Forum menu
Vengeful coppers try to stitch up conceited twerp. Not very edifying, but that's not the issue for me.
Having a Sherman at your desk during work time whilst accessing grumble on a work PC would get anyone else sacked. It is misconduct. Lying about it to your boss makes it worse.
He deserves to go no matter if the motives of the copper are driven by revenge.
If he takes old thick as mince with him, then that's a Brucey Bonus. And the longer it festers the more damage it is doing to the rotten structure that is the Tories into the bargain. Lovely.
[img] 
[/img]
https://twitter.com/NadineDorries/status/937019367572803590
Meanwhile another mp not on planet earth...
Why would she say that?
We must now have stupidest MP’s ever!
because she thinks it's how things are done, probably time to check her internet history - it's easy to do password on a post it under the mouse mat....
Given the sort of information these people deal with there needs to be a proper disciplinary process for such stupidity and a provision of It equipment and rules for use.
So they can download porn at work ?Is this really what someone expects form their MP
I agree they do have a unique position and this means they are held to an even higher standard as they make the laws and are in public office . No one has yet said they can do this in their workplace and not get sacked.
I’ve previously posted the methods that can be used to recall him. He can be sacked from his government position but the options to remove him as an MP are very limited.
MPs can be elected then wander around doing nothing for their entire term if they wish
Computer security is the least of their worries. There was a problem a few years ago with a civil servant stealing sensitive documents from the Home Secretary's safe and then meeting an opposition MP in a bar to hand them over so the MP could leak them to the press. If that sort of thing goes on what hope is there for IT security. I'm just trying to remember who was involved in that, and what the fallout was.......
because she thinks it's how things are done, probably time to check her internet history - it's easy to do password on a post it under the mouse mat....
It probably is how things are done there, you’re ascribing the standards you see at work to them. It’ll be a completely different world.
I know someone who works in IT at stormont. He says it’s like dealing with children with a massive sense of entitlement
People still read what he says 😯Aside from chewkw
I asked if this was what people expected of their MPs you seem to have read [ and answered]how do we get rid of an MPI’ve previously posted the methods that can be used to recall him
I thought we were discussing right and wrong not just what they do. One would assume MPS have access to material that we may not wish to be in the public domain ranging from security classified /private to politically sensitive.It probably is how things are done there,
Stunning she would be so blase about this and its scary she would openly "brag" about it.
But they shouldnt need the security issues explaining, let alone the simple options to achieve the same outcome without sharing passwords.
That she thinks its ok just goes to show how dim she is, no wonder the Russians are laughing at us.
Nadine Dorries is a proper swivel-eyed halfwit, and a borderline Nazi.
A particularly nasty combination.
If a police officer has come across evidence
Must’ve been good ‘evidence’
(Sorry, late to the party, that one was too good to miss...)
likes.....
Can you name any company or organisation where viewing porn on a work computer via a work network in work's time would be tolerated?
Yeah, a mate was looking at refining his employers website search function. Guess which websites have the best performing search functions? His job was to see if he could search for something and get no results. Apparently you have to have one hell of a vocabulary to break a porn sites search bar.
Just a thought, STW techies...
If I might be serious for but a moment. Why are grumble sites not blocked on MPs computers? Surely there is MDM software that can do that? Airwatch?
You don’t need MDM to block websites, assuming the pcs are all in the same network.
I thought we were discussing right and wrong not just what they do. One would assume MPS have access to material that we may not wish to be in the public domain ranging from security classified /private to politically sensitive.
Stunning she would be so blase about this and its scary she would openly "brag" about it.
Nobody sensible is suggesting that accessing porn whilst either being in work, or being a paid representative of the electorate is acceptable, I’m just pointing out that there’s next to nothing that can be done about it in this context.
Nadine Dorris just confirms my suspicions over the way MPs operate, and I’ve heard similar anecdotal stories about MLAs.. they’re mostly on another planet
Did all this stuff happen back in 2008?
I think a lot of people are viewing it in the context of nowadays when there are a zillion different "tube" sites for porn. How were people consuming porn back in 2008? I'm assuming if there's a lot of "downloaded" stuff, would it have been from p2p networks or something along those lines?
@jonnyboi, I’m assuming it was a laptop, given how much travelling MPs do.
Right then.
Monday tomorrow, so the story picks up again. Every hour this goes on for is damaging to 'our' shambolic government.
[img] 
[/img]
Resigned - from the Cabinet. Still an MP.
He's spending more time with his laptop.
Ha!
Diddums.
I am going to start accusing posters of doing that - its polite for lied isnt it ?"inaccurate and misleading" statements
Lol.
He's spanked his last cabinet monkey
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42434802
Squeezing in 1 last shambles before Xmas, still time for more tho
Mr Green said he accepted statements he made about what he knew about the pornography investigation could have been "clearer", conceding his lawyers had been informed about the original discovery in 2008 and the police had raised the matter within him in a phone call in 2013.
"I apologise that my statements were misleading on this point," he said. "
W@nker. Literally.
Now we've established that he's just a big fat [s]liar[/s] purveyor of misleading statements, in respect of the denials of having made inappropriate advances to a researcher......
although there were "competing and contradictory accounts of what were private meetings" between himself and Ms Maltby, "the investigation found Ms Maltby's account to be plausible".
Ha!
Moar Tory handwringing 😆
You have to love this government (small G, natch)
To lose one minister may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose two looks like carelessness.
Three looks...?
Strong and stable?
Now for it to come out that he was pushed rather than resigned...... then we can hold DD's feet to the fire over his threat to resign if Green was sacked.
It's starting to look a lot like..... well..... Christmas, I suppose.
So does this make it more likely Bob Quick will carry out his threat to sue Green?
Davis this is the escape route you've been looking for!
Green maintains in writing in his resignation letter he wasn’t looking at porn on his work computer. I think the issue is he wasn’t clear that the police had asked him about it. If what he wrote in his letter isn’t true then someone will take him up on that obviously.
No reason to resign as an MP hence he has not. Ministerial code is far stricter.
It's hard work defending this shower of shitehawks, but it's great to see that some can stoop to the task.
I can't quite believe Davis is still in a job given how much he's mislead parliament in the last few weeks. Of course, he now has a chance to go. Unless "asked to resign" is different from being sacked?
Green, Patel, Fallon...all gone in disgrace. Awesome. 😀
Seems May asked Green to resign
Will Davis be as good as his word?
Hahaha just kidding DD has been exposed as a champion bullshitter so often lately it's not even vaguely likely he'd keep his word on this
As someone else said - if it wasn't him then who else was accessing porn on his computer while he was mid-email?
And having established that he 'gave misleading statements' about whether he knew of the porn on his computer, do we really give any credibility now to his 'there isn't any.... OK there is, but it isn't mine' claims. Or will they also turn out to be misleading?
Quack quack.....
In the age of Brexit misleading the public/parliament is pretty much standard government policy
DD has been exposed as a champion bullshitter
Maybe, but he's hardly the worst on here.
Maybe, but he's hardly the worst on here.
Indeed, there are bizzies on here after all. 🙂
Touché!
Watched an interview some weeks ago with the retired officer. The interview took place in what appeared to be his home. Wherehe was flicking through paper notes he took during the initial investigation.
Thing is, if he has evidence then why would he have this at home, or copies at home ? should this not be the property of the Crown ? Not something you have on the bookshelf...
Touché!
😉
Seems May asked Green to resignWill Davis be as good as his word?
Green resigned not sacked, Davies is of the hook, how can you think it would be any other way.
Davies knows he's going, he'll just steer the unpopular Brexit ship on to a sandbank and pretend nothing more can be done. No one else really wants control of the tiller.
It's right that he was sacked/resign from the cabinet just a pity it took so long.And he should stand down as an MP but that isn't going to happen.What's also wrong is that he has kept his well paid job for almost a decade since this was discovered and he got promoted.Leaving him time to go on and indecently assault someone and send offensive texts whilst in his position of power.Wrong in so many ways.