Forum menu
Bands that you just...
 

[Closed] Bands that you just don't get.

Posts: 2616
Free Member
 

Not so much a specific band as a genre. Dub step. Even the most whacked space cadets must find it difficult to dance to.
Surely the people who manufacture this drivel can find the arpeggiator button on their synth?

RHCP -never less than tedious (under the bridge excepted cos of the guitar stuff)

U2- still find the Joshua tree a good listen if for the variety of songs and the unforgettable fire is an epic tune.

David Bowie-very hit and miss. Can't understand the beebs fawning over appreciation of him.

Bruce Springsteen- pointless.

Nirvana-ran out of ideas towards the end but the early stuff veers towards rem in its classic alt American rock. And nevermind seemed somehow to articulate the nature of deep platonic friendships (the exception being polly)


 
Posted : 03/09/2015 1:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's tough - there are a lot of great 'singles' bands, who produce the odd piece of absolute gold amongst an everlasting flow of formulaic turgid awfulness - bands where you just can't listen to a whole album without hitting the next track button. I am very much looking at Oasis, U2 etc


 
Posted : 03/09/2015 9:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Any band formed after 2006, and coldplay. But that may just be because I can't stand them.

Totally wrong. I could name plenty. They just don't get to air because they don't compete in a sing off.


 
Posted : 03/09/2015 9:23 am
 Gunz
Posts: 2258
Free Member
 

Light House Family - surely we can all agree on them.


 
Posted : 03/09/2015 9:30 am
Posts: 3449
Free Member
 

The Flaming Lips. Just nothing going on there at all to my ears.

Oasis. Average pub band who inexplicably became megastars.

Coldplay. Parachutes was really good, but I can't see why anybody is remotely interested in anything they've done since then.

Rolling Stones. A couple of good tracks from years ago, but massively overrated- maybe you had to be there when they were in their prime?

Stone Roses. Can only think their success was a product of the time and place, doesn't seem to be warranted musically as far as I can see.


 
Posted : 03/09/2015 9:33 am
Posts: 3349
Free Member
 

The Fall

Kanye - the entourage almost counts as a "band"


 
Posted : 03/09/2015 9:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I know I shouldn't bite but to say the Rolling Stones are overrated shows total ignorance of the ground breaking importance of what they did in the sixties. Why not just say you don't like them.


 
Posted : 03/09/2015 9:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Coldplay
The Manic St Preachers (except for motorcycle emptiness)
Muse - just crap


 
Posted : 03/09/2015 9:54 am
Posts: 9297
Free Member
 

Muse. They have good riffs but the songs go nowhere and matt bellamys voice does my head in.

The Libertines, The Vaccines, Mumford, Bastille, imagine dragons and all that kind of crap. Boring tedious limp shit for boring tedious limp people.


 
Posted : 03/09/2015 10:24 am
Posts: 1742
Full Member
 

Never got Level 42, yes Mark king is a brilliant bass player, but the songs are as dull as dish water.

Another vote for Muse here to, listened to them thinking I should like this but just doesn't click for some reason.


 
Posted : 03/09/2015 11:34 am
Posts: 8414
Free Member
 

john_drummer - Member
How can you be derivative of the stuff that came after you? Or is that a gag I'm missing

It was a joke. ๐Ÿ˜€

There are a lot of people on this thread who seem to be judging bands by contemporary standards. Yes, the Beatles, Stones, Bowie, Led Zep might be boring or dated these days but, seriously, how on earth can people say that they don't get why these bands were successful? Even U2 and Oasis stood out among the music that was around at the time, even if there were plenty of better bands who didn't make it. Just a quick google shows the bands that had number 1s around the time that Oasis broke - East 17, Rednex, Celine Dion, Take That, Livin' Joy, Robson and Jerome. Yeah, htf did Oasis and Blur make it? ๐Ÿ™„

(I'm not an Oasis fan btw, just picked them as an example.)

But anyway, the thread is turning into an'I hate' thread, so this is pretty irrelevant.


 
Posted : 03/09/2015 1:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

CountZero wrote:

most dance music; fine if you're dancing in a club, but who could possibly want to listen to one continual, 'doof doof doof doof doof doof'.

Err... me?
That pretty much describes over 90% of the music I listen to. ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 03/09/2015 1:10 pm
Posts: 1334
Full Member
 

Meatloaf, I bloody despise bloody Meatloaf. Bat out of Hell* indeed.

*mid-70s Zeitgeist eponymous album according to one reviewer!


 
Posted : 03/09/2015 4:32 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]Meatloaf, I bloody despise bloody Meatloaf[/i]
Yay, someone I agree with at last.


 
Posted : 03/09/2015 4:35 pm
Posts: 1545
Full Member
 

Sleaford Mods
Belle and Sebastien

I noticed someone made a comment about Royal Blood and not getting them. They are a 2 piece. Drums and a guy playing a bass guitar. What? It sounds like a separate bass and lead player. Nope. He just puts his bass through different speakers and also an octave effects pedal and it sounds like a separate bass and lead. Some stunning musicianship IMHO. But each to their own...


 
Posted : 03/09/2015 5:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm aware of that, I've seen them live. A clever party trick doesn't make them good...
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 03/09/2015 5:21 pm
Posts: 1545
Full Member
 

LOL.


 
Posted : 04/09/2015 10:01 am
Posts: 4097
Free Member
 

What? It sounds like a separate bass and lead player. Nope. He just puts his bass through different speakers and also an octave effects pedal and it sounds like a separate bass and lead. Some stunning musicianship IMHO.

That reminds me of another set of musicians that haven't really come up yet, the "widdly widdly" guitar speed merchants of rock. I'm thinking of the likes of Yngwie Malmsteen and Steve Vai. I like rock music, and I like a good guitar solo too, but to me a lot of that kind of playing is just technical showing off, and as a listener, it doesn't light my fire. To my ears BB King could fire off a solo that did more for me using two notes than the likes of Vai do with 27 notes per second.

Kind of the hard rock equivalent of the Mariah Carey school of singing, why sing one note when you can sing 47 different notes in one word? Because it sounds stupid and has much less emotional impact than one well chosen, well sung note does, that's why...


 
Posted : 04/09/2015 10:27 am
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Yeah, Belle & Sebastian. Certainly don't get them.


 
Posted : 04/09/2015 10:38 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Alvvays.
Current band, supposedly sound like "classic indie". If 'classic indie' is naff, monotonous songs with drippy girlie vocals, yeah. Awful.


 
Posted : 04/09/2015 10:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ha ha, Belle & Sebastian are my favourite band!


 
Posted : 04/09/2015 10:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I quite like Alvvays but they are pretty bland. There's a lot of that around if you look through the rostas of the likes of Polyvinyl.


 
Posted : 04/09/2015 10:49 am
Posts: 1545
Full Member
 

Ha ha, Belle & Sebastian are my favourite band!

Someone encouraged me to go and see them at Glasto a few years back. I really, really, didn't get it or the love the majority of the crowd had for them. The music in my opinion was dross to put it politely. Please try and make me get them.


 
Posted : 04/09/2015 10:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I can certainly agree with Shitehouse Family.

Lightning Seeds. So limp, so lame. I actually shout at the radio before tuning out. The aural equivalent of a weak handshake.


 
Posted : 04/09/2015 11:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I can certainly agree with Shitehouse Family.

Lightning Seeds. So limp, so lame. I actually shout at the radio before tuning out. The aural equivalent of a weak handshake.

All that kind of stuff, I mean - what's the point of it?

My missus likes Belle & Sebastian, but they bore me to tears.


 
Posted : 04/09/2015 11:31 am
Posts: 66112
Full Member
 

Basically, I need an in... There's loads of music I just don't [i]get[/i], not that I dislike it but I just can't grapple with. Then along comes a bit of music or understanding that opens the doors a bit. Doesn't mean I end up liking everything but there's a difference between not getting and not liking, I think I've got to get music [i]before[/i] I can dislike it.


 
Posted : 04/09/2015 11:58 am
Posts: 3449
Free Member
 

the Rolling Stones are overrated shows total ignorance of the ground breaking importance of what they did in the sixties.

Well, since I went on to suggest exactly that in the rest of my comment, I wouldn't say I'm ignorant of it. I recognise that some things I don't want to listen to are seminal, e.g. the Sex Pistols.

Still, I don't like them.


 
Posted : 04/09/2015 12:13 pm
Posts: 18029
Full Member
 

Doesn't mean I end up liking everything

Which applied to an individual band too. I'm sure even my favourites have put out stuff which is a bit, well, under-par. Yes even Zappa. Sorry Frank, there was that one thing, you know...


 
Posted : 04/09/2015 12:15 pm
Posts: 66112
Full Member
 

I finally caved on what was always kind of a point of principle, and started deleting tracks on albums that I really don't like. Tom Waits's fault. For every great track there's one that's 10 minutes of him round the back of asda, shouting at the bins.


 
Posted : 04/09/2015 12:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

For every great track there's one that's 10 minutes of him round the back of asda, shouting at the bins.

I'd buy that!


 
Posted : 04/09/2015 12:48 pm
Posts: 1545
Full Member
 

For every great track there's one that's 10 minutes of him round the back of asda....snip

I've got a playlist called 'Great Track Crap Album'!


 
Posted : 04/09/2015 1:12 pm
Posts: 18029
Full Member
 

I bet no-one shouts at bins like Tom Waits.


 
Posted : 04/09/2015 1:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Quite a few for me (quite a few mentioned already)...

U2
Coldplay
Muse
Foos (the first two albums are great as were a few singles after that but they're heading for coffee table rock status)
Chilli's (I hate anything after Californication which had sone dud tracks on it)
Bowie
Kings of Leon
Nirvana (Pearl Jam and Alice in Chains were so much better)

But then again a lot of people won't get the attraction to some of the stuff I listen too which a housemate from uni referred to a death, death die music.


 
Posted : 04/09/2015 7:46 pm
Page 4 / 4