Forum search & shortcuts

Donald! Trump!
 

[Closed] Donald! Trump!

Posts: 13820
Full Member
 

not Trump directly but..

https://twitter.com/ProjectLincoln/status/1355618315570393090


 
Posted : 31/01/2021 12:02 am
Posts: 12411
Full Member
 

No reputable lawyer wants to work for him.

https://twitter.com/Amy_Siskind/status/1355684839362539522


 
Posted : 31/01/2021 2:21 am
Posts: 12411
Full Member
Posts: 2036
Full Member
 

Which lawyer would work for someone who everyone knew hadn't paid his last lawyer?


 
Posted : 31/01/2021 8:20 am
Posts: 12411
Full Member
Posts: 13820
Full Member
 


 
Posted : 01/02/2021 9:15 am
Posts: 11678
Full Member
 

So Trump leaned on his defence secretary Christopher Millar to order a “stand down” for the national guard over the capital coup attempt, sounds perfectly normal.........

https://twitter.com/donwinslow/status/1355977325368623107?s=21


 
Posted : 02/02/2021 3:35 am
Posts: 12411
Full Member
Posts: 11678
Full Member
 

That’s went well.............


 
Posted : 03/02/2021 3:05 am
Posts: 9225
Full Member
 

I'd be so much happier if UK mainstream news outlets had adopted that approach to unverified misinformation from, say, 2015 on? Less climate denial, less anti-antiracism, les antilockfown/mask/vaccine nonsense, maybe no Brexit...


 
Posted : 03/02/2021 9:12 am
Posts: 163
Free Member
 

There’s definitely an argument for regulating the media further so that unsubstantiated claims aren’t legitimised. Treating News as entertainment has caused a lot of problems.


 
Posted : 03/02/2021 10:34 am
Posts: 12411
Full Member
 

There’s definitely an argument for regulating the media further so that unsubstantiated claims aren’t legitimised. Treating News as entertainment has caused a lot of problems.

This all sounds great until governments start throwing satirists into jail. The Onion would need to shut down, for a start. Armando Iannucci would be thrown in jail for The Death of Stalin, so should Oliver Stone for JFK.

The reason the U.S. Bill of Rights includes freedom of speech is to protect people like that from despotic government. Problem is, free speech means that people are allowed to say things that you find objectionable, so sensible people are very vary of government regulation of media.


 
Posted : 03/02/2021 11:42 am
Posts: 163
Free Member
 

Yes, I agree that it's a fine line, but there are parts of the media that undermine and manipulate democracy itself, and thereby reduce freedom for all.


 
Posted : 03/02/2021 3:05 pm
Posts: 4334
Full Member
 

Even in the USA free speech is not an absolute right. For instance "fighting talk" is not allowed i.e. "tends to incite immediate breach of the peace". You're also not allowed to threaten the president.


 
Posted : 03/02/2021 3:11 pm
Posts: 4334
Full Member
 

I was listening to Louis Theroux interviewing Ruby Wax this morning. She really didn't like 3 people - her dad, Jimmy Saville who she decided was too creepy to interview and Donald Trump who dumped her and her crew - he just told the pilot of his private jet to land at the nearest airport and get them out of the plane.

Lovely man.


 
Posted : 03/02/2021 3:18 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

bonkers....


 
Posted : 03/02/2021 4:27 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

what a muppet


 
Posted : 03/02/2021 6:26 pm
Posts: 8092
Full Member
 

I’d be so much happier if UK mainstream news outlets had adopted that approach to unverified misinformation

Newsmax had been pushing the various election fraud claims up until the point the voting machine company sent them a polite note asking them to apologise and to desist from doing it again if they didnt want to go to court.


 
Posted : 03/02/2021 7:19 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

The reason the U.S. Bill of Rights includes freedom of speech is to protect people like that from despotic government. Problem is, free speech means that people are allowed to say things that you find objectionable, so sensible people are very vary of government regulation of media.

The first amendment didn't impede the "fairness doctrine" that used to be applied to news organisations. In fact when tested in the supreme court the decision was 8-0 in support.


 
Posted : 03/02/2021 8:13 pm
Posts: 66130
Full Member
 

dissonance
Full Member

Newsmax had been pushing the various election fraud claims up until the point the voting machine company sent them a polite note asking them to apologise and to desist from doing it again if they didnt want to go to court.

I wondered that- the bit that the anchor wrote definitely felt like it was written by a lawyer.


 
Posted : 03/02/2021 9:24 pm
Posts: 12411
Full Member
 

The first amendment didn’t impede the “fairness doctrine” that used to be applied to news organisations.

IIRC, last time Fox News faced a big lawsuit, they denied being a news service. I think they said it was just entertainment, not news. Similar thing applies to people like Jon Stewart, who was meant to be an entertainer but ended up being thought of as a news guy. Basically, unless they deliberately say something that they know is untrue and that causes harm, there's not really much anyone can do about it.


 
Posted : 04/02/2021 12:45 am
Posts: 338
Free Member
 

My god, James Dellingpole.....not even the Mail or Express will have him now then?
I really wish I hadn't looked at the rest of that site 😬


 
Posted : 04/02/2021 8:43 am
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

IIRC, last time Fox News faced a big lawsuit, they denied being a news service. I think they said it was just entertainment, not news.

Alex Jones certainly tried that angle.


 
Posted : 04/02/2021 9:11 am
Posts: 338
Free Member
 

Double post.


 
Posted : 04/02/2021 12:36 pm
Posts: 6941
Full Member
 

Treating News as entertainment has caused a lot of problems.

That Pillow dingbat up there was certainly entertaining!


 
Posted : 04/02/2021 12:59 pm
Posts: 13820
Full Member
 

https://twitter.com/ZoeTillman/status/1357392242785333249

the earth is round....😁

Is that to flush out flat earthers?


 
Posted : 04/02/2021 8:09 pm
Posts: 66130
Full Member
 

Sometimes, you need to establish the basics


 
Posted : 04/02/2021 8:25 pm
Posts: 9176
Full Member
 

It's technically ovoid, but i agree that 2+2=4. You can demo that with apples. Or beans. Or fingers.


 
Posted : 04/02/2021 8:37 pm
Posts: 10337
Full Member
 

but a jury trial.  Can you imagine how long it will take to find a suitable jury 🙁


 
Posted : 04/02/2021 8:38 pm
Posts: 6941
Full Member
 

I've never read a court document before. I never expected it'd start like that. Is that normal or just symptomatic of the petulant and infantile nature of the defendants? Entertaining nonetheless.


 
Posted : 04/02/2021 8:50 pm
Posts: 2560
Free Member
 

Ovoid is round enough for me.


 
Posted : 04/02/2021 9:21 pm
Posts: 2560
Free Member
 

US claims can be a lot wacker than UK ones. In England and Wales that opening paragraph would go in a speech or written argument, but not in the document that starts the case off, which would be a rather dry set of allegations of fact. Can't speak for Scotland though. In the US, they tend to stick evidence, argument and allegations of fact all in at once.


 
Posted : 04/02/2021 9:25 pm
Posts: 23649
Full Member
 

the earth is round….😁

Is that to flush out flat earthers?

Something can be both round and flat 🙂


 
Posted : 04/02/2021 10:02 pm
Posts: 12411
Full Member
 


 
Posted : 05/02/2021 1:28 am
Posts: 7751
Free Member
 

So, in summary, the house says...would love you to come and chat with us; trump says...gee, thanks guys, but I'm just too busy and don't really have anything to say to you.
Translation - you're a lying scrote and we want to skin you; fk you.


 
Posted : 05/02/2021 1:49 am
Posts: 863
Full Member
 

A la Ralph Wiggum, if you freeze frame this video you can spot the exact moment that James Dellingpole lost his credibility -

He's not been de-platformed, he's just been found out.


 
Posted : 05/02/2021 2:49 am
Posts: 12411
Full Member
 

To save watching the whole clip:


 
Posted : 05/02/2021 7:31 am
Posts: 3994
Full Member
 

Just heard a soundbite of Biden's speech where he was talking about America's position on the world stage. Actions speak louder than words and all that but my word it felt good to hear him say it after the last four years!


 
Posted : 05/02/2021 8:48 am
Posts: 6938
Full Member
 

Trumps quit the actors guild now, they were due to kick him out anyway. He said they had done nothing for him, they said thank you.


 
Posted : 05/02/2021 9:29 am
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

Trumps quit the actors guild now, they were due to kick him out anyway.

After his pisspoor performance pretending to be the President of the United States, I'm not surprised.


 
Posted : 05/02/2021 9:32 am
Posts: 12411
Full Member
 

Does that mean that he can't go back to appearing on The Apprentice unless he moves filming outside the U.S. or hires scabs to work on set? He's a lousy businessman, but he did make a shedload of money off that show.


 
Posted : 05/02/2021 9:54 am
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

...can spot the exact moment that James Dellingpole lost his credibility...

Delingpole and people like have no place discussing international trade as an appointed expert pundit. Delingpole is an essayist, whose job is to dress up a contentious issue with words and counter logic. Unfortunately, people who read The Spectator or Breitbart largely can't tell the difference or simply don't care. Delingpole genuinely doesn't know the answer to the question put to him that has Sam Gyimah and Caroline Flint openly mocking him. But sadly, that hasn't ended his career as it should have in normal times.

Way back in 2016, I was involved in an exchange with a Brexiteer from Lincolnshire on social media. The guy was as ignorant as cheese, but kept on posting videos from Leave.eu showing various EU parliamentarians being berated by UKIP MEPs. He asserted that they were "good telling videos", which he thought was great. There was no context whatsoever, any attempt to explain this was dismissed outright as "Soros has got to you". He was a huge fan of Delingpole, but when asked why his response was "he tells it like it is".

The best analogy I have for the Brexit and Trump cultists is the difference between an adult and a child watching an episode of The Simpsons - they're both watching exactly the same script, but have a vastly different understanding of the jokes.


 
Posted : 05/02/2021 10:22 am
Posts: 13291
Free Member
 

Trumps quit the actors guild now, they were due to kick him out anyway.

After his pisspoor performance pretending to be the President of the United States, I’m not surprised.

TBF Martin,he should have been up for an Oscar in his role as an unhinged despot.
His performance was nothing short of spectacular.


 
Posted : 05/02/2021 10:35 am
Posts: 9225
Full Member
 

The best analogy I have for the Brexit and Trump cultists is the difference between an adult and a child watching an episode of The Simpsons – they’re both watching exactly the same script, but have a vastly different understanding of the jokes.

Absolutely the best, most concise explanation for why Brexit happened I've seen since the whole terrible shitstorm started to rumble into life.

*Applauds*

*Stands and continues applauding*


 
Posted : 05/02/2021 10:54 am
Posts: 12411
Full Member
Page 433 / 754