Not really look at what Obama is getting away with over sea's, do you think all of the drone strike and other shit would have been socially acceptable under Bush?
Obama can get away with a lot more shit than any white president ever would have, he got the Nobel prize before he had even done anything?
It's obvious that Obama is very well connected, his rise to power has been meteoric!
kaesae - Member
Hahahaha, this guy is unelectable without the media BS!
Why exactly was he running for president?
Because they knew he had no chance of beating Obama. Their [b]real[/b] candidate will be at the next election where Obama cannot stand.
Two points.
1) that money spent doesn't disappear. It goes to TV stations, who employ people who get paid, it goes to local print shops and truck drivers and whatnot.
2) If you don't spend it then someone else will, and you'll lose. That's why tight controls on political advertising (like we have here) are so important. We get plenty of coverage of the actual debates in the commons and moderated discussions on news programmes etc - we don't need totally unmoderated spin being blasted into our homes constantly.
That Moron and the other one OBAMA spent $2 billion on media crap when there are entire tent cities of people and we're heading into a winter.
Not quite true. Combined they spent 1.6B and 400 million dollars IS quite a lot but most of that (all but 200M or so) is raised funds so not government or party supplied. Not sure that the people who donated 1.4B dollars would have donated that sum to helping their fellow citizens or their country out of trouble.
That said, it works out at $5.14 per person in the US. For the UK the number is closer to $1 per person. If the US was to ban PACs and SuperPACs from also raising and spending funds, they'd be down to approx $1 as well.
Mormon, mormoff.
Because they knew he had no chance of beating Obama. Their real candidate will be at the next election where Obama cannot stand.
This is kind of the feeling I got too.The Republicans can't be [i]that[/i] stupid. Be interesting to see who is lurking in the shadows...
Is there a republican version of Boris? Seriously I think the govenor of New Jersey is being lined up for '16.
When it comes spaffing money on election campaigns, you have to look to Europe I'm afraid. the Americans have got nowt on the Italians
Say what you like about the filthy old goat Berlisconi, but his party funding wheeze was the work of utter corrupt genius
1. As you approach an election, make all political parties state funded, with massive funds available
2. Spend all your now state-supplied funds to advertise in the media. All of which you own.
3. Give yourself a load of free advertising too
4. Watch all your opposition try to counter your advertising blitz by spanking their now state-supplied funds to advertise in the media. All of which you own.
5. Win election
6. Sit back and count all the millions of taxpayers money you've just funneled into your bank accounts
7. Invite a houseful of underage hookers round to celebrate
This is how the US banking system collapsed
Great to see you bak with more research Kaesae.
Now, where did you get those frames from?
Obama is doing everything the money men want.
Romney has said publicly, and repeatedly, that the trouble with the economy is that American Banks and Corporations are massively over-regulated, and need freeing up from these constraints.
Exactly the same conclusion that any well-rounded, sane and rational person would have come too after the events of the last 5 years or so. Lehman Bros? Enron? AIG? Goldman Sachs? To name but a few. All obviously the victims of massive state interference, clearly.
Can you find me the bit where Obama said anything like that?
kaesae - Member
Not really look at what Obama is getting away with over sea's, do you think all of the drone strike and other shit would have been socially acceptable under Bush?
He only invaded 2 countries in his first term.
[quote=Coyote ] Be interesting to see who is lurking in the shadows...
[img] 
[/img]
binners - Member
All obviously the victims of massive state interference, clearly.
Thank goodness we have (finally) got that straight! 😉
The odd thing is how people perceive the TARP bailout though. Most think this was Obama, when it was Bush. But then gets confusing when Rep's increasingly object to it and Democrats favour it. Funny old world!
2016 - the delightful Ms Clinton in the blue corner versus.......?
binners, actions speak louder than words, can you show me where Obama has done anything to get the banks under control?
binners, actions speak louder than words, can you show me where Obama has done anything to get the banks under control?
Quite right.
Kaesae, actions speak loader than words, can you tell me where you got those frames from?
Er...compare the restructuring and recapitalisation of the US banks versus what has happened in Europe as a starting point? Which industry is better placed now to act as a transmission mechanism - the US or the European?
Legislation of size, structure, range of activities, compensation - all passed or WIP. In terms of restructuring banks, place the following countries/regions in order of policy publication - US, UK, Europe. Hmmm?
You just know that the Tea Party headcases will be doing the postmortum on this now and probably concluding that they lost because they were too lilly-livered and touchy feely. In fact what Romney was advocating was only marginally further from Socialism than Obama
And seeing as those hatstand-mad loons presently own the Republican party, Christ only knows what gun-toting, god-fearing, swivel-eyed, squirel-eating redneck they'll put forward in 4 years.
Perhaps Hillary versus Donald will be the 2016 low. All covered on "pay-to-view" TV!!
Isn't this whole charade a bit of a case of fiddling while Rome burns anyway? As its resolved none of the legislative paralysis in Washington, so the whole American economy is going to drop off a cliff in January anyway? Forcing a chain reaction meltdown, that will cause the implosion of the Euro, amongst other delights, and subsequent worldwide economic Armageddon?
And seeing as those hatstand-mad loons presently own the Republican party, Christ only knows what gun-toting, god-fearing, swivel-eyed, squirel-eating redneck they'll put forward in 4 years.
I keep hoping (without result) that each loss the republicans suffer encourages them to be less mental but they seem to think committing further to the slide into darkness is the only way to win. In some respects, imagine if they'd done something like select a moderate instead of Paul Ryan or toned down the anti-gay and anti-choice rhetoric. They'd have at least won the popular vote. Who knows how the swing states would have gone.
Isn't this whole charade a bit of a case of fiddling while Rome burns anyway? As its resolved none of the legislative paralysis in Washington, so the whole American economy is going to drop off a cliff in January anyway? Forcing a chain reaction meltdown, that will cause the implosion of the Euro, amongst other delights, and subsequent worldwide economic Armageddon?
What a cheery thought
Binners - yes, my point on the other thread yesterday - but Armageddon is hopefully going a bit far!!
So Greece (again today), EU budget discussions, Spanish bail out, weaker 3Q economic data, bank lending down again in Europe....not exactly a lot to make you feel good inside!
and subsequent worldwide economic Armageddon?
Here's hoping.
Once you start to question where money comes from you realise that the entire system of wealth creation in the western/developed world resembles a large game of jenga with greedy ****ers playing out of turn and grabbing any piece they can at the expense of everyone underneath.
There's a good book released last year called [url= http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/where-does-money-come-from-book/ ]Where does money come from?[/url] that has opened my eyes as to how the system works, it's rather unnerving reading and the jenga game will come crashing down at some point in the not to distant future so binners is right (gawd forbid, i never thought i'd say that - we really must be doomed), we are slowly working our way towards our own destruction.
Forcing a chain reaction meltdown, that will cause the implosion of the Euro, amongst other delights,
You are like a political Swiss Tony
there is no situation or scenario where you cannot link it to the demise of the Euro.
You are Farage and I claim my 5 METRIC euros 😉
Yeah, but money doesn't need to be anything physical, does it? As long as trust is maintained, at least...
I'm not entirely convinced that the jenga will collapse - after all, there are lot of powerful people holding it up.
And as I always tell you, when you level this at me - I'm all for the idea of a united Europe. Its a great idea!
But if you held a competition among village idiots worldwide, and everyone tried really really really really really hard, to find the most brain-numbingly stupid idea EVER! Then even they would struggle to come up with a concept as patently absurd and ridiculous as the Euro as a currency 😉
Well said that man!
I keep hoping (without result) that each loss the republicans suffer encourages them to be less mental but they seem to think committing further to the slide into darkness is the only way to win. In some respects, imagine if they'd done something like select a moderate instead of Paul Ryan or toned down the anti-gay and anti-choice rhetoric.
This,
What amazes me is that the Republicans can espouse these views and still get 48% of the vote!
This,What amazes me is that the Republicans can espouse these views and still get 48% of the vote!
And they won the house, so they could even conclude it's working. Their more right wing congress candidates won, and their more moderate presidential candidate lost
What amazes me is that the Republicans can espouse these views and still get 48% of the vote!
Absolutely! I just don''t get it either!
But the Republicans are going to have to 'do the math' sooner rather than later. Demographics are most definitely not on their side. Their white, middle class, evangelical christian, country club support is in terminal decline. Being replaced by rapidly growing ethnic populations to whom they have made absolutely zero effort to appeal. In fact in some cases (ie: Romneys 47% quip) have actively demonised. Can't see that happening any time soon though. The political wilderness awaits. Hopefully
The problem is that there are at least half a dozen distinct groups of people with significantly different values, and yet only two parties.
This is a big flaw, but it's hard to address. PR is the way forward imo, for most modern societies, but it's not even on the radar in the US afaik.
[img] 
[/img]
If Mitt was a straight forward Christian would he have landed more of the votes?
Hey you have a fan of your eurocurrency phobia - what was the character called who worked with Swiss Tony?
Shall I just call you Laurel and Hardy I have seen you binners I know which you are most like 😉
FWIW apparently all the tea party candidates bombed
It will surely harm the Republicans that they have them in their midsy controlling candidate selection and repelling a large number of swing vioters
If it really is about the economy then they lost the election rather than Obama won it
Still dont get how a party this right wing can get that many votes from people who would only be worse off under them
If Mitt was a straight forward Christian would he have landed more of the votes?
No
JY - You could use the full Malcolm Tucker quote if you like
[i]
Laurel and ****ing Hardy! Glad you could join us. Did you manage to get that piano up the stairs OK?[/i]
More than one JY 😉 !!!
Phobia is the wrong word though - there is no fear involved when dealing with something whose very design commits it to self destruction!
Just been reading [url= http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/790228-to-all-the-americans ]a nice "Well done America" thread on the MyFitnessPal forum[/url] of all places.
These posts seemed to sum up the anti-Obama [s]nutters[/s] movement:
I guess all who voted for Barrack Hussain Obama enjoyed the last four years of high unemployment, trillion in debt; For God sake the man has a freaken [b]Muslim name[/b].Oh and let's not forget if you are not on welfare you WILL be paying for Obama care. Hard working Americans be prepared to PAY, if you still are working, if you are not working be prepared to get fined for not having medical ins.
Obama was not elected to be president he was chosen, 1st and 2nd time you don't believe me listen to his mentor Rev. Wright give an exclusive interview with Ed Klein.
Obama was such an extremist that he had to stop socializing with people because of their ratical views; Obama shared all of these ratical views, but now he can't because he is in frony of the world, because that would not look right if a president associated with those kinds of people.
Romney may not have been the best alternative, but a better choice than a radical president like Obama. He is the worst president EVER.
In addition, Mitchell does not have what it takes to be the first lady.
yay...now we have to pay for womens full term abortions....among other things. wake up guys.
amen! now I get to be taxed again so the lazy ones (NOT NOT NOT saying everyone on unemployment is lazy, but over 80% are) can have more of my hard earned money...
I would like to see the faces of Obama supporters used to getting decent tax returns when they file their 2013 taxes. With the tax cut abolished, you're going to be lucky if you don't have to pay.
the above post was referring to the MILLIONS of illegal immigrants who are lazy and not even bothering to try and find a job. The problem is, assistance is being freely given to all the people who OBVIOUSLY don't need it. While the middle class's tax money goes to ungrateful jerks with no work ethic.
So basically blinding ignorance, selfishness and greed.
Nice!
What I want to know is, where's ernie_lynch got to? 🙁
He is the worst president EVER.
Incredible to think that that is probably being voiced, without irony, by someone who doubtless voted for ...
[img] 
[/img]
