Forum search & shortcuts

Lings Cars vs the A...
 

[Closed] Lings Cars vs the Advertising Standards Authority

Posts: 806
Free Member
 

I wish - but then unlike a huge amount of online customers, I have a brain in my head and research. That way if anything goes wrong, it's my fault.....


 
Posted : 14/03/2013 10:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Crikey Ling is annoying, never realised.


 
Posted : 14/03/2013 10:50 pm
Posts: 20896
Free Member
 

You never watched The Apprentice then?


 
Posted : 14/03/2013 10:51 pm
Posts: 12340
Full Member
 

Lucy Crowe is part of a public government body

Fail.


 
Posted : 14/03/2013 11:16 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

When people at work leave their screens unlocked at work, Lings Cars suddenly becomes their homepage


 
Posted : 15/03/2013 2:21 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So. Ling. Would you?


 
Posted : 15/03/2013 7:46 am
Posts: 12089
Full Member
 

Lucy Crowe is part of a public government body
Fail.

Sorry, should have been more precise: she works for a body that is not part of the political (elected) government, but is an organisation that regulates advertising, with legal firepower provided by the OFT. So no, not technically speaking a "public government body", but it might as well be.


 
Posted : 15/03/2013 10:04 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Shes an employee- anyone could scrutinise her emails/complain/dig etc etc - it'd probably come to nowt but if your personal emails to clients etc were made public, someone could nit-pick (or you'd worry they might). She might have gone home stressing about etc.

Handwringing? maybe but its part of the reason why I think Ling over-stepped a line. Self-promotion without thinking of others.


 
Posted : 15/03/2013 10:07 am
Posts: 1870
Full Member
 

Just noticed this thread, she's always had a bit of a crazy idea about advertising, years ago I'm sure she had a tank or a old jet fighter parked up advertising her cars. Not sure if she still does, but she lived about half a mile from me, second hand cars sales in dodgy advert scam...nothing new here?


 
Posted : 15/03/2013 11:25 am
Posts: 78575
Full Member
 

It's really not a scam.

Re: personal details, I can see an obvious potential issue with publishing email addresses on the Internet in this sort of context. To wit, an influx of semi-literate abuse from the bottom half of the Internet.


 
Posted : 15/03/2013 11:30 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
Topic starter
 

[i]second hand cars sales in dodgy advert scam[/i]

errrm, except she only sells new cars and even then only acts as an agent.

I'm interested as to why the equally frivolous Robin Reliant ad has received no attention from the ASA.


 
Posted : 15/03/2013 11:50 am
Posts: 20896
Free Member
 

has received no attention from the ASA

Because no-one has complained about it and they only respond to complaints?


 
Posted : 15/03/2013 12:23 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
Topic starter
 

so, in theory, she could continue to run the Reliant stuff despite the ASA ruling that the identical bar the car DeLorean one is 'wrong'?

Well that's the public well and truely protected.


 
Posted : 15/03/2013 12:25 pm
Posts: 20896
Free Member
 

Yes - she even offered that they look at the Robin advert in her correspondence with them.

It is ludicrous.


 
Posted : 15/03/2013 12:47 pm
Posts: 1870
Full Member
 

I saw a misleading advert the other day for Mcdonalds, there was a pilot saying he had just bought a burger for £1.49??? not in an airport he didnt!


 
Posted : 15/03/2013 1:23 pm
Posts: 14
Free Member
 

misleading adverts you say?

[img] [/img]

of course some are more accurate than others
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 15/03/2013 1:31 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
Topic starter
 

It's starting again.

from twitter;
[i]
Reply from the Advertising Standards Authority. It is "embargoed". Bollocks to that. Will publish, very soon.[/i]


 
Posted : 27/03/2013 5:26 pm
Page 2 / 2