I have no interest in him whatsoever regardless of level ...
How do you know?
Tell me what is new?
Not likely!
coz the news have no interest to me whatsoever.
since 1994?
To be fair to Chewkw here, the last time I read a newspaper it was because Linda Lusardi and Kathy Lloyd were on page 3.
Do you know who Piers Morgan is ?
Do you actually believe him when he says well anything actually ...probably unwise to ask that of a mod as its not like you can reply
All hail the kill file
Cougar - Moderator
since 1994?
To be fair to Chewkw here, the last time I read a newspaper it was because Linda Lusardi and Kathy Lloyd were on page 3
Yes, I remember Kathy Lloyd the page 3 in the Sun.
I remember when I first arrived to see page 3. I couldn't believe what I saw ... I thought the national newspaper had gone "pron". 😆
I only look at page 3 in those days btw ...
Do you actually believe him when he says well anything actually ...probably unwise to ask that of a mod as its not like you can reply
I have no idea TBH. Though I expect nor does he. (-:
eddiebaby - Member
Jesus Chewkw, even on a thread referencing Hopkins, Morgan and Trump you manage to be the biggest arse.
POSTED 23 MINUTES AGO # REPORT-POST
That made me laugh.
I thought hang on ... something is not right there ... then I switch off ...
Suddenly your views and voting record make sense, Chewkw. 😛
I thought hang on ... something is not right there ... then I switch off ...
reboot for an upgrade?
Jesus Chewkw, even on a thread referencing Hopkins, Morgan and Trump you manage to be the biggest arse.
😆
Ain't that the truth
Check out Mungus bullying an immigrant because he is not au fait with a couple of media trolls. 😈
How are you defining immigrant? are we not all global citizens?
Aside from the fact that the "Professional Opinion-Haver" (as I once saw her described, which amused me very much) is by any reckoning a vile stain on humanity, it's important that we don't forget [i]just how monumentally stupid[/i] she is.
She once started flapping her mouth about how she wouldn't let her kids associate with "lower class" kids with names like "Chardonnay".
Pressed, she admitted that she was judging entire familiies' entire social worth on the the names of their bairns.
She then went on to point out that she also didn't like kids who were given "geographical" names - "Paris", "Brooklyn" and the like.
Then someone pointed out that the dozy cow's own daughter is called "India".
I have door-knobs with more brains than she's got. And it says a lot that - thick as she is - she still connects with Right wing knuckle-draggers on equal terms...
eddie11 - Member
she articulates sod all and speaks for no one. Don't dress her up as some right wing social commentator.She has no agenda, no ideology, no politics other than self promotion. never has.
She just takes contrary and sometimes (well often) offensive opinions on anything and everything just for self promotion. She has been a useful generator of clicks for a range of employers but there is only so long she can be useful for. there is probably a random Katie Hopkins opinion generator somewhere on the web these days.
Sums up quite succinctly my feelings about her.
For those who oppose Katie Hopkins you seem to enjoy reading her views so much so you understand everything about her ...I don't even know that much about her apart from Apprentice ...
I know you can be pretty self-obsessed, but surely it isn't beyond you to be able to fathom out that one doesn't need to have read anything written by her, or the execrable Piers Morgan for that matter, or seen a single episode of The Apprentice, to be aware of her presence?
You don't have to be stood in the middle of a sewage plant to be able to smell it quite some distance away, same with those two, in that they get referenced in news sources elsewhere, usual in less than flattering terms.
🙄
Very well put, Count!
How are you defining immigrant? [u]are we not all global citizens?[/u]
Explain UKIP, then..?
😉
I thought she was way OTT to have any credibility, or to be taken seriously. Obviously she wound up a lot of SJWs (doesn't take much), but I think her trolling could have done with some refinement.
😀but I think her trolling could have done with some refinement.
Katie Hopkins is a product of our time. A vastly expanded array of 'channels' to broadcast 'views' combined with a uniquely gullible (at least since the days of witch-hunts) audience.
I say 'views' advisedly, because I very much doubt they are her real views. She is simply a publicity whore who reached a critical mass where it became financially advantageous for rags like the Fail to give her more of a platform. When you realise this, the spell is broken and you cease to be outraged or even bothered. 🙂
The disturbing thing is the existence of the required level of gullibility to allow this to happen.
Worst are the muppets who think the likes of Hopkins 'represents' them and lap it all up, no matter what. To these people I say "you do realise that she guffaws with the rest of her crew at soirees about how utterly ****ing stupid the great unwashed must be to believe her crap and get away with it, don't you?"
A level higher on the 'learning to read without moving their lips' scale are the outraged. Again, they actually think she is committed to her supposed views rather than her notoriety and bank balance. But at least these people don't actually follow her.
It's all one big sham. She spouts some crap, loads of people take notice, she earns more cash. The baffling thing is that grown ups are taken in by her and allow themselves to be willing tossed off like this.
At least the folk who used to boo Kendo Nagasaki on the ITV wrestling were (mostly) aware that it was all a show, a sort of panto. Even kids know panto when they see it.
Aside from the fact that the "Professional Opinion-Haver" (as I once saw her described, which amused me very much) is by any reckoning a vile stain on humanity
"Professional Opinion-Giver" seems more appropriate to me. As Dannyh just said, whether she actually has those opinions is a matter of speculation.
Then someone pointed out that the dozy cow's own daughter is called "India".
That was Philip Schofield, on whatever morning TV show it is he presents.
Even kids know panto when they see it.
Oh no they don't.
but I think her trolling could have done with some refinement
you think she was too subtle?
you think she was too subtle?
You over-estimate her target audience.
Just for chewky, this is Piers Morgan, a successful english batsman, enjoying an over in the nets.
Cougar - Moderator
Even kids know panto when they see it.
Oh no they don't.POSTED 39 MINUTES AGO # REPORT-POST
[img] 
?1349652370[/img]
I really, really wish Brett Lee had properly crusted Morgan. Then strolled off and left him laying in a pile of broken teeth and stumps.
But, not even getting into line Piers? What an utter Walter Mitty.
Chest_Rockwell - MemberCheck out Mungus bullying an immigrant because he is not au fait with a couple of media trolls.
CharlieMungus is my friend coz he is a baiter.
I like someone who can fish.
Edit: Oh ya he is Not bullying and should be encouraged to interact with me in such a way as I totally welcome that. 😆
You see CharlieMungus is strong and stand his ground unlike some of you the weaker lot running to the mods ... I like CharlieMungus me. 😛
So, chewkw, you are just a troll then, yeah?
Thank heavens.
I was actually worried for a bit that you might, er, well, er (concerned voice) think you were 'part of [i]something[/i]' with all the far-right bullshit. 😐
I like someone who can fish.
I used to be a qualified coarse angling coach, and once beat the then World Champ Tommy Pickering on the next peg, in a match on the River Erne at Enniskillen,
Do I qualify?
dannyh - MemberSo, chewkw, you are just a troll then, yeah?
No, am not a troll.
Because it started with proper questions then answers but everyone did (still dont I guess) not believe me then started to make assumption about me.
When they finally run of ideas they call me troll ... oh c'mon. 🙄
That depends ... if you fish with your expensive gadgets then everyone can do that so not that qualify. 😛keithr - Member
I like someone who can fish.
I used to be a qualified coarse angling coach, and once beat the then World Champ Tommy Pickering on the next peg, in a match on the River Erne at Enniskillen,Do I qualify?
everyone did (still dont I guess) not believe me
That's the most perceptive thing you've ever posted, I think.
And you're right. We don't believe you.
dannyh - Member
everyone did (still dont I guess) not believe me
That's the most perceptive thing you've ever posted, I think.
And you're right. We don't believe you.
Fortunately or unfortunately you (not targeting you) are just who you are that's your identity, where you cannot help by being yourself.
Do you want to change or can you change? 😛
If you can change then you can / will be able to believe me. 😀
[img] 
[/img]
dannyh - Member
😆
Fortunately or unfortunately you (not targeting you) are just who you are that's your identity, where you cannot help by being yourself.
It's one thing to talk/post bollocks, but can you please do so with intelligible punctuation and grammar?
Bollocks is often difficult to interpret, what with it being bollocks and all that, but combining bollocks with riddles - sorry, I'm too literal for guessing games.
dannyh - Member
It's one thing to talk/post bollocks, but can you please do so with intelligible punctuation and grammar?Bollocks is often difficult to interpret, what with it being bollocks and all that, but combining bollocks with riddles - sorry, I'm too literal for guessing games.
Funny clip that.
Anyway, relax just be yourself ... 😀
I feel sorry for those who have not realised chekwk is a bot gone rogue.
To be fair, he did said one thing on this thread I agree with.
I too had no idea who Katie Hopkins was until she proposed the final solution for some group of people (not sure whom exactly).
@dannyh - your post from about 7pm friday, before you engaged with the chewbot, pretty much sums it up.
Piers Morgan can be described in the same terms but he appears to have some understanding there is a 'volume control' button even though he struggles to know when to use it.
People with vile opinions - either real or just assumed for whatever reason - are contemptible.
The truly poisonous are those who employ the likes of Hopkins and Morgan.
Said it before, but worth saying again..
My estimation of Piers went up slightly when his stance on gun control lost him his American gig
frankconway - Member
People with vile opinions - either real or just assumed for whatever reason - are contemptible.
The truly poisonous are those who employ the likes of Hopkins and Morgan.
People with vile opinions come in all forms and shapes [b]from all sides[/b].
Reading this entire thread, I'm unable to offer anything other than to cite Burke, K vs Bonham-Carter, B and hope that the general consensus errs toward dissuading Ms Hopkins from spouting rented hate so readily.
@chewkw - I did not state/suggest/imply that people with vile opinions were restricted to a specific group or sector or race or religion.
Don't attempt to infer an interpretation when you're, in fact, attempting to initiate a pointless exchange of posts.
My comments are correct, accurate and all-inclusive.
Move along.
chewkw
People with vile opinions come in all forms and shapes from all sides.
Be fair, mainly from the right / Brexit fraternity (in a gender non-specific way).
Huh, I've had to read this thread and use Google find out who Hopkins is and what LBC is, how come you lot all know? Are you all readers/listeners?
