Forum search & shortcuts

F1 season starting....
 

[Closed] F1 season starting.... anyone else quite excited?

Posts: 14293
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#4948137]

It all starts again this weekend and I am actually quite looking forward to it - partly because it reminds me of better weather!
Hamilton being at Mercedes is going to be interesting as I quite like him and it will be good to see him drive without too much expectation on his shoulders.
Secretly hoping that Alonso does well. Just a shame I don't have the Sky package.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 10:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm very excited. I'm currently watching a couple classic races that i've recoreded on SkyF1 to get me in the mood, Oz 1994 and then Oz 1999.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 10:48 am
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

Yes. I'm hoping this is a Mercedes / lotus / red bill / Ferrari / mclaren fight to the finish!


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 10:54 am
Posts: 10966
Full Member
 

Hell yes. Promises to be a close season - new tyres, exhaust & DRS restrictions will level the playing field a bit (lookin at you RedBull), no real conclusive leaders from testing and no dogs in the top flight either. I'm hoping for a Kimi revival, just to see what he says in those cringeworthy podium interviews.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 10:55 am
 Lest
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh yes! Can't wait!
Will be interesting to see how much sandbagging has gone on in the testing.
Would love to see Ross pull another one out the bag .... He's got the drivers to do it I recon. Can't quite believe they are as quick as they looked in testing though :~


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 10:56 am
Posts: 17855
Full Member
 

Yep. I am looking forward to it!


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 10:58 am
Posts: 7869
Free Member
 

First race on BBC?


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:01 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

I really cannot wait to see how the tyres degrade and how the teams cope with this in terms of startegy and pit stops

Can there be a better way to tell who is the fastest driver - I THINK NOT


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:05 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I am! I've got a niggling concern though that we could have a 2002 (IIRC) type season where everyone thinks RBR won't be dominant but then turn out to be just that...

But hopefully the stricter flexy wing tests will hurt them more than others resulting in a really close season with ebb and flow like last year. It would be brilliant if Hamilton's Merc is somehow up there (and not just in qualifying but through the race rather than chew its tyres up like last year)


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yay, can't wait, and I get to watch it at a sensible time down here. Free coverage in Oz though for some reason the races in the americas are repeated at 11 in the evening on a Monday night, so missed most of those last year.

Anyone know of any sites that show full re-runs for such times?

Rich


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

BBC iplayer with a UK proxy (ish) - beartunnel for example


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:32 am
Posts: 7869
Free Member
 

I have a dish pointed at RTL (Astra) and listen to R5 commentary. Only problem? They're out of synch by about 5s 🙂


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:45 am
Posts: 770
Free Member
 

I'm really looking forward to my afternoon snoozes.
Go for ride, home, shower, lay on sofa watching F1, wake up 1.5 hours later. 😀


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:49 am
Posts: 3449
Free Member
 

First race on BBC?

Not till China in April for the whole race live, 'extended highlights' for the rest as last year:
[url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/21682493 ]BBC coverage[/url]


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES!!!! 😛


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Kimi + lotus for wildcard bet!


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:59 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Its going to be a re-run of Hamo's first season in F1- exactly like it was. Firing on all cylinders, off, crashes, storming, all over the place.

Hamo at his talented-rawness 8)

Kimi's going to finish 2nd this year and regail us with more funny one liners.

Vettel is going to be a nice boring driver.

Button is just going to be boring.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 12:22 pm
Posts: 303
Full Member
 

Yep, Suzi Perry...


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 1:21 pm
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

I was at a mates house the other weekend who has a full Sky package, their coverage of F1 is amazing, It was the last Barcelona test and everything was covered including truck polishing and wheel cleaning. Brilliant for anoraks, its a shame but it leaves me a bit cold these days and I am a grade a petrol head. To much politics to many dull tracks and way to much money.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 1:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There's been less politics and money in the last couple of years than the years before!

Even some of the really dull (previously) tracks have had fantastic racing in the last couple of years too... Are you sure you've been watching F1 and not MotoGP? 🙂


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 1:38 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

it feels like they've pushed the reset button.
looking forward to seeing how it pans out.
hoping for a season of off-the-track and on-the-track flouncing, bickering and handbags as well as some epic drives in the rain.
happy now that Schumacher has finally done one.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 1:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES!!!!
+1

Yep, Suzi Perry...
-1

And agree with what brakes said


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 1:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fantasy this year? Mrs od won it last year!! 🙂


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 1:50 pm
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

clubber 😆 MotoGP was dull last year but made up for by Moto2 and Moto3 madness. Things like DRS for me is just awful, it is such an artificial way of manufacturing overtaking. Kimi is great for the sport and his Abu Dhabi performance on the track and on the radio was fantastic. I think the world needs more Maldanado and Grosjean and less Vettel 😆


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 1:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't mind DRS - it's not a guaranteed overtake so I think they usually get it about right and they're tweaking it each year.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 3:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't think you understand DRS if you find it so awful. That in itself might be a problem for DRS (ie not being able to get an easy appreciation of it) I suppose - but it is pretty well designed, imo and does exactly what it set out to do. If DRS gifted overtakes t cars that did not deserve to overtake then the other car would immediately re-pass the very next lap every time, but they don't.

I can't bloody wait for the season to start though.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 3:17 pm
Posts: 7626
Full Member
 

I've nothing against DRS. I'm not sure why we expect masses of overtaking in a race format that by design has the faster cars starting ahead of the slower cars.

It does allow some teams to be a bit more adventuress on strategy as they know there is a better opportunity to overtake again if a strategy loses them track position for whatever reason.

I think Vettel will win again FWIW. Be good to see Lewis battling for some wins though


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 3:27 pm
Posts: 10966
Full Member
 

has the faster cars starting ahead of the slower cars

Not always true of F1 though - yes the faster cars in qualifying setup are ahead of the slower cars in qualifying setup but that doesn't always translate to the race. 1 lap performance is not the same as 10/20/50+ lap performance.

F1/the FIA are sort of stuck with the aero situation (and therefore DRS) unless there are wholesale changes down through all the layers otherwise we'll see lower formulae with potentially higher cornering speeds than F1. IIRC the early draft of the 'new F1' rules had major wing restrictions but those have been scaled back to retain a lot of the aero performance, partly because nice big wings are high value advertising spots.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 3:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm afraid it just doesn't excite me at all.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 3:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That's ok. Some people find riding bikes boring.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 3:57 pm
Posts: 10966
Full Member
 

Just spotted this for the motor sport fans - [url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01rd365 ]That Petrol Emotion - BBC4, 18 Mar, 20:00[/url]


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 4:21 pm
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

I don't think you understand DRS if you find it so awful.
😕

Whats to understand?


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 4:31 pm
Posts: 20682
Full Member
 

Actually yes, I quite like the tech and strategy aspects of it. Also, I have automatic access to Sky F1 HD (part of my existing HD package) so it's all there for me.

Only really got into F1 a couple of years ago although I remember watching the nail-biting Hamilton World Champs win and I've seen "one-off" races over the years without being into the whole series.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 4:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Whats to understand?
Some people declare it false and seem to think that it allows cars to overtake that shouldn't really be able to. Also that it makes overtaking too easy and possible without skill or risk. All untrue. If you think those things, I don't believe you really get the drs and understand how they fine-tune the points on the track. It won't be perfect every time, but they alter the activation and detection points every year to get it pretty good, and it is less imperfect than just being stuck behind much slower cars because of the aerodynamic effect.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 5:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yes! cant wait to see how Hamilton gets on and if Button gets any better 🙂


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 5:35 pm
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

stuck behind much slower cars because of the aerodynamic effect.

and that is the crux of the problem, you cant overtake because your car is so reliant on its aerodynamics and it wont work in disturbed air. DRS is a crude way around the fact that F1 rules have painted the sport into a corner. Much better to limit the effects of aerodynamics than to introduce a "overtaking gimmick"


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 5:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Indeed.. but F1 is supposed to be the pinnacle of motorsport. The problem that they were facing was that by restricting the aero futher, F1 cars would be slower than lower formulas, including Indy.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 5:47 pm
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

Clubber Indy cars are faster than F1 cars 😉 well at least when they go round in circles. Arie Luyendyk qualified in 1996 with an average speed of 236 mph for the Indy 500. Going around in circles is a bit dull IMO but then so is a race like Valencia god rest its soul.

I don't hate F1 but I think it has got to change, it wont because the money is to big and the poison dwarf is pulling the strings.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 6:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've always wondered how fast an F1 car would go if they actually did ovals though - eg tiny wings, etc..

The comparison is obviously vs street circuits though.

And F1 has had two of the closest, most exciting championships in the last couple of years with good racing at most of the tracks. F1 needs to change to be relevant and IMO the new engine format is doing that. I reckon it's generally doing pretty well. Only the financial risk of teams going out of business is the storm on the horizon IMO right now.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 6:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Such a tired, boring argument that F1 has too much aero and not enough mechanical - heard it all before a million times. Some of the best races are wet or drying - those are the races where the ratio of aero to mechanical is even higher, so that gives the lie to that theory. Aerodynamics is part of the fabulous technology of F1, and the drs pretty successfully addresses one of the pitfalls of that.

Last season was yet another brilliant cliff-hanger with great races all the way throughout the season, more winners than ever and the Championship settled by a scant handful of points in the dramatic final race. Fer crying out loud! What more do you want?


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 6:14 pm
Posts: 10966
Full Member
 

I've always wondered how fast an F1 car would go if they actually did ovals though - eg tiny wings, etc

Iirc BAR ran a side project to set a max straight line speed for a legal F1 car, but were 'only' aiming for around 250mph. I'd reckon an indy car could crack that without as much tweaking, and a le mans car wouldn't be too far off.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 6:21 pm
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

Such a tired, boring argument
but you keep getting involved 😉

Hey I am just not a huge fan of the current F1 set up, takes all sorts doesn't it 😀


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 6:23 pm
Posts: 7626
Full Member
 

I've always wondered how fast an F1 car would go if they actually did ovals though - eg tiny wings, etc

Around a "road circuit" Eg Silverstone or Spa an F1 car would eat an Indy car for breakfast. An F1 car has a big power to weight ratio advantage over an Indy car and this would make all the difference.

On an oval track its more about the fact the Indy car is optimised to run in a high speed configuration constantly turning left. You could modify an F1 car to run on an oval but it would be close between it and an Indy Car

Le Man's cars are too heavy to be competitive against either.


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 11:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I know about the BAR F1 salt lake thing - but that's just straight lining and they had some funny set up - eg no rear wing but a 'rudder' instead.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 11:44 am
Posts: 2812
Full Member
 

dead annoying. damn noisy, loads of roads are closed, and the council has spent millions on the thing. We leave the city when it's on.


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 11:45 am
Page 1 / 2