Forum menu
Christian Hotel Rul...
 

[Closed] Christian Hotel Ruling

Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

Well if you can show examples of where “outsiders “ religions have greater freedom than Christians [Christians have their leaders sutting in the House of lords where they can affect the law] but no other religions get this.
Perhaps you /he are claiming a Muslim/Sikh/ whatever Hotel owner is allowed in law to ban civil partnership people from staying in their hotel. If so it is just wrong to say this
It is one of those lazy statements that racists/right wingers [ not saying you are either so lets not get sidetracked] say but it does not actually stand up to analysis.
The only thing I am aware of is the right of Sikhs to carry a knife – but then again so can anyone else if they are in full kilt

Ginger nuts , hob nob and bourbons on the vegan plater here whilst we play with our new fish farm set from TSY industries. Can I just let you know a Whale is a mammal 🙄


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 12:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well someone wanted the right to ban people from their hotel and someone else wanted the right to not be banned hence someone had to win and someone loose so yes someone's rights had to be more important than someone elses.

The constant conflict between opposites arising from the internal contradictions is characterised by a primary and a secondary aspect, the secondary succumbing to the primary, which is then transformed into an aspect of a new contradiction.

.............is possibly what happened.


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 12:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So Ernie - under the same law I presume you'd be able to set up a private club for men restricting membership to those with an English heritage? Maybe excluding anyone without English parents and grandparents perhaps? I wonder how long that would last before the thought police closed it down?

Can you really not see the difference between organisations that support minorities (which contrary to the bullshit you often hear still have been proved to suffer more discrimination) and a racist gentleman's club for the white majority?


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 12:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Can you really not see the difference between organisations that support minorities (which contrary to the bullshit you often hear still have been proved to suffer more discrimination) and a racist gentleman's club for the white majority?

Sorry, I appear to have misunderstood the meaning of the word Equality, or perhaps more accuratley Egalitarianism

I [i]thought[/i] it meant that people should be treated as equals on dimensions such as religion, politics, race, and culture, and maintain that [b]all[/b] humans are equal in fundamental worth or moral status?

PS. - since over 50% of the population are women, then by definition white men are also a minority group - why shouldn't they have the right to a private club? or does your moral code only apply to minority clubs which you "approve" of?


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 12:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Blimey this is a bit of a moral dilemma. Thing is, I'm Catholic, so do I sympathise with the hoteliers? Then again, my son's gay, so do I sympathise with the couple involved? Shibboleth doesnt like people with tattoos so I cant ask his advice, ernie and ratty just confuse me, and people keep talking about pigs. Anybody got a hob nob going spare?


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 1:00 pm
Posts: 7100
Free Member
 

Anybody got a hob nob going spare?

Why hob-nobs? have you got a problem with digestives? you bigot.


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 1:03 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

Grumm why did you bite his reply was predictable.


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 1:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

B'mitch i think you'll find you should come to your own risk assessed conclusion based on double blind trials and the mental capacity act. dont forget to factor in rotational injuries and such.

oh, and what's wrong with my fig rolls you pig denying knitted suit wearing gay son bearing well intentioned religious man?! 😈

*scrubs off my "i love b'mitch" tattoo with a scouring pad*


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 1:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Grumm why did you bite his reply was predictable.

My very thought. Specially as ratty knows full well that private members clubs are allowed to deny membership to women if they so wish, but not deny membership on the grounds of race. A perfect reasonable situation which no fair-minded person would have a problem with.

But good luck to you Grumm if you want to argue with ratty.


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 1:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fig rolls, phil, as any fule kno, are an invention of Satan and all his cheeky imps. Sorry, but hob nobs are the one true biscuit, perhaps with a bit of abilify crumbled on top for a little anti psychotic treat... 😛


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 1:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mmmmm tasty biscuity dopamine system stabilisation, tasty and with reduced chance of relapse 😀


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 1:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You see, this is all health and safety / political correctness gone mad. A bloke down the allotments told me that a swan can break a mans arm with its wing. Just imagine if it was a GAY swan. Doesnt bear thinking about. Then again, I blame the yanks, coming over here and luring our womenfolk with nylons and chewing gum.


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 1:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Under the same law I presume you'd be able to set up a private club for men restricting membership to those with an English heritage? Maybe excluding anyone without English parents and grandparents perhaps? I wonder how long that would last before the thought police closed it down?

What equality law means for membership of an association

Membership just for people who share a protected characteristic

An association (except for a political party) may, if it chooses to, restrict its membership to people who share a protected characteristic.
For example:
• A club for deaf people can restrict membership to people who are deaf and would not need to admit people with other disabilities, such as a blind person.
• An association of blind people of a particular ethnic origin, such as Chinese, could restrict its membership to people who belong to both these groups.
• A gardening club for men does not have to admit women as members.
• An association for Christian women does not have to admit women of beliefs other than Christianity, nor does it have to admit men whether Christian or of any other belief.

[b]But membership must not be solely on the basis of someone’s colour, for example, an association cannot say it will only accept white people or black people as members, and cannot offer different terms of membership on the basis of colour.[/b]

Access by associate members and guests who share the same characteristic

An association (except for a political party) may, if it chooses to, restrict access by associate members and guests to people who share the same protected characteristics as the members of the association.
For example:
• [b]A women-only club could, if it chose, refuse to accept guests or associates of the opposite sex. So could a men-only club.[/b]
• A club for transsexual people could, if it chose, to refuse to admit someone’s guest if that person was not a transsexual person.
• A club for gay men does not have to accept straight men or straight women or lesbians as associate members or guests.

[url] http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/uploaded_files/EqualityAct/service_providers_association__club__society.pdf [/url]


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 1:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

😆

just took me about a minute to swallow the last bite of my tesco healthy living granary roll i was laughing so much


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 1:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And what if it was a muslim swan? Elf, is there such a creature? Just imagine, a big, bi-curious muslim swan, hissing and flapping at you, wanting to break your arm with its wing because you wont let it stay in your spare room. Makes your blood run cold just thinking about it. You couldnt make it up could you? Apart from the fact that I just did, obviously.


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 1:59 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

A black swan perhaps?


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So Ernie - under the same law I presume you'd be able to set up a private club for men restricting membership to those with an English heritage? Maybe excluding anyone without English parents and grandparents perhaps?

There wouldn't be a problem with that, as it wouldn't exclude people on the grounds of race. IE, I would be allowed to join, as would anyone who is born here.

In fact, our national sports teams are organised along such lines. In case you hadn't noticed, like...

A club is different to a business, however.

I spose these old bigots could get round the Law by setting up a club, and then not actually be open to the 'public', only club members, who they could select as they saw fit (except for their colour). I suspect that business might not be quite as good. I dunno.


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just a small point regarding the £1800 the couple received each.

If they had planned a holiday in all innocence and found it ruined by the B&B owner's bigotry, then fair enough.

If, however, as has been mentioned, they knew about the potential for discrimination in advance and chose this B&B specifically to make a point, then firstly, shouldn't it be the duty of the police to send in undercover officers to gather evidence, rather than being left to private individuals.
Secondly, is it right that someone should be awarded damages when they deliberately put themselves in that situation.


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes Fred, I chose the definition carefully to sit within the law by including parents and grandparents born in England, rather than stating anything regards race - which is exactly why I then went on to ask how long you thought it would be before the thinkpol closed it down...


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

black swans? velvet tippers the lot of them. there's a film with that in it so it must be true...


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well it wouldn't need closing down as it wouldn't be breaking any laws, would it?

As I've pointed out, but you seem to have missed; our national sports teams are organised along these lines. No-one has a problem with that.

Did you imagine we might get all up in arms over such an idea, Labby? Why would you think that?

Being a bit daft today, aren't you?


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And what if it was a muslim swan? Elf, is there such a creature?

Well I've eaten Halal goose, so I'd imagine swan is ok.


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm offended, all this talk of biscuits, what about some cake, CAKE!!!!
Cake discrimination is just wrong

It gets worse, Khani. Have you noticed no-one's mentioned Jelabis or Burfi or anything? Racist. 🙁


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

For the first time - in what must be - 30 years, I've just had a couple of Garibaldi biscuits

I'd forgotten how nice they are 🙂


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lols at barnsleymitch - post of the thread!

Just imagine, a big, bi-curious muslim swan, hissing and flapping at you, wanting to break your arm with its wing because you wont let it stay in your spare room.


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I despair sometimes, I really do 🙁
People can stick up for themselves, but who will speak for the cake 😕
CAKEY FREEEEDDOOOOMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:35 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

It gets worse, Khani. Have you noticed no-one's mentioned Jelabis or Burfi or anything? Racist

To be fair, I'm just finishing a home-made onion bhaji*. Yum.

*Made of free-range hand-knotted ethnically diverse and spiritually aware gay Sikh onions, obviously


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:35 pm
Posts: 57398
Full Member
 

Garibaldi biscuits? Communist!!!


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Garabaldi biscuits ?
They're not vegan, they've got dead flies in them.


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:38 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

that is nice nick but were they Spanish ones? white ones? or red ones? we muct know - did you go for a diversity of onions or were you selective on colour or nationality...it is important that we [and the swans ]know this


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:38 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Balance the Garibaldi with some Bourbons and you're practically centrist.


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:39 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Well, the onions were Spanish, but they were cooked in Italian olive oil, and had coriander from my local Turkish shop.

I went for green onions rather than red though; they say once a Trot, always a Trot, but in this case the sogginess of the reds on offer made me discriminate in favour of the green ones.

Does that make me a racist or just anti 'vegetables of colour'?


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:44 pm
Posts: 57398
Full Member
 

Well, the onions were Spanish, but they were cooked in Italian olive oil, and had coriander from my local Turkish shop.

I don't think it makes you racist, but just think of the 'food miles' that meal has racked up. When the ice caps melt, I know who I'll be blaming


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:47 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

[b]STOP THE THREAD![/b]

I have a flapjack.

That is all.


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:49 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

You think that's bad? All I have to do is fire up the Land Rover and you can hear the polar bears crying. Mainly because they want more onion bhajis, mind you......


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

These are racist biscuits
[IMG] [/IMG]
Cake isn't like that you know.....


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Where's Labby gone? Probbly sitting there thinking 'bugger, I've really got this wrong and made myself look silly [i]again[/i]'. 😆


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:51 pm
Posts: 57398
Full Member
 

I'm trying to remember from my Geography lessons; Is that the essential difference between the arctic and the antarctic

The Arctic is polar bears eating onion bhajis. And the antarctic is penguins with cheeseburgers

That's right, isn't it?


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 2:58 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

nearly iirc penguins have their own kids tv show and they prove intelligent design to the christains.


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 3:04 pm
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Rocky bars and Nature Valley Chewy Trail mix, today.

Have we done Dinosaur biscuits yet? They're horrid too!


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 3:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So, who would win in a fight between a decent god fearing, hotel owning nazi couple and a heavily made up, cross dressing swan that had (alledgedly) been sniffing poppers and was hell bent on getting all jihad on you because you had looked at it funny?


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 3:20 pm
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Swan


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 3:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mr T


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 3:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

He wouldnt have time to say "quit your jibber jabber" Before the camp winged assassin of fundamental justice would be on him. Swan 1, Mr T's broken arm 0.


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 3:28 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Nah, the polar bears would have them all in a fight. And they have the whole ethnically balanced look as well - black skin, white fur, making them the only mammals that can sing Ebony And Ivory and know it to be true.

Except that polar bears can't sing, and the probability of getting them to sit at a piano is minimal. And it's a god-awful song anyway.


 
Posted : 19/01/2011 3:29 pm
Page 5 / 6