Forum search & shortcuts

Jimmy Carr and Tax
 

[Closed] Jimmy Carr and Tax

Posts: 6758
Free Member
 

But you're not paying your fair share - someone else has to pay that for you.

.. But if you pay more than your competitors you'll go out of business because they'll undercut you (admitedly this may not be the case with comedians, but my guess is they do not form a large proportion of those evading tax).

Morals only come into it in the sense that the government needs to sort it out. you can't rely on morals as a means of tax collection.


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 8:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have only ever heard Jimmy Carr tell jokes, and I have seen him a fair bit on the telly - I've even seen him live once. Since when has he been involved in a campaign against tax avoidance ?

Wouldn't it be a case of him doing sketches that point the finger at banks/corporations that reduce their tax bills as opposed to being involved in any specific campaign. I don't see you pulling anything out to demonstrate he isn't involved either, so I guess we'll never know on that one.


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 8:59 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

What Carr does legally with his own money is his business

yeah they should just mind their own ****ing business and get on with setting tax rules and the laws of the country 😕


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 8:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

if he can dodge tax or anyone then good on em , i hate tax !


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:00 pm
Posts: 7279
Free Member
 

He did a skit on Barclay's tax avoidance on some Channel 4 show, that is what irks.

EDIT: hadn't realised already posted on previous page


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:02 pm
Posts: 18593
Free Member
 

Europe 1 reported Cameron has invited French people that fear paying our new sort-of-socialist goverement too much tax to take up residence in the UK. How morally right is that?


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:03 pm
Posts: 15461
Full Member
 

with so many people riding about on high horses someones bound to come a cropper.

That a richer than average 'meeja' type chose to take advantage of the loopholez available to them doesn't really shock anymore than any MP or company MD/CEO...

Next....


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:04 pm
Posts: 401
Free Member
 

J K Rowling pays full UK tax on her earnings and offshore's nothing

She did this as she wrote her book on the dole and felt morally obliged to repay the investment

Some might say that she can afford to with her huge Harry Potter gravy train but at least she's morally well placed when the karma train comes into town


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:04 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

.. But if you pay more than your competitors you'll go out of business because they'll undercut you

Not always true, in many cases its more to do with greed than the claimed competitiveness.


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sorry Edukator, I don't think you need to worry, that won't happen

TJ has been telling us for years that the Laffer curve is a right wing fantasy, and that if you increase taxes on high earners, they don't just F off abroad.

FACT!

😉


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

at least tickets for his next tour will be cheaper.. yay!


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wouldn't it be a case of him doing sketches that point the finger at banks/corporations that reduce their tax bills as opposed to being involved in any specific campaign. I don't see you pulling anything out to demonstrate he isn't involved either, so I guess we'll never know on that one.

So he's done some jokes about banks ? And that makes him a hypocrite ?

When Jimmy Carr tells jokes it's to make a serious point ? I thought his jokes were about taking the piss, it never occurred to me that he was being serious. Which is probably how I'll carry on interpreting it.

I don't see you pulling anything out to demonstrate he isn't involved either, so I guess we'll never know on that one.

What's that suppose to mean - that because I can't prove that he was not opposed to tax avoidance we have to assume that he possibly was, and therefore that he is a hypocrite ? 😕


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:13 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

DP, sorry.


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:13 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Morals only come into it in the sense that the government needs to sort it out.

That's the most pathetic denial of responsibility I've heard in a while.
'Yes, I did something completely immoral. Why wasn't there someone to stop me?'


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Which is probably how I'll carry on interpreting it.

Carry on then...


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:16 pm
Posts: 18593
Free Member
 

It's fascinating who you bump into doing their shopping in places along the north side of lake Geneva.

Amélie Mauresmo, Patricia Kaas, Phil Collins, Tina Turner, Richard Virenque, James Blunt, Michael Schumacher, Alain Prost, Jean Alesi, Sébastien Loeb, Alain Delon, Marie Laforêt, Johnny Hallyday, Charles Aznavour... .


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Carry on then...

Thank you, I will.

And you carry in interpreting that comedians are making serious points when telling jokes. It wouldn't do if everyone treated jokes as, well, just jokes. Obviously it's no laughing matter. Don't forget to whip yourself up into a froth of indignation if you detect any "hypocrisy" in any of their jokes.


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:25 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

"searches internet to see how JC is doing soo damnnn fine"


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And you carry in interpreting that comedians are making serious points when telling jokes. It wouldn't do if everyone treated jokes as, well, just jokes. Obviously it's no laughing matter. Don't forget to whip yourself up into a froth of indignation if you detect any "hypocrisy" in any of their jokes.

Kind of weird because I thought that comedians like Ben Elton and the like were using comedy to provide us with deeper messages, they were just comedians all along. Silly me.
For the purposes of accuracy where did I call him hypocritical, I just offered an example.


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So Jimmy Carr is like Ben Elton is he ? Indeed are you saying most comedians are ? 😀

I can't imagine two much more different comedians. One was politically correct to the point of boring, and the other one sometimes makes me cringe at his politically incorrectness, amusing as it invariably is.


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So Jimmy Carr is like Ben Elton is he ?

Your words ernesto. Where the frigg do you get these ideas? You keep reading things into what other people say.
It's like having a two year old in the house at times. Why? Why? Why? Why? You're supposed to be a bit smarter than that, no?
Back to The Clash I think, I do like a nice little pop song to sing along to, no politics there, no siree... Can't have a popular singer making political comments, can we?


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nice photo of Jimmy Carr on the BBC website

[img] [/img]

Is he auditioning for a job as a sex doll?


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 9:57 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

druidh - Member
Is he auditioning for a job as a sex doll?

I'm guessing you know better than us what one looks like...


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 10:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Your words ernesto. Where the frigg do you get these ideas? You keep reading things into what other people say.

The question mark denotes a "question" DS. So I take it you can't see a connection between the two. Where do I get these ideas from ? Well I take clues from what you post, eg :

[i]"I thought that comedians like Ben Elton and the like were using comedy to provide us with deeper messages"[/i]

So why mention [i]"Ben Elton and the like"[/i] if there is no connection with Jimmy Carr ?

Why? Why? Why? Why? You're supposed to be a bit smarter than that, no?

No not really. I'm struggling.


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 10:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No not really. I'm struggling.

Not often I agree with you ernesto, but I'm with you on this one.

So why mention "Ben Elton and the like" if there is no connection with Jimmy Carr ?

Do you really need that spelled out to you? TBH ernesto I really can't be arsed, it's like pulling teeth...


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 10:14 pm
Posts: 7279
Free Member
 

I think Carr's problem is one of association, because he makes a satirical TV show with Charlie Booker (Guardian columnist), David Mitchell (Guardian Columnist) and Lauren Laverne (OBserver columnist), a certain demographic Guardian readers think he is one of them. I agree with EL that he is not paricularly political in his comedy but by hanging out with the wrong sort he is assumed to be of the soft left and therefore this false assumption leads to the accusations of hypocrisy. This can be contrasted with Ken Livingstone, who made specific politic statements, or someone like Andrew Marr taking out a superinjunction.

EDIT: I think Cameron was ill advised to go into the morality of tax avoidance.


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 10:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Do you really need that spelled out to you?

Sounds like you do have to spell it out to me - I'm really struggling.

You make a comparison between Jimmy Carr and Ben Elton, and then suggest that there is is no caparison between Jimmy Carr and Ben Elton, claiming it's just me "reading things".

I would be ever-so grateful if you could explain it all to me. Although sadly I suspect that you can't, so you'll come out with some old bollox about not being arsed just to save you the embarrassment of admitting that you were talking nonsense. Am I right ?


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 10:27 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Put simply-

Tax avoidance if it's a Lefty (Livingstone, Carr, Milliband, Guardian et al) = Fine

Tax avoidance if you're a nasty Tory evil person = BAD. EVIL. Etc.

🙂


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 10:34 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

.


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 10:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You make a comparison between Jimmy Carr and Ben Elton, and then suggest that there is is no caparison between Jimmy Carr and Ben Elton, claiming it's just me "reading things"

Where did all this happen? You say comedians can not do anything else except make jokes yet an example, not comparison, of Elton to illustrate a point has you all confused and doing your usual. As mefty has said is easy to be confused in this and believe that JC is being a bit political and might be considered to be hypocritical.
Like I said ernesto, I'll leave you to it...


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 10:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"You will need the world's biggest, most aggressive team of blood-hungry amoral tax lawyers. If you meet the criteria, you'll pay one per cent tax like Barclays do."

Looks like he met his own criteria. Q 😆


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 10:46 pm
 Taff
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

If I knew a way of saving money on tax I would do it. I need every penny I can. Granted JC has more money but still


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 10:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

CaptainFlashheart - Member

Put simply-

Tax avoidance if it's a Lefty (Livingstone, Carr, Milliband, Guardian et al) = Fine

Jimmy Carr is a "Lefty" is he Flashheart ? Well you might well be right - I have no idea, despite being a reasonable fan of his.

So what do you base that claim on Flashheart.......is it because Jimmy Carr is a very amusing comedian and no one that amusing could possibly be right-wing ? Do tell.

For the record I think legal tax avoidance is fine, whoever does it, even I do it. However I don't think opposition to plugging unacceptable loopholes is fine.


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 10:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think the confusion here may be caused by the fact that some people seem to think Ben Elton is a comedian ?

Surely that's not been the case for about 2 decades.


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 11:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

he should pay same tax like everyone else. is this a difficult one?


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 11:05 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

Tax avoidance if it's a Lefty (Livingstone, Carr, Milliband, Guardian et al) = Fine

Tax avoidance = bad
Tax avoidance by people who bleat about how wrong tax avoidance is (eg Livingstone, Carr, Guardian, Milliband) = bad and hypocritical

Pretty simple really. At least the Tories don't tend to make any secret of what selfish arseholes they are I suppose. 😉


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 11:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Good on Jimmy Carr .The whole idea of employing accountants is to avoid paying as much tax as possible .I only wish mine was as efficient


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 11:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tax avoidance by people who bleat about how wrong tax avoidance is (eg Livingstone, [b]Carr[/b], Guardian, Milliband) = bad and hypocritical

But Carr isn't a hypocrit, is he? He's allowed to say one thing and do another. It's called comedy.


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 11:12 pm
Posts: 7279
Free Member
 

For the record I think legal tax avoidance is fine, whoever does it, even I do it. However I don't think opposition to plugging unacceptable loopholes is fine.

So when you accused me of sticking up for tax avoiders, was that a compliment? In light of the above, I presume it was, so please excuse my tardiness in thanking you.


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 11:20 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

I assume all those happy at dodging their responsibilities by avoiding paying tax also advocate maximising loopholes in the benefit system to claim as much as possible, for the least expenditure of effort?


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 11:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So when you accused me of sticking up for tax avoiders, was that a compliment?

If that's what I did then yes, take it as a compliment. Although I can't recall the occasion - it's obliviously been playing on your mind for a while.

I have no problem at all with anyone minimising their tax liabilities through legal methods. And I have never criticised anyone for doing so. I do have a problem though with huge loopholes which allow some very wealthy people to avoid paying tax. Most people agree that these loopholes should be closed.

Whilst they exist and are perfectly legal I see absolutely no reason why they should remain the preserve of Tory Party members, as some people bizarrely seem to believe.


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 11:41 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

why do we need to close them if you dont have a problem with legally minimising tax ?
It seems you do have a problem with legally minimising tax or you would not feel the need to act to stop people doing it.

I also think it is fair to say if you make an issue of tax avoidance [ not saying JC has but say Ken] and you then do it you do look worse than someone who does not make an issue of it and does it for obvious reasons.


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 11:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

why do we need to close them if you dont have a problem with legally minimising tax ?

😕 For the same reason most people have a problem with some of the loopholes.........they are impossible to justify keeping.

I fully expect people to legally minimising their tax liabilities though. Why wouldn't they and why shouldn't they ?


 
Posted : 20/06/2012 11:52 pm
Posts: 7279
Free Member
 

You did, one of the fortunate things of not being a prolific poster, I have a reasonable recollection (and in comparison with Leveson enquiry witnesses, an exceptional one) of my posting history. But it would be remiss of me not to reassure it has not been weighing on my mind, I am rather pleased to find something further than we agree on, like yourself I am a big fan of the red white and blue...TESCO. You will no doubt be able to find it because I also recall you are a dab hand with the search function.


 
Posted : 21/06/2012 12:04 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

I fully expect people to legally minimising their tax liabilities though. Why wouldn't they and why shouldn't they ?

is it because
they are impossible to justify


 
Posted : 21/06/2012 12:07 am
Page 2 / 7