Forum menu
Please explain
 

[Closed] Please explain

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I was under the impression that inhabitants of many developing nations have amazingly strong immune systems thanks to poor sanitation, and as a result never get ill?

Presumably this is better than constantly being ill because everything is too clean?


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

...and how on earth do you people cope with oral sex?

just fine (when the opportunity arises), but the major difference is with OS i do have a say as to who's legs I shove my face inbetween.

Not as much of a say as I'd like or I'd be locked in a hotel room with Rachel Weisz right now, not conversing with you unhygenic poo-handed people ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 1:49 pm
Posts: 16208
Free Member
 

I was under the impression that inhabitants of many developing nations have amazingly strong immune systems thanks to poor sanitation, and as a result never get ill?

Your impression is mistaken. Diarrhoea kills over 2 million people a year, most of them in poor countries.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 1:50 pm
Posts: 4041
Full Member
 

Nope, that's just silly.
Isn't it just.

Incidentally I never said I don't wash my hands after a poo.

You think there's no splashback from cubicle toilets? Do you wash your hands after using a urinal?
Do you wash your trousers after using a urinal? If not then what's the point in washing your hands? You might touch something that has touched something that has been wee'd on.

I agree that there is a need for cleanliness, but personally I don't see the point in washing my hands every time I have a wee for various reasons. As for arguments, all you're really saying is that if I wash my hands I might not spread germs? I'm saying I might (or might not since I'm quite a clean person anyway) spread germs but we can't avoid germs so why worry too much? I'm not going to smear poo on your sandwiches if that's what really worries you.

As I said earlier, I saw someone pick his nose in the office but he didn't go and wash his hands. And somebody else just sneezed, should I escort them to the toilets for a wash?

Everything in moderation, live and let live, etc etc.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 1:52 pm
Posts: 16208
Free Member
 

Do you wash your trousers after using a urinal?

Let me repeat the bit you missed out:

If all you can come up with is "but you don't do inconvenient and time-consuming things to prevent spreading germs" you really don't have much of an argument.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 1:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've always thought it rather bizarre that people wash their hands after peeing. I know exactly where my pride and joy has been (very fussy about where I stick that), and I can pee without hitting myself, whereas my hands are covered in germs from gods knows where...makes sense to wash hands before touching trouser snake. And of course in the normal course of events urine is sterile.

Faecal matter on door handles and taps however is a concern.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 1:56 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

I was under the impression that inhabitants of many developing nations have amazingly strong immune systems thanks to poor sanitation, and as a result never get ill?

๐Ÿ˜ฏ

You should probably alert the World Health Organisation to your findings.
Because they currently claim:

About 2 million people die every year due to diarrhoeal diseases, most of them are children less than 5 years of age. The most affected are the populations in developing countries, living in extreme conditions of poverty, normally peri-urban dwellers or rural inhabitants.

Among the main problems which are responsible for this situation are: lack of priority given to the sector, lack of financial resources, lack of sustainability of water supply and sanitation services, [b]poor hygiene behaviours, and inadequate sanitation in public places[/b] including hospitals, health centres and schools.

-- http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/hygiene/en/

But what would they know eh? ๐Ÿ™„


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 1:56 pm
Posts: 4041
Full Member
 

How many billions of people died of dysentery and other nasty infections before we mastered basic hygiene?
No offence Graham but people always roll out this nonsense too. It's so far out of context as to be pointless - we're talking about somebody not washing their hands after going to the toilet, not a return to pre-historic times or suddenly commuting to a third world country.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 1:57 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Do those who never get pee on their own hands not give Mr Johnson a little shake at the end of the performance? Surely that leads to the dreaded "wet penny"?

Or do you purposely shake onto your trousers and avoid your hands?


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 1:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Your impression is mistaken. Diarrhoea kills over 2 million people a year, most of them in poor countries

I was being sarcastic ๐Ÿ™‚ Trying to highlight how bleeding obvious it is that poor sanitation = poor health.

I agree that there is a need for cleanliness, but personally I don't see the point in washing my hands every time I have a wee for various reasons.

Fair enough, I was talking specifically about poo. I genuinely do find it odd that people will spend 5 mins doing a poo and then won't bother to spend 20 seconds washing their hands, literally walking past the sinks on the way out. It really couldn't be easier and you've nothing to lose (other than 20 seconds I suppose).

As I said earlier, I saw someone pick his nose in the office but he didn't go and wash his hands. And somebody else just sneezed, should I escort them to the toilets for a wash?

Everything in moderation, live and let live, etc etc.

I'm not fussed if people sneeze on me (other than for reasons of them being impolite), but if someone wiped poo on me I'd probably be a bit upset. For that reason, I'm probably subconciously putting poo into a different category from bogies and sneezing. I used to eat my bogies as a kid, I don't think I ever ate my own crap. I suspect our bumholes are far away from our mouths for a reason ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 1:59 pm
Posts: 16208
Free Member
 

It's so far out of context as to be pointless - we're talking about somebody not washing their hands after going to the toilet, not a return to pre-historic times or suddenly commuting to a third world country.

These "third world countries": would they be the ones where people die because of "poor hygiene behaviours"?


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:00 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

we're talking about somebody not washing their hands after going to the toilet, not a return to pre-historic times

Are we? Cos I thought crikey's bit about living in caves and trees was referring to pre-historic times.

I realise now he could also have meant Wales.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I realise now he could also have meant South Wales.
๐Ÿ™„


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:02 pm
Posts: 16208
Free Member
 

I was being sarcastic Trying to highlight how bleeding obvious it is that poor sanitation = poor health.

Sorry: it's not all that obvious to some other members of this forum, it would seem.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:05 pm
Posts: 4041
Full Member
 

I used to eat my bogies as a kid, I don't think I ever ate my own crap. I suspect our bumholes are far away from our mouths for a reason
That's why we have hands and fingers! Did you never have a dream where your arse was itching uncontrollably, and then wake up with a dirty finger and a nutty taste in your mouth?

No? Nobody? OK, just me then.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sorry: it's not all that obvious to some other members of this forum, it would seem.

They know best though, they are STW specialists in hygiene ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:12 pm
Posts: 4041
Full Member
 

These "third world countries": would they be the ones where people die because of "poor hygiene behaviours"?
Sigh, yes they would. However if you were to ask someone in one of these third world countries if they were more worried about the open sewer running past their front door (tent) or me having a bit of wee on my trousers I'm pretty sure I know what the answer would be.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That's why we have hands and fingers! Did you never have a dream where your arse was itching uncontrollably, and then wake up with a dirty finger and a nutty taste in your mouth?

No? Nobody? OK, just me then.

ha ha ๐Ÿ™‚

To be fair, on reflection, i'm happy to lick an attractive girl's bum. But then again, attractive girls don't poo (as has been scientifically proven many times) ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I was reading another forum recently and this guy was getting all het up about Teh Muslims at his work, saying them using water to clean was disgusting, unlike him using paper. It then degenerated into a discussion of whether rinsing (water) or wiping (paper) was Better for removing an oleaginous substance like poo. This went on for several pages until the guy outed himself as having hung around in the work bogs and staring under the doors to audit how many people were using paper and how many used water. lol!


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:19 pm
 emsz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm trying to eat my lunch, can we just agree to wash our hands?

Thanks

Oh, and we all taste of the very finest vanilla FACT 8)


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:21 pm
Posts: 4041
Full Member
 

How does that work then in a 'normal' UK toilet? Do you use the water from the bowl, take a cup or flask of water, what?


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I use a plant sprayer, tonyd. The same 12 litre one I use to clean my bikes


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:22 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Camelbak?


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:23 pm
Posts: 4041
Full Member
 

and Muc Off?


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Supersoaker with some fenwicks?


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:28 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Surely any decent toilet has bum cleaning built-in?

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:35 pm
Posts: 16208
Free Member
 

Sigh, yes they would. However if you were to ask someone in one of these third world countries if they were more worried about the open sewer running past their front door (tent) or me having a bit of wee on my trousers I'm pretty sure I know what the answer would be.

I see you're still peddling the same argument. Let's try again:

If all you can come up with is "but you don't do inconvenient and time-consuming things to prevent spreading germs" you really don't have much of an argument.

Simple version: it's difficult to divert an open sewer. It's easy to wash your hands.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Awesome device. Why are there two settings to clean breasts?


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm not being facetious

Faeces-ist!


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 2:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

my willy is clean, i mean i would expect a girl to put it in her mouth. for those who think you should wash your hands every time you touch your willy, i suggest you should probably wash your willy more often.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 3:06 pm
Posts: 4041
Full Member
 

I see you're still peddling the same argument
I thought that was an entirely different argument to "I don't do inconvenient and time-consuming things to prevent spreading germs".

Simple version: it's difficult to divert an open sewer. It's easy to wash your hands
Not if you don't have clean water and live next to an open sewer.

What's your point exactly, or are you just arguing for arguments sake? Cutting and pasting the same sentence isn't much of an argument in itself, and it's certainly not going to persuade me to wash my hands next time I have a wee. I might also point out that the sentence you keep quoting back to me ("I don't do inconvenient and time-consuming things to prevent spreading germs") is your original interpretation of my posts - there are several reasons I don't wash my hands.

If you choose to interpret everything I say as "I don't do inconvenient and time-consuming things to prevent spreading germs" then one of us lacks the imagination and intellect to present a decent argument, whichever of us it is there's not much point continuing.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 3:07 pm
Posts: 16208
Free Member
 

I thought that was an entirely different argument to "I don't do inconvenient and time-consuming things to prevent spreading germs".

If you'd really thought about it, you'd see that it's precisely the same argument.

Not if you don't have clean water and live next to an open sewer.

I have clean water and don't live next to an open sewer. I also wash my hands. Because it's quick and easy, and may be useful in preventing the unnecessary spread of germs.

there are several reasons I don't wash my hands.

Other than being lazy and unhygienic? What are those reasons?


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 3:16 pm
Posts: 4041
Full Member
 

If you'd really thought about it, you'd see that it's precisely the same argument
I'd suggest that perhaps you are reading too much into things here and seeing exactly what you want to see. ie one argument consisting of the phrase "I don't do inconvenient and time-consuming things to prevent spreading germs" which you yourself came out with.

Other than being lazy and unhygienic? What are those reasons?
Since you haven't bothered to read any of my posts I'll not go through them all, however this:

If I did I suspect I'd probably have no skin left on my hands
was the very next sentence in my first post, right after where you presumably read "I don't do inconvenient and time-consuming things to prevent spreading germs"

Assuming I'm lazy and unhygienic because I don't conform with your ideals doesn't make it so, and it certainly doesn't help the rest of your argument by making that statement.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 16208
Free Member
 

I'd suggest that perhaps you are reading too much into things here and seeing exactly what you want to see. ie one argument consisting of the phrase "I don't do inconvenient and time-consuming things to prevent spreading germs" which you yourself came out with.

Yes, that was in response to you asking why I don't put on new clothes after I'd been to the toilet. See [url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum ]Reductio Ad Absurdum[/url]

If I did I suspect I'd probably have no skin left on my hands

In my part of England, the taps dispense water rather than hydrochloric acid.

Assuming I'm lazy and unhygienic because I don't conform with your ideals doesn't make it so,

Washing hands is quick, easy, and helps to prevent the spread of germs. If the best you can come up with is "tap water dissolves my skin" it suggests that you have no justification other than that you can't be bothered.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 3:41 pm
Posts: 4041
Full Member
 

Not washing hands is quicker and easier than washing them. If I'm not worried about the odd germ why would I bother?

Does it offend you that much that I don't mind the odd germ? It doesn't offend me in the slightest that you seem to abhor them.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 3:49 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

As a nurse I have to wash my hands more thoroughly and I suspect far more often than most lay-persons would during the average day and yet my hands have, as yet, failed to dissolve into mushy stumps.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 3:53 pm
Posts: 4041
Full Member
 

Great news! I just went for a wee and then I washed my hands. Hopefully all you nutters out there will be able to sleep tonight now!


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 4:00 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

I can't believe there are grown men who still need to be told to wash their hands after going to the loo.

I've often wondered who those "Now Wash Your Hands" signs in bogs are for. Now I know. It's for Tony-"Fishfinger"-D. ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 4:07 pm
Posts: 16208
Free Member
 

Not washing hands is quicker and easier than washing them. If I'm not worried about the odd germ why would I bother?

Not washing hands is quicker and easier than complaining on here. Why do you bother?

Does it offend you that much that I don't mind the odd germ? It doesn't offend me in the slightest that you seem to abhor them.

I couldn't care less. I just think it's a pity that you're too lazy to do something quick and easy to prevent the spread of germs.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 4:11 pm
Posts: 13291
Free Member
 

* makes list of people to avoid shaking hands with *

but on a more serious note.... golden shower anyone?

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 6:27 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

but on a more serious note.... golden shower anyone?

I've heard it is also called 'champagne' and is often served alongside 'caviar' in specialist German nature films.

Hope you aren't reading this whilst eating your dinner.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 6:57 pm
Posts: 1383
Free Member
 

I wash my hands cos that's the hygienic thing to do, but also because it's a good opportunity to get rid of the bacteria from them that all you horrible dirty non washers are leaving everywhere.


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 7:23 pm
Posts: 3874
Full Member
 

Neglect. It's not about choosing not to wash, it's about neglect, both of your own hygiene, and by contact transfer mine. Go and wallow in your own filth for my money, but don't spread it all over my world. ๐Ÿ˜ก


 
Posted : 21/05/2012 7:40 pm
Page 2 / 2