I think once I say Gants Hill then we all know its game over.
It might have been, if you hadn't let your disdain for the '67 ruleset blind you to the Hainault loop sub-clause.
Barons Court
I'm starting to find the lack of adherence to the game protocols somewhat unsporting, and therefore under the Wellington Boots Privilege, I give you Hammersmith.
1967 Revised Edition rules, you said? I've an amusing story about trying to shoehorn Merkland Street in under those rules that led, eventually, to the splintering of the Drumchapel and Clydebank Mornington Crescent Society.
Anyway, I learned the hard way. Charing Cross.
Perhaps you need to take a deeper dive into the rules. The Open University run an Mornington Crescent online course led by leading gamers which gives you a proper grounding in things. They do seem to focus on the modern rules though, so some research in the library archives by yourself may be needed.
Ah dammit. Rickmansworth and I'm out.
Rickmansworth and I’m out.
😆
Surely the only way to defeat the proposition of Rickmansworth is with a dose of Chalfont & Latimer?
Surely the only way to defeat the proposition of Rickmansworth is with a dose of Chalfont & Latimer?
Yes, you rub it on your Temple.
more in desperation than hope
Rookie move, Embankment for the bonus point!
Rookie move, Embankment for the bonus point!
Well to your Embankment, I give you my Farringdon. It is, after all, only one letter out from my surname.
<p style="text-align: left;">If I can join in part way through? Think that Spaffmold's Variation is part of the '67 rules, so Bromley-by-Bow</p>
Sorry but you left it wide open.
Mornington Crescent.
(As ratified by the Brine convention).
Ha! Easy move I'm afraid, by using a Seymour Street (adapted convention) application I can block you with a Camden Town.
