Forum menu
Android users getti...
 

[Closed] Android users getting shafted by Sky...

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Both iOS and Android have pros and cons stretching from hardware to software differences/issues.

To the OP, if having the Sky Go App is this important to you then get an iphone, like most phones they are free/cheap on contract so switch over come renewal time.


 
Posted : 24/01/2013 3:42 pm
Posts: 78464
Full Member
 

if having the Sky Go App is this important to you then get an iphone

iPod Touch would probably be more cost-effective, non?


 
Posted : 24/01/2013 3:48 pm
Posts: 78464
Full Member
 

Oh and for all the "wah wah iPhone" evangelists I'll remind you, this is about [i]one [/i]app from [i]one [/i]company. Android does sometimes play second fiddle to iOS from an app development perspective, but this sort of handset-specific weirdness is highly atypical.


 
Posted : 24/01/2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got a slingbox because the sky go app it terrible, doesn't work outside the UK either.


 
Posted : 24/01/2013 3:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You only need to re-code and test the HDMI disabling class, not the entire app.. not rocket science.

apart from the point retro83 made about it not being easy to control HDMI output from the API, you then have to test on every phone that runs android, plus multiple versions of android, plus make sure that it can't be hacked around.

So not so trivial in terms of resources required, for something that is free.


 
Posted : 24/01/2013 4:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

To the OP, if having the Sky Go App is this important to you then get an iphone, like most phones they are free/cheap on contract so switch over come renewal time.

i have to wait until November before the current contract finishes :(...but i won't be going over to apple....i wont be getting another sony either. as good as the phone is and i still believe its a better overall phone than the iphone, i dont like how sony restrict the software updates that are made available to it...

Oh and for all the "wah wah iPhone" evangelists I'll remind you, this is about one app from one company. Android does sometimes play second fiddle to iOS from an app development perspective, but this sort of handset-specific weirdness is highly atypical.

thanks cougar!! 😀


 
Posted : 24/01/2013 4:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So not so trivial in terms of resources required, for something that is free.

SkyGo isn't free. It's paid for by all the sky subscribers who will happily pay ~£50+ for a choice of channels. It's also a deal sweetener that is worth a [i]hell[/i] of a lot to Sky as it is one of the increasingly few things that differentiate Sky from Virgin Media.


 
Posted : 24/01/2013 4:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

worth a hell of a lot

bet it isn't - anyway there may be some point to developing for tablets but only geeks watch tv on their phones...

There's other things they should concentrate on as the differentiators between them and virgin.

For instance, if you take out a subscription to sky sports, you then have to pay extra to get the HD channels !

HD channels should now be standard fare, not a chargeable extra, especially as SD channels are now such poor quality and way lower than the old analogue PAL pictures.


 
Posted : 24/01/2013 5:12 pm
Posts: 78464
Full Member
 

HD channels should now be standard fare, not a chargeable extra

They obviously charge for it because they can (it's "HD and 3D" package now, sneakily), but I do wonder how long they'll be able to sustain it as more channels get on board.

especially as SD channels are now such poor quality and way lower than the old analogue PAL pictures.

Yeah, I'd noticed that. It's almost as if they want you to move to HD... oh.


 
Posted : 24/01/2013 5:24 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

apart from the point retro83 made about it not being easy to control HDMI output from the API, you then have to test on every phone that runs android, plus multiple versions of android, plus make sure that it can't be hacked around

Yeah but that doesn't apply to the whole app, does it?


 
Posted : 24/01/2013 5:27 pm
Posts: 12888
Free Member
 

especially as SD channels are now such poor quality and way lower than the old analogue PAL pictures.
I think this is because they have only a limited amount of bandwidth due to all the HD channels and +1 channels etc nowadays. Obviously something has to give and it might as well be the largely useless SD channels. Agree the quality is shocking these days though!


 
Posted : 24/01/2013 5:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah but that doesn't apply to the whole app, does it?

And your point is? They still have to test on lots of handsets and OS versions. Still work.

I suppose your one of those developers that relies on a test team to find all your bugs?


 
Posted : 24/01/2013 5:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

SD channels dropped badly in quality as soon as freeview came along 🙁


 
Posted : 24/01/2013 5:50 pm
Posts: 91168
Free Member
 

I am saying that I don't think it's as hard as they made out. In other words, they can't really be bothered to put a lot of resources into it.


 
Posted : 24/01/2013 5:50 pm
Page 2 / 2