Forum menu
Flange - I hope your right; but sadly you got too many people who can get fooled too easily by a fake selling a good cause .. and too distracted to look any further as TomHoward here demonstrates with his imagination of what Geraint Thomas has put back in covering what he has taken out.
It's kind of like Phillip Green some time ago; then he was seen as a philanthropist and generally great guy .. once you scratched the surface things looked a lot different; but bias or ignorance can disguise such things.
Frank Conway - I have continued to do my normal work visiting and supporting vulnerable people within hospital and community settings during the COVID situation. Which not looking to big myself up - is a lot more worthwhile than sitting on a turbo trainer getting publicity for zwift and encouraging people to donate money.
What have you done during the COVID crisis?
frankconway
SubscriberChrist all *king mighty, global crisis and some of you are carping about motives and tax status.
The NHS needs help and support.
Have a look at yourselves.
For those of you criticising – what have you, personally, done to help; practically or financially?
G doesn’t need the publicity nor does he need to bask in the glory of his efforts.
I suggest you wind your necks in and invest your energy in doing something positive.
It is possible and acceptable to simultaneously praise G's efforts, criticise tax dodging and be concerned about the charitisation of the NHS. All of those things are ways to help and support health and carer workers.
For those of you criticising – what have you, personally, done to help; practically or financially?
Paid my taxes?
He's now being criticised for jokingly asking for a bag of peas, after doing something for charity. Instead of sitting on a pile of his money.
I think we've hit a bit of a low here.
I'm sure GT pays his taxes. But as someone who doesn't currently live or work in the UK I doubt they'd be paid here. Why that should be held against him 🤷♂️🤷♂️
Why that should be held against him
Well, if you cant work it out I dont see why anyone should bother explaining it to you.
aa - G would have paid his taxes when a UK resident so same as you; he will now be paying taxes in Monaco at the appropriate rate - yes, lower than the UK.
Are you trying to claim moral high ground?
Well, if you cant work it out I dont see why anyone should bother explaining it to you.
No I can't work it out I must be stupid. Tell me why someone who doesn't work or live in the UK should pay British taxes.
Bunnyhop - just a suggestion on where to focus: maybe explore the tax avoidance criticism before the bag of peas criticism eh ...
Frank Conway .. I am still keen to hear what you have been doing during this COVID crisis; because seeing as you were the one asking us I can only imagine you must be in the thick of it at the front line ..
Homerun - if you look back at one of my previous comments you will find a link to explain it. Ask an appropriate adult to read and explain it if its still a bit complicated for you.
aa – G would have paid his taxes when a UK resident so same as you; he will now be paying taxes in Monaco at the appropriate rate – yes, lower than the UK.
Good for him, you asked what I'd done I gave you an example, your response speaks volumes.
No I can’t work it out I must be stupid. Tell me why someone who doesn’t work or live in the UK should pay British taxes.
I respectfully decline, you clearly wouldnt grasp it anyway.
I respectfully decline, you clearly wouldnt grasp it anyway.
So you can't, all you could do is voice an opinion based on your own prejudices.
Mooman your the same, you parade your prejudice and envy like a banner for the whole world to see.
So you can’t,
I can, I could even read the rest of the thread where its explained. That you choose not to or you choose to pretend to not understand because you dont agree with the opinions of others is your choice.
Mooman your the same, you parade your prejudice and envy like a banner for the whole world to see.
You really are childlike in your ability to see your own view as the only one possible, its quite amusing
I can, I could even read the rest of the thread where its explained.
Where on this thread is it explained ?
You really are childlike in your ability to see your own view as the only one possible, its quite amusing
Oh the irony 😂😂😂😂.
Simon E....
Of the donations, how many are from people earning £9/hour and how many (and how much) made by the better off? All those gushing TV events – Children in Need, Sport Relief etc – with their overpaid celebs asking the little people to cough up again and again while they invest their huge salaries and appearance fees in tax avoidance schemes. It is wrong.
Carers don’t need you to clap for them; what they need is a government that allows them a passable wage and fair benefits (like more than 5 days sick pay a year) instead of being treated like disposable plebs at the bottom of the food chain. And anyone who ‘claps for carers’ having voted Tory in December is a hypocrite.
Damn well said.
Christ all *king mighty, global crisis and some of you are carping about motives and tax status.
The NHS needs help and support.
Can you not see the link?
The NHS has needed help and support for years/ decades, but hasn't got it due to a combination of rich, selfish, self serving tools, ambivalent people and a sub class of scum who continue to vote Tory because they are too stupid to realise what it happening and how they are being manipulated by the powerful rich.
Well this is a pleasant thread.
I only have one thing to add: Please let's not conflate the underfunding of the NHS and Tory hypocrisy with Geraint's attempt to do something useful (albeit with a commercial partner) and his tax arrangements.
These issues can co-exist without one rendering the others worthless.
Also: Are you OK Mooman? You seem surprisingly vexed by a relatively innocuous event here.
Also: Are you OK Mooman? You seem surprisingly vexed by a relatively innocuous event here.
I am very good thank you; just back from a very nice 3hr sunny bike ride, and whilst the head wind on the way back was a little challenging at times, overall it was a very nice ride. Thus I can allay your concern that I may be vexed xx
These issues can co-exist without one rendering the others worthless.
Indeed, but at the same time we can discuss these matters together, as they are linked, its just a shame some feel the need to be shouty about it.
class of scum who continue to vote Tory
Anyone who's voted Tory are scum?
Anyone who’s voted Tory are scum
Of course not, dont be daft, some are just really stupid!!
moonman - 'G' made a funny comment about needing a bag of peas (surely you must know his sense of humour by now).
He wins the TdF and the whole of Britain/UK applaud him, he's wins the sports personality of the year, voted for by the public. He raises thousands of pounds for charity and gets criticised. Fella can't do anything right.
I'm a huge fan. He wrote a note for me once when I was in a bit of a state and I'll always be grateful for that.
Bumyhop - I have no issue that you have a different opinion than mine; we all have different social values and opinions of what social responsibility is. If you feel he does more good for the NHS by encouraging people to donate a off amount towards the NHS instead of paying UK tax on his multi-million pounds cycling contracts then thats your decision.
As you state - your a big fan because he wrote you a note; if that makes him a great guy in your book then I guess nothing is likely to alter your opinion of him.
So why do you think he should pay tax here? Because he was born here? I get that British cycling invested in him, but as I said, he gave them what they wanted (gold medals), and continues to work to give them a world champion. He now lives in another country and makes his living, primarily, outside of this country, so why pay here? Are you saying that people that come here for work shouldn’t pay tax here, but in their country of birth, as that’s who educated them etc, despite getting all the ‘benefits’ of living here?
Are your living arrangements based on what is best for the treasury, or best for you? And if there were two different options, one favouring the treasury, one favouring you, which would you pick?
TomHoward - maybe re-read this thread from the beginning to get a basic understanding of the answers to the questions you ask, or maybe you too could ask an adult to read and explain it to you if that is too difficult.
Also to maybe emphasise it a tad better - remind yourself of what country he moved back to as this COVID19 crisis developed.
His move to Monaco - the same as some of the other SKY/INEOS riders was simple tax evasion ... I have little doubt as soon as the multi-million pounds cycling contracts end he will move back to the UK.
On the funding he received whilst an amateur - don`t you think it would be fair if he paid into a the same system that gave to him so other athletes could receive the same opportunities?
His move to Monaco – the same as some of the other SKY/INEOS riders was simple tax evasion
No it wasn’t. Tax evasion is illegal. What he has done is tax avoidance, which isn’t. Maybe get an adult to explain the differences to you. Do you chastise people with ISA’s with the same vigour? What about those who use the cycle to work scheme?
I’ve no doubt British Cycling are very happy with what he has given them, in order for them to keep their funding up. I don’t think that because an organisation has invested in someone early on, that that person should be indebted to them indefinitely, no. Imagine if banks worked in the same way.
Do you chastise people with ISA’s with the same vigour
Now we all know people have different views and morals and ethical values, thats fine but can we try and keep the argument sensible. Going into tax exile and paying into an ISA are in no way similar.
On the funding he received whilst an amateur – don`t you think it would be fair if he paid into a the same system that gave to him so other athletes could receive the same opportunities?
He was essentially funded by the National Lottery - and Sky I guess - rather than directly by the tax-payer. That's how British Cycling took off.
If you want to blame someone for the underfunding of the NHS, I'd say the Tories are just a little more culpable than a professional cyclist. This is a bit like Matt Hancock randomly deciding that professional footballers should be taking pay-cuts because, well, they have lots of money.
It's all chaff to distract from the Tory neglect of the welfare state for the last ten years. A better question to be asking would be why the **** is our health service so stretched that a professional cyclist is raising money to support it.
I never meant my original comment - aimed at all tax avoiding sports stars, not just G - to turn the thread so shouty, and I'm really sorry about that.
I think he's an amazing athlete, his tax situation is entirely separate to that.
But if he's doing this to encourage people to make a moral choice to contribute to a charity, then people need to consider his - and others - moral choice to maximise his tax situation in Monaco. Someone roughed out how much UK tax he could have potentially paid in to public services if he was UK based.
If he needed to live and train abroad, lots of cyclists manage to do so in Spain, Italy or France, and pay taxes there.
I'll add this link
maybe he just like monaco ?
why the **** is our health service so stretched that a professional cyclist is raising money to support it
WHere did you want the money that you put in the NHS have been taken from ?
Defence ? Terrorist attacks ? Floods ? Roads ? Police ? Litter ? Parks ? Regeneration ?
You can't magic the money, it has to come out of something else?
Going into tax exile and paying into an ISA are in no way similar.
Different ends of the same spectrum. Where do you draw the line?
WHere did you want the money that you put in the NHS have been taken from ?
Defence ? Terrorist attacks ? Floods ? Roads ? Police ? Litter ? Parks ? Regeneration ? You can’t magic the money, it has to come out of something else?
Not buying votes in parliament?
Not buying votes in parliament?
£100s upon £100s of millions worth ? You think that would have made a dent in what the NHS needs ?
You can’t magic the money, it has to come out of something else?
I'm not quite sure how you went from my comment to this, but I would happily scrap Trident and divert that expenditure to the NHS for a start. Or HS2 for that matter.
£100s upon £100s of millions worth ? You think that would have made a dent in what the NHS needs ?
Literally 1000 £million. I think it would be better spent there, yes.
but I would happily scrap Trident and divert that expenditure to the NHS for a start. Or HS2 for that matter.
So because you don't want them that means they're invalid ? Hmmm not sure that's how things work in the world.
It got to this because there's so many people who say "fix the NHS, do this for the NHS" but without any idea how it would actually be done in the real world.
We're talking MASSIVE amounts of money here, not a pittance.
The money should come from taxation. You, and me, and all those on the minimum wage. Which I'm fine with - I'll contribute my share to get public services I want to see.
And as long as millionaire celebs and businesses can export their money offshore, it means our taxes will go up more than they might otherwise need to.
The money should come from taxation. You, and me, and all those on the minimum wage. Which I’m fine with – I’ll contribute my share to get public services I want to see.
SO tehy'll increase tax and the UK public are OK with that ? 1% ? 2% ? 5% ?
I'm not seeing that being accepted.
And as long as millionaire celebs and businesses can export their money offshore, it means our taxes will go up more than they might otherwise need to.
Agree. But if those millionaires don’t live here, and don’t make their money here, I struggle to see why they should pay tax here. Different story for people who DO live and make money here, but as mentioned above, it’s the game, not the players, that should be criticised.
So because you don’t want them that means they’re invalid ? Hmmm not sure that’s how things work in the world.
Well, I'm not entirely convinced that we need an independent nuclear deterrent or a massively expensive high speed rail system, but that's how discussion about budgeting works. My argument would be that we need a well-funded NHS rather more than the ability to wipe humanity off the face of the earth - or at least bits of Russia - at the press of a button.
I'm not even saying I'm 100% correct, but you asked where money could come from and I gave you a couple of suggestions. Your reply is that my argument might not be valid, which is fair enough, that's how discussion works, but just saying 'you might be wrong' isn't that persuasive.
I'd argue that if you want to take the whole idea that running a nation state is like running a household, having nuclear weapons is a bit like insisting you need a Ferrari as well as your normal household car. Which is fine if you can afford it, but if it means you're struggling to, say, pay the electricity bill, isn't necessarily the best use of your finances.
Why do we need nuclear weapons?
Sorry, this is just a dead end. What we really need to do, like some of the nordic states, is shift the way we think about taxation levels and wealth distribution.
Why do we need nuclear weapons?
I guess the simplest answer is "because other lunatics have them"
Although in your defence i'm not convinced in a civilised society we need them either... but there are some really special people leading governments in various parts of the world... So i can kinda see why we do.
Don't get me wrong here, i think the NHS really needs to be funded better and really deserves to be... even before this pandemic ever appeared.... But it's not really that simple is it.... As you've compared it to running a household, that's exactly the phrase we'll use, it really is like that, it's a finite budget of funds and putting it into pot 3 means it has to come out of 4, or 6, or 12...
I don't know the answers, i am not saying for a second i do... but i'm not convinced there's ANYONE on here who has a grasp of the decisions that governments have to make day in day out.. Do i think the government is great/right/correct, no, not really.... But that doesn't mean some random bloke in the street could do better as so many seem to think.
But that doesn’t mean some random bloke in the street could do better as so many seem to think.
I don't think anyone's suggested handing over the control of state expenditure to a 'random bloke in the street' - it would make good television though 🙂
The rest of it is about living in a democracy. If you don't believe we have a right to scrutinise government spending and policies, then you might as well live in China or Putin's Russia.
Regardless of all that, you wouldn't catch me spending 36 hours on Zwift 🙂
He’s a really good athlete and I’m sure he’s doing this with the best intentions, but the idea of reframing the NHS as a charity has the potential to do more harm than good.
There is some truth in this, but it is absolutely not the fault of anyone raising money or making charitable donations. This is the symptom of an overall problem elsewhere.
And it's not tax-avoidance either.
We know the NHS have received some of the largest funding cuts in its entire history during the past decade. And yet the government have stood there and told bare faced lies about it, proclaiming they are better funded than ever, and large parts of the media have backed them up.
Even people here are asking where the money should come from, like it just doesn't exist. Yet it did exist prior to the current government. Perhaps it was never perfect, and it never will be, but it was much better funded under the Labour government. The figures tell us this, and the doctors and nurses at the NHS are all telling us this. In fact it was better funded by every government prior to the current one.
But through all the corruption and disinformation we have in the age of information, we actually have little understanding collectively as a nation of WTAF is going on. And that vulnerability is being used against us. And as such, a lot of people still think the government are doing a fantastic job.
Don't blame a guy riding a bike for charity, raising almost half a million for a good cause.
I actually thought what Geraint did was a really nice touch, highlighting the efforts nurses put in on a daily basis.
WHere did you want the money that you put in the NHS have been taken from ?
Defence ? Terrorist attacks ? Floods ? Roads ? Police ? Litter ? Parks ? Regeneration ?
People paying taxes I reckon given the theme of the thread.
Going into tax exile and paying into an ISA are in no way similar.
Different ends of the same spectrum.
They really are not, one is a government supported scheme to encourage savings in relatively small amounts, the other isnt. If you can tell which is which ypu can understand the massive difference. I've never seen a government scheme for the other one.