Forum menu
Civies with speed c...
 

[Closed] Civies with speed cameras (and time on their hands)

Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

Juan the final solution was done by the army at the behest of the Nazi Party /Himmler. It was not implemented by concerned locals.

Anyway to compare the attempt to slow drivers down with the attempt to eradicate an entire race is ridiculous in the extreme.
Yes people did them both but that is about the only similarity there.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 10:40 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

"There have been many proven instances"
Source, Count?


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 10:42 am
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

Where can I get in on this? A recent speed monitoring scheme on the road at the end of my street found that 1 in 3 drivers were breaking the 30mph speed limit and 1 in ten were exceeding 40mph! Apparently, that's not bad enough for the police to do anything about it.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 10:43 am
Posts: 41873
Free Member
 

So you got caught speeding, didnt get a fine, didn't get any points and didnt kill anyone?

Whats your problem?

Anyway what pisses me off more is parrish councils now have the ability to set speed limits, meaning everywhere within a couple of miles of melbourne (derbyshire) is now a 40 limit. Despite the fact I can only think of one corner that ever had a problem with accidents and most of the roads affected are wide open straight roads! The police and council have already said (on the record) that they have no intention of enforceing these new limits as they dont agree with them!

note: new Jews were killed in the typing of this post (and I completely fail to see the analogy of catching speeders and the holocaust)


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 10:45 am
Posts: 17396
Full Member
 

I'm a cyclist. I hate it when people speed past me. Just one wobble and I'm dead/maimed.

Anything that stops idiots misbehaving with over a ton of fast moving metal in close proximity to me is going to get my support.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 10:51 am
 juan
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

junkyard I am talking about all the nice people telling the nazi police about the suspicion of their neighbour being jews, about being members of resistance. As it was illegal to be any of it during WWII. You still can't see on the principle the differences of civilian grassing their neighbours when they brake the law?


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 10:53 am
Posts: 13349
Free Member
 

I was more concerned with the OP second post. At that point the concerned citizens demonstrated they were not fit for the job. A letter to the chief constable and your MP should be sent on complaining of vigilantes and conduct likely to cause a breach of the peace. (NB this is for the second post content, I have no problem with reporting speeding motorists).
This would appear to be a cheap way of collecting data for a concerted anti-speeding campaign with an officer in attendance. As a matter of policy I think the police should concentrate their efforts in towns and residential areas. Improve driving standards in urban areas and there should be a positive knock-on effect in the great outdoors.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 10:56 am
Posts: 41873
Free Member
 

hang on a minute, how the fek is shoping your neibour for being a jew in Nazi Germany the same as shopping them for speeding?

One was one of the worst genocides in history, the other is someone doing whats right to protect the rest of us? You've either got a pretty twisted mind and think that being a Jew is illegal, but we shouldn't shop people for it. Or think that speeding is legitimate? Come on, which is it?

Should we ammend the quote to.......

"first they came for the murderers, kiddy fiddlers, rapists and corrupt politicians, and I didnt speek out, then they came for the speeders and there was no one left?" (probably missquoted)


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 11:17 am
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

junkyard I am talking about all the nice people telling the nazi police about the suspicion of their neighbour being jews, about being members of resistance. As it was illegal to be any of it during WWII. You still can't see on the principle the differences of civilian grassing their neighbours when they brake the law?

I think a guy round the corner killed his wife and buried her under the patio. Should I not grass him up?

I saw a young woman nick an iPod from a shop. Should I grass her up?

I saw a guy steal some bread from the entrance of Sainsbury's; he looked homeless and pretty hungry. Should I grass him up?

I saw a young lad doing wheelies on the road on his scooter; I noted down his reg number. Should I report him?

A relative puts out the bins for the old lady over the road before 7pm the day before bin day. Should I grass her up?

The state have implemented a programme of ethnic cleansing. The guy next door has a big nose. Should I inform on him?

Are all these examples the same, Juan?


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 11:18 am
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

If some one claims to never speed then they are talking utter bobbins. The only time I have seen civvies out with a speed gun it looked like something out of dads army, a bunch of grey heads with a new toy they all wanted a go with.

I think blurring the roles of civilians and the police is setting out on the road to hell.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 11:30 am
Posts: 34537
Full Member
 

first of all im with the dont speed in a built up area its not just the law its common sense, if you cant see that maybe you shouldnt have a license at all

secondly whats wrong with empowering local people to make try and make their own village safer, sounds like a brilliant idea to me
frees up police to investigate robberies murders etc, makes roads safer and gives older folk something to do, other than watch diagnosis murder


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 11:47 am
 juan
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

Mike legally they are, morally they are not, where do you draw the line?
I am against anything that encourage/help people grassing each other. But that is my opinion.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 12:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]I am against anything that encourage/help people grassing each other. But that is my opinion. [/i]

So to clarify, if (hypothetically) my next-door neighbor stole your bike, you wouldn't want me to tell the police?


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 12:14 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

juan what a model citizen you are there
Lets hope if you are beaten in the street/run over by a car/robbed etc everyone is as helpful as you are and turns the other cheek.
If I see any of the stolen bikes listed on here again best not grass eh as for the guy beating the old lady ...i saw nothing sir was not there


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 12:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It isn't going to happen round here, the local scum will nick the guns in no time.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 12:26 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

Mike legally they are, morally they are not, where do you draw the line?

How do i draw the line? [i]Morally[/i], is the key word there...


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 12:29 pm
 Dave
Posts: 1026
Free Member
 

Best bet is let machines do the job, they don't bear grudges.

Average speed cameras on all roads should sort it out.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 12:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why not simply find out the the registration number of the tvats with the gun, wait till they're in position and do a few quick laps (*obviously you'd affix the cloned numberplate).


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 12:51 pm
Posts: 33981
Full Member
 

I can't quote specific examples of radar gun inaccuracy, and I'm doing this on a phone, so extended research and cut'n'paste aren't an option, but I have seen a number of TV features, including Watchdog, where accuracy is called into question, where drivers have been taken to court for doing excessive speed, only for the case to be dropped after the car manufacturer proving that the model in question was incapable of doing the quoted speed. I believe in some countries, Canada being one, certain types of speed gun have been banned due to their inaccuracy except under the most rigourously controlled conditions. When a speed gun is handheld, the margin of error due to hand movement with the gun throws up all sorts of discrepancies. One newspaper test proved a static car was doing 72mph in a built up area. These things are not infallable, and in the hands of people with virtually no training, but an over-enthusiastic zeal to nab wrong-doers, mistakes will be made.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:00 pm
Posts: 23338
Free Member
 

just wave at them.

a stern letter is hardly a major discouragement is it now?


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:02 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

I love the way petrol heads get all indignant about speed cameras 🙂
It's simple really, don't break the rules and you won't get busted.
If you have a problem with your neighbours spying on you, then don't be anti social in your own communities and there would be no need for any spying.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:04 pm
Posts: 34537
Full Member
 

[i]just wave at them.

a stern letter is hardly a major discouragement is it now? [/i]

exactly its only a letter its not points or a fine

if it isnt enough to shame you into keeping your speed down in a built up area then maybe you should emmigrate from this 'nazi state' coz quite frankly we dont want you!


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:05 pm
 Olly
Posts: 5276
Full Member
 

im all for it!

coming from a quiet rural village (very quiet, blink and youve missed it sized)

I KNOW kids from next door run out into the road when the ball goes over the fence and i KNOW people come through at 70!

i saw some of the vigilantes the other day pointing thier hairdryer at me, and although i did wonder if they actuallyt HAD jobs/lives, i did check my speed.

if they get enough positive readings, they can have a GATSO put in, or traffic calming measures and THEN youll be whinging.

if they want to waste thier time, slowing people down/gathering data to get some traffic calmin in, then good luck to them.
if people respected thier community and stuck to the speed limits, they wouldnt have to bother!

so what if they are nosey, pulling up and asking them "who do you think you are" makes you nosey AND a prized ****.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:12 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Well said, Olly


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:36 pm
 G
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm afraid after my recent thread about speeding, this response is going to get boring and repetative.....
If you can't do the time, don't do the crime" Right?

😉


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 2:03 pm
Posts: 8
Free Member
 

Personally, I think average speed cameras are the best option through villages and the like. That way, no issues.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 3:20 pm
Posts: 41873
Free Member
 

yep, id happily have average speed camers in villages, would make life much more pleasant.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 3:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

G - Member

I'm afraid after my recent thread about speeding, this response is going to get boring and repetative.....
If you can't do the time, don't do the crime" Right?

Indeed.

German submarine captain in Dads' Army episode: "Your name shall go in ze book. And when we get back to Germany, your name will be passed on, and the YOU SHALL BE SHOT!"


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 3:59 pm
 MrK
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i get it! jon1973 was speeding in the privacy of his own home. that's how come it's spying! oh, wait, it was in public. in view of everyone. hmm, it's not spying at all is it.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 4:18 pm
Posts: 8671
Free Member
 

Just don't speed!. I have no sympathy for speeders in the slightest.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 4:21 pm
Posts: 3091
Full Member
 

This system is kind of it's own enemy, my old boss fully supported this community involvement - as it meant that the police wouldn't be parking a van there from time to time as they had some busy bodies instead, who have no authority and would probably let him pass as the kind benefactor to the local church that he is.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 4:47 pm
Posts: 1083
Full Member
 

+1 for average speed cameras in cities/towns/villages


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 5:42 pm
Posts: 50
Full Member
 

Olly - Member
im all for it!

coming from a quiet rural village (very quiet, blink and youve missed it sized)

I KNOW kids from next door run out into the road when the ball goes over the fence and i KNOW people come through at 70!

Blah, blah, blah...

I see the standards of parenting and education aren't very high in your quiet rural village.


 
Posted : 16/06/2009 12:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]I see the standards of parenting and education aren't very high in your quiet rural village. [/i]

I'm not sure that's entirely fair. It's human nature to treat a road differently that has 1 car passing per an hour compared to 1 per second.


 
Posted : 16/06/2009 8:36 am
 Dave
Posts: 1026
Free Member
 

Standards of parenting and education aren't very high if drivers assume that speeding through a village to save seconds off a journey, at the detriment of everyone else, is somehow a fundamental human right.

I like the idea of kids and parents feeling it's safe enough to cycle on the road.


 
Posted : 16/06/2009 12:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think with all the idiots that you have mentioned are on the road where you live. These people are seriously taking their lives in their hands. If some scroat is willing to beat someone up for the crappy mobile, what they going to do if someone tries to "snitch" on them for speeding.
On another note handehld speed guns are reported to be crap. The yanks dont use certain ones anymore!


 
Posted : 16/06/2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If they put speed limits up then people wouldn't get caught.


 
Posted : 16/06/2009 7:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

to the OP,
as you were back visiting your folks, these civic minded folks were in fact not spying on their neighbours, but in fact outsiders like yourself who abused their community by breaking the law and driving dangerously, putting the lives of the local community at risk.
It's a bit sad that as a cyclist yourself, who really ought to have a good grasp of road safety issues, that you haven't yet grown up enough to realise that you are in fact, just in the wrong, and you are in fact the reason that people feel the need to try an protect their community from the hazard that dangerous drivers are. Grow up.
I wonder, do you have kids?
If so, i suspect you might support the pointing of a very different kind of gun at drivers who speed, and definitely those that pass you at a junction whilst texting or blabbing away into their phone.


 
Posted : 16/06/2009 8:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

On a program recently the did a bit on a school that had a problem with speeders outside of it. The police got the kids to hold the radar gun and check the cars speed and any that were going over were pulled in and asked to explain to a bunch of 7,8,9 year olds why they were speeding and the kids explained back why it was so dangorus. you have never seen so many people looking so uncffortable at having to explian them selves.
I would also like to see more avarage speed cammeras around.


 
Posted : 16/06/2009 8:28 pm
Posts: 1083
Full Member
 

Ah yes I saw that too owenfackrell, I thought it was very good.


 
Posted : 16/06/2009 8:30 pm
 Kuco
Posts: 7217
Full Member
 

Run them all over bring back the bull bar 😉


 
Posted : 16/06/2009 8:36 pm
Page 2 / 2