Forum menu
Football hegemony
 

[Closed] Football hegemony

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#8000287]

In the car this evening, hoping to listen to a bit of commentary on something Olympic, or maybe some updates on results I've missed. So what is on 5live? A ****ing football match! 2 weeks every 4 years, yet it still gets kicked off the schedules by the sport which dominates the schedules for the other 206 weeks. Is football that important?

Oh and nothing on 5LSX which I could get on my phone as an alternative.


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 10:05 pm
Posts: 8527
Free Member
 

Yes.

Next!.


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 10:06 pm
Posts: 46071
Free Member
 

I was questioning this last night - is it now a self propagating industry?
So large it gets the money, uses that for influence on TV schedules, so more people watch, so more money, so more TV time, so more influence, so more people watch etc...


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 10:10 pm
 mt
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

It's football what do you expect? How will those with no life manage through the summer, they may have to actually watch real committed sports stars in Rio.


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 10:10 pm
Posts: 8527
Free Member
 

Yawn.....


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 10:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[quote=Nobeerinthefridge ]Yawn.....

Yep, that's my usual reaction to football too


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 10:15 pm
Posts: 8527
Free Member
 

Me as well to be honest, just yawning at the usual anti footy snobbiness.

Carry on!.


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 10:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Like it or lump it, but football is a huge money maker.
I wonder if it'll be possible to spot the haterz. It's been just over a month where they've not been able to tell us how much they hate. It must've been hell. All back to normal now there will be more football threads. ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 10:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

they may have to actually watch real committed sports stars in Rio.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 10:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I usually avoid all of that sort of thing, but TBH when the BBC schedules are like this, I can understand why it gets called wendyball or other things by non fans who are tired of how pervasive it is. It's just far too dominant, when there's plenty of other sport which is rather more exciting to watch (or listen to commentary on) and has far more riding on than one of 380 premier league matches.


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 10:22 pm
Posts: 1171
Free Member
 

Is BBC1, BBC4 and BBC Sport website not enough Olympics coverage?
I'm looking forward to being able to easily find live updates from the Premier League on the BBC Sport page again instead of it being hidden behind non sports like horse dancing and jumping into a swimming pool.


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 10:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If the Beeb management had any sense, they would pick some other sports and drive their popularity. Leave the money laundering boys to sky and BT.


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 10:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[quote=mark88 ]Is BBC1, BBC4 and BBC Sport website not enough Olympics coverage?

Not when you're in the car and only have access to radio - which is the whole point. Is 206 weeks out of 208 not enough football coverage?

I far prefer watching (or listening to commentary on) those sports you're so dismissive of than <insert derogatory term for football here> and I'm sure I'm far from alone.


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 10:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

aracer - Member
mark88 ยป Is BBC1, BBC4 and BBC Sport website not enough Olympics coverage?
Not when you're in the car and only have access to radio - which is the whole point. Is 206 weeks out of 208 not enough football coverage?

I far prefer watching (or listening to commentary on) those sports you're so dismissive of than <insert derogatory term for football here> and I'm sure I'm far from alone.

They could put the olympics on at the end of june/start of july. problem solved?


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 11:03 pm
Posts: 44786
Full Member
 

If you were using your phone could you not have run the audio commentary from the BBC website?


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 11:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[quote=seosamh77 ]They could put the olympics on at the end of june/start of july. problem solved?

Good point - clearly the Olympics should be scheduled not to conflict with the far more important English footie season.

tj - I was in the car driving before switching to 5live hoping for coverage. Could just about cope with selecting 5LSX on iPlayer radio whilst stopped at the lights (just a couple of clicks as it's the only channel I normally listen to on that, for cricket coverage). Haven't ever tried listening to audio commentary on the website on my phone - though was there even any audio only, video doesn't always work well on the move round here given the data rates I get, and it would eat my BW. Maybe you're more experienced at doing things like this with a smartphone and can give me some tips ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 11:46 pm
Posts: 8945
Free Member
 

They do it deliberately to make softies cry.

Maybe theres lots of evidence that its the sport most people like the best. Iknow. Imagine that!


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 11:49 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

sometimes they ruin the wall to wall footy coverage with golf and that shit take days


 
Posted : 15/08/2016 11:54 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

hoping to listen to a bit of commentary on something Olympic, or maybe some updates on results I've missed

So really just any bar football, hey BBC you have commentary rights to this really popular game but someone wants you to read him the results from sport he has never watched instead.


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 12:54 am
Posts: 57373
Full Member
 

Did you want to listen to the commentary on the horse dancing? The badminton? Or one of the other sports you, and nobody else could give a shit about for the next 4 years?

Ironically the team playing tonight were the solitary beneficieries of the much vaunted legacy of the last overblown sports day


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 1:19 am
Posts: 7278
Free Member
 

Radio Football Live does deserve its nickname. I too was somewhat surprised to discover commentary on a soccer match yesterday afternoon when I was gardening. Nothing on Sports Xtra following the end of the cricket - BBC have taken a TV and online approach which is a shame for us radio listeners.

A couple of years ago I was listening to an autumn international on the Radio and they interrupted commentary for the Half Time Scores.


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 2:15 am
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 2:30 am
Posts: 6761
Full Member
 

If your in the car, why not listen to a music cassette instead?


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 4:44 am
Posts: 8527
Free Member
 


A couple of years ago I was listening to an autumn international on the Radio and they interrupted commentary for the Half Time

That must've been [i]awful[/i] for you.
Bless.


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 6:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=olympic+football&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b&gfe_rd=cr&ei=T7OyV53kI8KG8QeWkoGgDA#gfe_rd=cr&mie=oly%2C%5B%22%2Fm%2F02vx4%22%2C6%2C%22r%22%5D ]DO NOT PUT 5LIVE ON TO LISTEN TO THE OLYMPICS AT 17:00hrs TODAY!!! YOU'LL PROBABLY EXPLODE!!![/url]


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 7:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The worse thing about this is the fact Costa was still on the pitch to score the equaliser.
[img] [/img]

Ref had a shocker as Kante should have been off as well.

Anyway, I had already started a football thread, but we can use this one OP. I'm not fussed.

๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 7:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[quote=binners ]Did you want to listen to the commentary on the horse dancing? The badminton? Or one of the other sports you, and nobody else could give a shit about for the next 4 years?

Nah, nothing so exciting was on - just some gobby overpaid bloke riding a bike round and round in circles.

[quote=captainsasquatch ]DO NOT PUT 5LIVE ON TO LISTEN TO THE OLYMPICS AT 17:00hrs TODAY!!! YOU'LL PROBABLY EXPLODE!!!

Strangely enough, checking the schedules, at 17:00 is the news and either side is coverage of interesting Olympic sports - it appears it's only the English local league which is more important.

I am enjoying all the football fans doing their best to prove the thread title though - bongohaha I can understand how you're sad about the lack of interest in your thread in comparison with how many people want to discuss all those "less popular" sports on the Olympics thread...


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 9:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Does the BBC Sports app have audio commentary on it?


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 9:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I am enjoying all the football fans doing their best to prove the thread title though

Odd comment, especially in a football thread. Should we talk about how great synchronised swimming is?
The odd thing is how non-football fans think we are interested in how much they dislike football. It's almost like the Top Gear haterz falling over themselves to express how much they hate Top Gear, whilst detailing specific points in each programme as to why they don't watch it.


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 9:49 am
Posts: 14103
Full Member
 

If there was a real demand for Olympic sports it [b]would[/b] be on telly and radio a lot more.

There isn't though. People get a bit excited about it every four years, but they'd be as bored as hell if they had to watch a swimming regatta or hockey match every weekend.

Football commands the coverage because the demand is there.


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 9:52 am
Posts: 8416
Free Member
 

I am totally sick of the Olympics on the BBC.

They have more staff over in Rio than is in Team GB.

It is on Radio 5, BBC 1 and BBC 4. They have the first 15 minutes of the news dedicated to it.

There was no 606 on Sunday either, replaced by the bloody Olympics.


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 10:05 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[quote=captainsasquatch ]Odd comment, especially in a football thread. Should we talk about how great synchronised swimming is?
The odd thing is how non-football fans think we are interested in how much they dislike football.

It's not a football thread, it's a thread about disliking football! Feel free head over to to bongohaha's popular thread if you don't want to read about people disliking football.

There's clearly a demand for Olympics, because it does matter, unlike one game out of 380 - I understand why football gets all the coverage the rest of the time, but actually lots of people are getting more excited about all these other sports than they are about football at the moment.

[quote=gobuchul ]I am totally sick of the Olympics on the BBC.
...
There was no 606 on Sunday either, replaced by the bloody Olympics.

Well you're getting an insight into how non football fans feel most of the time then.


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 10:06 am
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

Did you think you'd keep the football fans off here by using fancy words? Shame on you.

In the spirit of hegemony, we claim this thread for detailed analysis of Brighton and Hove Albion's back four, or how Raheem Sterling's hair is shaping up.


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 10:28 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

Well you're getting an insight into how non football fans feel most of the time then.

Its popular you dont like it
No offence but deal with it as it is not going away

I can see why you are annoyed and i do agree the olympics should have taken precedence over minor - all of them are at the start- games in the EPL
Modern life is wall to wall football and even as a fan i find myself losing interest in the constant coverage so it must be crap for non fans


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 10:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's not a football thread, it's a thread about disliking football! Feel free head over to to bongohaha's popular thread if you don't want to read about people disliking football.

That'll be an end to the haterz telling us how much they hate football on the normal football threads then.
Excellent, as they were really boring and tiresome. ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 10:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I know it's in bad taste to the OP, but would be funny if this became the defacto football thread.

Bit like that incessant snow updates one ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 10:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I know it's in bad taste to the OP, but would be funny if this became the defacto football thread.

Not bad taste, just proving a point!


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 10:48 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

I cannot believe Costa escaped a red card for that second challenge and he should never have been on the pitch to score

First lot of fixtures and here we are discussing ref allready ๐Ÿ˜ˆ


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 10:50 am
Posts: 7278
Free Member
 

I prefer Costa to Starbucks but think Cafe Nero is better than both.


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 11:05 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not bad taste, just proving a point!

Perhaps you should start a thread where all the haterz can get together to see who is the biggest hater. Maybe offer prizes.


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 11:06 am
Posts: 23592
Full Member
 

Heres a question for football fans - as it appears that some are assembled.

Football - and in no small part English Premier League football - is probably the most watched and enjoyed sport in the world.

Given that

1. The most exciting bit of a football match (I imagine) is when someone scores a goal

and

2. Goals hardly ever get scored and its not uncommon for no goals to be scored at all

If the rules of football could be changed a bit (more or fewer players, a different sized pitch, bigger goals) so that a football scoreline would be something like 12:7 or 28:22 or even 116:106 instead of a dizzying 1:0 would [i]you[/i] enjoy the game more or less - seeing your team score more goals and seeing more goals being scored generally - and would the sport as a whole be improved by that or would it suffer?


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 11:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Soccer. For all those awkward times when you've got nothing interesting to say to anyone about anything but you need to talk anyway.


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 11:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think there is a middle ground between the haterz and the loverz.

Maybe we can all meet there and play a game of football like the German and British soldiers did during WWI ๐Ÿ˜‰

If the rules of football could be changed a bit (more or fewer players, a different sized pitch, bigger goals) so that a football scoreline would be something like 12:7 or 28:22 or even 116:106 instead of a dizzying 1:0 would you enjoy the game more or less - seeing your team score more goals and seeing more goals being scored generally - and would the sport as a whole be improved by that or would it suffer?

The Americans had a few ideas...


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 11:08 am
Posts: 57373
Full Member
 

It wasn't on that 606 wasn't on on Sunday. I was looking for the mushroom cloud over North Laaahndon as calls for Arsene to go hit critical mass ๐Ÿ˜€

Has anyone mentioned egg-chasing yet? Apparently thats a much more civilised affair. With fans all hugging each other over a pint of Scruttocks Old Nobchomper, andplayers who stop the match to help little old ladies across the road, and get kittens down from trees. Not like the n'er-do-wells and rapscallions that watch and play football ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 11:09 am
Posts: 57373
Full Member
 

Soccer. For all those awkward times when you've got nothing interesting to say to anyone about anything but you need to talk anyway.

Soccer?

[b]ITS A HEADSTRIKE IN THE SCOREZOOOOOOOOOOOONE!!!!!!!!![/b]


 
Posted : 16/08/2016 11:12 am
Page 1 / 2