Forum menu
Refusal to take par...
 

[Closed] Refusal to take part in religious school trip = racial descrimination?

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

wrecker - Member 
I'd be apoplectic if I received a threat like that. There would be a very loud conversation with the head teacher.

...and ask her to have a stern word with whoever was responsible for such rubbish!!!!

I am all for trips to museums etc but I wonder what/how much multicutltural awareness will be taught by looking at artefacts. For the subject in hand, they must be more interesting options.....


 
Posted : 22/11/2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Daily Mail already have it

as do a few other papers which don't get "blocked" on here:
http://swns.com/news/schoolchildren-told-punished-racism-attend-religious-workshop-islam-40466/
http://www.expressandstar.com/education/2013/11/22/school-at-centre-of-religion-row/ especially loving the classic local paper "people looking grumpy" picture in that which also makes it into:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/10468353/School-children-as-young-as-8-told-they-would-be-labelled-racist-for-missing-school-trip.html


 
Posted : 22/11/2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 7125
Full Member
 

My wife is an RE teacher (as well as being amazing) and she doesn't believe they can do that.

Apparently parents can withdraw their children from RE entirely if they so wish.


 
Posted : 22/11/2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Annoys the hell out of me when schools try to shove religion down the throats of the pupils...

Although, obviously, they aren't doing that in this case.

It clearly says the children will not be taking part in any religious practices.

But don't mind that eh.


 
Posted : 22/11/2013 6:39 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Oh how I would love babybgoode to come home with a letter like that.

An interesting meeting with the head would follow and they had better have done their homework about under what legal framework they were going to try and tarnish BBG a racist (or me for that matter).

EDIT - From an educational point of view I would encourage BBG to go on such trips but if I got that particular letter I would withhold consent out of principle.

Quick question - as a parent do you not have the right to withdrawn your child from any school trip?

Cheers

Danny B


 
Posted : 22/11/2013 6:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ms Small was probably looking forward to sitting down with a slightly chilled Chatdonnay and then all hell breaks loose on the web!!!! I wonder if her beaming smile is as broad now? Leaving aside the silly note, I am starting to feel for her now.... 😉


 
Posted : 22/11/2013 6:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Read their latest Ofsted report.

Graded INADEQUATE in EVERY category.


 
Posted : 22/11/2013 6:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[quote=oldnpastit opined]My wife is an RE teacher (as well as being amazing) and she doesn't believe they can do that.

According to the news stories I've linked they can't - were forced to back down by the council. Interesting to note that the school has also been in special measures whilst she's been head - not really doing herself any favours with letters like that!


 
Posted : 22/11/2013 6:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

OMG is gets worse, it will be hemlock not Chardonnay now!!!!


 
Posted : 22/11/2013 6:43 pm
Posts: 341
Free Member
 

100 childrens parents also told to pay £5.00 for them to go, = £500 quid for 2 buses.

Somebodies obviously not very good at maths either.


 
Posted : 22/11/2013 6:48 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

And I completely missed the bit about requiring a GP's note to verify sickness.

Well I would happily bill her the £50 a GP would want for a sick note in such circumstances.

In fact, no I would not. If she would not believe me as a parent as to the health of my child I think I would argue a complete breakdown of trust and would remove my child from the school together.

That actually makes me more angry than the racial discrimination bit to be honest.

Great head they have there - maybe she should move on and head up the Coop bank or something...


 
Posted : 22/11/2013 6:52 pm
Posts: 341
Free Member
 

Next weeks headlines in the press,

Head teacher quits job, at failing school over lack of ability to write a non threatening leter to childrens parents and carers.

and appears on breakfast tv to tell her story, and becomes an immto keep them amusededite media sensation to people with little in their sad little lives.


 
Posted : 22/11/2013 7:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

...and ask her to have a stern word with whoever was responsible for such rubbish!!!!

So Ms Small isn't the head?


 
Posted : 22/11/2013 7:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's was a joke! Ok a poor one it turns out! 😉


 
Posted : 22/11/2013 7:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[quote=Simon_Semtex opined]Read their latest Ofsted report.
Graded INADEQUATE in EVERY category.

In fact it merely "Requires improvement" in the latest report


 
Posted : 22/11/2013 9:51 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Lol at people wanting to be excused from RE because you think religion is tosh. Just because you think it's tosh doesn't make it any less a part of the world about which you need to know.

It would be nice if we could pick and choose out schooling wouldn't it? Then we wouldn't have to have our views challenged ever! What a wonderful world that would be.


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 10:19 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I see thanks to the handy +Share I can now share this on [url= http://www.amenme.com/amenme/AmenMeChannel.aspx ]AmenMe[/url].

My joy is complete.


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 10:30 am
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

So you don't have to do RE if you're racist? Is this a bnp manifesto promise?


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 10:32 am
Posts: 7100
Free Member
 

It's political correctness gawn mad, I tells ya.


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 10:33 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

It would be nice if we could pick and choose out schooling wouldn't it?

Well you can pick for your child to go to a religious school but you cannot pick for them to go to a non religious school free from RE. Yes it would be nice if we had the same choices as them. it would not be fair for me to insist on atheism classes in their schools which is what they do to us all irrespective of our choices. they have choices we dont. How is that fair? only one side picks and chooses and they do it for us all.
Then we wouldn't have to have our views challenged ever!

I await the invite to their places of worship to do just this - they and you would support this I assume and it will be enshrined in law as well obviously

Molly you are the most religious atheist in the world

I dont mind having views challenged I mind having to do it every week funded by the state and being branded racist if i decline the invite.


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 10:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This seems appropriate:

[url=

now[/url]


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 11:01 am
Posts: 10337
Full Member
 

and being branded racist if i decline the invite.

I think that bit only applies in one particular niche school? Nicely slipped in there


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 11:02 am
Posts: 17293
Full Member
 

What does religion have to do with race?


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 11:15 am
Posts: 9232
Full Member
 


DenDennis - Member
I think its actually quite clever isn't it?
the real religious bigots, of whatever persuasion, close minded and those who refuse to tolerate / integrate with others would be the ones exposed....

No, not really.

Why woud anyone not want their kid to do this if not for racist reasons?
Because i am not religious and as far as I am aware not liking the beliefs of the religious nor wiahing to have my kids exposed to it does not make me a racist.

Bang on.

MORE IMPORTANTLY it is NOT a statutory requirement to attend RE but it is a statutory requirement for schools to deliver it so it is also factually incorrect

Bang on again.

In England and Wales Parents have the statutory right under Section 71 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 to withdraw their children from RE lessons and acts of Collective Worship at all maintained schools, including faith schools. Parents are not obliged to give a reason for requesting withdrawal.

Right on brother.

The parental right to withdraw a child should be freely exercisable and the school must give effect to any such request.
To assume everyone who does it is a racist is a massive non sequitor and I thought the point of RE was to teach tolerance - apparently this is not extended to those of no faith as I assume they are not part of the local community
I will be surprised if this is real tbh

I agree with this too.

Wonders will never cease - I agree with Junky on a thread regarding religion!

I wouldn't have a problem with my children going on this trip - but how on earth people would see refusal as inherently racist is beyond me...


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 11:15 am
Posts: 4130
Free Member
 

Just send the kid - your fault for having them!


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 11:17 am
Posts: 4315
Free Member
 

@ dannybgoode

In fact, no I would not. If she would not believe me as a parent as to the health of my child I think I would argue a complete breakdown of trust and would remove my child from the school together.

So schools should believe every parent on face value when a child is absent? 😯

You might be honest and send your child in unless they are really poorly, but many give in to slight sniffles etc. which is not an authorised absence. The key is honest and open communication between schools and parents.


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 11:19 am
Posts: 174
Full Member
 

Political Correctness gone mad 👿

How can refusal to send your child on a Religious trip be classed as Racial Discrimination? Race & Religion are 2 separate things.

Why should the child have a Racial Discrimination note made on their school records, when it is the parents choice.

Who in their right mind would employee someone who sends official letters on behalf of their organisation out to parents in Comic Sans.

So much for freedom of choice! 🙄


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 11:26 am
Posts: 9232
Full Member
 

The key is honest and open communication between schools and parents.

The key is respect and treating each other as adult equals...


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 11:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm starting to wonder if one of my favourite argumentative tandem riders is back on the forum..?

That is a very weird and inflammatory letter though..
The religion activity sounds pukka, but that threat is a bit nuts to say the least.. I suppose we can guess [i]fairly[/i] accurately at the intent behind it, but really!!?
However, I'm from a town that is only economically viable due to a very large teacher training college, and I see very few children come out of there that aren't completely divorced from reality, so it doesn't really surprise me either..


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 11:42 am
Posts: 9232
Full Member
 

Well I'm not him - I always wear a helmet!


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 11:44 am
Posts: 4315
Free Member
 

The key is respect and treating each other as adult equals...

Absolutely. Unfortunately parents do lie sometimes to schools (unsurprisingly).


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 11:50 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

as indeed has the school in this case as there is no statutory duty to attend the statutory duty is for schools to deliver RE

It would be a poor world if the default was to assume the school or the parent was lying just because some do.

I don think they can demand a Dr note either tbh


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 2:41 pm
Posts: 4315
Free Member
 

Don't get me wrong - this letter is totally out of order. However I didn't imply the default position was to assume either party is lying.

Schools can request medical evidence to help code absence appropriately, but this can take many forms and this letter is not the way to do it!


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 2:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How do we know that letter to be real?

Seems like a docted one to stir up the kind of reaction it has on here IMO. 🙄


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 3:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How do we know you are real?


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 3:39 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

How do we know that letter to be real?

given the storm going on I would assume a press release would have gone out from the school and the LEA by now pointing out it was fake
Seems like a docted one to stir up the kind of reaction it has on here

I really value the opinion of someone who chooses where to shop based on the skin colour of the shop owner - to be fair you said indigenous iirc then fled to your cave to avoid further debate- have you any evidence to support your claim its a fake?

thought not

Bye


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Best thing to do would be to thwart the school by teaching your children to be uber-racists yourself.


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 3:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is there any way to tell if you are Eel..?

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 3:54 pm
 joat
Posts: 1450
Full Member
 

News just in; it appears they have realised what a stupid thing they have done and have told parents to ignore the "inaccuracies" in the original letter. It's on the BBC website, sorry can't link as I'm incompetent with my mobile.


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 4:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 joat
Posts: 1450
Full Member
 

No, new news.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-stoke-staffordshire-25066688.


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 5:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This letter was not sent out in error, as the head would have read it and been happy for her signature to be there, so this is just a bit of back tracking when they have realised that they have pushed the racial boat just a bit too far.

I am not sure whether I would have let my children go on such a visit in the first place, but then I would have looked at what sort of visit and religions were to be looked at before making my decision as to whether to allow or not. And before someone shouts racist, I am far from it, as I am agnostic and have seen/ experienced many faiths, and there are those that I would not wish my children to experience. That does not make me a racist, just a caring parent, as I have seen Islam at its best and worst out in the middle east.

I would certainly have taken the school to task over the letter had I received one such, and would certainly seek to have the head disciplined over a threatened abuse of power. Imagine threatening to leave something against a child's name to carry all the way through school because of the action of a parent. Such nonsense leaves the school and authority wide open to litigation and shows the head teacher to be truly irresponsible.

Imagine the other side of the coin, where there was a strict Islamic family (only using this as an example, I have nothing against Islam but think on this, the prophet Mohammed married a 6 year old then consomethinged at 9, so be carful what you want your children to learn), back to the family, and a school was going to take children on a visit to a number of churches both Catholic and Protestant. Do you think for one second if the Islamic family removed their child from such a visit there would be a letter such as this? I think not. If such a thing happened, the head teacher would be removed from their position, so why is it ok the other way round?


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 6:24 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

I [s]have nothing against Islam [/s] am not a racist but

FTFY

Rolls eyes that folk still do this
This has nothing to do with any religious group or people it was a school what done it

to turn it into islamphobia - whilst insisting you are not says more about you than Islam

PS thanks for joining just to post that - a banned member trolling or a current one to scared to say this openly?
I will take your denial as a given


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 6:29 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

it would not be fair for me to insist on atheism classes in their schools which is what they do to us all irrespective of our choices

What a bizarre thing to say. You study things that are part of the world. RE in no way promotes religion, in the same way that doing WWII in history promotes fascism or studying the empire promotes imperialism.

And you can't study atheism either. That would be like studying history of a tine when nothing happened and there was no-one around. You don't half come out with some bollocks at times JY 🙂


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 6:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Final point of note, I used the term not a racist as its what had been banded around in the discussion, the correct term is I am not a bigot. But I was also correct in the former as the colour of someone's skin does not bother me in the slightest, nor their personal beliefs.


 
Posted : 23/11/2013 6:57 pm
Page 2 / 3