Forum search & shortcuts

Bizarre car questio...
 

[Closed] Bizarre car question - A6 v Golf R?

Posts: 9
Free Member
 

I have to disagree. I reckon driving standards are better in the uk than everywhere I've driven. (N America, France, Italy, Spain, Germany, Austria and Switzerland).


 
Posted : 15/06/2014 10:38 pm
 tlr
Posts: 517
Free Member
 

For what it's worth I have had a 2009 A6 3L diesel Quattro since 2009. It's the longest I've ever kept a car, and I recently decided not to change it any time soon. It's my first diesel, but the engine does seem to suit it well. I have had 2 litre diesel A6s as courtesy cars and there is a world of difference between the two engines.

I've had a number of 'performance' cars, but the A6 is just a great car for me now. It's big, comfy, quick enough 0-60 in 6.5 secs supposedly) so overtaking is simple, but it doesn't feel as if you need to drive it balls out all the time to justify its existence like some other cars do. Economy is pretty reasonable for a big car too.

Only you know how to balance your requirements, but I haven't regretted buying it at any point I don't think.


 
Posted : 15/06/2014 10:42 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]I have to disagree. I reckon driving standards are better in the uk than everywhere I've driven. (N America, France, Italy, Spain, Germany, Austria and Switzerland).[/i]

Totally agree.


 
Posted : 15/06/2014 10:48 pm
Posts: 1073
Full Member
 

What about an A5? I've got the 3.0 TDi S-Line Quattro and it's superb to drive. Decent fuel economy and 0-60 in around 5.7 secs as standard. I've had an economy remap done on it and hence it's a bit quicker through the gears now plus it's around 270bhp. Tons of room in it as well. I had the mk5 Golf R32 and it's easy quicker than that and much cheaper to run.

An A6 is far too big a car to be getting powered by a 2.0L engine. Completely gutless from what I've heard. It does very much depend on how you like to drive your car as well though. I'm finding that I like the driving position in the Golf better as my wife has a GTD. My old R32 being a much smaller car seemed to go round the corners quicker. When the A5 does go though I will be getting an R but I would say that its a good compromise.


 
Posted : 15/06/2014 11:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd jump at the chance of an S4/S5/S6, but the after market warranties are silly money compared to the 335/535.

Why bother with an after market warranty then. They are a load of money, rarely pay out in any case, and if you look after your car and maintain it properly (a big % of people don't) then why should you have problems? Modern cars rarely break for no reason.

FFS just get the Golf, the A6 is an old mans car and there's plenty of chance to be sensible later in life.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 3:53 am
Posts: 16175
Free Member
 

Ive not entirely being keeping up with this thread, but I am surprised that the OP is looking at £30k cars but doesn't know what he wants from a car. ie does he want a sports car, or something to get from A-B. Comparing the Golf with an A6 just does not compute.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 6:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think, if I'm honest with myself, as much as I love the Golf, it's probably not the most appealing car to be in for 5 hours on a Friday night after work. Perhaps it would be ok for me, but not for my passenger.

It will be fine, I used to do similar in an mx5 and my passenger was over 6 foot. Buy the car for you not to make others comfy. Sure the Audi will be comfier but the Golf is hardly going to feel like your passenger is sitting in a side car.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 7:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ive not entirely being keeping up with this thread, but I am surprised that the OP is looking at £30k cars but doesn't know what he wants from a car. ie does he want a sports car, or something to get from A-B. Comparing the Golf with an A6 just does not compute.

Try to think about it, or maybe even read the thread?

Most others have managed to get their head around the question.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 7:29 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Standards of driving in the UK are shocking. Its auto bullying depending on the car you are in etc. Woe to you if you use your horn or flash your lights.

In Germany only once did I encounter a prick- in a UK plate Skoda Octavia VRS who tailgated me.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 7:35 am
Posts: 6320
Full Member
 

Considering none of the cars the OP listed are exactly that exciting (being all, at best, warm medium/large saloons)

Maybe the Audi is a bit dull, but on what planet is a sub-5 second Golf a "not exactly exciting... ...warm" car?

Late to the party, but I've always tried to go for experience over utility and I've never regretted it. Even managed to fit a bike or two in the craziest cars. I don't drive to work though and we have a nice enough Civic for family/long-distance duties, so my priorities are maybe a bit different.

Get the Golf, OP.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 8:15 am
Posts: 793
Free Member
 

Just get the R, 5 weeks ago I bought a Mk 6 😀


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 8:21 am
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Standards of driving in the UK are shocking.

There are more aggressive people here, but less of other problems like say, utterly insane young lads (France) total lack of concentration (USA) or 150mph cars on a two lane road (Germany).


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 8:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I had an a6 Quattro Avant 2.7TDI, great car. IMO 2.0l is too small and engine in such a big car. I would happily get another (owned it 7years 100 miles virtually no costs except regular servicing was worth about 6k when it was sold). Over the years I've owned 6 Golfs.

Of the two cars you quote I would go for the Golf. If it where me I'd get a 2.0L diesel Golf rather than a 2.0L Audi, however through in a bigger motor and Quattro and then its advantage Audi.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 8:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I had an a6 Quattro Avant 2.7TDI, great car. IMO 2.0l is too small and engine in such a big car.

Not much difference in power these days, the 2.7 had a maximum of 182 bhp and 400 Nm of torque and the new 2.0 has 170 bhp and 350 Nm of torque.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 8:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not much difference in power these days, the 2.7 had a maximum of 182 bhp and 400 Nm of torque and the new 2.0 has 170 bhp and 350 Nm of torque.

Do they really drive the same ? I appreciate what you are saying re the numbers but I would have to be convinced.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 8:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Do they really drive the same ? I appreciate what you are saying re the numbers but I would have to be convinced.

Would be interesting to see the torque curves I agree but just something to bare in mind.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 8:54 am
Posts: 5803
Free Member
 

What has happened to stw? Page 4 of a car thread and no one has said Octavia? There. I said it. Vrs TSI combi would be the size of the a6 avant nearly with golf gti performance. Is not the R.... But it's enough car that I'm surprised it hasn't been suggested before now. In bias though..... I collected mine last weekend :D. Oh....5.5 month wait on vrs.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 9:07 am
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

Octavia is 2WD, the VRS just wheel spins in the wet, not in the same league as the Golf R or Golf R32 where you can use all the power all the time.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 9:11 am
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Octavia... Vrs TSI combi would be the size of the a6 avant nearly

Don't talk rubbish.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 9:18 am
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

PS

I've got the 3.0 TDi S-Line Quattro

I'm dead jealous, I think the A5 is one of few current cars that are beautiful, and I bet it's lovely with the V6. Always wanted to drive a V6 diesel.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 9:20 am
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

I thought the Octavia was built on the A4 / Passat floor pan.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 9:20 am
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Another STW classic.

'Im interested in buying x or y, and only interested in x or y, so I'd like opinions on x or y'

Cue loads of replies suggesting a, b, c, d, e, f......


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 9:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got the 3.0 TDi S-Line Quattro

I'm dead jealous, I think the A5 is one of few current cars that are beautiful, and I bet it's lovely with the V6. Always wanted to drive a V6 diesel.

Err have you ever driven one though? Looks nice sure but but it's expensive, heavy, lacks steering feel and it pretty dull to drive. Still, with the V6 at least you'd not have any more problems loosing your place in the overtaking queue 😉


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 9:54 am
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Err have you ever driven one though?

No, of course not.. not likely to either 🙂

I thought the Octavia was built on the A4 / Passat floor pan.

Afaik it's Octavia, Golf and A4 on the same chassis, and A6, Passat and Superb on the same.

Just checked the Audi website and it seems the 2.0 is now 190ps and the 3.0 low power version 205. Given that they are so close in power output there must be enough of a difference between the two to warrant making them both.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 10:01 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@molgrips I think it's the Golf/A3 (and some Seat / Skoda) which share the same chassis (A4/Passat I believe). Re V6 TDI my 2.7 was the old engine before the 3 and I was mightily impressed, pretty quick, 6 speed to work the torque, economical. 3.0 is supposed to be even better


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 10:09 am
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

@molgrips I think it's the Golf/A3 (and some Seat / Skoda)

Really, I thought the Octavia was a fair bit bigger than the Golf. Mind you I was comparing the MkIV Golf with a 2012 VRS, so different generations...


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 10:11 am
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

I don't think an A4 is as big as a Passat. I do however think an Octavia is as big as a Golf.

Well bugger me... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Group_B_platform

Looks like the Passat and A4 *used* to be the same platform, but now they are using one extendable platform for A4s, A6s and a load of other stuff.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 10:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@footflaps - I think it may be Octavia/Passat/A4 - so yes bigger than Golf


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 10:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

haha - someone will come along in a minute who actually knows

Audi tend to build "small" cars on a given chasis - eg Golf vs A3, A4 vs Passat


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 10:16 am
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

There is no way an Octavia is the same size as a Passat.

They can now build cars on the same platform (engine orientation and layout etc) but vary the wheelbase and track however they like. Interesting idea, and it'll end this comparison debate 🙂


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 10:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@molgrips - just looked on Pistonheds - seems the Octavia is a stretched Golf floor-plan, ie bigger Golf, smaller than a Passat


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 10:21 am
Posts: 17855
Full Member
 

Octavia is Golf/A3/Leon chassis. It seems quite a bit bigger than the Golf estate though, so not sure if it's just got longer overhangs or whether the chassis has been lengthened a bit.

molgrips - Member

Octavia... Vrs TSI combi would be the size of the a6 avant nearly

Don't talk rubbish.

molgrips if you're talking boot space then the Octavia wins.
Skoda reckon 610/1740 litres for the Octavia
Audi reckon 565/1680 litres for the A6.

I assume that rear legroom would probably be not quite as good in the Octavia.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 10:21 am
Posts: 5185
Full Member
 

MQB platform can be used for everything from Polo to Passat sized cars.

Anyway, I went for a lease this time (of the previous bargain 6-cylinder hatchback). Still very happy with it. I don't care if people think paying £9k for 2 year use is madness, I carefully tot up what my cars cost and think it's decent value. My last car was a Fabia vRS, bought at 6 months old with a huge amount off - ran for 2 years, still cost just under £7k in depreciation and other running costs. The Alfa 156 SW I bought at 3 years old was considerably more expensive than that.

I'd always bought 2nd hand, was going to wait a few years for this one to drop to affordable, but the lease deal was too good to pass up. If you're happy with the cost and conditions, no reason not too. Enjoy it for a couple of years, give it back, no worries about deprecation or warranties or other costs.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 10:29 am
Posts: 7869
Free Member
 

The numbers might say the 4 pot 2.0l diesel is making nearly the same as the 6 pot 3.0l but they are chalk and cheese. The 6 is lovely and smooth and wafts along on a wave of torque.... Errrmm you get the idea....

There is no comparison (or substitute for cubes).


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 10:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@boblo - that would be my gut feel (ever since I had a 6 pot BMW 320 from a 4 pot 1800 Golf - more cylinders, more cc's)


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 10:57 am
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

Buy the R man!

Even though I drive a lukewarm hatch, and have planned on slipping into middle age with a boring 2.0 diesel estate, a large part of me would trade sensible for a hot hatch and few come hotter than that Golf. Buy it.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 11:13 am
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

I would buy a car for the comfort of my passengers. I like driving people around, and I like them to be happy. Every time I see some stupidly souped up old Subaru rattling around with a thoroughly embarrassed and uncomfortable looking girlfriend in the passenger I chuckle to myself 🙂


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 12:13 pm
Posts: 20891
Free Member
 

I had an old style A6 2.0tdi (the higher output engine, was about 174bhp I think) and test drove a new shape one - the engine is *vastly* better and the car itself is lighter so the combination makes for a much better experience.

I ended up going for the 3.0tdi V6 though.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 12:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The whole leasing versus buying debate only really works when thinking about buying a brand new car because the biggest killer will be depreciation and on big cars like a 5 series or an A6 it can be terrifying. A second hand car will always be cheaper even with repairs unless it goes horribly wrong.

My step uncle has just got shot of is RS6 (08 plate) and in a year he took a £10k hit on top of the £7k bill a few months ago. That is pretty scrary, admittedly it's a very sill, fast car and people in this country are scrared of petrol. But I'd wince at that kind of hit.

Leasing protects you from the depreciation because it's not yours and companies like BMW and Audi are able to control the second hand market once the lease ends (e.g. the super cheap 135 leases have started to dry up now they've shifte a few).

Of the two cars that the OP mentioned, I'd go for the Golf R - it'll be more than comfortable for long trips but will be fun when you want it to be.

With regards to the other options, the E9X series BMW's are showing their age now. We have an E90 330 that I love, but the newer cars are much nicer inside (BMW seem to have stepped their game up here at last).

The one car that I really wouldn't ignore is a B8 S4 - the likes of Chris Harris reckons that its the best car Audi make at the mo. Fast, practicle, understated and just very good. They're falling to sensible levels so that should leave you enough to cover bills. I wouldn't bother with a third party warranty because they'll just wriggle out of it.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 12:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The one car that I really wouldn't ignore is a B8 S4 - the likes of Chris Harris reckons that its the best car Audi make at the mo. Fast, practicle, understated and just very good.

Funny you should say that...I did have a look at one in Glasgow Audi. But 23mpg will start to hurt over 20,000 miles 🙂


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 12:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Funny you should say that...I did have a look at one in Glasgow Audi. But 23mpg will start to hurt over 20,000 miles

But they are supposed to be utterly brlliant to drive and live with. I can't imagine the the Golf will be a world apart fuel economy wise.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 1:20 pm
Posts: 6816
Full Member
 

Out of the two I'd get the Golf as you'll have more fun in it. It has featured in a couple of tests in Top Gear mag recently so might be worth getting a back issue.

I'm just about to pick up our new car that will replace a couple of year old car that replaced a car I'd had for years and bought second hand. Having a brand spanking new car is simply very nice. Buying a second hand car, however tidy is not the same. If you can afford it, go for it. 😀


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 1:45 pm
Posts: 5803
Free Member
 

Molegrips. Octy combi boot is 610 or 1740 litres
A6 avant is 565 or 1680. . I don't think I'm talking rubbish and the figures agree.

Footflaps. As I said, it isn't an R, but it is a gti. Same power, bigger brakes ( golf performance pack ones as standard) and lighter.

Just putting it out there. I admit I may be bias, but the figures can be looked up by anyone.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 2:14 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

I wonder how they've made the boot that big, having been in both an Octy and an A6...


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 2:25 pm
Posts: 1130
Free Member
 

30k budget? Sod the hot hatches and German luxo-barges.

http://used.jaguar.co.uk/search#/details/2267665

That is a properly special place to be. Love my saloon.


 
Posted : 16/06/2014 2:33 pm
Page 3 / 4