Forum menu
one of the two presenters
AWT?
RB Horner had better hope the (ex)employee hasn't got anything more revealing up her sleeve...
That's just going to lead to more questions about the transparency of the whole affair. Whoever is in charge of PR should be sacked.
Subtle pinch of the bingo wings...nice! 🙂
Horner will be controlling the PR machine and dictating what they release about his controlling behaviour. Irony?
Subtle pinch of the bingo wings
Does anybody else think that's a very odd position for her to be holding her left arm? Not entirely natural, or comfortable looking.
I wonder what he'd choose if she gave him the ultimatum between keeping his job or her?
one of the two presenters
Possibly a lesson that workplace relationships don't get tougher than that, or else they didn't get a golden handshake when they left.
On a positive female front - there are some properly talented drivers in F1 Academy. Doriane Pin being the favourite following her excellent drives in WEC last season.
And Ken Block's daughter Lia has made a cracking start.
The whole Red Bull F1 thing is really fascinating, not just because of the soap opera nature, but because the F1 Team is so out of alignment with everything else Red Bull is involved with. Their sponsored athletes are (i believe) very carefully chosen and all seem to be role models and 'nice' regardless of how extreme and crazy their sports are.
The brand image is sacred and that extends to who they choose to represent them.
In F1, someone like Daniel Ricciardo also fits this mould, but Max and behaviours never really seemed to, and now all this stuff.
I previously had Horners outbursts etc down as being a pantomime villain for the entertainment, but am now not so sure.
I cant imagine that the parent Red Bull company are happy with any of this, and wonder if this is what all the drama is about. They need it to get back to being 'clean' but are so reliant on Horner etc making everything work that they dont know what to do next.
AWT?
JT? He's a wrongun.
And to the woman in question here..... I really hope she walks away with enough in the bank and the sort of reference that allows her to get he life together again. I really hate this shit.
Max fits in with the younger generation - he's constantly live streaming on SIM racing. Doesn't appeal to me but does to many kids.
Checo - really popular in South America and malleable!
Daniel - the smile act is wearing thin for me. He's been average since his comeback. I think this could be his last season in the RB camp.
Yuki - only there because of Honda. He'll be in VCARB next season again, but I can't see who else would take him.
^^^ that pic of Karen & Geri hugging......it looks to me like he's pinched her right arm bingo wing. I can't imagine it would be easy to do that by accident, especially as she's pretty slim, so there's not a lot to pinch there. Bloody painful to be pinched there, too.
Her left arm position looks like she's trying to reach up & pull his arm away to release the pinch on the right arm.
Weird.
This crap isn't doing anyone any good & the employee being suspended is just another level of PR mishandling. It just looks terrible and if they keep this up, isn't going to go away for a while.
I cant imagine that the parent Red Bull company are happy with any of this, and wonder if this is what all the drama is about. They need it to get back to being ‘clean’ but are so reliant on Horner etc making everything work that they dont know what to do next.
As I understand it, the F1 team is an independent business from the drinks company. It took over the old Jaguar F1 team, but was built into a championship contender by Horner and Newey. Dietrich Mateschitz gave Horner autonomy and pretty much a blank cheque, but put Helmut Marko in as a consultant to keep an eye on things. Mateschitz built Red Bull as a company by selling drinks based on a Thai energy drink owned by the Yoovidhya family, so the Yoovidhya's own 51% of Red Bull. Apparently, Horner has been trying to buy out the F1 team but the Austrian side apparently want to take control back. Horner has the backing of the Thai side though, so this looks like an attempt to discredit him and let Marko take control back.
Joe Saward has an excellent column on it. He's fairly careful, I assume the threat of lawsuits is hanging over every journalist who reports on it. Saward does note that the screenshots of the text messages taken many months ago indicate "CH typing". I think this is meant to imply that this was a honeytrap, where the female employee initially consented but then later complained about unwanted attention (because it's implying that the screenshots were taken many months before the complaint was made). If the KC's finding was that the evidence wasn't credible and that the female employee was not honest about the facts, that would justify retaining Horner and suspending the female employee. But, who really knows?
thols2
Joe Saward has an excellent column on it. He’s fairly careful, I assume the threat of lawsuits is hanging over every journalist who reports on it. Saward does note that the screenshots of the text messages taken many months ago indicate “CH typing”. I think this is meant to imply that this was a honeytrap, where the female employee initially consented but then later complained about unwanted attention. If the KC’s finding was that the evidence wasn’t credible and that the female employee was not honest about the facts, that would justify retaining Horner and suspending the female employee. But, who really knows?
Yes it's an interesting piece, Joe is usually good to listen to on Missed Apex etc. But having read this a couple of times I found it a bit unsavoury, Joe seems more concerned about morality of the leak than the allegations.
He also says there was "no evidence of wrongdoing"... well no, actually we don't know what the investigation found. Only that Red Bull dismissed the grievance. The lawyer could have recommended that they sack Horner. But perhaps he has information not in the public eye that he cannot reveal.
On that point though, you have to bear in mind with Saward, he gets his stories by talking to people in the paddock. If he annoys them, no more stories.
I found it a bit unsavoury, Joe seems more concerned about morality of the leak than the allegations
One thing to keep in mind with Saward on this is that his sister was brutally raped and later committed suicide (as I remember it, whatever the details, it must have been harrowing for him and his family). His writing and some of the comments seem to reflect that. I think he found it a very painful topic to write about.
Imagine if the whole thing had been an invention of the accuser and that the independent investigation had proven this.
"Time to draw a line under all this" says Horner as a whistleblower in his team is suspended.
Fairness and inclusivity, anyone?
"This crap isn’t doing anyone any good & the employee being suspended is just another level of PR mishandling. It just looks terrible and if they keep this up, isn’t going to go away for a while.:"
I agree, in the absence of any details it does feel like chucking petrol at the fire
The story has made the fornt page on the BBC News website again, you don't normally see anything F1 related there unless Hamilton wins a championship
Benson says she's been dismissed for being dishonest
- Alonso is tge fastest in FP2, followed by Russell
That would be a lovely way to start on Saturday!
Having read the latest from the BBC regarding Horner, I'm left wondering why it took a week to suspend the employee, why not suspend both whilst the case is being investigated.
It also goes on to say that Honda are also unhappy with the lack of clarity surrounding the issues.
The whole thing is so opaque as to be laughable. It's always worth having in the back of your mind while the race team refuse to name the KC involved, give any insight at all as to the outcome, but insist that it's all been a legitimate process that's been honest open and thorough, and that a junior female employee has entirely fabricated the whole thing and is so dishonest as to be sacked; that Horner is not just an appointed manager, he's essentially the owner of that team. I will be entirely not-astonished if its reported that the employee has been legally lent on regarding contact with the media
I look at the body language between Horner and his wife, and it tells its own story. As some-one up thread said, F1 is a world where morality and honesty have been removed and replaced with money and power.
Imagine if the whole thing had been an invention of the accuser and that the independent investigation had proven this.
Maybe she'd been put up to it by Jos Verstappen to undermine Horner and get him out and now that's come to light and Jos is throwing his toys out and trying to get Max into a Mercedes. There's been madder conspiracy theories.
I've not seen the messages though, do we think they were genuine? Were they bad enough to get Horner dismissed if they were?
.
.
Just had a look to see if I could find any odds for a punt on Sainz winning the 2025 championship but can't find anyone taking bets on that. Hamilton, to Ferrari, Verstappen to Merc then Sainz to RB for the last year of the current regs with the fastest car, it sounds plausible
Just had a look to see if I could find any odds for a punt on Sainz winning the 2025 championship but can’t find anyone taking bets on that.
Well... at the minute he doesn't have a car to drive! 🙂
That's why I thought I'd get decent odds🤣
I’ve not seen the messages though, do we think they were genuine?
The messages go from about a year. Mar 23- Jan 24. they start pretty boringly, mostly work, then get jokily flirty, but by the end its like you're reading the private messages between people who are intimate, honestly; it feels a bit invasive reading them. Now, there are Apps that will allow you to replicate WhatsApp log ins, so who knows, maybe the whole thing's a figment of her imagination, and its entirely made up, but there are pictures of Horner in the chat that would seem on the face of it, pretty difficult to create, and again, Geri's public appearances don't look like she thinks its entirely made up. I would say though, I reckon that releasing them to the public in the way they were was absolutely an attempt to get Horner to resign by some-one interested in making that happen. Whether that had anything to do with the female employee is another thing altogether.
Going full Weinstein by firing the woman involved and then telling everyone shes a liar is a terrible look in 2024. Really thought we'd got past that now.
Even the torygraph are unimpressed https://www.telegraph.co.uk/formula-1/2024/03/08/christian-horner-red-bull-saudi-international-womens-day/
Maybe she’d been put up to it by Jos Verstappen to undermine Horner and get him out and now that’s come to light and Jos is throwing his toys out and trying to get Max into a Mercedes.
"Hi there female friend, I was wondering if you could help me out, settling a grudge that even I dont fully remember by taking on one of the most powerful people in your industry. Of course, you'll almost certainly ruin the career you've been building over the last 10 years, and completely destabilise one of the most successful teams ever. I really do hate him though, so do us a solid, and put in a completely fabricated grievence after collating evidence for the next year please."
Imagine if the whole thing had been an invention of the accuser and that the independent investigation had proven this.
Then the messages would not have been leaked.
And Horner could clearly state they were false rather than 'I did nothing wrong'.
In my view it's clear retaliation, but hey! the woman must be lying...
Who knows what's been going on, certainly none of us, so all we have is speculation. What is old as time is that rumour & gossip expand to fill a vacuum, and RB could take definitive steps to end this sorry saga once and for all.
That said, Liberty Media are struggling to enthuse the public with their golden goose, and they're getting an awful lot of column inches out of this ridiculous salacious-love-interest plotline that frankly no F1 fans want or need.
Horner is not just an appointed manager, he’s essentially the owner of that team.
He doesn't own the team, he's an appointed manager. If the Thai shareholders (who own 51% of shares of the parent company) want him gone, he'll be gone.
What it looks like is that the Austrian side are unhappy with the autonomy that the F1 team has and they want more control, but the Thai side are happy with Horner. The screenshots of the messages taken by the female employee apparently show "CH typing," which may be an indication that she was taking screenshots many, many months before she made a complaint (because it suggests the screenshot was taken right after the message was sent, not months later). On top of that, screenshots of text messages would be trivial to fake so some screenshots by themselves prove nothing without forensic evidence about their authenticity. We don't know what actually happened, but if she did deliberately lead Horner on, collect seemingly incriminating screenshots, and then misrepresent what really happened, that would justify her dismissal on the grounds of dishonesty.
She has the right to appeal the dismissal. If it really was retaliation and she did nothing wrong, she deserves a large payout as compensation. If she deliberately misrepresented the facts with the intention of having Horner dismissed, she deserves to be named and shamed. The only way we'll find out is if she appeals the dismissal, without that, all we have is speculation.
The screenshots of the messages taken by the female employee apparently show “CH typing,” which may be an indication that she was taking screenshots many, many months before she made a complaint (because it suggests the screenshot was taken right after the message was sent, not months later).
All it suggests is that CH was typing at the time she took the screenshots.
For example: he could have said "delete this conversation", then she goes back through the convo and screenshots everything while he is typing his following message: "it makes things safer for both of us"
He doesn’t own the team, he’s an appointed manager.
Sure, what I meant (didn't really say very well) is that at Milton Keynes, at the race team he is effectually the top man, he decides the direction, he decides what happens and what doesn't happen, and he doesn't have to explain himself to anyone. Certainly as far as the female employee with whom he starts flirting with is concerned, there's no-one above Horner she can go to and say "look at what this other employee is doing"
All it suggests is that CH was typing at the time she took the screenshots.
True, but if Red Bull are going to sack the guy over screenshots of text messages, there needs to be corroborating forensic evidence that the complainant's account is factual. This wasn't like Harvey Weinstein or Donald Trump, where there were multiple women with similar accounts, it's a single complainant whose account apparently differs from Horner's. If the other evidence doesn't support her account, then Horner would have a case against Red Bull for unfair dismissal. Given that he apparently earns 15 million per year, that's going to be quite the compensation payout if Horner won in court.
It's the power imbalance that makes it improper.
If there was relations between a PA and the wheel gun man, it wouldn't have this coercive element that makes it distasteful. The suspension of this woman were CH was allowed to have business as usual just underlines it.
And if you look back at how he treated his previous squeeze before Angry Spice slid into the picture, you'll see he has form as being a class A dirtbag
there’s no-one above Horner she can go to and say “look at what this other employee is doing”
But she did do that. That's why Red Bull had an inquiry into it. I would be surprised if her firing was on the instruction of Horner. Red Bull hired a KC to investigate, he would have reported back about his findings. Her sacking would have been done after Red Bull lawyers looked over the evidence and gave an all clear (unless Horner and Red Bull are spectacularly stupid, which can't be completely ruled out to be fair.)
there’s no-one above Horner she can go to and say “look at what this other employee is doing”
They don't need to go above Horner - they can go to HR or whatever they call it, who can and should act in spite of who he is. If they are unable to, that's a toxic environment in itself.
I'm also aware (not saying it's right) that sports teams don't have the same 'rules' as normal workplaces. I played decent level sport and someof our dressing room discussions were very robust at times; and at high level it would be even more - not unheard of for the manager to throw teacups at people for example.
you’ll see he has form as being a class A dirtbag
I don't like Horner, he's an awful man, but that doesn't make him guilty of this. In situations like this, the company has to investigate and determine the facts. If they didn't any employee could have a superior dismissed just by alleging harassment. Wanting the allegations to be true doesn't make them true. If the employee has misrepresented the events in order to have Horner sacked, then the wrongdoing is on her part, not his.
I would be surprised if her firing was on the instruction of Horner.
Has she been fired? Thought it was just suspended at this stage but I could be wrong.
dakuan
Free MemberGoing full Weinstein by firing the woman involved and then telling everyone shes a liar is a terrible look in 2024. Really thought we’d got past that now.
Even the torygraph are unimpressed https://www.telegraph.co.uk/formula-1/2024/03/08/christian-horner-red-bull-saudi-international-womens-day//blockquote >
Blimey, I had to check that quote in there from Amanda Phillips, "Commercial Operations Coordinator for BWT Alpine F1" was real
[img][/img]