And in any case the death rate of people who attempt to summit Everest is only 6.5%….so actually it is a lot safer than a whole load of stuff that we normally do every day like crossing the road, picking our noses while driving and mountain biking.
That's bollocks but go on.
And in the immortal words of Mater Yoda…”And that is why you fail….”
There always have been and always will be those amongst us who do just get out there and do and take that chance against death or whatever risk it is they’re facing. Then there is the 98% of the rest of us who choose not to and just look for reason after reason why not to. We owe everything to those 2% who do get out there and do extraordinary things.
Us 98% will never understand what drives those 2% because we simply don’t have it. we’ll never figure it out. But it is to the benefit of all of us that the 2% do push the boundaries. Good on them. Long may they flourish. Who are we to criticise them? I wonder of all the people in that photo how many of them died that day? I suspect zero.
And in any case the death rate of people who attempt to summit Everest is only 6.5%….so actually it is a lot safer than a whole load of stuff that we normally do every day like crossing the road, picking our noses while driving and mountain biking.
So in summary - you put those who pay a small fortune to companies to have professional climbers winch them up Everest on the bleeding edge of human endeavour. But that actually climbing Everest is less dangerous the crossing the road or picking your nose.......Yep - that all makes perfect sense.
The litter on the mountain is appaling - I believe people do go over to try and clear up but that level of folks going is a disaster.
I was sat on top of Kinder Scout today, just me and the bike. Sat on top of South Head, me, the bike and a howling wind. Hollins Cross/Mam Tor - busy with walkers.
Not for me going up places when it's busy.
Population growth out of control.
Keep sending them up the mountain and that should help a little!
FWIW I work in university recruitment/admissions, we see a lot of gap yah people but I’ve never seen a single one that’s climbed everest.
Not very much.
Just so we can be amazed.
Can those saying that climbing everest is too easy / not worthy of bothering / not their cup of tea. Please post up a picture of your monitor and keyboard so we can all see how much more worthwhile arguing on the internet is compared to climbing a mountain on a Friday afternoon (with or without oxygen and/or a sherpa).
Points will be deducted for any sort of mess, non biodegradable items, anything deemed a risk and dead bodies.
Can those saying that climbing everest is too easy / not worthy of bothering / not their cup of tea. Please post up a picture of your monitor and keyboard so we can all see how much more worthwhile arguing on the internet is compared to climbing a mountain on a Friday afternoon (with or without oxygen and/or a sherpa).
Points will be deducted for any sort of mess, non biodegradable items, anything deemed a risk and dead bodies.
Have a wild guess at how the average person who spunks £50K to climb Everest funds the venture? Do you think there is the tiniest of possibilities that they might just spend a sizable proportion of their lives behind a monitor and keyboard? Just an incy wincy possibility?
Have a wild guess at how the average person who spunks £50K to climb Everest funds the venture? Do you think there is the tiniest of possibilities that they might just spend a sizable proportion of their lives behind a monitor and keyboard? Just and incy wincy possibility?
Yup, but not today. Today they're on top of everest. Which is fairly hard to deny, although some do try, a lot more cool.
Just so we can be amazed.
Can those saying that climbing everest is too easy / not worthy of bothering / not their cup of tea.
What the ****'s wrong with saying that climbing Everest is not your cup of tea?
Always fancied working on the clean up operation. But not particularly bothers about the summit. There have been some very poor decisions and consequences on the mountain but this is peak season and the weather looks good. Amazing photo.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-48395241
6.5% mortality rate makes the Isle of Man TT look sane btw
Yup, but not today. Today they’re on top of everest. Which is fairly hard to deny, although some do try, a lot more cool.
No they’re not, they’ll be lucky to get to the summit next Wednesday with the size of that ****ing queue. 42 years on this earth have taught me one thing. If there’s a queue for it, it’s going to be shit.
What the ****’s wrong with saying that climbing Everest is not your cup of tea?
Summary of the thread:
I don't want to climb everest because it's too busy. And I'm going to pretend I can't figure out why anyone would want to.
I don't want to climb everest because it's too expensive and busy. And I'm going to pretend I can't figure out why anyone would want to.
I don't want to climb everest because it's too dangerous, expensive and busy.And I'm going to pretend I can't figure out why anyone would want to.
I don't want to climb everest because it's too messy, dangerous, expensive and busy. And I'm going to pretend I can't figure out why anyone would want to.
I don't want to climb everest because I read a book so don't need to, it's too messy, dangerous, expensive and busy. And I'm going to pretend I can't figure out why anyone would want to.
I don't want to climb everest because it's apparently easy and you get a piggyback for £50k, I read a book so don't need to, it's too messy, dangerous, expensive and busy. And I'm going to pretend I can't figure out why anyone would want to.
I don't want to climb everest because It's just not the real spirit of climbing to want to climb the tallest mountain in the world is it, it's apparently easy and you get a piggyback for £50k, I read a book so don't need to, it's too messy, dangerous, expensive and busy. And I'm going to pretend I can't figure out why anyone would want to.
You missed out I don’t want to climb Everest because I’m poor and I detest queuing at sea level never mind at that height. Surely if you have a sense of adventure you wouldn’t pick the summit with a queue, you’d go for K2, the north face of the Eiger or Baintha Brakk. If your queuing then it’s not a special achievement.
Seven deaths on Everest in the last week apparently. Three through exhaustion whilst descending on that day pictured.
Folk are stupid.. There was a 'big' family walking down towards Hollins Cross today on the 'paved section' in the Peaks. No-one had any rucksacs for bad weather kit, all in t-shirts etc, and it was flipping windy as I was riding up the ruddy hill sweating my ass off. I stopped for a couple of minutes on South Head and it wasn't somewhere you'd stop for long without kit (literally got my camelbac off and the missus phoned - it's a bit windy she said... forgot I was off work - yeh, top of a mountain..) and this was on a warm day.
The pictures make me think why bother doing going to Everest if there is going to be a huge queue and all the rubbish being left...
Everest had never been on my main list of things to do, but I maintained a vague aspiration to climb it one day, until a guy came into my shop who'd actually done it. It had cost a fortune, due to all the preparation, licences and equipment needed, he lost his front teeth when a boulder hit his face halfway up and the whole experience sounded miserable.
The picture above is a little misleading - according to a quick Google search, around 4000 people have reached the summit since the 1950s. The picture makes it look like it's that many in a week.
JP
But it is to the benefit of all of us that the 2% do push the boundaries.
How are people pushing the boundaries on Everest on a fully supported climb?
Dont get me wrong I doubt I could do it and wont be putting it to the test even if I win the lottery and have enough cash to try it. However it really isnt elite level mountaineering unless you are doing the lesser used routes/without oxygen/your own sherpa and so on.
There are plenty of challenges which have had far less people complete it since they are unable to be supported and hence you really do need to be in the 2% of the population who can do that sort of shit.
The picture above is a little misleading
It isnt. There only are so many days where the conditions are suitable for summiting. So you get serious queues when suitable.
That or you are insanely brave and capable and go outside of that window.
Beck Weathers quote sums it up for me
Weathers said that his view on climbing Everest had changed "fairly dramatically" and stated that "if you don’t have anyone who cares about you or is dependent on you, if you have no friends or colleagues, and if you’re willing to put a single round in the chamber of a revolver and put it in your mouth and pull the trigger, then yeah, it’s a pretty good idea to climb Everest”
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20151008-the-graveyard-in-the-clouds-everests-200-dead-bodies
Are we sure that isnt a photoshop job in the OP?
How are people pushing the boundaries on Everest on a fully supported climb?
Many are pushing their own boundaries. As you say, they are not elite high altitude mountaineers. Many are older, less fit, less technically adept and mentally determined to cope when things go wrong. Even with a Sherpa shoving them along and oxygen they are placing themselves at substantial risk going above 8000m, even before you factor in a massive queue which puts them up there far longer than they planned.
So it's a major physical and mental achievement for most of the supported punters, and you have to admire their resilience.
As a climber, doesn't make me want to do it, though. The majority of the experience looks utterly miserable.
Do they not carry their rubbish back down with them? Bit weird no? I always take my jelly baby bag off the hill
Do they not carry their rubbish back down with them? Bit weird no? I always take my jelly baby bag off the hill
No. When you are at your limit of physical capability, and possible death is a real factor, you just dump what you have used up. Too much effort to carry back down used oxygen bottles.
It is also too much effort to bring down injured in many cases, hence the mountain is also littered with dead bodies.
Queuing for heaven.
the death rate of people who attempt to summit Everest is only 6.5%….so actually it is a lot safer than a whole load of stuff that we normally do every day like crossing the road, picking our noses while driving and mountain biking.
That's an interesting illustration of how some people perceive risk. Do you really think that the death rate for mountain biking or crossing the road is greater than 6.5%?
We’ve not seen his crossing the road technique yet..
Did you watch the documentary about the guy that solo climbed el capitain, that’s climbing, god knows how he managed that, I was scared just watching it.
Do you really think that the death rate for mountain biking or crossing the road is greater than 6.5%?
it's true! I get killed at least twice a week crossing the road
I read dark summit and it showed a real concern about the commercialisation of climbing Everest. The fact that there were punters that had some experience of mountaineering but not enough to safely summit Everest yet greed of some operators and the "I've paid so we ARE doing it" attitude of customers meant that there was real danger of death. Dark Summit was suggesting that there needs to be more control over access.
"On May 15, 2006, a young British climber named David Sharp lay dying near the top of Mount Everest while forty other climbers walked past him on their way to the summit."
https://images.app.goo.gl/usAmc8XgaETE337T7
So that means what 13 out of every 200 people who go on from base camp, statistically, die.
I'm at gt7 today if mountain biking was that dangerous there'd be over 20 deaths today. I'll let you know later how many coffins leave the site.
The fact remains than modern technology and the ever richer rich segment of the population mean that more and more people can do things like climb the worlds tallest mountain. The mountain itself doesn't care, and it'll still be there for thousands of years after mankind has come to an end. It is however a more nuanced discussion on if we, as a society, consider somewhere "ruined" by us being there??
I think there have been reports of two more deaths. An Irish and English climber. I think that brings the total to 9 in the last few days?
If that pic is the queue to the summit how do the ones at the front get back down through that mob? I thought this area was the 'death zone' and your time here was severely limited. Its not like you can just say 'excuse me, coming through' and push past coming down. Is that picture a mix of people going up AND down? If so its no wonder people are dying.
I love being on top of a mountain, but the idea of shuffling forward in that queue for a few minutes at the summit is just grim, especially when people are dying next to you as they wait. It's just an expensive tick in a box.
I guess the Nepalese will have to cut the number of permits since companies and individuals can't make sensible decisions for themselves and their clients.
This is always the risk when you have a large number of people who've spent or been paid £££ to get to the top and it turns out you have only a narrow window of good weather.
I guess the Nepalese will have to cut the number of permits since companies and individuals can’t make sensible decisions for themselves and their clients.
It's a bit presumptuous of us to dictate Nepal's tourism policies.
Also sensible decisions can he very hard to make at that altitude.
There's a blog about the latest conditions here:
http://www.alanarnette.com/blog/2019/05/23/everest-2019-3-new-deaths-now-6-on-everest-15-overall/
The writer claims that because of inexperience and queuing, some climbers are taking 20 hours for a summit push that should take around half that time.
It’s a bit presumptuous of us to dictate Nepal’s tourism policies.
Also sensible decisions can he very hard to make at that altitude.
A lot of these decisions are being made in base camp. I don't think anyone can dictate to Nepal what their policy on permits is, they will simply have to balance multiple deaths due to overcrowding with their revenue.
If that pic is the queue to the summit how do the ones at the front get back down through that mob?
Yup, that is the issue. I think it's time for a limit on the number of ascents on any one day, though how that would be policed, I've no idea. Of course, on the other hand it's their choice to be there - apart from the Sherpas of course, it's their jobs.
I was reading that blog earlier today via the Guardian report.
The one reply around handling the increasing numbers / potentially decreasing skill level ws pretty decent I thought, having people climb 2 6000m and 1 7000m peak before being given a permit to climb Everest, as stated it'd be a benefit to the local economy in many ways - there's probably a few practical problems that it'd through up mind.
onehundredthidiot
Member
I’m at gt7 today if mountain biking was that dangerous there’d be over 20 deaths today.
If Euan hadn't sanitised the bombhole there probably would have been.
I’m laid up feeling ill and have spent the day watching various documentaries on the big and dangerous peaks. Fascinating stuff and you’d think after 1996 there would have been more restrictions. I know oxygen is now mandatory, but it seems more limits are needed to save people from themselves. Just about to watch Meru.
1996 was the year that bloke rode from holland, I think, to Everest , climbed it without oxygen, then rode home.
Edit Sweden
https://www.adventure-journal.com/2016/06/historical-badass-goran-kropp-the-man-who-rode-to-everest/
It would appear Everest is now pretty much a tourist attraction not just the most extreme physical challenge on earth. So with that in mind H & S it to the max. Install steps, a handrail, wheelchair friendly ramp, O2 dispensers at regular intervals, climbing assistant persons with full first aid qualifications etc.
