Forum menu
This probabilistic analysis by Rootclaim says that it's 80% likely that Bolt is clean.
https://www.rootclaim.com/claims/did-usain-bolt-use-performance-enhancing-drugs-14420
Well. That was vague.
Spam
is spam performance-enhancing ?
(in fairness to DrNo, this is way above "sdlkjfsdcsakxakjxkjh")
I suggest that it's 90% likely the article is nonsense given that it's speculation. So a 90% chance that the 80% is rubbish leaves us with what chance of doping ?
I remind you all that Armstrong claimed never to have tested positive for over 12 years after a positive test for cortisone that was widely reported and yet the Anglo-Saxon media rarely if ever contested his claims. The media in were complicit in presenting Armstrong's smokescreen of weight loss and other nonsense as they currently are for the team I'm not allowed to talk about on STW.
well he's the fastest man in the world, and the other 4 out of the top 5 (who are all slower than him) have all been popped for doping. As have some of his Jamaican teammates. So if you believe in what The Cycling Podcast refers to as 'performance-based suspicion' then yes.
And same would apply to Paula Radcliffe, Chris Froome, Peter Sagan and many other people at the top of their game who have beaten or taken records from dopers.