iirc its only if you dont intend to return it to QVC can it be considered theft.
gobuchul, I'm sorry I called you a dick. I'm giving up smoking. I get like that.
Set fire to their house
If they complain just reply with 'Suck it up loosers'
'Suck it up loosers
Presumably with their new Dyson Hoover
To close the thread off.
Various people on here were correct, QVC and Police don't consider us the victim (it's QVC).
Because we had to fill in paperwork for QVC, they now consider the matter closed regarding our involvement. They have all the evidence and info now so up to them whether their fraud team pursue it.
I went around and spoke with the neighbours. All civil enough. They admitted receiving it and selling it but 'suggested' that it was part of a job lot that they had bought so they didn't see the label with our name and address on when the delivery driver dropped...or when they reposted it to the new owner!
If I'm honest, I don't believe the story and they've been found out. They will be watched closely from now on. I realised earlier that here is a police officer who lives further down our road so he'll be a good source of info in the future should there be further anti-social behaviour or suspicious activity.
Singletrackmind> Set fire to their house
No. Sell their house on Ebay, see how they like it. Solves all problems.
They will be watched closely from now on.
Christ on a Dyson bike.
[URL= http://i884.photobucket.com/albums/ac50/tymbian/Mobile%20Uploads/2016-08/FB_IMG_1470589033022_zpsec2fp0sf.jp g" target="_blank">
http://i884.photobucket.com/albums/ac50/tymbian/Mobile%20Uploads/2016-08/FB_IMG_1470589033022_zpsec2fp0sf.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]
To go back to the original question asked, policing point of view:
As you never took possession of the item personally (cause you didn't get the delivery) then did it ever become your property that could be stolen from you ? Answer is probably no due to sale of good type acts likely stating that owner ship transfers when item received as described once paid for ( or something like that - would need checked ). You never got it , so not yours to lose, you're not the victim of the theft.
They failed to ensure the item went to the right house and so may not of upheld their side of the sale agreement to you, hence the replacement to you.
Which brings the focus to qvc still being the losers. Would they pursue it.? Up to them to make a complaint I suppose. There is an admission by the neighbour that they took possession of property not theirs and sold it on. Could that be construed as an intent to deprive? Possibly.
Still poor that the neighbour didn't pass it on. Totally at it.
