Forum search & shortcuts

Heartwarming love s...
 

[Closed] Heartwarming love story of the day..

 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#1558089]

http://tinyurl.com/2eu8daj

😯


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 3:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What I find almost as disturbing, Dez, is how on Earth you found this crap? 😯


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 4:03 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

[i][b]That night, grandmother and grandson became lovers.[/b][/i]

I'd like to think I was fairly open-minded and progressive in my views on incest between consenting adults. But everything about that sentence makes me squirm with the wrong of it.


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 4:12 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The young chap sitting opposite me emailed it round 🙂
He frequents some strange forums on t'internet. I, of course, do not do any such thing.


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 4:12 pm
Posts: 126
Free Member
 

Anyone know how to make a smiley of someone spewing coffee all over their keyboard?
❗ will have to suffice


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 4:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[b]That night, grandmother and grandson became lovers.[/b]

I'd like to think I was fairly open-minded and progressive in my views on incest between consenting adults. But everything about that sentence makes me squirm with the wrong of it.

It's wronger than wrong, isn't it?

PapaWheelie; I find this one works well in these situations: 😯


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 4:20 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

**** me, worse than that B&B programme last night.


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 4:22 pm
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

"'When he emailed me a photo, I thought what a handsome and sexy man he was before pinching myself – he was my grandson!'"

LOL!

and ewwwwww!

:S


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 4:32 pm
Posts: 6320
Full Member
 

Anyone know how to make a smiley of someone spewing coffee all over their keyboard?

Will this do?
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 4:33 pm
Posts: 8177
Free Member
 

[img] http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-shocked003.gi f" target="_blank">http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-shocked003.gi f"/> [/img]


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 5:01 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong
Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong
Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong
Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong
Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong
Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong
Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong
Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong
Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong
Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong!


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 5:19 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

I've never, I mean [u][i]never[/i][/u] been so attracted sexually to someone that I couldn't be put off by small details like them being a close blood relative I don't think. The idea that there are people who have such powerful passions that they honestly have no choice but to roll with it, despite the fact that it's wrong, bad, a crime against god and nature, something that most monkeys would shy away from with little squeals of horror strikes me as somewhat alarming.


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 5:33 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Actually, I'm not sure about the monkeys. They're probably cool with it I guess.


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 5:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

On the scale of wrongness, how wrong is it?

I mean, if having a childhood crush on a cousin is at one end, and murdering your new-born then drinking their blood etc in a rampage of sexual excess is at the other (I'd deliberately like to not imagine anything else on that level really), where does this one sit? I mean, it's pretty wrong, isn't it?


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You’re all too cynical I’m sure they are very much in love and will have a long and happy relationship – well obviously not that long given her age


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 5:51 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

[i]where does this one sit?[/i]

I mean, there's no coercion, there's no violence, no-one gets hurt. It's just yucky. Partly because she's old, and really not terribly hot, and partly because he has a slightly pathetic puppy-dog air about him. And partly because we're mostly pretty squeamish about the idea that anyone that old still has sex, nevermind sex with young people, nevermind sex with young close relatives.

Gross and wrong, and wronger because it's really gross, but I reckon it's probably in the middle somewhere on your spectrum.


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 5:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Actually, I'm not sure about the monkeys. They're probably cool with it I guess.

I somehow doubt it, inbreeding is genetically bad for pretty much all species. I'm sure that our revulsion at the thought of shagging our own granny, stems from very powerful instincts and has little to do with "social convention".

I assume that we automatically discount the possibility of sex with any female which we have had any strong bond with during childhood - sister, mother, granny, etc. But iirc, men are attracted to women who look like their mothers did, when they themselves were toddlers - in other words, successfully fertile women.

I can see how this might cause problems when close relatives meet for the first time as adults and Genetic Sexual Attraction occurs.


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 6:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I reckon it's probably in the middle somewhere on your spectrum.

I was thinking about a 5/10 myself, but then the thought of what a 10/10 might be became a little more than I was comfortable with.


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 6:21 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'd hate to think what's 6,7,8 or 9 on that scale...


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 8:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I feel ill 😯


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 10:51 pm
Posts: 6855
Full Member
 

Also, the spelling and grammar in this article is not journalistic, and it sounds like a bunch of brits.

That's a relief.


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 10:58 pm
Posts: 129
Free Member
 

I feel like these 2

[img] /vomit-smiley-9532.gif[/img][img] /vomit-smiley-1538.gif[/img]


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 11:10 pm
Posts: 6330
Full Member
 

Morally I feel that this is wrong. However the morality is based (I assume) upon the premise that it is wrong to engage in an incestuous relationship due to the increased likelyhood of producing children with genetic problems.

However, these morals originate from a time before IVF and surrogate mothers, so some may argue that they are out of date because in the situation that the OP highlights there is no possibility of a concentration of genetic problems/ defects. Unless of course the donor mother is a close blood relation. And we are now very definately in ' The VERY BEST of the Jeremy Kyle Show' territory.

All in all though. Euch


 
Posted : 29/04/2010 11:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

oh
my
god


 
Posted : 30/04/2010 12:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Seriously man...you make me sick 😉


 
Posted : 30/04/2010 12:22 am
Posts: 34016
Full Member
 

On the scale of being wrong in so many ways, I'll put that at around 5/10, possibly 6. As talkemada says, at the top of the scale, there are things that can just poison your mind. Regarding the whole looks thing, I've occasionally seen blokes with women, while being roughly the same age, looked like their granny. No accounting, as they say


 
Posted : 30/04/2010 8:31 pm