But my statement stands:
Keeping a cat indoors is selfish, egotistical and wrong.
How anyone can justify it is a mystery to me.If your home life is not condusive to keeping an outdoor cat, get another pet.
It must be difficult living with such narrow minded views.
Do some research - don't just make assumptions and don't assume people who keep their cats indoors don't care about the welfare of their cats.
Do some research - don't just make assumptions and don't assume people who keep their cats indoors don't care about the welfare of their cats.
I've had cats all my life - I also have friends who have exclusively indoor cats.
A cat is not meant to be kept inside.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is putting their own pleasure before the welfare of their pet.
It must be difficult living with such narrow minded views.
No harder than knowing I'm keeping a creature that would love to be in it's natural habitat outdoors imprisoned inside, I would imagine.
Seriously, what satisfation is there in keeping a creature that is meant to have access to the outside locked in a house all it's life?
That's potentially 18 years without ever experiencing a huge part of it's natural environment.
And you reckon that's not cruel?
Considerably OT but I wonder how many cat owners think its OK to let their cats (introduced species) go out and about and terrorise the local wildlife, but would be offended when their own moggie gets terrorised by a bigger, wilder introduced species....
Indoor cats are happy being indoor cats. Outdoor cats are happy being outdoor cats.
It's change which is the problem.You can't take one and make it the other.
Rusty, speaking as someone who's always had outdoor cats, you're wrong. Sorry.
Cougar - ModeratorIndoor cats are happy being indoor cats. Outdoor cats are happy being outdoor cats.
It's change which is the problem.You can't take one and make it the other.Rusty, speaking as someone who's always had outdoor cats, you're wrong. Sorry.
You can condition most creatures, including humans, to accept almost any environment.
According to the testimony of many hostages, if you keep a human locked up for a number of years, they are initially distrustful of the outside when you open the door and allow them a choice.
That acceptance doesn't make the imprisonment any less wrong.
Imprisoning a creature that is meant to have access to the outside, when there are lots of alternative companiable indoor pets available can be nothing other than an act of pure selfishness.
It's obvious we're not going to agree on this and I'm starting to repeat myself, so I'll leave it at that unless anyone brings an alternative point of view to the debate.
Human rights and animal rights aren't directly comparable. Otherwise, we'd all be vegetarians.Which is more cruel, to have a cat live happily to 20 indoors, or have one die under a car tyre aged 3?
I don't disagree that in preference I'd rather cats could roam; as I said, it's what mine did. But I'd strongly disagree that keeping an indoor cat is cruel.
Cougar - ModeratorHuman rights and animal rights aren't directly comparable. Otherwise, we'd all be vegetarians.
I wasn't comparing the comparative rights of humans and animals - for a start, I don't believe animals have or should have 'rights'.
I was stating how all animals can be conditioned to accept an unnatural and unhealthy environment.
Which is more cruel, to have a cat live happily to 20 indoors, or have one die under a car tyre aged 3?
I'd say to have one live to 20 indoors.
The SSPCA obviously disagree with you Rusty. They were very happy to let me adopt my two rescue cats in the knowledge that they'd be living indoors. And it's not like they were happy to find just anyone to take them, I had to wait months before they got any in to re-home.
I can understand where your point of view comes from but unfortunately things aren't as black and white as you seem to think. Mine have had the opportunity to go outside, they just don't want to.
Ours used to go out for days on end but now she is much happier indoors.
She's scared of the big bully bengals over the way.
Outdoor cat conditioned to be an indoor cat by other cats.
Teh ironing, etc
Many Bengals are evil little ****ers. I would never have one as a pet. Vocal, destructive, dominant and often hunt well or fight regularly if allowed out.
Get a moggy, most centres struggle to rehome black/white cats. Get a pair of those and enjoy normal cats (nb they do not come with a manual and can be as capricious as any woman )
Aggressive?
Well, not our two. In fact our Bengals are two of the most gentle and affectionate cats I've ever met. They're intelligent and very vocal, but they've never raised a claw to me despite having to administer worming meds and the occasional bath.
Ours are rescue cats, their previous keeper decided to get rid of them but they haven't damaged anything in the house, they don't pee all over the place and they don't make a nuisance of themselves.
Woah...slow down there Columbo! They're mentioned specifically to [i]exclude[/i] them from the Act....basically, the exact opposite to which you alludedocrobster - Member
The fact that they get a specific mention in the same sentence as "dangerous wild animals act" seemed like a clue. 🙄
You obviously haven't read the link that you felt so compelled to post, or if you did, there was little or no comprehension on your part.
Indoor cats are happy being indoor cats. Outdoor cats are happy being outdoor cats.
Exactly.
Most cat rescue shelters will have cats that for one reason or another will be perfectly happy or prefer being indoors. Get rid of the idea that one breed or another will suit, visit some cat shelters near you, explain your situation and take advice from the staff there. and you'll end up with the best match for you & your situation.