as simple as that. The spineless display against ireland sets the tone. I doubt any Scots fans would begrudge japan going thru

Japan are now above Scotland in the rankings - and deservedly so. We can change that. Our destiny is in our hands


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 3:42 pm
Posts: 2591
Free Member
 

Hey Duckman, you're right. Nothing has changed from the presupposed view that Japan would get the bonus point against Samoa and go into the Scotland game on 14pts.

However, the 85th minute bonus point did change things for me as I got to make fun of all my Scottish friends!


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 3:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Scotlad have this weird stat (IIRC) where over the last 3 years we have beaten every team ranked above us bar NZ

When was the last time Scotland beat South Africa?


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 4:08 pm
Posts: 44814
Full Member
 

yer right - I shouldn't rely on memory or quoting other fans! Doh!


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 4:30 pm
Posts: 1083
Full Member
 

It is the inconsistency that’s the frustration with Scotland, i enjoy watching them much more than Wales or Ireland, you just never know who’s going to turn up.

Allez l’ecosse


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 5:27 pm
Posts: 6991
Full Member
 

FFS, squint put-ins are ignored for two years and this is the moment he decides to take issue with it?

****.


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 5:50 pm
Posts: 8416
Free Member
 

Going back to the ongoing high tackle controversy, the commentators were agreeing that it’s a good thing in the long term but will cause some upset in the short term while players make the necessary adjustments.
I agree but surely this should all have been carried out during the last four years of domestic competitions, not in the biggest tournament in rugby.

And the irony of the RWC is that Lavanini gets a red for a high tackle on Faz who should have had several cards for it over the last few years. 🙄


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 5:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I agree but surely this should all have been carried out during the last four years of domestic competitions, not in the biggest tournament in rugby.

I agree, it is becoming more and more tedious. I cannot see it winning over the hearts of those not already invested in the game.


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 6:01 pm
Posts: 44814
Full Member
 

There is no change to the laws or guidance around high tackles for the WC. Its been the way it is for several seasons

Bruce Wee - the squint put it. He actually stated no hook so feeding to the back of the scrum - not the same. He motioned both squint put in and no hook


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 6:46 pm
Posts: 2591
Free Member
 

The problem is that the current generation of players have been brought up to go for the big hits. Just because the way a law is refereed suddenly changes doesn't mean that the players will automatically be able to change their behaviour.

SBW is a case in point. One of the world's most adaptable athletes yet his basic instinct (from the NRL) to hit someone with a shoulder charge got him sent off (rightly) against the Lions.


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 7:04 pm
Posts: 44814
Full Member
 

in 3 years they should have been able to


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 7:11 pm
Posts: 8416
Free Member
 

There is no change to the laws or guidance around high tackles for the WC. Its been the way it is for several seasons

Yes, we all know that. There is, however, a difference in the way it’s being interpreted.


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 7:23 pm
Posts: 2591
Free Member
 

in 3 years they should have been able to

Really? 10-15yrs of doing something until it's instinctive isn't gonna just disappear.

The coming generations will learn but the current ones will get a lot of cards.

Farrell ducked slightly into the tackle and Lavanini is 6ft 7. It was an unfortunate collision and ruined the game completely. I didn't bother watching the 2nd half.

I still think replacing the red carded player after 10 minutes is the answer. Or you could have a two tier system of orange for the Lavanini type penalty with him replaced by another player after 10 and red for the Quill tackle on Farrell with him off permanently with no replacement.


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 7:59 pm
Posts: 44814
Full Member
 

There really is not idelejon - unless its been interpreted differently in England. this is exactly how the pro 14 has been doing it for years


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 11:17 pm
Posts: 44814
Full Member
 

namaste - think how the tackling the player in the air has changed in the same timespan - when did you last see a player being cartwheeled?


 
Posted : 05/10/2019 11:18 pm
Posts: 2591
Free Member
 

when did you last see a player being cartwheeled?

True but as you chase a kick there's a bit more time to consider what's about to happen.


 
Posted : 06/10/2019 12:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I still disagree with doing away with red cards. Take them away and where is the punishment for stuff like spear tackles which are bloody dangerous?

Players know the rules. Sod the spectacle when safety is jeopardised with things like the spear tackle the Italian props did.


 
Posted : 06/10/2019 8:10 am
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

Farrell ducked slightly into the tackle and Lavanini is 6ft 7. It was an unfortunate collision and ruined the game completely.

I think d’allaglio said it in the wrap up and I teach it to my kid - look at his eyes in the replay.  He isn’t looking at Farrells shorts, he’s looking at his face and that’s where he went.  I’m a generation before these players and I was always taught to aim for the shorts.  I appreciate players want to wrap up the ball but if your looking at someone s faces in a tackle situation that’s where you’re body will be going.

Have a look as well at Underhills tackle at 48 mins.  Perfect example - looks at the shorts, shoulder to hip area, slides down the legs.


 
Posted : 06/10/2019 9:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Never mind all this legal/illegal tackling, as a Leicester Tigers supporter I have seen the most amazing, rare and improbable thing.

Telusa Veanu has been spotted actually on a rugby pitch, actually playing rugby. I’m off to see if I can discover where dodos have been hiding all these years.


 
Posted : 06/10/2019 10:17 am
Posts: 8469
Full Member
 

France trying really hard to make topping pool C impossible.....


 
Posted : 06/10/2019 11:05 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lucky bounce of the ball here and there and now we have a more interesting game. To be fair it’s all been exciting. Worth watching if you’ve given it a miss so far.

France v Tonga


 
Posted : 06/10/2019 11:07 am
Posts: 7843
Full Member
 

Tongan 4 should be in the bin. Veanu went for a big smash in from the side when the 4 avoided yellow first time.


 
Posted : 06/10/2019 12:01 pm
Posts: 2591
Free Member
 

France are a shower of shite aren't they?

Another fine example of how one of the main uses of the TMO is to prevent tries being scored. In Penaud's non try, yes, there was a knock on from the high ball but the ref and linesman both saw it and didn't call it. Then, once the try has been scored they go all the way back to check it and disallow the try. If the try hadn't been scored they'd have played on.

Where's the fairness in that? There are any number of missed calls in games. It's part of the sport. So why only use the TMO to chalk off tries? Either use it to go back and check everything, all the time, or use it for the line/grounding/final phase passing decisions.

Scoring tries is the point of the game and the current use of the TMO negates that.


 
Posted : 06/10/2019 12:46 pm
Posts: 7843
Full Member
 

And yet there so much foul play being missed. As for the offside line it looking like it's now the centre of the set piece.


 
Posted : 06/10/2019 12:56 pm
Posts: 7843
Full Member
 

That's two levels of refereeing. France penalised at 76 minutes for 7 not rolling away although he's really trying a few minutes before the whole Tongan front row dropped round the Rick to block the ball and 18 block french 9 nothing from the ref.


 
Posted : 06/10/2019 1:06 pm
Posts: 8469
Full Member
 

So much talk of sweaty shirts and slippy balls. Why not sew on a patch of cotton/sticky stuff to the front of the shirt?


 
Posted : 06/10/2019 1:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

France are a shower of shite aren’t they?

It's just a trick they like to pull on other teams. They play like clowns until everyone thinks they're hopeless, then they turn around and play sublimely. As much as I like to see England lose, the thought of French people being happy is so nauseating I think I'll wish England good luck.


 
Posted : 06/10/2019 1:52 pm
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

So much talk of sweaty shirts and slippy balls. Why not sew on a patch of cotton/sticky stuff to the front of the shirt?

The shirt already have rubberised grip areas around pectoral and above hip areas. https://www.rugbydump.com/news/the-evolution-of-rugby-jerseys-over-the-years/


 
Posted : 06/10/2019 3:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

People are unimpressed with England, but France are making harder work of games than we are! When they bother, they look pretty good but they only bother for about 20mins of a game.


 
Posted : 06/10/2019 3:43 pm
Posts: 2591
Free Member
 

As much as I like to see England lose, the thought of French people being happy is so nauseating I think I’ll wish England good luck.

Geez!

I thought my anti- Farrell bile was bad. Your life sounds like Schadenfreude is your only source of joy.......


 
Posted : 06/10/2019 3:43 pm
Posts: 26891
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Wales: L Williams; North, Jonathan Davies, Parkes, Adams; Biggar, G Davies; Wyn Jones, Owens, Francis, Ball, Alun Wyn Jones (C), Navidi, James Davies, Moriarty.

Replacements: Carre, Dee, Lewis, Shingler, Wainwright, T Williams, Patchell, Watkin.

Fiji: Murimurivalu; Tuisova, Nayacalevu, Botia, Radradra; Volavola, Lomani; Ma'afu, S Matavesi, Saulo, Cavubati, Nakarawa, Waqaniburotu, Kunatani, Mata

Replacements: Dolokoto, Mawi, Ravai, Ratuniyarawa, Yato, Matawalu, Vatubua, J Matavesi

Still no back up locks!!


 
Posted : 07/10/2019 7:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fiji best Wales in 2007 right? That's not really pissible this time is it?


 
Posted : 07/10/2019 7:59 am
Posts: 2254
Full Member
 

Tipuric being rested or injured?


 
Posted : 07/10/2019 8:15 am
Posts: 26891
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Tipuric rested as is Wainwright. I guess Tips may be captain v Uruguay.


 
Posted : 07/10/2019 8:48 am
Posts: 26891
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Fiji best Wales in 2007 right? That’s not really pissible this time is it?

Anything is possible but I dont see a Gatwards coached team trying to take Fiji on at beach rugby again.


 
Posted : 07/10/2019 9:32 am
Page 26 / 58