Forum menu
Ten four
Copy that, good buddy!
The amount of people I see with heads level but eyes looking down into their laps, trying to hide their phone use is what scares me.
It's just so entrenched in modern habit that it really is going to be difficult if not impossible to make a sea change to behaviour.
In a crazy sort of way I've wondered if allowing use in full view might actually be safer than the current situation where so many are clearly eyes down! 😕
Difficult one to tackle but I'm glad they're making moves to address it.
How about we use the modern mobile GPS tech that monitors movement to simply prevent phone use while on the move?
Not sure how you'd get around passenger use?
Whilst i applaud cracking down on motorists on the phone, it does seem the Police just target things that will be an "easy score", straight to Court and don't pass go.
Got knocked off my bike twice commuting last year, first time, lady from a side road, i went over her bonnet and put heel through her windscreen. Police response, let insurers sort it out, despite my being injured.
Second time, a white Transit hit me just as i was riding along, and drove off, witness behind stopped, phoned police, gave them the registration number and the name of the company on the side, Police stated it tallied to a local firm and a Transit, and despite me breaking to ribs and loads of bruising, they haven't even taken a statement from the witness.
Obviously involved them having to do some leg work, i must admit i have lost of lot of respect for them as they seem to just go for the traffic offences that produce an instant result and no further work for them.
captainsasquatch - MemberYou should be used to drac's bizarre sense of humour by now.
Yeah, it's funnier if you wilfully bang your car door into cars that have parked too close in a car park.
I'm driving right now, if you are on the motorway you don't need to watch the road all the time, just glance up every 20 seconds or so.
Whilst i applaud cracking down on motorists on the phone, it does seem the Police just target things that will be an "easy score", straight to Court and don't pass go.
+1
Great in theory. As long as they're not just gonna walk down stationary traffic jams trying to catch people out. Or doing people who have pulled over to take a call because the engine's running or something.
Second time, a white Transit hit me just as i was riding along, and drove off, witness behind stopped, phoned police, gave them the registration number and the name of the company on the side, Police stated it tallied to a local firm and a Transit, and despite me breaking to ribs and loads of bruising, they haven't even taken a statement from the witness.
Thats proper crap! If you have a witness... can you not chase them up for a response at least ?
Back to the nitty gritty though...
A hand held communications device is something that must at some point be held in the hand of an individual while they are making or receiving a voice call or another form of communication.
So how about if its fixed in a proper windscreen holder ?
1 out of ten hexhamstu. And that's being generous!
Yeah, it's funnier if you wilfully bang your car door into cars that have parked too close in a car park.
What's funny is watching people misquoting or deliberately misunderstanding in attempts to win points or the internet or something.
So how about if its fixed in a proper windscreen holder ?
Why not just accept that it's wrong to use a phone rather than trying to circumvent the law?
Use ther phone and accept the consequences when caught.
And that Jimmy Carr will not receive a penny of my money, arrogant twunt!
[quote=lowey ]
So how about if its fixed in a proper windscreen holder ?
I'#ve been wondering too Lowey, you;re not alone. Also from [url= http://www.inbrief.co.uk/motoring-law/mobile-phones-and-driving/ ]the link on page 1[/url] :
Am I able to talk on my phone using a hands free kit whilst driving?Talking on a hands free kit is deemed to be within the law as the individual is allowed to push buttons but they are not allowed to actually hold the phone. This means that the phone should be kept in a cradle which is attached to the dashboard of the car. If an individual is using a hands free but is still holding the phone to press buttons then they will be in contravention of the law.
Don't built-in satnavs stop allowing you to mess with them when you drive off? Mine does, dunno if it's common or not.
[irony overload]
Journalist attending a local police 'cracking down on mobile phone use' photo op just tweeted:
[i]a journalist driving here to cover phone/driving crackdown has just been busted: £200, 6pts.[/i]
[/irony overload]
Pushed through the letter box?
A Peter Tatchell has been dispatched to your location.
[i]Don't built-in satnavs stop allowing you to mess with them when you drive off? Mine does, dunno if it's common or not. [/i]
not on my BMW - you can reroute, accept alternatives due to traffic etc when driving
Cheers Jules.
Why not just accept that it's wrong to use a phone rather than trying to circumvent the law?
Thanks for that helpful answer.
What's funny is watching people misquoting or deliberately misunderstanding in attempts to win points or the internet or something.
Stop whining.
How about we use the modern mobile GPS tech that monitors movement to simply prevent phone use while on the move?
Some sat nav phone apps do that - they're resistant to taking new inputs when the cars in motion - asking for extra button pushes/confirmation clicks (basically asking you to confirm that you're not the driver) that you'd only be able to respond to easily as a passenger. But of the three apps I use only one behaves in that way so if meddling with the phone in motion is something you want to do you'd just choose those apps.
Stop whining.
😆
Some sat nav phone apps do that - they're resistant to taking new inputs when the cars in motion - asking for extra button pushes/confirmation clicks (basically asking you to confirm that you're not the driver) that you'd only be able to respond to easily as a passenger. But of the three apps I use only one behaves in that way so if meddling with the phone in motion is something you want to do you'd just choose those apps.
The Waze app does that. Just click 'I am the passenger' and you're good to go.
The [s]Waze[/s] Pokemon Go app does that. Just click 'I am the passenger' and you're good to go.
FTFY
Why not just accept that it's wrong to use a phone rather than trying to circumvent the law?
Establishing what you are and aren't allowed to do isn't circumventing anything, it's ensuring that you're complying with the law, you dirty great troll you.
Don't built-in satnavs stop allowing you to mess with them when you drive off?
The one in my Hyundai didn't. It just popped an unskippable warning for several seconds that you'd to tap to agree to, every single time you started the car.
I'm now in a Passat (hi Molly) - the settings menu in the dash disables itself when the car is moving, but the sat nav doesn't give a toss either way. Not quite sure why they thought one was fine and the other not.
The [s]Waze[/s] [s]Pokemon Go[/s] Iggy Pop app does that. Just click 'I am the passenger' and you're good to go.
FTFY.
Why not just accept that it's wrong to use a phone rather than trying to circumvent the law?
Because It's not "circumventing the law" as the law says it's perfectly fine to use as a handsfree, or as a satnav etc, as long as you don't hold it in your hand.
What you mean is "why not just do what [b]I[/b] think the law says, rather than find out what it [i]actually[/I] says"
That differentiation between a phone being held and one being pressed matches my understanding of the law.
tomhoward - MemberAlso, why are radios exempt? As in walkie talkies, rather than music players.
I believe the legislation states two way comms device, CB radio is one way. Apparently these are less distracting.
I'd have trouble reciting my own name to a passenger whilst driving, let alone having a conversation on the phone. 😳
Whilst I think this new set of points/fines and wotnot is generally a good thing, how the hell are the police going to enforce it? Routinely I see no rozzers on the motorway even when doing a 4 hour schlep, and the local bobbies don't really seem to GAS as they head back for more doughnuts. And I bet they lack recording ability in their cars for proof purposes.
It's another piece of government led legislation that has headlines and no teeth, I'm afraid. Don't forget that Thomaz bloke last year was sent down for 10 years for four deaths...
I'd have trouble reciting my own name to a passenger whilst driving, let alone having a conversation on the phone.
Maybe you should slow down a bit...? (-:
Cougar - ModeratorMaybe you should slow down a bit...? (-:
I'd have trouble due to focussing on the more important task of driving, rather than due to any excessive accelerative forces...
Have I missed something?
(T'was an exaggeration anyway; I've had to give commentated drives)
Fines, points etc are all well good unfortunately where are the police who are going to enforce it? Driving in to work on the M62 this morning, traffic slow moving but moving nonetheless. Several offenders with their heads at the right angle but eyee pointing down.
People will take no notice unless there is a visible deterent.
Has everyone downloaded and installed the Big Brother app, so police can see who is breaking the law from an office and ban/fine them?
The clarification that I saw was that touching the phone with one finger is ok. So, in a cradle and using a hands free kit, pressing sat nav buttons, etc. will be fine.
Shouldn't be, but will be.
where are the police who are going to enforce it?
The police round here recently ended their 51 weeks of turning a blind eye to phone use, for seven days. They called it a seven day crackdown, but whatever.
How about we use the modern mobile GPS tech that monitors movement to simply prevent phone use while on the move?
Not sure how you'd get around passenger use?
Or in a train?
Actually.......
captainsasquatch - MemberWhat's funny is watching people misquoting or deliberately misunderstanding in attempts to win points or the internet or something.
...hmmm, it seems your memory is as bad as your attitude when in a car.
[url= http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/if-you-dented-someones-car-would-you-own-up ]From your first post on this thread[/url]
I've sometimes dinged people who've parked too close to me. If they care so little about their property, I don't see why I should.
People will take no notice unless there is a visible deterent.
Stirling today, police on two main roads into the city pulling folk over for phones / windows not de-iced etc
It depends on your priorities as a police force and politicians.
[b]jamie[/b] well, I liked it 😆
...hmmm, it seems your memory is as bad as your attitude when in a car.
Someone's had a productive morning. Still doesn't mean what you think it means.
Try doing something that matters now.
I thought half term had finished.
captainsasquatch, have you ever thought about joining the Lodge of Big Hitters?
I welcome the idea, but there are so few police on the roads it just seems like lip service.
Ok the odd person that gets caught will be in a world of pain and rightly so, but statistically speaking, it's business as usual and people will continue to eat their bowl of coco pops on the morning commute.
The only time I have to post on here these days is whilst I'm driving 🙁
Can you lot type in BOLD please, I'm having to squint reading this.
Surrey RPU have posted this on their Twitter:
https://twitter.com/SurreyRoadCops/status/836630728561549312/photo/1
[img]
[/img]
[img]
[/img]
[img]
[/img]
[img]
[/img]
Lolz at 'Captain Business-Park' shouting 'JUST OBEY THE LAW'
😀
[i]Question. If your phone is attached to a windscreen holder, are you ok to touch it to make calls, hang up, enter sat nav details etc ? Or is it an offence to simply touch the thing.[/i]
Me and singletrackmind was driving back from a ride on the weekend - van in front in the slow lane - I says - "He's on the phone in front". STM says "How can you tell?" - well, being Iggy Pop in this case (thanks Jamie), I was watching the van as it was unable to hold a position in the lane, wasn't swerving about violently, just enough to know th driver wasn't paying full attention to what he was doing. We get next to him - phone is in a holder on the dash, he's leaning forward over the wheel tapping the screen. STM leans on the horn, van man doesn't even notice.
So yeah, it has to include that as well.
I'm still allowed to play with my iPod Classic whilst driving, so I'm glad about that.
I've had to give commentated drives
[wilful mis-understanding] Horse racing or footy? [/wilful mis-understanding]