Forum menu
National Insurance ...
 

[Closed] National Insurance and business leaders

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've just finished a job for a massive Saudi chemical company - they've just binned another project as 'unworkable' after blowing £90m on it

Not really any different from public cock ups apart from it doesn't get on the local news


 
Posted : 08/04/2010 2:17 pm
Posts: 26890
Full Member
Topic starter
 

The Rural Payments Agency
Tax Credits (replace with adjustment to tax codes and a change in basic personal allowances)
CSA Enforcement (deducted at source through change in tax code)

Who will pay the landed gentry?
Who will sort out paying the child carers?


 
Posted : 08/04/2010 2:17 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

Don't get me started on Govt IT. I'm on my second project.

If you really want to cut waste, you could start by creating a single Government IT department that was responsible for all the IT needs of the public sector. That way, it'd KNOW when it was doing the same damn thing over and over again and cocking it up in different ways - and could do something about it.

Having said that, the money they spend on this crap goes into the economy, so a lot of programmers'd lose their jobs. Me, for one.


 
Posted : 08/04/2010 2:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't like having a large state sector. It just seems that public employees are not very good at spending money wisely, so I'd rather that money was spent by individuals.

Just thinking locally to me, the county council has blown the thick end of £160M on a guided bus that's 2 years late, spent several million on random consultations trying to get us to like congestion charging, and pays the chief executive £200k (I'd happily do it for half that and a free supply of bike chains and brake pads).

When it's not your money it's awfully easy to waste it.

You're getting the making cuts and proper accountability for spending mixed up.


 
Posted : 08/04/2010 2:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You're getting the making cuts and proper accountability for spending mixed up.

Perhaps. Is "accountability" the system whereby whichever political party is in power, it's the same endless layers of empire-building civil servants and quangos spending money on things they think will make them look good at the next level up of their bloated parasitic organization?


 
Posted : 08/04/2010 2:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

One thing's for sure, Britain would be in a lot better condition if it could get a full days work out of its employees, both public AND private.
Instead, youse are all on here, wasting your beloved bosses money! 🙂
(I'm on day aff BTW)


 
Posted : 08/04/2010 2:46 pm
 mt
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

The money tree will sort it all out just go out and harvest it. Spend it all and wait for more to grow, it's like magic really. Face it the money has gone, no amount of point scoring and politicing can change that. There will be cuts whoever gets in, anyone who says otherwise is a liar, anyone who thinks otherwise is deluded.


 
Posted : 08/04/2010 3:06 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

It just seems that public employees are not very good at spending money wisely, so I'd rather that money was spent by individuals.

Mmm yes, but on the other hand private individuals cream tons of money off the top for themselves. Horses for courses perhaps.

Spend it all and wait for more to grow, it's like magic really.

No it's called investment. Basic economics.


 
Posted : 08/04/2010 3:15 pm
 mt
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

Investment, now that is an interesting word when used as part of a lesson in basic economics. Is that a bit like putting horse sh1t on your roses, get plenty around that plant, it grows stronger cause it's getting well fed, you then get bigger and better flowers. Are the flowers what you would call a return on investment perhaps or just a nice to look at with no way paying for further manure purchases.


 
Posted : 08/04/2010 3:26 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

Returns on investment aren't necessarily re-invested. That's why re-investment is called re-investment and not investment.

But anyway, what's your point caller?


 
Posted : 08/04/2010 3:56 pm
 mt
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

The horse sh1t needs to be paid for or it's not manure.


 
Posted : 08/04/2010 4:24 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

You've stretched the metaphor a bit too far there. Lost you.


 
Posted : 08/04/2010 4:52 pm
 mt
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

I'm not suprised. Get back to the money tree.


 
Posted : 08/04/2010 9:21 pm
Posts: 13349
Free Member
 

Molgrips would that be the centralised IT function that was privatised and the trained staff scattered to the four winds?
Tax credits are administered by HMRC with no extra people Z 11, they are currently under fire for achieving efficiency savings by slashing head count with the consequent decrease in service standards. (Report [url= http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/cmtreasy/483/483i.pdf ]here[/url])


 
Posted : 08/04/2010 9:37 pm
Page 3 / 3