Forum search & shortcuts

If the Nazis hadn&#...
 

[Closed] If the Nazis hadn't been defeated in WW2 what would life be like now?

Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

I wonder if 'Allo 'Allo would still have been commissioned


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 10:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Good job Britain stood between Ze Germans and the dithering Oirish then


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 10:31 pm
Posts: 17396
Full Member
 

They would probably have dissolved the Union. Divide and conquer.

They would have got rid of the upper house, and probably reinstated Edward VIII.

So we might actually have had a more apparently "democratic" system, but with an unfortunate ideology (to put it mildly).

Our young men would have been decimated fighting for the [s]EU[/s] Fourth Reich on the Russian front.


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 10:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I was at school with a lad who told us his dad was Estonian and old enough to serve during the war. He was in a German anti-aircraft gun crew. Allegedly he only ever shot down one aircraft, and it had black crosses on its wings...


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 10:42 pm
Posts: 22
Free Member
 

A lot less chavs living off everyone else's pocket


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 10:42 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

Our young men would have been decimated fighting for the EU Fourth Reich on the Russian front.

ooooooh tasty.

there's a certain school of historical thought that would suggest that the uk fought both world wars to fight inevitable german hegemony in europe and ultimately failed in the attempt regardless of the result of both world wars after 90 mins.

german domination of the eu post wwii is the proof of this theory's pudding.


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 10:47 pm
Posts: 4954
Free Member
 

M6TTF - Member
A lot less chavs living off everyone else's pocket

Why do you believe this to be the case?


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 10:48 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Good job Britain stood between Ze Germans and the dithering Oirish then

Straight from the old faithful Big Book Of Bollocks.

(sorry dude, your post didn't merit an intelligent rebuttal.)


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 10:49 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Hilarious..
Ok..so we'd all be in leiderhausen, drinking 2ltr beers, eating pork, watching pron, and we'd all be spotting mullets and weight about 22 stone, we'd be wearing plastic gold, unable to wash our cars on sundays, be sitting on ply furniture, have some pickled cabbage in the fridge, go to work on time, have an efficient public transport system, enjoy further education, do army service, sit talking in depth politics over schnaps...
Better than here yeah???
"I've been drinking, apologies to all"


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There would be no permissive society. Everyone would know their place, and be glad for the place they were given.

The strictest standards of 'decorum' would be upheld and this 1920s guide to etiquette would a staple of households across the land.

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14314/14314-h/14314-h.htm

But obviously it would be altered to include the prevailing fashions in Germany such a the 'Zieg Heil' salute, and men would have to also remember to not just bow in the presence of a woman, but also have to click their heels together aswell ...


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 11:01 pm
Posts: 22
Free Member
 

M6TTF - Member
A lot less chavs living off everyone else's pocket
Why do you believe this to be the case?

The German work ethic is significantly better than ours. They have some great schemes to ensure kids work and not sit on their arse - I don't necessarily believe it would play out this way, but it's a thought


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 11:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Margaret Thatcher would still be Prime Minister.

Eh, would that be the infamously pro-Jewish Margaret Thatcher? the one whose cabinet was 25% jewish?

In the words of the Jewish Chronicle

[i]Cynics have attributed Margaret Thatcher’s espousal of Jewish causes, and even her friendly attitude towards Israel, to the presence of a sizable “Jewish vote” in her Fnchley constituency. Such a view is derided by those who know her well. Mrs Thatcher herself says that her closeness to the Jewish people grew from the moment before the Second World War when a young Austrian Jewish girl, Edith Muchavauer, appealed to her pen pal – the young Margaret’s sister for help. Edith had written to the Roberts family about the Nazi threat. When Alderman Roberts invited the girl to stay, his daughter Margaret learned for the first time some of the tragedies that Jews had encountered.[/i]

Lets throw in some other evidence...

[i]according to Nigel Lawson, the former Finchley MP felt an affinity with the Jewish community.
He told the JC recently that her Cabinet included so many Jewish members, because “she was completely untouched by antisemitism. She took individuals on their own merits and recognised ability where she found it."
[/i]

Or how about:

[i]In the 1930s, a girl called Margaret Roberts (later Thatcher) was growing up in Grantham, Lincolnshire. Margaret’s big sister Muriel had an Austrian Jewish pen-friend called Edith. When Hitler’s German army occupied Austria, Edith’s worried father asked Margaret and Muriel’s parents if the Roberts family would look after his daughter.

They agreed. Young Edith escaped the tightening grip of the Nazis and went to Grantham to stay with the Roberts. Margaret remembers Edith and the accounts she gave of her life. “She told us what it was like to live as a Jew under an anti-Semitic regime. One thing Edith reported particularly stuck in my mind: the Jews, she said, were being made to scrub the streets.” (Edith eventually moved to build a new life in South America.)

Later, as Thatcher rose to the leadership of the Conservative Party, she continued to earn a reputation as a friend of the Jewish people. She was a popular MP among her constituents in Finchley (which had a high Jewish population) and was a member of the Anglo-Israel Friendship League of Finchley and the Conservative Friends of Israel. She joined in the singing of Hatikvah at a local event in 1975.

When she took the leadership of the party, Foreign Office mandarins feared her Jewish connections and support for Israel would see her viewed as “a prisoner of the Zionists” by the Arab world. Once PM, her cabinets and behind-the-scenes teams often included many Jewish politicians, prompting Harold Macmillan to quip that she had “more Estonians than Etonians”. (Not the most sensitive of punchlines, but it should be noted that Macmillan too had given shelter to Jewish refugees in the 1930s and 40s.)

Thatcher became the first serving British Prime Minister to visit Israel when she spent three days there in May 1986. (She had visited twice prior to becoming PM.)[/i]

Sort of shoots down your point really, eh Ernie 😕

Bit Confused really Ernie.. as I would have thought a more likely candidate for Prime Minister was your good mate Ken Livingstone (you know, the anti-semite you keep voting for!)

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-mayor/article-23478856-anti-semitism---and-a-timely-question-for-ken.do


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 11:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The truth is awkward sometimes deadly 😉


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 11:09 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

trailmonkey - Member

Our young men would have been decimated fighting for the EU Fourth Reich on the Russian front.

ooooooh tasty.

there's a certain school of historical thought that would suggest that the uk fought both world wars to fight inevitable german hegemony in europe and ultimately failed in the attempt regardless of the result of both world wars after 90 mins.

german domination of the eu post wwii is the proof of this theory's pudding.

A good point! - although modern Germany under Merkel is not [i]quite[/i] the same as Nazi Germany under Hitler...


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 11:10 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

The truth is awkward sometimes deadly

Heh!

You ought to try finding it out sometime. 🙂


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 11:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

radioactive, very radioactive after the Germans and Yanks fought a limited Nuclear conflict over Europe. Assuming the yanks could buy time with the horrific logistics faced by Germany invading from across the Atlantic. I doubt that their rocketry would have come on far enough for ICBM's by the time the B29's were built.

An interesting idea of what if.......


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 11:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I certainly wouldn't be here 🙁

Most likely, my Dad's side would have all been gassed for being Jewish while my Mum's Dad would have been shipped off for the Aryan breeding programme that was being arranged for the people from the right bits of France/Germany.

Quite happy it didn't turn out that way, really.


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 11:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If the Nazis had won I assume ethnic cleansing would be complete and the politics in the middle east would be different.


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 11:16 pm
Posts: 11
Free Member
 

There are more than a few ways to answer this, as simply put there are several ways in which the Nazi's might not have ben defeated. But since we are talking about this country let's concentrate on events in 1940;

1. GB negotiates peace after the fall of France: Lord Halifax instead of Churchill replaces Chamberlain and negotiates a weak deal for GB which sees the USSR receive no British aid later on in the war and the possibility of the Royal Navy guaranteeing the safety of German shipping.

The outcome may well have been the defeat of the USSR, but ironically the British Empire staying around a lot longer, albeit pro-German and with Nazi sympathies.

2. Germany actually manages to successfully invade & subdue GB in Sept 1940. Mosely would have been a puppet PM, Edward back on the throne, and lot's of undesirables made to disappear.

The outcome may have seen the bulk of RN working for the Kriegsmarine and a strong German invasion of the USSR, probably later, 1942 perhaps? This would almost definitely have seen the USSR defeated. Remember the German reverses at Kursk etc in 1942 were made possible by British Intelligence passing the Russians the entire German Battle plan. Couple that with the resources of much of the British Empire to be tapped (the Indian army was massive) and no material aid from the USA to the USSR.

The comments about killing non-blond blue-eyed or Caucasian babies' are also disingenuous; the irony of the third reich is that during the war the German population swelled with people from the East and occupied western Europe. There were many slavic people amongst them, even to the point were they were put in German uniform. Whilst the Nazi's definitely had a racial heirachy in mind, it was only certain peoples they sought to completely exterminate, the rest were seen as resources to be utilised.

I'm just glad it turned out the way it did. Even if I was here my marriage to my wife would definitely have been illegal under the race laws that a BUF government led by Mosely would have passed... and I doubt that 70 years later they would have been revoked, or the Jim Crow laws in the Southern US states for that matter.


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 11:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A lot less chavs living off everyone else's pocket

The Hitler Chavs


 
Posted : 05/11/2011 11:39 pm
Posts: 4130
Free Member
 

BigEaredBiker - That was a nice read!


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 12:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

1) Godwin's Law would never have been invented. Consequently, arguments on the internet wouldn't be half as entertaining.

2) South West Trains would have exactly the same customer service policies as at present, but at least they'd stick to their timetable.


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 12:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh...

Ian Curtis, Peter Hook, Bernard Sumner and Stephen Morris would have had significant difficulties with thinking up original band names 🙂


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 12:30 am
Posts: 34538
Full Member
 

wed all be in the euro

except it'd be called the deutsche mark


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 12:33 am
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

BigEared - good post. However, do you think the Nazis could have forced the defeated armed forces to fight for them?

Questions like that make me think that it was simply not possible for Hitler to conquer the UK (or indeed the rest of Europe) for long enough to make it to the present day. If it hadn't ended when it did, it would finished some other way. The timing and nature of Hitler's downfall is probably the only variable.


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 12:36 am
Posts: 1646
Full Member
 

No p*ssing about when it comes to energy, nuke power station at the bottom of the street, object to it, doubt it because by now they will have bred objectors out of the population. Anyone raising an objection will find themselves acting as a national socialist party freedom fighter in some as yet unconverted part of the world.


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 12:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Zulu-Eleven - Member

Margaret Thatcher would still be Prime Minister.

Eh, would that be the infamously pro-Jewish Margaret Thatcher? the one whose cabinet was 25% jewish?

In the words of the Jewish Chronicle

Cynics have attributed Margaret Thatcher’s espousal of Jewish causes, and even her friendly attitude towards Israel, to the presence of a sizable “Jewish vote” in her Fnchley constituency. Such a view is derided by those who know her well. Mrs Thatcher herself says that her closeness to the Jewish people grew from the moment before the Second World War when a young Austrian Jewish girl, Edith Muchavauer, appealed to her pen pal – the young Margaret’s sister for help. Edith had written to the Roberts family about the Nazi threat. When Alderman Roberts invited the girl to stay, his daughter Margaret learned for the first time some of the tragedies that Jews had encountered.

Lets throw in some other evidence...

according to Nigel Lawson, the former Finchley MP felt an affinity with the Jewish community.
He told the JC recently that her Cabinet included so many Jewish members, because “she was completely untouched by antisemitism. She took individuals on their own merits and recognised ability where she found it."

Or how about:

In the 1930s, a girl called Margaret Roberts (later Thatcher) was growing up in Grantham, Lincolnshire. Margaret’s big sister Muriel had an Austrian Jewish pen-friend called Edith. When Hitler’s German army occupied Austria, Edith’s worried father asked Margaret and Muriel’s parents if the Roberts family would look after his daughter.

They agreed. Young Edith escaped the tightening grip of the Nazis and went to Grantham to stay with the Roberts. Margaret remembers Edith and the accounts she gave of her life. “She told us what it was like to live as a Jew under an anti-Semitic regime. One thing Edith reported particularly stuck in my mind: the Jews, she said, were being made to scrub the streets.” (Edith eventually moved to build a new life in South America.)

Later, as Thatcher rose to the leadership of the Conservative Party, she continued to earn a reputation as a friend of the Jewish people. She was a popular MP among her constituents in Finchley (which had a high Jewish population) and was a member of the Anglo-Israel Friendship League of Finchley and the Conservative Friends of Israel. She joined in the singing of Hatikvah at a local event in 1975.

When she took the leadership of the party, Foreign Office mandarins feared her Jewish connections and support for Israel would see her viewed as “a prisoner of the Zionists” by the Arab world. Once PM, her cabinets and behind-the-scenes teams often included many Jewish politicians, prompting Harold Macmillan to quip that she had “more Estonians than Etonians”. (Not the most sensitive of punchlines, but it should be noted that Macmillan too had given shelter to Jewish refugees in the 1930s and 40s.)

Thatcher became the first serving British Prime Minister to visit Israel when she spent three days there in May 1986. (She had visited twice prior to becoming PM.)

Sort of shoots down your point really, eh Ernie

Bit Confused really Ernie.. as I would have thought a more likely candidate for Prime Minister was your good mate Ken Livingstone (you know, the anti-semite you keep voting for!)

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-mayor/article-23478856-anti-semitism---and-a-timely-question-for-ken.do

Posted 1 hour ago

Hahaha .... Zulu-Eleven gets all serious 'cause the woman of his dreams has been cruelly insulted by a mean spirited cad, and laboriously trawls the internet to clear his beloved Maggie's name........what a dipstick ! 😀


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 1:10 am
Posts: 17396
Full Member
 

molgrips - Member
...do you think the Nazis could have forced the defeated armed forces to fight for them?...

Propaganda and good pay. The Nazis have discovered the evil Russian death camps for intellectuals and Polish officers.

Enlist as many idealistic young British as possible to fight the Russians and liberate the steppes. That way there are no fighting age men hanging around UK spoiling for trouble.

The Romans used that system well.


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 1:17 am
Posts: 66118
Full Member
 

ernie, it is possible to accept a correction with good grace you know, you don't have to be obnoxious as well as wrong.


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 1:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ernie, it is possible to accept a correction with good grace you know, you don't have to be obnoxious as well as wrong.

You thought my "Margaret Thatcher would still be Prime Minister" comment was a serious one too ?! LOL ! 😀

.....sometimes this place cracks me up - it really does 🙂


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 1:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So thatcher supported Israel's suppression of the Palestinians?

Sounds about right. Evil bitch.


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 1:23 am
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

you don't have to be obnoxious as well as wrong.

This has never been a problem for ernie.


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 1:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Godwin's law before the first post. Chapeau!

Life would be full of fear. Bullies would run the show. If his scientists were correct, the race would be pretty much perfect by now and we'd have massive unemployment within one generation as older workers lived (even) longer.

Quite close really, wasn't it?


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 1:27 am
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Darcylulz.... 🙂


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 1:28 am
Posts: 1646
Full Member
 

We have people comparing one minister of state with a another minister of state, one of which was responsible for 60 million plus dead. In such a state where the one with the higher disregard for life won a do you think we would have chance to even think such a thought never mind post it up in public to be recorded for ever?


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 1:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think I'm going to dine out on this one........"so anyway, this guy posts up a thread on STW and asks what would have happened if the Nazis had won WW2, I say that Maggie Thatcher would still be PM, and a couple of guys come along all serious to point out why I'm "wrong" !"

Priceless 8)


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 1:38 am
Posts: 66118
Full Member
 

ernie_lynch - Member

You thought my "Margaret Thatcher would still be Prime Minister" comment was a serious one too ?! LOL !

Hey, the Edinburgh Defence actually does exist! Just not in Edinburgh.

Seriously, doesn't matter if you were joking or not, it's your response which is pathetic.


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 1:41 am
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

You must 'dine out' in some really dull places. With some really dull people.


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 1:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No OK, it's a fair cop Northwind, I can't deny it any longer - I was being serious. And I am eternally grateful to Z-11 for having patiently taken the time out to laboriously trawl through the internet to prove that Maggie Thatcher couldn't have been PM under the Third Reich. The truth is, I just couldn't admit that I was wrong.

Although just pointing out that she was a woman might have been a tad easier and quicker.......the Nazis believed that a woman's role was looking after the family.


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 1:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Of course, I didn't have to trawl for anything - I've got a full referenced library of everything to know about her in my shrine, next to the signed topless photo 8)

You going to apologise for voting for an Anti-Semite for mayor of London Ernie? 😉


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 1:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tonight Zulu-Eleven, I'm your bitch. I apologise for having besmirched Maggie's good name, gawd bless her, and I apologise for having voted for Ken.

Anything else I need to apologise for ? .....don't be shy


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 2:05 am
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Obnoxious, as well as wrong.


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 2:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm not asking you mate. I'm Zulu-Eleven's bitch tonight.


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 2:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Shy? why would I be shy Ernie? Your mother wasn't 😆


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 2:11 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wee boys' fight. In light of recent events, please calm down and let your wee willies go a bit flacid.


 
Posted : 06/11/2011 2:18 am
Page 2 / 2