Forum search & shortcuts

Are you in the top ...
 

[Closed] Are you in the top 50 places to live?

Posts: 4111
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#7524927]

The Halifax has just announced the 2015 best places to live in the UK and it appears its rather grim oop North!

[url= http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/top-50-places-live-uk-7033039 ]Here[/url]

Our little corner of Surrey (Mole Valley) is up to 7th, which backs up everything we ever say about living around here.....its got a lot going for it!


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 11:24 am
Posts: 18035
Full Member
 

That's just the Halifax's way of keeping Southerners out.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 11:34 am
Posts: 3453
Full Member
 

No 91 but I do live in NW England


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 11:37 am
Posts: 5542
Free Member
 

Yeah. Australia voted second best place for "quality of life" in the world.

(Apart from our internet...)


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 11:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

LOL Winchester


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 11:51 am
Posts: 5851
Full Member
 

In at number 9, it's nice enough, but the local off-road riding leaves a lot to be desired!


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 11:53 am
Posts: 9149
Full Member
 

9 here as well. Odd that, I don't like it as much as some other places.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 11:55 am
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

😆


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 11:56 am
Posts: 57405
Full Member
 

When we get electricity and running water we'll be in there in the top ten, I'm sure of it!


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 11:57 am
Posts: 17293
Full Member
 

18 with a bullet.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 11:57 am
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

Mole Valley at Number 7, best bit closish to London which is best for me, would prefer somewhere in the Cotswolds though.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

91 here, not bad considering we must be terribly shackled by our proximity to Blackburn and Burnley.
Another building society did one of these a few years ago and we were in the top 10. Must have had a section on the quality of the local sausages 😀


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:07 pm
Posts: 46114
Full Member
 

I see.

This is a study where earnings, house prices, exam results and fast roads means you do well..

But lower earnings, lower house prices, an education system less focused on exam results, great community and riding in mountains from your door score low....

I have made my choice.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah. Australia voted second best place for "quality of life" in the world.

Massive country, quality of life varies massively though. Eg Perth vs Sydney or Melbourne ?

Lived in Guildford for 20 years, 30 mins to London on train, Heathrow or Gatwick. 90 mins to channel tunnel. Great riding from the front door. I wouod certainly say its worthy of the top 10. Central London most recently, convenient for work / social Monday/Friday but not so great for outdoors so not really for me. Interesting to see Winchester and especially Eastleigh so high up, spend my weekends around there and for me its no where near Surrey for a variety of reasons


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just through by the skin of our teeth at number 50.
That's a big drop though and I suspect the fact that we are being dragged into greater london is a reason for it.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No1 best country - Norway


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I see.

This is a study where earnings, house prices, exam results and fast roads means you do well..

But lower earnings, lower house prices, an education system less focused on exam results, great community and riding in mountains from your door score low....

I have made my choice.

This. I only skim read it trying to ignore all the clickbait, but they didn't seem to mention what their criteria actually were at all....


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:12 pm
Posts: 5542
Free Member
 

jamba.... not my list, blame the ruddy UN. I was surprised too. I'm from Wolverhampton though so being on the plane over for 22 hours was already an improvement.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:12 pm
Posts: 433
Free Member
 

Having read that top 50 list I can gladly say I don't live in any of their ideas of the "best" places to live in the UK.

My ideas of best clearly differ!


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:13 pm
Posts: 18035
Full Member
 

Yes it's good to see non of the shit holes like Swaledale have made it into the top 50 and Northumberland is way down the list. Horrible, grotty, dirty places.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:14 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I had to go into Stevenage yesterday. Plenty of places down south are complete sh*t holes.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:15 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Stevenage isn't the south, it's way oop north if you ask me.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:20 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Stevenage isn't the south, it's way oop north if you ask me.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What Matt outandabout said....I have made my choice too!!


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This. I only skim read it trying to ignore all the clickbait, but they didn't seem to mention what their criteria actually were at all.

Well if it's the same as the usual one they trot out each year the priciple criteria seem to be wealth, daylight hours and lack of rainfall. In other words "proximity to the southeast".


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:22 pm
Posts: 2599
Free Member
 

I'm in 2 of those- I live on the border 8)


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:23 pm
Posts: 3677
Full Member
 

Hmm... it's a bit subjective, isn't it? Asking someone if they consider themself healthy rather than using actual definable data?


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:28 pm
 hels
Posts: 971
Free Member
 

I was very amused by this on the Scottish news this morning, where it was billed as "Orkney Best Place To Live In Scotland" with no mention that it was number 83 in the UK. So parochialism lives !

Double amused in fact, as my Father's family emigrated from Orkney to live in (drum roll) Christchurch !! Good choice, people who are dead now...

P.S that's the Christchurch in the south island of New Zealand, not the one in deepest darkest Engerland.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:32 pm
 AD
Posts: 1578
Full Member
 

I'll stick to Cumbria thanks - even when it floods...


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:33 pm
Posts: 4438
Full Member
 

Number 13 here, lucky for some!

As for

I had to go into Stevenage yesterday. Plenty of places down south are complete sh*t holes.

I see your Stevenage sir and I raise you... Luton!


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:33 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

I live in fleet which is Hart. Score - number 1 🙂


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:47 pm
Posts: 7203
Full Member
 

I live in Richmond Upon Thames (just over the border from 😯 ... HOUNSLOW).

I can't say it's awesome but it'll do.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:54 pm
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

Whenever I see a list like that I assume that some weighting has been given to average earnings. Which is ironic given that in half the areas listed, people on bigger salaries will have less disposable income once their massive mortgages/rent are taken out.

I mean, FFS - Chelmsford? I grew up there. It's a boring, dreary, chavvy town surrounded by pretty dull countryside.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:55 pm
Posts: 890
Full Member
 

Another Fleet inhabitant, more by random chance than planning


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:55 pm
Posts: 13291
Free Member
 

Yes, Munich.... Consistently in the top five best cities to live according to UN, Mercer and Monocle lists to name but a few.

Safe and clean;don't have a problem with the GF wandering home at night alone. Lots of green spaces in and around town. Plenty of jobs (but not enough affordable housing). Close to the alps and good transport links to the rest of Germany as well as Austria and as such Italy.

Beer's not bad, either.... (b)


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:55 pm
Posts: 19545
Free Member
 

It does not matter where you live if you have shite income even the best paradise in the world will be shite to you ... coz you are still begging shite for others' left over.

darrell - Member
No1 best country - Norway

Not if you live in their foreign slump ...


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 12:57 pm
Posts: 46114
Full Member
 

I see your Stevenage sir and I raise you... Luton!

I raise again with Slough.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 1:00 pm
Posts: 13291
Free Member
 

It I were to return to the UK I am adamant that I would not be relocating to the south East.... Folks live in Chelmsford (#25) but my blood pressure rises as I ride or walk through town....
Far too many people round here. (and is going to get worse given the amount of housing going up.) Traffic jams from 3 till 7 during the week as every ****er seems too lazy to walk or ride anywhere (and I'm including both my immediate and extended family in that), not helped by the crappy infrastructure.
And the riding is crap.

Same can be said for most of the south east, imo.

South West of "The North" for me if I were to return....


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 1:05 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

If we're doing stupid lists - I live in the 'fourth funkiest town in the world' apparently.

http://www.hebdenbridge.co.uk/news/news05/17.html


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 1:09 pm
Posts: 13291
Free Member
 

"Orkney Best Place To Live In Scotland"

They only allow you to move to Orkney ,if you swear to always vote for Orkney in the best place to live in [s]the world[/s] Scotland polls.
FACT


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 1:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The top 50 list has changed quite a bit this year - the top 10 used to be dominated by areas in the East of England. But the whole region is suffering from people moving from/escaping London, without the infrastructure to support the population growth.
The population of Hertfordshire, for example, has doubled in the last 20 years - now over a million people live there.
When I think of the South East, I think traffic. I now think the same of the East. If you can work remotely then I'd recommend the South West or a nice village up north.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 1:24 pm
Posts: 8421
Free Member
 

When I think of the South East, I think traffic.

+1


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 1:26 pm
Posts: 2182
Free Member
 

I was born in Hart, I now live about 15 miles down the road toward Winchester, but still work in Hart and have family here.

For balance, it is populated by over entitled arrogant tosser's who obviously feel that they have 'made it' to be living here while merrily tearing the soul out of the place for the last 25 years or so.

Oh, and the traffic. Trying to drive a car across town in Fleet takes about twice the time it does by bike. And the attitude of the drivers (generalising a bit here but this is from experience)over entitled arrogant tosser's

Yes, there is a nice pond and a canal. But will you even get a smile let alone a hello from anyone you happen across while walking around them. No.

There is lots of land to ride bikes on, all owned by the MoD.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 1:36 pm
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

These lists are meaningless.
Any particular location could be utopia or hell depending on your outlook or circumstances.
I find the idea of Guildford abhorrent but 60,000 chose to reside there.

If Orkney is so wonderful how come more people haven't moved there?


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 1:43 pm
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

When I think of the South East, I think traffic.

When I think of the north I think rain, tanning salons and middle aged men in white trainers/static inducing 'sportswear' using a lot of hair gel.


 
Posted : 18/12/2015 1:46 pm
Page 1 / 3