Forum menu
Townies...
Jolyon Maugham QC has announced on Twitter that he clubbed a fox to death on Boxing Day morning, while wearing his wifeโs satin kimono and nursing a hangover
while wearing his wifeโs satin kimono
Enquiring minds want to know...
I think the lesson here is don't post on Twitter.
Aye for someone who should have an ounce of common sense about them, killing an animal then posting it on social media comes across as a touch dumb.ย Still at least he's admitted the crime so should be an easy prosecution ๐
As an owner of chickens, canโt say Iโm that bothered about the event. However I find it incredible that someone so evidently intelligent has had such an enormous failure of common sense as to bleedinโ TWEET about it. Just 🙄 really.
Still at least heโs admitted the crime
Iโm not convinced a crime has been committed to be honest.
Iโm not convinced a crime has been committed to be honest.
Assuming he didn't manage to kill it humanely yes it has. Chances of managing to kill it humanely, with a bat, whilst it's awake and unrestrained are about 0.
I see he's also admitted to buying the bat to deter intruders.
Not a wise thing to say in public.
Iโm not convinced a crime has been committed to be honest.
Pictures of the kimono are required before I pass judgement.
I see heโs also admitted to buying the bat to deter intruders.
Not a wise thing to say in public.
One is still struggling to display even the smallest modicum of original thought I see.
Assuming he didnโt manage to kill it humanely yes it has.
I see your point, but I think that the statutory defence would be around reasonable practicability. The argument would be that the fox couldnโt be safely released, or conventionally humanely dispatched, so in the circumstances the best was made with the equipment to hand. Unpleasant, but Iโm not sure what he could have done differently in the circumstances. Why the **** he thought it sensible to tweet about it though is beyond me.
I see heโs also admitted to buying the bat to deter intruders.
A deterrent is only worthwhile if it is known about.
Also, I don't see the issue with that. If you have something you can use to reasonably defend yourself (weapon of opportunity) then how is the other party to know if you intend to do so or it is only to scare them. Either way, job done.
I swear to God that after the Brexit vote I woke up in a parallel universe.
And I want to go back.
squirrelking
Member
A deterrent is only worthwhile if it is known about.
Deterrant isn't all before the fact- having something that you can wave at intruders deters them from doing anything more once you're there.
And your point is, caller?
Flashy - what is the point of your post?
Is it condemnatory of what was, allegedly, done - or the political persuasion of the self-confessed perpetrator?
If the former, dim on Maugham's part to ****ter about it; will have the townies frothing.
If the latter, yawn.
I love game pie - properly made with hare as one of the ingredients; wouldn't happen without 'country sports'.
You give the impression you're a 'country man'; if true, you would understand what happens in truly rural areas.
Lamping to feed dogs with freshly killed rabbits, for example.
If feral fox in urban environment, does anyone really care?
Fox, pheasant, badger, rabbit, hare, squirrel run over on country roads by chelsea tractors - is anyone really bothered?
Road kill burgers - could support food banks.
Not bothered about what, allegedly, happened; 'QC in kimono shocker' is daily wail headline.
As for bat (baseball, cricket or any other variety) for self-defence; what's the problem?
I would prefer shot-gun but there are legal considerations.
Also, I donโt see the issue with that. If you have something you can use to reasonably defend yourself (weapon of opportunity) then how is the other party to know if you intend to do so or it is only to scare them. Either way, job done.
a weapon of opportunity isnโt bought in advance as a weapon before the opportunity to use it. I imagine.
Whether itโs a weapon of opportunity or not is irrelevant because itโs not in a public place, I think. Itโs not illegal to have offensive weapons in a private place.
The word that's missing from this conversation is "premeditation". If he has a bat purposely to be used as a weapon adainst intruders, and killed someone with it that's a whole different charge to grabbing something heavy with a purely domestic function leading to the same outcome.
IANAL.
YANAL.
He is.
Maybe he should've worn a little red jacket and have it torn to shreds by dogs instead.
While tooting a little trumpet
Maybe he shouldโve worn a little red jacket and have it torn to shreds by dogs instead.
Don't you townies go questioning the ways of the country folk. These things can't be changed after all.
When I read this I though it was some sarcastic ironic rant about Boxing day drag/fox hunts.
Seems not.
Flashy โ what is the point of your post?
To start a thread?
posting it on social media comes across as a touch dumb
It's the way of the world now. Social media - post stuff you shouldn't/never would say out loud and usually that nobody in the ****ing world would have had any interest in. Get used to it.
To start a thread?
Without an opinion or discussion from the OP. We have been discussing getting stricter on such posts as weโve closed them in the past as itโs essentially trolling.
Boxing day drag
The wife's kimono?
Still at least heโs admitted the crime so should be an easy prosecution
Sounds like the fox got caught in the electric fence around the chickens (it would have been electric as nothing else will keep a fox out).
So, given that the fox has been getting zapped by the fence every couple of seconds, for God knows how many hours,I'd say that this guy has put it out of its misery with whatever he had to hand.
Putting it on ****ter is incredibly stupid and just illustrates his level of hangover.
Flashy โ what is the point of your post?
Big hitter keeping his post rate up .
Well, it's started a thread, but pretty poor to post like that without offering up an opinion. It's too lazy even to call it trolling.
I'm firmly in the "what else could he do" camp, easy with hindsight to come up with ideas but I'm not sure I'd know how to safely release a trapped, maybe injured, bitey wild animal.
The post on social media was dumb as **** though.
Sounds like the fox got caught in the electric fence around the chickens (it would have been electric as nothing else will keep a fox out).
i havenโt seen anywhere say it was electric fencing.
Nope, it doesn't say, but as I said, the only fencing that keeps foxes out is electric.
People with chickens know this and this guy could certainly afford it.
given that the fox has been getting zapped by the fence every couple of seconds, for God knows how many hours,Iโd say that this guy has put it out of its misery with whatever he had to hand.
If he was less of an intellectual he might have done something practical, like turn the power off?
It's likely his upbringing kicked in and killing it was the default option.
In drag.
Obviously turn the power off!
The point I'm making is that this fox would have been continuously zapped by the fence if it was an electric one (it does says it's netting which is what the electric ones are).
I would imagine this would have had a serious physical effect on it.
We have kept chickens for over 20 years and have never even thought about having an electric fence. I don't know anyone that does in fact.
It's not the first time he's tweeted about wearing his wife's kimono and wielding a baseball bat in the garden (11 November). Something may be less (or more) than it seems.
We have kept chickens for over 20 years and have never even thought about having an electric fence. I donโt know anyone that does in fact.
We do, our neighbours do and my folks do. Itโs good because itโs also easily relocatable.
That being said; itโs a red herring in this discussion as thereโs no evidence it was involved.
ITV news managed to tweet a photo of a fox (handy if you don't know what one looks like pre headstoving) and Jolyon, with a not quite out of focus sign behind him, reading 'above the law' (handy if you need to hate Jolyon even more).
The Right Wing doesn't know whether to love or hate foxes now though....
Nope, it doesnโt say, but as I said, the only fencing that keeps foxes out is electric. People with chickens know this and this guy could certainly afford it.
So you made it up. My parents, grandparents and uncles kept chickens for years not once did they use electric fencing.
Out of interest, are the people on this thread bemoaning his actions* all vegans?
If not, why are you posting?
* The whacking action, not the twittering action
No I assumed from the fact that the fox was caught in "the netting" which is what electric 'fencing' is.
The only other netting I could imagine using would be chicken mesh but the holes are too small for a fox to get caught in.
Electric netting on the other hand has small holes at the bottom to stop small animals and larger holes further up (because only larger, fox- sized animals, can get that high). These larger holes are big enough for a fox to potentially get stuck.
Shall I post a picture to illustrate?
in 15 years the only times I've lost chickens to foxes is when our electric netting has been off.
Friends without electric netting on the other hand used to get foxes in all the time.
But then we're in the county where foxes don't have the luxury of discarded McDonald's, etc that urban foxes have.... So maybe they're less easily put off by non-electric netting.
Out of interest, are the people on this thread bemoaning his actions* all vegans?
Obviously not, or they would've mentioned it!! ARf! I made that joke up myself.
The only other netting I could imagine using would be chicken mesh but the holes are too small for a fox to get caught in.
Not once itโs tried to chew itโs way through. Not all netting is electrical fencing and not all electric fencing is netting.
Shall I post a picture to illustrate?
No, I helped install it relatives farms many times, climbed over it hundreds of times when walking, shooting and biking.
These larger holes are big enough for a fox to potentially get stuck.
Shall I post a picture to illustrate?
No. The grown up thing to do is say you aren't as right as you first thought