At what point do we get into the law of diminishing returns I wonder?
I suppose that the focus on children and intervention is an interesting one - especially having listened to a programme on Radio4 yesterday about Australia apologising for forced adoptions etc... I wonder where you draw the line?
(ps - think its really good that we do sometimes all have these type of deep down and serious polite discussions on here)
Only because we know a mod is watching 😉
Serioulsy i agree on the sentiment there
I heard that as well and the use of the words forced adoption v abduction was telling
Horrific and so recent as well
Steve Bell nails it again....
[img] 
[/img]
Purely coincidentally, I'm sure, yesterdays Times contained the supplement 'The 30 Best Places in Britain to Buy a Second Home'
Ordsall didn't feature. A glaring omission
Back to the OP
Big problem for me with all this release of "private info" is that it really only tells you what "they" want you to hear.
Firstly, it isn't by their own admission, complete archive. At best it is merely selected items kept by Thatcher as personal mementos. Lets face it, I could write a letter to Ronald Reagan and not send it, so at the end of the day what does it actually prove if I then publish it 30 years later?
The other thing is why? Any chance it might have something to do with the book published yeterday by her sychophnatic former minister?