Forum menu
Before people spout off about material possessions not bringing happiness - true, but I'd wager those that are happy with their Mondeo et al, would also claim to have the perfect idyl. Really?
Maybe they simply don't need some sort of compensatory extension to their personality?
I really despair at the folk that state they are happy with their lot.
Maybe they actually are? Had you considered that?
All well and good being happy in your current life/situation, but really - do you have no imagination, are you kidding yourselves, or could life simply not be any better.
Some of the wealthiest people I know have very modest cars, as they simply don't feel the need to own a flashy motor. Their choice. Maybe they prefer collecting art, or antiques, or travelling, giving to charity, or whatever. People are different, you know?
I know it's hard for you to understand people might dare to have values different to your own, but that's how it is.
One of these to go on the back window shelf elf?
I NEED THIS BEAUTIFUL THING.
I know the server's running a bit slow, but 'kinnel Elfin, did you post that back in the 80s?
🙂 The 120y was a decent little motor you know. A mate had one; it outran several other lads' cars, much to their dismay. Speshly that **** Knoxy with his hideous Austin Maestro which blew up on the A11. How we laughed. How he failed to see the funny side.
As an aesthete, and one who appreciates truly great design and style, I've always had a soft spot for the Citroën DS; a car which had no equal. Utterly unique, and very beautiful.
-[b]Roland Barthes[/b].It is obvious that the new Citroen has fallen from the sky inasmuch as it appears at first sight as a superlative object .. We must not forget that an object is the best messenger of a world above that of nature: one can easily see in an object at once a perfection and an absence of origin, a closure and a brilliance, a transformation of life into matter (matter is much more magical than life), and in a word a silence which belongs to the realm of fairy-tales. The D.S. - the “Goddess” - has all the features (or at least the public is unanimous in attributing them to it at first sight) of one of those objects from another universe which have supplied fuel for the neomania of the eighteenth century and that of our own science-fiction: the Deesse is first and foremost a new Nautilus .
As for bikes; there is nothing currently for sale that, to me, could ever match a fully customised bicycle, where every component is made just for that machine, and no other.
I love the irony of someone talking about a 'lack of imagination', yet expressing their own preference for objects that are available as standard...
There is a guy at work still commutes in one. He loves it 😯The 120y was a decent little motor you know.
Here's my choices, very practical I think.
[img] http://gallery.mtbr.com/data/mtbr/1855/DSC_1124.jp g" target="_blank">
http://gallery.mtbr.com/data/mtbr/1855/DSC_1124.jp g"/> [/img]
Heh! Nice one Woody! 😀
Looking at some of the vehicles on this ,some of you have all the taste of premiershit footballers
R8
Audi and Orange.
Easier to remember if they have the same model numbers!
Looking at some of the vehicles on this ,some of you have all the taste of premiershit footballers
Are you being serious?
Citroën BX 4TC evolution and a Moulton Twin Pylon.
Or alternatively General de Gaul's Stretched DS and a Coiella tandem.
That ^^^^ green turner is stunning!!! Just checked the price tho 😯
don simon - MemberLooking at some of the vehicles on this ,some of you have all the taste of premiershit footballers
Are you being serious?
It's the standard line chucked out on here whenever this sort of thread comes up.
Apparently a beautiful Italian sportscar is totally vulgar if
a) It's not 50 years old
b) A footballer might have one
On the plus side, at least Rooney hasn't had a Ferrari yet. Just the one slightly less than subtle Italian so far !A footballer might have one
1. Aston Martin Vanquish S
2. BMW M3
3. Mini GP
4. Ford KA
5. Mercedes CLK DTM AMG
6. Mercedes CL63 AMG
7. Bentley Continental GTC Speed
8. Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder
9. Mercedes G55 AMG
10. Overfinch Range Rover Sport
11. Range Rover Supercharged
12. Cadillac Escalade
13. BMW X5
14. VW Golf R32
15. Mercedes SLK
16. Chrysler 300C
17. BMW M6
18. Audi RS4 Avant
19. Porsche 911
It's the standard line chucked out on here whenever this sort of thread comes up.
I know, I'm playing. 😉
As I work for a car company I'll excuse myself from the first part for fear of perceived bias. As to the second - I'd upgrade my Zesty 214 to a 914. Cant' see I could ever need more bike than that for what I ride. Won't ever happen, though...
Can I change my mind please?
[url= http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/1985-FERRARI-288-GTO-/220719491919?pt=Automobiles_UK&hash=item3363e82b4f#ht_1625wt_1117 ]GTO[/url]
It'd be a toss up which one would break down first conqueror...
If money was no object I'm sure you'd own quite a variety of cars and bikes. If it's a money no object, but you can only have 1 car and 1 bike it's a different kettle of fish. the cars and bikes I'd like to own for their intrinsic value/aesthetics/heritage are quite different to the ones I'd like to rag.
It'd be a toss up which one would break down first conqueror...
Yeah but money no object... you have the money to fix it
The TVR would be brutal.. who needs electronics, safety features and reliability .. forget that 🙂
0 to 60 mph (97 km/h). 3.7 seconds
Engine: TVR Speed Six engine, Straight-6
Displacement: 4.0L (3996 cc)
Power Output: 380 bhp (283 kW; 385 PS) @ 7,000–7,500 rpm
😈
And that tvr sounds like Thor on a bad day!!




















