Forum menu
Neighbours Wireless...
 

[Closed] Neighbours Wireless Internet Connection

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Theft of WiFi hasn't been tested in court ...give it a go ๐Ÿ˜‰ I would tell her work if they want to get internet installed go ahead otherwise go stuff themselves!!!


 
Posted : 01/09/2011 8:03 pm
Posts: 349
Free Member
 

If everything's IPV6 enabled then anything IPV6 going over the link would most likely have part of your MAC addy as part of the address. OK the ISP wouldn't be able to trace, but there would be a telltale sign.

Surely to trace back to you they'd need to get a warrant to go round every computer within range of the wireless and check to see if the details match? Can't see that one happening!


 
Posted : 01/09/2011 8:06 pm
 br
Posts: 18125
Free Member
 

I don't secure my wireless, so if you live in HP19 come knock on my door ๐Ÿ™‚

Only my two immediate neighbours can 'see' it, and we all are on unlimited Virgin - so I ain't worried, and all laptops fully secured.


 
Posted : 01/09/2011 8:23 pm
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

Maybe they do know what they are doing and are logging all data to get passwords :p

If you have signed up for BTFon and they are too then you can use theirs I guess - as long as you have started to pay: https://www.bt.com/wifi/secure/index.do?s_cid=con_FURL_btfon


 
Posted : 01/09/2011 9:15 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]If everything's IPV6 enabled then anything IPV6 going over the link would most likely have part of your MAC addy as part of the address[/i]

Yeah, there'll be lots of IPV6 traffic going over it. ๐Ÿ˜‰
And of course, if you really felt paranoid you could easily alter your MAC address before connecting.


 
Posted : 01/09/2011 11:11 pm
Posts: 2812
Full Member
 

my network is called 'stoptryingtostealmywifiyou****s'

but spelt right

and the password is well rude and offensive


 
Posted : 02/09/2011 12:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Theft of WiFi hasn't been tested in court ..

Yes, it has. s125 of Communications Act. First conviction in 2005. http://www.bailii.org/uk/other/journals/Script-ed/2009/6_2_SCRIPT-ed_355.html at 3.1.

Very rarely prosecuted, though. If I were in the OP's position I would just do it.


 
Posted : 02/09/2011 5:24 am
Posts: 10980
Free Member
 

You could of course find a neighbour who has BT Fon: http://www.btfon.com/


 
Posted : 02/09/2011 6:29 am
Posts: 5938
Free Member
 

speaking of funny network names. someone in our office tethers his phone and his network is called 'Pretty fly for a wi-fi'

made me chuckle


 
Posted : 02/09/2011 6:42 am
 Drac
Posts: 50620
 

If everything's IPV6 enabled then anything IPV6 going over the link would most likely have part of your MAC addy as part of the address. OK the ISP wouldn't be able to trace, but there would be a telltale sign.

Yeah because the ISP will know their customers MAC address. They are also are going to go to the hassle of tracing who's connected to customers connection. It's just not going to happen on top of that MAC is not an IP trace. The point of the fail is that IP tracing would only show up which customer had that IP.


 
Posted : 02/09/2011 8:08 am
Page 2 / 2