“Lock Her Up"
Crooked Hillary?
She said she’s really sharp and witty
Her twitter account is amusing. Lots of responses from her to maga halfwits trying to insult her.
There was a trump nutter woman on the news the other night saying she’d take a bullet for him because he would do the same for her. The cult of trump is quite incredible.
Well his adoring fans appear to be thin on the ground currently.
Donald Trump's calls for mass protests fell flat ahead of his NYC arraignment on Tuesday.
By noon, more than 100 Trump backers had descended upon a park outside a Manhattan courthouse.
https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/death-destruction-wasnt-trumps-calls-181319244.html
Trump and his enablers and supporters will use that argument regardless of the charges. So whether it’s accusations of vote rigging in Fulton country or illegally removing classified documents, they will always claim it’s politically motivated.
Let's not forget Trumps obsession with Hillary's email server or Hunter Biden's laptop.
Republican & Trump hypocrisy at its finest. Of course there's an element of political motivation, that's what happens when you enter politics, behave like a WGBE and provide a never ending stream of subject-matter...
.
And the rats are turning on each other:
More likely though that he's just doing this to try and force Cohen to not testify against him.
Lawyer: Trump would like to miss a few days of his trial because, you know, all the fuss and that and they had to block roads off and it made the traffic really bad in NY when he turned up, so he's thinking of the people.
Judge: This wouldn't have anything to do with the fact Trump has a rally in a different city in a couple of days, would it?
Honestly, can't make it up.
In the continuing story of "everything that Trump touches turns to shit'....
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-65350125
Mike Lindell claimed to have data that he says proved there had Chinese interference in the 2020 election. He was so sure this evidence was so conclusive that he offered $5m as a challenge fund to anyone who could prove him wrong.
It turns out that was easy - it took a few hours for someone (a trump voting republican) to look at and and determine is was a load of crap. So he claimed his $5m. Lindell is trying to wriggle out of it so is being sued.
Think is though - he was offering $5m to 'anyone' who could prove the data to be false. And to my mind 'anyone' means anyone and everyone who makes a valid claim gets $5m - not just the first person to do so. So get your claims in quick before he gets rinsed by Dominion 🙂
I won't be able to sleep until the wig question is resolved.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1651726886916198400
the daily fail have an opinion piece "Is it too late to ask Donald Trump to the Coronation?" as he's due in scotland on the 6th. Lets hope he gate crashes it and gets jumped on by 20 burly coppers.
I ?think? he was pretending to lift weights. Or maybe he was trying to squeeze out a particularly troublesome turtle head
Is there a very slim person behind that podium, a la Police Academy?
Trumps legal team in the Carroll civil case have called no defending witnesses, including Trump.
Closing arguments likely today.
I thought Trumps team had released video of his deposition - I thought that was his "defence"? IIRC it amounted to "I mistook her for my then wife, even though she wasn't my type at all"
Trumps legal team in the Carroll civil case have called no defending witnesses, including Trump.
Loved the way Trump stormed back from Ireland to 'confront her' when he knew fine well that is was too late to do such a thing. Then the judge trolled him by extending the hearing so he could have his say. And Trump promptly bottled it conveniently didn't turn up.
TBH, much as I'd like to see it, I don't think he'll be found to be guilty in this one, despite the fairly low bar in the civil case. The other cases seem to be getting juicy though, especiually as they seem to have an insider who is spilling the beans (and has photo eveidence by all accounts) on the secret documents case.
Its civil standard of proof and Carrols witnesses sounded like they stood up well to cross examination.
I think guilty on defamation charge is highly likely; battery charge less so - not because of doubts about his guilt but time elapsed and no hard (no pun intended) evidence.
Punitive damages likely, I think.
As don is '...so wealthy' as he would have us believe, a few millions is easily affordable.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-us-canada-65502076
Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse of magazine columnist E Jean Carroll in a New York store in the 1990s, a jury in a civil case finds.
Well it’s wrong to be happy about it. Poor woman
$5 million. He'll appeal and stall, of course, until the inevitable grifting begins again
Has the grifting ever stopped?
Sad thing is I cant see it making much difference. The maga nutters will just go fake news/law and the rest of the republicans will be too scared of the loons to point out he really isnt fit for office.
Can't believe someone has got something to stick though. Well done
Can’t believe someone has got something to stick though. Well done
But, but, but, he’s the victim here, anyone can see that!
I'm glad that E Jean Carroll has been vindicated and gets some semblance of justice.
As for Trump, it tells us nothing we didn't know before. His base won't care, and the lies will still keep coming. Hopefully this and the future indictments will be enough to lose him the swing voters completely. He can never win with just the right wing base.
Dirty rapey powerfull man gets a big hit... 5 million deneros.. that will probs bankrupt him, again, but it's not a shell company this time.
I do love a good news story.
hopefully more to come.
It also only took 3 hours to decide for a unanimous verdict, albeit on the lesser of the assault charges. That's quite significant as well as they really appear to be have had no doubt. I wonder if his team expected that
It was mentioned that there may be an appeal on telly last night. If he appeals, does he have to appear in court? I doubt that would help his case.
It sounds right, but the US courts process seems so ****ed up, I'd not bet on it.
BBC reporting that two GOP senators are saying he shouldn't run for election, his rivals staying quiet.
His support will shrink to the hard-core nutters, though there are many of those, but anyone planning on there being a Republican president will drop him.
The question will be, how much damage will he do to the GOP if he tries to run or, even better, sets up his own party.
Three hours for the jury to return a unanimous verdict - probably most of it spent drinking coffee - just shows it was a slam-dunk as far as the jury were concerned. If Trump want to counter-sue it should be his attorney for the feeble defence, mind you the video deposition meant he was starting from 6ft under.
BBC reporting that two GOP senators are saying he shouldn’t run for election, his rivals staying quiet.
But one Senator (Tuberville) saying “I’d vote for him twice!” Graham and Rubio all jumping to his defence!
It'd be interesting to see how Fox and the other sources of 'news' that the tooled-up, squirrel-eating shitkickers of Arsewipe, Idaho rely on for their worldview are reporting this?
I'm guessing they're going full bore for the conspiracy/witch-hunt line with Trump as the wronged, persecuted victim
It was mentioned that there may be an appeal on telly last night. If he appeals, does he have to appear in court? I doubt that would help his case.
Not sure what the basis of any appeal would be, apart from to stall for time and to allow him the opportunity to grift some more cash off his supporters.
It's astonishing to see his evangelical base standing by him, until you realise that this particular brand of Christianity is a political device driven by hate and money, rather than anything 'godly'. Obviously, they'll drop him as soon as they realise he's finished politically, or a better alternative comes along. But DeSantis is making no headway against a nappy-wearing, twice-impeached, sexual predator, so it's looking like Trump has the nomination if he wants it.
It’s astonishing to see his evangelical base standing by him, until you realise that this particular brand of Christianity is a political device driven by hate and money, rather than anything ‘godly’.
They have the Cyrus defence for that. Its ok for someone to be an unbeliever so long as they are "doing the lords will".
I’m guessing they’re going full bore for the conspiracy/witch-hunt line with Trump as the wronged, persecuted victim
they'll react to this in the same way the right wing "free speech" grifters reacted to the news of the Republican protestors being arrested by the Met.
i.e. by ignoring it.
It’s astonishing to see his evangelical base standing by him, until you realise that this particular brand of Christianity is a political device driven by
hatecontrol and money, rather than anything ‘godly’.
Saturday calling, Oi can we have our ip back please
Fibbing for god the evangelical call it. Its ok to lie if you are doing gods work
I have run up against this with the assisted dying campaign.
Also see Kavenagh on the us supreme court. He said he would not reverse wade v roe
Hope a criminal case follows.
Guys an abhorrent oozing pustule
May be this has been posted already, but my god the deposition is insane
He says, literally, almost, that stars like him are allowed to sexually assult women (2nd video down)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-65504435
Is a factor he has lost access to any decent lawyers? From the reporting I have seen the defense in this case looked really poor
Is a factor he has lost access to any decent lawyers
What Rudi or Cohen?
He's never had good taste in legal representatives TBH...
Thats what happens when you don't pay them for their services
