Forum menu
LabMonkey - good man, i use a PT2.4 on OP. Have they sorted the Wireless on SRM yet? Principal reason for the PT over the SRM was the uncluttered simplicity, but i concede that the SRM is king... if you want to pay for one!
or to pump a greater volume of blood (increased stroke volume)
I've noticed my heart beating [b]harder[/b] sometimes, which I suppose means greater volume rather than faster
ro - I would take a hard look at the work of Tim Noakes - do you really believe in his 'central governor hypothesis'? He makes some interesting points in his work, and defends them strongly, but it is not accepted in all circles - even today in the Journal of Applied Physiology there is a point:counterpoint argument about this very issue.
I think the whole "not speaking to you" bit was your comment not mine, lines of communication are always open as far as I am concerned.
My comment was directed at TandemJeremy however but there was a lag!
i have to go to bed now. mommy says so. she may let me play on the computer tomorrow. will you still be my friends then? please?
MTT - We have a few SRM systems here (I work at a University) and if I am honest the SRM's in my office are not working. We have just wired ones for road and mountain bikes at present but we are waiting on some new wired units from Germany. What I use mainly, for 'training' and research is a Lode ergometer in the labs - they are the nuts (but 12k each)
Simon - 'harder' is a touch one to perceive, it does contract slightly more forcefully but also the valves are open for a fraction longer, allowing greater expulsion of blood per beat
sorry, labmonkey, but it's 10:50 here and i need my beauty sleep. just when i find someone interesting too 🙁
stick around, you seem interesting. educate the buggers while i'm sleeping, huh?