Forum menu
I *heart* this;
[i]An alternative medicine conference has ended in chaos in Germany after dozens of delegates took a LSD-like drug and started suffering from hallucinations.
Broadcaster NDR described the 29 men and women “staggering around, rolling in a meadow, talking gibberish and suffering severe cramps”.
More than 150 medical staff, ambulances and police descended on the scene and took the raving delegates to hospital.
No one recovered sufficiently to be interviewed by police until Monday, a spokesperson said.
Torsten Passie, a member of the German government’s expert commission for narcotics, told NDR: “It must have been a multiple overdose. That does not support the view that the people concerned took the hallucinogen knowingly.
“One has to assume that people were not told about the substance, its effects and risks before taking it.”
Police are reportedly looking into possibilities including the drug being taken as a joint experiment, or it being furtively given to conference participants as a prank.[/i]
[url= http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/homeopathy-conference-ends-in-chaos-after-delegates-take-hallucinogenic-drug-10491114.html ]http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/homeopathy-conference-ends-in-chaos-after-delegates-take-hallucinogenic-drug-10491114.html[/url]
Should've just handed out some glowsticks and [s]water[/s] powerful remedies and let them get on with it.
Sounds great apart from the cramps - orange juice would have fettled that.. 😉
Quick , someone link up the Northside song ...
Maybe having that many homeopathy practitioners in one place was the problem - they need to be diluted in with lots of non-deluded people?
wwaswas - like!
Some reports are saying that the drug was 2C-e..
According to yunki Jr - 'woaaah that's some seriously bizarre stuff.. Weird shit.. I wouldn't like to take that without knowing about it and I know what it is.. Woooaaah'
(imagine a hairier, dirtier version of young Keanu Reeves)
wwaswas - Member
Maybe having that many homeopathy practitioners in one place was the problem - they need to be diluted in with lots of non-deluded people?
Very, very good Sir
And the subtext here I guess is to discredit across the board the holistic approach to healing in favour of medical orthodoxy's central dogma ? .. Crack on with your trips to the doc's - I'm sure he's got just the pill for you . No sense in taking responsibility for one's own health and learning about one's body - Leave it to the experts right?
[i] Leave it to the experts right? [/i]
as long as they're not expert homeopaths I'll go with that.
wwaswas - Member
Maybe having that many homeopathy practitioners in one place was the problem - they need to be diluted in with lots of non-deluded people?
Possibly post of the week. Well done sir, well done.
If it was 2C-E then that's some strong stuff to be taking accidentally. Get the dose wrong and you'll be tripping balls for half a day.
[nelson from the simpsons] Ha Ha [/nelson]
+many wwaswas 🙂
And the subtext here I guess is to discredit across the board the holistic approach to healing in favour of medical orthodoxy's central dogma ?
I'll bite: go on then, what is "medical orthodoxy's central dogma"? As most doctors I know certainly take a holistic view of illness, when appropriate.
No sense in taking responsibility for one's own health and learning about one's body - Leave it to the experts right?
LOL.
My missus is in her final year as a Senior Registrar before she makes it to consultant.
So far she has spent 23 years of continual [i]"learning about one's body"[/i], in both academic and practical settings, with much of it specialised on just one sub-system.
But yeah, I'm sure I can reliably second guess her with half an hour's reading of unreviewed theories from random's on the internet. 🙄
noltae - MemberAnd the subtext here I guess is to discredit across the board the holistic approach to healing in favour of medical orthodoxy's central dogma ? ...
no, just laughing at homeopathy.
it's not clear from the article wether the tripsters were A) just feeling the effects of placebo (the 'drug' they'd take was homeopathic), or B) they really were on something fruity.
Crack on with your trips to the doc's - I'm sure he's got just the pill for you
Well if he is handing out E's then I am all for medical orthodoxy central dogma.
Anyway it was probably all just a big mistake.
[i]Leave it to the experts right? [/i]
as long as they're not expert homeopaths I'll go with that.
Splendid!!!
I'll bite: go on then, what is "medical orthodoxy's central dogma"? As most doctors I know certainly take a holistic view of illness, when appropriate.
Sweet!! Which practice are you registered to????
I've been looking for a GP that understands the notion of a holistic approach for about the last 12 years and I'm yet to find one. In my experience they like to have a 5 minute chat, pick one prominent symptom you mention and the prescribe a pill and send you on your way for the next 2 years...
If the qualified Doctors of today are any better that homeopaths can someone please explain to my why the entire Westernised world is facing levels of chronic illness greater than at any other time in history? Oh yeah, and then there's the epidemic of mental illness that spreading from America like a plague?
FTFY 🙂devash - Member
If it was 2C-E then that's some strong stuff [s]to be taking accidentally[/s]. Get the dose [s]wrong[/s] right and you'll be tripping balls [s]for half a[/s] all day.
Jamz - MemberIf the qualified Doctors of today are any better that homeopaths can someone please explain to my why the entire Westernised world is facing levels of chronic illness greater than at any other time in history?
1) homeopathy is a western invention.
2) diet, exercise and boredom.
[i] can someone please explain to my why the entire Westernised world is facing levels of chronic illness greater than at any other time in history?[/i]
Because people used to quickly die from chronic illnesses or secondary issues and now they live for a long time with a chronic illness and secondary issues?
If the qualified Doctors of today are any better that homeopaths can someone please explain to my why the entire Westernised world is facing levels of chronic illness greater than at any other time in history?
[b]Statement 1[/b] - Because the average age of our nation is steadily increasing, due to advances in medicine.
[b]Statement 2 [/b]- As age increases, levels of chronic illness increase.
[b]Statement 3[/b] ... is fairly obvious given the above.
However, Scurvey and the Bubonic plague is at an all time low...
And the subtext here I guess is to discredit across the board the holistic approach to healing in favour of medical orthodoxy's central dogma ? .. Crack on with your trips to the doc's - I'm sure he's got just the pill for you . No sense in taking responsibility for one's own health and learning about one's body - Leave it to the experts right?
That's like saying "i like chips, so you can't drive a Toyota". Discrediting homeopathy and encouraging patinets to take responsibility are 2 completely separate events. (of which, I give 'max doctoring power' to both..)
DrP
All we need to do is make sure that people never get the chance to suffer these pesky chronic diseases by catching people young and trying to treat their serious acute illnesses with homeopathy. That should fix the problem.
If the qualified Doctors of today are any better that homeopaths can someone please explain to my why the entire Westernised world is facing levels of chronic illness greater than at any other time in history? Oh yeah, and then there's the epidemic of mental illness that spreading from America like a plague?
Because people can now afford to see a Dr since the NHS was created? Pretty hard to be diagnosed with a disease when all you have to barter with is a Turnip.
Ditto a lot of 'western' diseases like cancer. Cancer got it's name because in the very late stages your skin could develop in a spiders web like pattern of tumours which resembled crabs, so it was usually diagnosed when you died. Hard to develop a chronic 'western' condition when you're dead.
I am not a doctor but from what I understand, most (I would assume all, but obv. I am not a doctor) people die. As they live longer before they die they have more time to get ill. And then eventually die from something.
From the subtext here I assume homeopathy users don't die (or at least they die at the same age they'd die in the 1800s thereby having less illnesses). But again. I am not a doctor.
p.s.
I am not a doctor
When was the last time you saw someone who has had an accident plead with bystanders ..... "AAAAAARRrrggghhh Help ! Call a Homeopath"
[i]"AAAAAARRrrggghhh Help ! Call a [s]Homeopath[/s]comedian - laughter's the best medicine" [/i]
😉
Surely they could have thrown a scrap of your own back into a bath, had you drink it and you'd have not needed all the hardware?
And the subtext here I guess is to discredit across the board the holistic approach to healing in favour of medical orthodoxy's central dogma ? ...
Not at all. Do you have anything specific you'd like me to discredit for you, or are you just generalising?
"Holistic" is a bit misleading. I've been dealing with doctors and specialists second-hand for a few years now (my wife has a chronic condition or two) (aside from "being married to me" that is) and it's very, very rare to find one that "looks at the bigger picture." Health professionals, IME, are very focused on what they know and defer to others for anything else; this is both a benefit and a curse of being highly specialised. But to get someone to step back and go "well, you've got X, Y and Z so maybe these are related and actually the underlying cause of all this might be something else entirely" is incredibly difficult. At this level, I'd applaud a more "holistic" approach to healthcare in these sorts of cases.
However, "holistic" is also tied up in all manner of pseudo-scientific quackery; the flow of chi and the body's innate intelligence and all that pish. "Dogma" is inappropriate with reference to actual medicine, as dogma implies a tenet of a belief system. "Orthodox" medicine doesn't require belief, it'll work (or not) regardless of whether you believe in it (placebo effect notwithstanding).
What Cougar refers to is the concept of 'siloing of care' - that is separating out an person's conditions and illnesses into individaul 'problem lists'.
For all the merit they provide to healthcare, this is a flaw in care provided by specialist consultants.
Consultant heart - Mrs X needs this pill for condition Y
Consultant lung - Mrs X needs this pill for condition Z, which may increase the effect of the previous pill...
Despite mostly sitting on our backsides doing nothing (hey, NHS flappy bird champ South East here...) or failing to identify dismembered patients for the severity that they are, the idea of General Practice is that of being 'all encompassing' and actually seeing the bigger picture... stopping unnecessary meds, identifying prescribing/polypharmacy complications etc etc...
DrP
And the subtext here I guess is to discredit across the board the holistic approach to healing in favour of medical orthodoxy's central dogma ? .. Crack on with your trips to the doc's - I'm sure he's got just the pill for you . No sense in taking responsibility for one's own health and learning about one's body - Leave it to the experts right?
+1. Good post.
You're also in favour of learning about one's body cg? Unlike the homeopaths who would prefer it all to remain a mystery (but it works!)
You're also in favour of learning about one's body cg?
Yes, I've had to do that myself. It was preferable to ending my life.
the idea of General Practice is that of being 'all encompassing' and actually seeing the bigger picture
This is how it [i]should [/i]work, but unfortunately the quality of GPs does seem to vary wildly. For every GP we've seen who's actually had the ability (and time / inclination) to do that we must have seen half a dozen who were the medical equivalent of front line technical support.
Which to be fair is what's needed most of the time, you don't need a highly trained and experienced senior consultant to give you a couple of paracetamol for a headache. The problem arises when it's more complicated than that, and there doesn't appear to be any form of escalation route within General Practice itself; you've just got to keep going back until you get lucky, it's a lottery. The woman she's currently in the care of is absolutely brilliant, but my god we've seen some nobbers along the way.
You snipped my second sentence c.g. - in that case I am confused why you apparently seem to support a post which in the context of the rest of this thread would appear to be supportive of homeopathy, a practice which relies on obfuscation rather than knowledge.
Jamz - Membercan someone please explain to my why the entire Westernised world is facing levels of chronic illness greater than at any other time in history?
Either of my 2 chronic conditions would have killed me without relatively recent medical progress. Things like this mess up your stats something rotten.
With children who are in contact with multiple state agencies they hold regular multi-disciplinary meetings where they share information and try to arrive at a holistic view of what the child is experiencing/needs.
I can see the NHS adopting the same approach for 'complex' cases as being ultimately better for the patient and cheaper for the NHS?
dunno if anyone's not stated the screamingly obvious yet but I will in case not
Doctors are paid by the NHS and review available drugs, then prescribe them if they think you need them, and won't if they think you are ok
(it's not uncommon to hear 'I went to the doctor and he didn't give me the antibiotics/meds I think I need' from a care recipient)
Homeopaths are not employed by any central organisation, they buy the treatment and sell them to you.
try and find someone who went to the homeopath and wasn't offered a treatment because there was nothing wrong with them
I suspect part of the problem is that it can be difficult to distinguish complex cases with a significant psychiatric dimension from those which are organically complex (if you know what I mean- I am not a doctor). Trying to decide which agencies/departments are appropriate is what makes it tricky.
Sorry ed, but your post needs a little fixing:
[quote=edhornby ]Homeopaths are not employed by any central organisation, they buy the [s]treatment[/s] sugar pills and sell them to you.
try and find someone who went to the homeopath and wasn't offered a [s]treatment[/s] sugar pill because there was nothing wrong with them
Though to be completely fair, it's exactly the people who there is nothing wrong with (or a GP will not give any conventional medicine to, which includes those people with untreatable illnesses like a cold) who homeopathy works really well for.




