Forum menu
Mad Max. is it just...
 

[Closed] Mad Max. is it just me?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#7676906]

I love Tom Hardy, it gets great reviews, but I'm pretty much of the thinking wtf?


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:27 pm
Posts: 1510
Free Member
 

Your not alone. I too thought it was a big pile of *!%#


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Didn't enjoy it. Just sat here watching the original Mad Max now, much betterer


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:29 pm
Posts: 20
Free Member
 

Thoroughly enjoyed it, and I usually hate car chases :mrgreen:


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:30 pm
Posts: 3536
Full Member
 

Thought it looked stunning, but it didn't do anything else for me.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:32 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50604
 

Mindless action just simple entertainment.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:32 pm
 nant
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Load of rubbish.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:33 pm
Posts: 66112
Full Member
 

It's not just you, it only has a rotten tomatoes score of 97% and metacritic score of 90% so there must be at least a couple of dozen other people that didn't think it was INCREDIBLY AWESOME like right-thinking folks.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Looked good, OK film, far better than the bilge that is Spectre.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:35 pm
Posts: 35041
Full Member
 

yeah, it's just you.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:37 pm
Posts: 4747
Free Member
 

I watched it, but can't remember anything about it.
Make of that what you will.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:37 pm
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

Seen it twice and both times left me going meh, just doesn't work for me

Ming just watched Spectre again and enjoyed it more than first time.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:40 pm
Posts: 6581
Free Member
 

What Drac said


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:40 pm
Posts: 5346
Free Member
 

I liked it - ridiculous, for sure, but sometimes I quite like things blowing up all over the place.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:41 pm
 ton
Posts: 24281
Full Member
 

love mad max films. Mel is ace.
this was total shit.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:41 pm
Posts: 5730
Full Member
 

Came out of the cinema needing a stiff drink, was pretty intense.

Not sure that it translates to a smaller screen, but am more than happy to watch it again.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:44 pm
Posts: 5300
Full Member
 

Is this the new one? Absolute shite. It's everything I hate about a film. No plot whatsoever. Even the best action movies need a story. It's 2 hours of mindless CGI.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:44 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50604
 

So you missed the story then?


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:46 pm
Posts: 109
Free Member
 

New mad max lets drive over there to meet some old ladies then drive back.

Awful film that is pointless


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:48 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50604
 

New mad max lets drive over there to meet some old ladies then drive back.

😆


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:48 pm
Posts: 5300
Full Member
 

So you missed the story then?

I'm sure someone in the film maybe talked about a story or something. But it definitely bypassed me.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:50 pm
Posts: 109
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:50 pm
Posts: 10535
Full Member
 

I thought it was crap as well. Just didn't see the point of it.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:50 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50604
 


I'm sure someone in the film maybe talked about a story or something. But it definitely bypassed me.

Not sure that's the films fault.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:52 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

Yep, I gave up when it was 2/3 through and went to bed........


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 10:53 pm
Posts: 8859
Full Member
 

I was disappoint. Too many "going full speed, change up a gear go faster" scenes. Err, why weren't you in that gear before??!


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 11:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Well that post went better than expected. However we've sat here and watched till the end. I do wish the synopsis on sky had said

New mad max lets drive over there to meet some old ladies then drive back.
😆


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 11:06 pm
Posts: 1503
Free Member
 

I thought Charlize Theron was a lot more like Max from the original films than Tom Hardy.
Saying that though, I still really enjoyed it at the cinema.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 11:07 pm
Posts: 5300
Full Member
 

I'm sure someone in the film maybe talked about a story or something. But it definitely bypassed me.

Not sure that's the films fault.

If the film is hideously boring from start to finish, then I would argue that it is 😉


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 11:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

loved it.

But not everything is for everyone. Just because you didn't like a piece of music/film/comedy doesn't mean it isn't good.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 11:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

2 hours of mindless CGI

You'd actually be surprised how little was actually CGI, George Miller doesn't really like CGI.


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 11:35 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Loved the film, like tinker tailor isn't a film about spying but the complicated relationships between people mad max isn't really about the cars. It's a great story and perhaps a fine bond audition for Tom Hardy


 
Posted : 28/02/2016 11:58 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50604
 

You'd actually be surprised how little was actually CGI, George Miller doesn't really like CGI.

You must have seen an uncut version.


 
Posted : 29/02/2016 12:08 am
Posts: 2683
Full Member
 

I enjoyed it, and was surprised I did. I don't normally like stuff blowing up constantly films. But I'd had a bad week and it was just full on fast and loud. I think one of the reasons I liked it is that it reminds me of graphic novels and comics of my youth. Sparse dialogue against a stylised backdrop. Not big and endless exposition that comes with modern high concept sci-fi.

As I said I was surprised, my normal film watching is more likely to be the lives of others or hunger or the machinist to name three films I've watched in the last few weeks and enjoyed

Edit


 
Posted : 29/02/2016 12:34 am
Posts: 33970
Full Member
 

Wow, somebody didn't enjoy a film that lots of other people did. [i]There's[/i] a surprise. 🙄


 
Posted : 29/02/2016 12:44 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

2 hours of mindless CGI

fin25 is right - a lot of Mad Max was done with physical stunts, not CGI.


 
Posted : 29/02/2016 12:56 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

I wasn't entirely persuaded by the plot, but I was completely bowled over by how well the whole thing was done and how gorgeous it looked.

Apparently it is to be released in [url= http://www.slashfilm.com/fury-road-black-and-white-version/ ]black & white[/url], which Miller likes the idea of very much.

We spent a lot of time in DI (digital intermediate), and we had a very fine colorist, Eric Whipp. One thing I’ve noticed is that the default position for everyone is to de-saturate post-apocalyptic movies. There’s only two ways to go, make them black and white — [b]the best version of this movie is black and white[/b], but people reserve that for art movies now. The other version is to really go all-out on the color. The usual teal and orange thing? That’s all the colors we had to work with. The desert’s orange and the sky is teal, and we either could de-saturate it, or crank it up, to differentiate the movie. Plus, it can get really tiring watching this dull, de-saturated color, unless you go all the way out and make it black and white.

🙂


 
Posted : 29/02/2016 3:46 am
Posts: 7124
Full Member
 

I saw it on an airplane. I thought it was actually really very good and a lot better than I was expecting.


 
Posted : 29/02/2016 5:29 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

And it's currently romping through the Oscars list, most successful film this year.


 
Posted : 29/02/2016 5:31 am
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

You have to scroll down through all the big Oscars first though to find out which ones it won.

Must give it another try - think I got through 30 minutes or so and gave up. Post-apoc is probably my favourite genre so I must be missing something.


 
Posted : 29/02/2016 7:39 am
 Drac
Posts: 50604
 

fin25 is right - a lot of Mad Max was done with physical stunts, not CGI.

Eh? It has loads of CGI in it. Not that I mind that in films as there's some things really can't be done without it.


 
Posted : 29/02/2016 8:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you haven't seen it yet, start a fire in your garden, then throw loads of dolls on it. Same thing.


 
Posted : 29/02/2016 8:29 am
 hels
Posts: 971
Free Member
 

I fast-forwarded through most of it. But then I'm old school, and like things like plots that make sense, character development etc. And I am pretty sure that Tom Hardy chap attended Joey's "Smell The Fart" school of acting. You know, staring into the middle distance with a "who dropped that one" expression.

However, it wasn't nearly as rubbish as Mad Max 3 now was it ?


 
Posted : 29/02/2016 8:36 am
 Drac
Posts: 50604
 

However, it wasn't nearly as rubbish as Mad Max 3 now was it ?

Loved that as a kid but then I seen it as an adult, I even tried again the other day. Yeah it's not good it has some good scenes in it but sploilt by others.


 
Posted : 29/02/2016 8:38 am
Posts: 8755
Full Member
 

I thought it was pretty pants - the first half was decent enough but when they finally get away from the pursuers it's like the writers just ran out of ideas so the second half has them retracing their route and going through the same stuff as the first half.


 
Posted : 29/02/2016 9:17 am
Page 1 / 3