Forum menu
Children with pierc...
 

[Closed] Children with pierced ears question

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#4802901]

OK - this is just a question, as I am genuinely curious about people's opinions. I am not a parent (I "inherited" my stepchildren when they were 13 and 15 years old), so I am sure that I don't know very much about children and the rearing thereof, but:

I recently met the 18 month old daughter of an acquaintance of mine, and felt shocked, and really rather nauseated to see that her ears had been pierced.

Is it just me, or does this seem to be just not quite right?


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 6:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is he / she Spanish?


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 6:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

No, but the mother is a bit of a chav. Sorry, I KNOW that's very judgemental, but it's true!


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 6:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's ok if you're either a Chav or Spanish apparently

http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/should-there-be-a-minimum-age-for-piercing


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 6:43 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

What about Spanish Chavs?


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 6:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's not right. Allowing for chav / Spanish exceptions.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 6:44 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

How about circumcision?
Happy with that?

Or are you just identifying another thing with which to make yourself feel superior to those you see as beneath you?


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 6:46 pm
 ART
Posts: 1073
Full Member
 

Is it just me, or does this seem to be just not quite right?

not just you... I remember not being allowed to have my ears pierced until I was 13 (I think ... as it was some time ago .. ahem!) doing it to kids before they are grown up enough to understand and make choices like this for themselves isn't right IMHO, but they'll be plenty of people out there who would disagree.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 6:48 pm
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

Have to say I think children with piercings anywhere is just wrong.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 6:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Young children with pierced ears look terrible. Age 10(ish) upwards - fine.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 6:53 pm
Posts: 10199
Full Member
 

in the grand scheme of things it's really not a big issue. Just accept that some folks live differently to you? It's a much more relaxed way of life. ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 6:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Young children with pierced ears look terrible. Age 10(ish) upwards - fine.

No! 12. Only scum think it's ok under that age


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 6:58 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

OK, so what about circumcised Spanish chavs who are over twelve?


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 6:59 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

What you do with your servants is your own concern.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 7:01 pm
Posts: 40
Free Member
 

Piercings are bad enough, [url= http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bbd_1359238137 ]but what about tattoo's![/url]


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 7:01 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

๐Ÿ˜† @ rusty

Think it looks odd personally and not something I did to my young kids


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 7:02 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

What you do with your servants is your own concern.

I brand mine. They work for someone else over my dead body!


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 7:02 pm
Posts: 654
Full Member
 

I would never employ a child with pierced ears.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 7:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I would never allow a child with pierced ears to give me a tattoo.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 7:30 pm
Posts: 12088
Full Member
 

My 8yr old wants her ears pierced. Half-Spanish, all the girls in her class have pierced ears, so I'll probably let her.

And now I've found out how much it seems to piss some people off, perhaps I'll get her a tattoo as well ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 7:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

How about circumcision?
Happy with that?

Difficult to say without investigating said child rather more thoroughly than the parents would be entirely happy about.....


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 7:54 pm
Posts: 453
Free Member
 

I feel that if the children are not old enough to give "invormed" consent ... say less than 12.. the person doing the piercing should be charged with ABH and sent to prison ..... no fence sitting here.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:01 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

I would never allow a pierced, tattoed, chavvy, under-12 Spaniard to circumcise me.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:02 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

So no one's given a sensible answer to the circumcision question then?

Snobbery it is. ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I feel that if the children are not old enough to give "invormed" consent ... say less than 12.. the person doing the piercing should be charged with ABH and sent to prison ..... no fence sitting here.

LOL........ I think............... I hope..............


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:04 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

So no one's given a sensible answer to the circumcision question then?

Well, if you will take such a cavalier attitude to posting on here, old chap, what do you expect?


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:04 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Very good. ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:05 pm
Posts: 2661
Free Member
 

Its not as bad as stapling a shopping list to their head.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Seems a bit pointless and I don't know anyone who has had their daughters ears done.

I'm not sure genital mutilation is in the same ball park.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is it just me, or does this seem to be just not quite right?

Not read whole thread.

I think doing any (non necessary medical) 'modifications' to a child unable in law to give their consent (I reckon that's under 13 then, as per sex*), is not only a bit sick, but is also illegal, yet we choose to turn a blind eye to it.

Edit: Clarification. Although the age of consent in the UK is 16, the law says any child over 13 is legally capable of making the informed decision to give consent, under that age they can't. So anyone caught have sex with a child under 16 has committed the crime of under age sex. Anyone caught having sex with a child under 13 has committed rape, because under law, the child is not old enough to legally give consent. Sex with no consent = rape.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:32 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

I'm not sure genital mutilation is in the same ball park.

Well, if eating meat is the same as infanticide, this seems a logical leap, surely?


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm not sure genital mutilation is in the same ball park.

I think harming or mutilating your child because you don't think they are 100% perfect as is, definitely is in the same ball park.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:39 pm
Posts: 12088
Full Member
 

I think harming or mutilating your child because you don't think they are 100% perfect as is, definitely is in the same ball park.

Well, given that ear piercing is neither harming nor mutilating, I guess it's OK?

Though apparently I'm a child-murdering rapist for thinking so ๐Ÿ˜•


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:43 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

joolsburger - Member
I'm not sure genital mutilation is in the same ball park.

Usually just above the ball park, no? ๐Ÿ™‚

CaptainFlashheart - Member

[i] I'm not sure genital mutilation is in the same ball park.[/i]

Well, if eating meat is the same as infanticide, this seems a logical leap, surely?


Would either of you care to explain how circumcision and ear piercing differ from a moral and ethical point of view?


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:44 pm
Posts: 1083
Full Member
 

CaptainFlashheart - Member
So no one's given a sensible answer to the circumcision question then?
Well, if you will take such a cavalier attitude to posting on here, old chap, what do you expect?

Cavalier? Roundhead, surely, when circumcision is the matter in hand.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well, given that ear piercing is neither harming nor mutilating,

[b]harm[/b] noun physical, mental or moral injury or damage.

I'd say something with a hole in (that isn't suppose to have a hole in) is damaged.

Tip: get yourself a dictionary, I prefer Chambers.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd say something with a hole in (that isn't suppose to have a hole in) is damaged.

Bastid surgeons!

Tip: Open your mind.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:50 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

This one ok?

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:50 pm
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

Snobbery it is.

If the lower classes want to make it easy for the rest of us to identify them at a distance, so we can discriminate against them, then I'm all for it. Nice that they know their place and are happy to wear it on their ear lobe. ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bastid surgeons!

Ah, so necessary surgical intervention is the same to your as genital mutilation or hanging some decorations off your child?

Really?

Really?

๐Ÿ˜ฏ

Open my mind? I'm sure that's what dear Jimmy might have said. The child is not old enough to legally chose, the procedure is not medically needed.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:55 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

#prudetrackworld


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You just said a hole where it shouldn't be.
Personally I find bigots more offensive than piercings. ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 8:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

We never pierced how Daughters ears, we left that for her to decide
But some cultures seemed to pierce kids ears when very young.


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 9:00 pm
 CHB
Posts: 3234
Full Member
 

My daughter had her ears pierced at age 7. However we went for a very small 18ct stud with just a .2ct diamond in each.
No chance of her being mistaken for a chav.

๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 9:05 pm
Posts: 25943
Full Member
 

Never did my kids any harm

The eldest even got a pearl necklace for my 40th


 
Posted : 27/01/2013 9:10 pm
Page 1 / 2