Forum menu
Alec Baldwin shots ...
 

[Closed] Alec Baldwin shots woman dead on movie set !!

Posts: 3136
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#12083868]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-59005500.amp

Holy cow 🙁


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 10:22 am
 scud
Posts: 4108
Free Member
 

Blimey was just reading that... does seem to mirror what happened with Brandon Lee on that Crow movie.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 10:25 am
Posts: 3008
Full Member
 

Just seen that, how tragic ☹


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 10:25 am
Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

Not the first time it's happened using a real gun with suposedly blank cartridges and ending up killing someone.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 10:25 am
Posts: 33206
Full Member
 

Been a few instances over the years, let's hope the production and the armourer on set were well insured.

Let's hope that there was an armourer on set!


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 10:26 am
Posts: 16528
Full Member
 

Terrible for all involved and I would think Baldwin will be in a real bad place mentally after this, I would be.

As for the grief of the families, that's on an even deeper level of tragedy.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 11:20 am
Posts: 8332
Free Member
 

So can this happen even if only blanks are loaded, or would a real bullet need to have been accidentally loaded for this kind of thing to occur?

I have no idea how blanks work, but I assumed they didn’t have a projectile?


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 11:29 am
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

at extremely close range the exhaust gas from a blank has enough force to punch through the skull and kill. I knew someone who died like that (his mate was larking around with a blank firing pistol). Though i doubt it's what happened in this case as there were 2 victims suggesting a live round or something in the barrel.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 11:34 am
Posts: 1484
Full Member
 

If foreign objects have somehow got into the chamber/barrel then the explosion of the blank cartridge will fire them out at high speed.
That's part of the reason the military use blank-firing adapters in blank-firing exercises. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blank-firing_adaptor
Obviously doesn't look good to have one of these on a prop weapon in a film.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 11:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Absolutely tragic and sadly not that uncommon. Armourer should have some questions to answer I suspect. The ease with which accidental discharges can occur is one of the reasons why the military take these things incredibly seriously

[url= https://i.postimg.cc/P5T47JC6/DD7-FAAD7-3-C41-408-F-8-E26-AC8-A60-F41-F8-E.jp g" target="_blank">https://i.postimg.cc/P5T47JC6/DD7-FAAD7-3-C41-408-F-8-E26-AC8-A60-F41-F8-E.jp g"/> [/img][/url]


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 11:58 am
Posts: 8021
Full Member
 

I have no idea how blanks work, but I assumed they didn’t have a projectile?

As Klunk says ins possible either the gas alone could kill or the wadding but it would need to be extreme close range.
I would guess its going to be live rounds were mixed up with dummy rounds.
Although could be a case like Brandon Lee. Which had a incorrectly constructed dummy round which resulted in a bullet getting stuck in the barrel so that when blanks were fired it was effectively a live round.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 12:06 pm
Posts: 4179
Full Member
 

If foreign objects have somehow got into the chamber/barrel then the explosion of the blank cartridge will fire them out at high speed.

In the case of Brandon Lee, I believe they had used a realistic looking dummy bullet to film a close up of the gun being loaded. They then didn't notice the actual bullet (ie. projectile part) of the dummy had been retained in the chamber, so when a blank was loaded behind it they had basically made themselves functional round of ammunition.

As above, this one sounds odd as you've really not going to manage to seriously hurt/kill two people with just a blank. It's either a Brandon Lee style chance-in-a-million screw up, or simply there was a live round floating around.

I'm not sure how prop guns generally work - though you obviously can't have a blank-firing adaptor hanging off the end of the barrel, you still need a functional equivalent in a semi-automatic/automatic in order to restrict gases enough to build enough pressure/energy to cycle the action.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 12:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That BFA entry is interesting and suggests that movie props are sometimes fitted with disguised attachments, or may have some kind of barrel constriction.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 12:09 pm
Posts: 2369
Full Member
 

After Brandon Lee incident a lot was made of never actually pointing prop guns directly at other actors but slightly off, just in case. Speculation here but it sound perhaps like the gun was pointed at camera killing one crew member and injuring another.

There have been other incidents too, you've got to think the solution is to stop using bullets or blanks - 20 years ago The Matrix used CGI for a lot of their gunshots, muzzle flashes etc. Must be even easier and cheaper to CGI it these days.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 12:29 pm
Posts: 14291
Free Member
 

Interestingly the lady killed wasn't an actress but the director of photography, so not shot during filming of a scene.

Edit: "Speculation here but it sound perhaps like the gun was pointed at camera killing one crew member and injuring another"
Ahhhh, yep.

I doubt CGI is cheaper or easier TBH.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 12:36 pm
Posts: 8021
Full Member
 

or may have some kind of barrel constriction.

Yes it is needed for semi/fully automatic weapons since they generally work by having some of the gas trapped behind the bullet being diverted back and moving the action*. So without a bullet you need some other way of blocking the barrel and diverting some of the gas backwards.
Its not needed though for manual action weapons eg revolvers, bolt action rifles and so on.

*there are exceptions eg a gatling gun uses a electric motor to crank in the next round.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 12:43 pm
Posts: 2369
Full Member
 

I doubt CGI is cheaper or easier TBH.

I kinda meant cheaper than 20 years ago, but even so probably cheaper than having on set gun handlers and safety people etc. that are required for on set firearms. It's pretty amazing how much is done post production now, mostly unnoticed by viewers.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 1:27 pm
Posts: 12376
Full Member
 

That's terrible news. I imagine Alex Baldwin and everyone else involved are absolutely devastated. I had a lousy week at work, but this really puts things in perspective.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 1:38 pm
 Sui
Posts: 3149
Full Member
 

double post


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 1:48 pm
 Sui
Posts: 3149
Full Member
 

That's going to screw with his head for a long time to come, feel sorry for him and obviuously the family of the deceased.

This is typical with countries where there are not bans on hand guns, it's too easy and cheap to use real ones and then just use blank cartridges, however there is an issue with using real and blanks;

1. The projectile of a real round also causes back pressure, which is what turns a pistol (non S&W type) into a semi automatic. If you remove the projectile it will not re-cock.

2. To get around this you either block off the chamber towards the end, or you use a BFA - in the case of films these are desguised as the silences (surpressors) similar to the big yellow ones the army use.

3. If you completely block the chamber, you still need a gas exhaust port, these are normally ontop of the barrel near the ejection port - the issue here is that you can see them if you look closely enough, which for films is never good.

4. Purpose made blank firers are what should onyl ever be used in films (personal opinion) - the barrels are always blocked off, and there are loads of brands that have very good imitations which are perfectly legal to buy on-line. The bad thing is that they are easily drilled out and turned into working weapons.

edit - sorry see dissonance got thre first..


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 1:49 pm
Posts: 12376
Full Member
 

It was a 19th century western so it would have been a revolver, not an automatic.

Also, it would be pretty simple to fit a battery and actuator into a semi-auto so that it was electrically powered and could only fire blank cartridges, but still looked like like a real weapon.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 1:58 pm
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

It's America, it's a probably a handgun. Im guessing some doofus put real bullets in it 'for fun'. Thats exactly the sort of genius move I can well imagine around half the US population thinking was a good idea.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 2:07 pm
Posts: 17334
Full Member
 

Im guessing some doofus put real bullets in it ‘for fun’.

Not a chance. Most likely, a blank was fired too close and into a camera, and the force of exit gasses displaced something from the filming equipment that injured two very close bystanders looking directly at the weapon, one fatally.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 2:12 pm
 Sui
Posts: 3149
Full Member
 

thols2
Free Member
It was a 19th century western so it would have been a revolver,

makes it even worse of a f up. So much easier to have the barrels blocked off an not affect the operation and using blanks with a dummy head..


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 2:17 pm
Posts: 33206
Full Member
 

There's a lot of assumptions being made unless some more details of the gun and process have been released.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 2:23 pm
Posts: 15460
Full Member
 

Been a few instances over the years, let’s hope the production and the armourer on set were well insured.

Let’s hope that there was an armourer on set!

Apparently Baldwin is the producer (or a least a producer) on the film.

It's all speculation at the minute TBH, but very sad for everyone concerned.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 2:29 pm
Posts: 1657
Full Member
 

Interestingly the lady killed wasn’t an actress but the director of photography, so not shot during filming of a scene.

The DoP would be on set during filming, so Google tells me.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 2:55 pm
Posts: 14291
Free Member
 

Ahhh... right.
(although I meant right in with the actors during the shooting of the scene- see what I did there?!)


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 2:57 pm
Posts: 1657
Full Member
 

Ah, yeah, gotcha.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 5:32 pm
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

Not a chance.

Still going with regular bullet myself. I think you under estimate the ability for americans to do stupid stuff with guns.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 6:05 pm
Posts: 1336
Full Member
 

BBC say it was live bullets in the gun.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 6:18 pm
 scud
Posts: 4108
Free Member
 

How the hell did they end up with live rounds in there?!

It amazes me that no basic handling skills on a Hollywood film, very first lesson with any sort of firearm is "blanks or not, never point a weapon towards anyone....EVER!!"


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 6:31 pm
Posts: 16528
Full Member
 

Live rounds. S***.

I wonder why live rounds were even on the set?


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 6:35 pm
Posts: 78497
Full Member
 

Why do they even need blank-firers?

Multi-million pound budgets for films and they can't make a prop gun that goes 'click' and then add flash-bang in post?


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 6:47 pm
 kilo
Posts: 6930
Free Member
 

“blanks or not, never point a weapon towards anyone….EVER!!”

Going to be a bit difficult making a film under those constraints; don’t point it at another actor, don’t point it at the camera man, don’t point it towards people on set, may be just point it up in the air?


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 6:50 pm
Posts: 4179
Full Member
 

BBC say it was live bullets in the gun.

I’m sure I’m being incompetent but I can’t find that anywhere. Could you give a link?


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 6:51 pm
Posts: 16383
Free Member
 

Going to be a bit difficult making a film under those constraints; don’t point it at another actor, don’t point it at the camera man, don’t point it towards people on set, may be just point it up in the air?

My understanding, possibly from watching a YouTube, was that on set you never point a real gun at a person, loaded or otherwise. If you need to point it at person then it needs to be a dummy model gun.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 7:06 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50615
 

I’m sure I’m being incompetent but I can’t find that anywhere.

You’re not is doesn’t mention live rounds.

Tragic stuff and from what I’ve read the director was injured by the camera not directly by the firearm.

Going to be a bit difficult making a film under those constraints; don’t point it at another actor, don’t point it at the camera man, don’t point it towards people on set, may be just point it up in the air?

No, not at all it’s easy for them them to give the impression they’re pointing at someone with different shots and camera angles.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 7:07 pm
 kilo
Posts: 6930
Free Member
 

Judging from the below it seems that pointing blank firers at crew and cast, as well as using real guns seems may still be quite the norm;

It remains unclear whether Baldwin was rehearsing or actually filming a scene at the time of the incident, and if so, why the discharged gun was pointing towards crew members rather than a fellow actor.

On Friday, the director Ben Rockula called for the use of blanks to be outlawed. “They’re extremely dangerous and under the best of circumstances they eat time,” he wrote.

“Every time you have to shoot a scene with blanks, you’re going to lose 30 minutes to safety meetings, passing out ear plugs to the entire crew, setting up Plexiglass and plywood, on and on. It has to be done to avert tragedies like this. And it doesn’t always work.”

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2021/oct/22/on-set-fatalities-halyna-hutchins-alec-baldwin


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 7:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Which had a incorrectly constructed dummy round which resulted in a bullet getting stuck in the barrel so that when blanks were fired it was effectively a live round.

That's the main risk IIRC. Something substantial getting stuck in the barrel like a squib, for example, and it not being cleared before firing a blank.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 7:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

BBC say it was live bullets in the gun.

Probably a shotgun then. Would seem impossible to confuse a blank metallic cartridge with a real one.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 7:35 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

that would be insane, letting live shotgun rounds on set :/


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 7:44 pm
Posts: 8021
Full Member
 

Would seem impossible to confuse a blank metallic cartridge with a real one.

It was a western so possibly a revolver with what was supposed to be a dummy round as opposed to a blank in it for a close up of it being loaded or waved around with a close up of the front of the cylinder.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 7:55 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

that would be insane, letting live shotgun rounds on set :/

what am i thinking when it comes to guns the yanks are nuts.


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 8:05 pm
Posts: 4626
Full Member
 

According to the very-most-reliable source that is the NY Post, it was a single live round.

https://nypost.com/2021/10/22/prop-gun-used-by-alec-baldwin-in-shooting-contained-live-round-union/


 
Posted : 22/10/2021 8:46 pm
Page 1 / 3