if only... . 🙁no doubt your posts are part of a sophisticated tax planning exercise to establish a fact pattern to secure such a result
I'm currently happily accurately filling in my tax declaration and will pay the bill they send me with a smile on my face. It'll probably be about the same as the grants we'll get for junior's education next year.
As regards the whole 'it's legal, so it's OK' thing...
[img] 
?oh=651b754a469d6c2a2af49f34d23f1d6b&oe=5781227D[/img]
Banks typically monitor politicians for potential money laundering activity as part of their general monitoring requirements for tackling politically exposed persons (PEPs) – who are entrusted with prominent public functions. Yet, in discussing amendments to the bill, Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne expressed his concern:Banks are at risk of going too far and being disproportionate when applying their rules to politically exposed persons in Britain, and their families in particular.
wonder why he thinks that you shouldnt look too closely at politician's families and tax avoidance? hmmmmm
[url= https://offshoreleaks.icij.org/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=osborne&e=&commit=Search ]Quite a few results for Osborne*[/url] in the Searchable Database released today:
https://offshoreleaks.icij.org/
*Haven't had time or energy to check any of them for links to Our Fearless Number Cruncher/Self Interested Financial Terrorist
[img] 
[/img]
