For your inner Kaesae 😉
Pfff! With Weight Loss Ward on ITV?
Fat chance!
off to watch it with a mate who believes[ ie does not believe] should be fun 😯
Good lad!
Have to say there are a few things that make me wonder. I need to google them.
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2001/ast23feb_2/
NASA answers here; in my eye brave legends who flew a flying bomb and are heroes. no more to say about it
Thanks for the tip, watching Miniature Britain, recording Elementary, set to record it on 5+1 at 9.00.
It's a bit guff TBH, one sided and lots of points missed.
I once decided to make a serious effort not to believe in the moon landings.
I looked at loads of sceptic sites. They all said don't believe us, just look at the evidence. What do you see in this picture?
Well what I saw was people on the moon
Some sites said they could show me the evidence that we hadn't been to the moon for jusr $25 dollars. Hmmm
PS why didn't the Russias point out that there were no radio transmissions from the moon?
why havn't one of those powerfull telescope taken pics of the flag and moon buggy that's was left there?
that might shut a few people up.....maybe...
It's a bit guff TBH, one sided and lots of points missed.
Channel 5, Al.
I don't watch it bar the films.
MTB Rob - Memberwhy havn't one of those powerfull telescope taken pics of the flag and moon buggy that's was left there?
that might shut a few people up.....maybe...
[url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories ]They have. [/url]
Anyone who believes the hoax theories should be chemically castrated.
[img] 
[/img]
Don't take the piss. You should respect all points of view.
[quote=CaptainFlashheart ]
Quite plainly photoshopped.
Don't take the piss. You should respect all points of view.
Who pissed on your space chips?
...and, surprisingly, you're wrong.
druidh - Member
CaptainFlashheart »
Quite plainly photoshopped.
Prove it hasn't. Or has.
[quote=cynic-al ]druidh - Member
CaptainFlashheart »
Quite plainly photoshopped.
Prove it hasn't. Or has.
Well, for a start there is no way they could have taken those massive signs in that little capsule.
Don't take the piss. You should respect all points of view
You are right but you are also an idiot just like them.
Respect that 8)
druidh - Member
CaptainFlashheart »
Quite plainly photoshopped.
You're an expert in Photoshop?
He knows a lot about digital cheating.
Ah, explains everything! 😆
You're an expert in Photoshop?
Of course I thought you would know by now that everyone on here is an expert in EVERYTHING!!
Don't take the piss. You should respect all points of view.
Eh? Can you justify that statement. That's ludicrous.
Jeeze, the supposed 'expert' who worked at Rocketdyne, is such an idiot. What was his job, janitor?
The stuff about the rocket motor having no exhaust plume shows his clear lack of knowledge. I've seen a drag car, [i]Vanishing Point[/i], powered by a LEM Hydrogen Peroxide fuelled motor. There's a sudden, loud noise, with a cloud of exhaust, then the car rockets (ha!) past, with no visible exhaust or plume.
I remember watching this program first time around, and the conspiracy nuts made me shout at the telly then; it hasn't gotten any better.
The stuff about lack of stars, etc, is also such a load of crap. 🙄
Teh mountains, TEH MOUNTAINS. They're the same in every picture! Almost like... They're... absolutely massive [i]mountains[/i]?
Prof cox: class 🙂
Love the video clip - don't **** with a test pilot, they are test pilots for a reason, the main one being that they are as mad as a bag of frogs!!
www.clavius.org or http://www.braeunig.us/space/hoax.htm debunks just about everything on tonight's show.
In fact my daughter (12) made a fair stab at debunking most of the stupider theories (she was bang on regarding the disappearing cross hairs and the flag that *gasp* continues to move with no air resistance to slow it).
The whole programme was so moronic, I didn't know whether to be sad or cross.
The root cause is the same as all conspiracy theories, homeopathy, etc.
Thick people like to think they're smarter than smart people.
Mythbusters busted the myths about the light / shadow, potentially faked walking on the moon sequences and the flag fluttering in a vacuum. They also bounced a laser off of a laser reflector left on the surface.
ampthill - MemberPS why didn't the Russias point out that there were no radio transmissions from the moon?
All you need. Whole thing was impossible unless their enemies colluded with them.
Which they probably did because of the chemtrails.
This wasn't the same as the original program I saw, same idiot conspiracy nuts, but the one I saw had a forensic debunking of all the theories, done under controlled conditions.
I can't believe that an RPS member was so clueless about things like the lighting conditions; had the clot never used a fill-in reflector, like a light-coloured sheet? The moon's pale grey, it reflects sunlight for Chris'sakes! Even the Earth reflects sunlight, you can see the dark part of the moon sometimes when it's less than full because of reflected earth-light.
What a bunch of half-wits.
[url= http://stuffucanuse.com/fake_moon_landings/moon_landings.htm [/url] exposes the moon landings as fake almost conclusively.
Gotta love the Clangers!
Don't take the piss. You should respect all points of view.
Eh? Can you justify that statement. That's ludicrous.
I was being sarcastic, and also sending myself up with reference to the religion threads.
These people are in fact boneheads.
bencooper has it bang on:
The root cause is the same as all conspiracy theories, homeopathy, etc.Thick people like to think they're smarter than smart people
No telescope can resolve human activity on the moon from Earth. The shots of tracks are taken from other space craft
What? Aliens?
No telescope can resolve human activity on the moon from Earth. The shots of tracks are taken from other space craft
Yeah, we know that. Your point is?
Some one asked can't we see the moon lander with a telescope. I hadn't seen a straight answer di I miss it
I'd come to the conclusion years ago that it was fake. You only have to take into account the technology being used today by other countries to even attempt to get to the moon to know it wasn't possible.
It's just typical US Cold War propaganda. I am wondering though what they'll say when some ACTUALLY gets there and finds no evidence - or will the CIA spend the next 100 years in covert ops to sabotage these attempts....
I'd come to the conclusion years ago that it was fake
That's enough for me then. Clearly a big lie.
